[latte-dock] [Bug 399731] Symlink layout file not supported
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399731 Michail Vourlakos changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[latte-dock] [Bug 399731] Symlink layout file not supported
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399731 --- Comment #3 from Michail Vourlakos --- (In reply to Aetf from comment #2) > Please view this as a feature request then. > > Is there any consideration that symlinks are not supported? yes, complexity... Layout files are used for some features e.g. the Locked/Unlocked layouts. Based on if the file is read-only or not the layout is considered locked or not... There are multiple places in the code e.g. layout uniqueness, renaming etc... that symlinks would introduce a level on uncertainty and complexity. So I being the only developer/maintainer of Latte for now would not like to mess with this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[latte-dock] [Bug 399731] Symlink layout file not supported
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399731 Aetf <7437...@gmail.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|INTENTIONAL |--- Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED --- Comment #2 from Aetf <7437...@gmail.com> --- Please view this as a feature request then. Is there any consideration that symlinks are not supported? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
[latte-dock] [Bug 399731] Symlink layout file not supported
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399731 Michail Vourlakos changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Michail Vourlakos --- It was never intended to support symlinks... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
