Re: Testbed Discourse Server For Trial discuss.kde.org.uk
Nate Graham ha scritto: > On 6/29/19 4:04 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: >> Hi Jonathan, >> Thank you for setting this up! >> I've recently had the opportunity to experience Discourse in action in >> another community, and found it to fulfill most of the things we found >> lacking in both of our current forum and mailing list software (which >> makes sense given that they're both age-old and haven't seen much - if >> any - exciting feature development in years). >> So I (personally, not speaking for the board) would really like us to >> test it out and see if we can replace first our forum and hopefully some >> day Mailman with Discourse. >> Thanks, >> Thomas >> > > +1, I'm also quite in favor of this. Having used it in other communities, I > find that it works well as a sort of half-forum-half-mailing-list tool that > can succeed in replacing both. I may have already asked this: do we have a plan to evaluate also hyperkitty (mailman 3 frontend) before completely replacing also the mailing lists? It provides a forum-like interface. -- Luigi
Re: Testbed Discourse Server For Trial discuss.kde.org.uk
On 6/29/19 4:04 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: Hi Jonathan, Thank you for setting this up! I've recently had the opportunity to experience Discourse in action in another community, and found it to fulfill most of the things we found lacking in both of our current forum and mailing list software (which makes sense given that they're both age-old and haven't seen much - if any - exciting feature development in years). So I (personally, not speaking for the board) would really like us to test it out and see if we can replace first our forum and hopefully some day Mailman with Discourse. Thanks, Thomas +1, I'm also quite in favor of this. Having used it in other communities, I find that it works well as a sort of half-forum-half-mailing-list tool that can succeed in replacing both. Nate
Re: Contributor training feedback data
On Saturday, 29 June 2019 23:33:13 BST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > We (the board) have not decided yet which trainings to offer at this > year's Akademy (but we have decided that we do want to offer trainings > in general!). We've gone through the survey results, thought about what > made sense to us as well and where we might find suitable trainers, and > are now in the process of trying to find trainers. > Hi Unfortunately this looks like it will result in similar problems with training as last year where many people couldn't attend things they were interested in If people don't know well in advance (months) what training there will be and on what days, they can't plan their dates for travel & accommodation at Akademy -- Kenny (Male pronouns: he/him)
