Re: Backwards compatibility for shared desktop ontologies?
On Thursday 19 May 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote: The beta tagging is due to happen today. As far as I know this hasn't been addressed. Was it more complex than expected or you just didn't have time? I propose that we revert the dependency bump and tell packagers they need to package a version of SDO 0.7.0. Then when the issue is fixed in rcgen it can go through the usual feature freeze exemption process. Hi Sebastian, this seems to be still unresolved in kdelibs, at least it still depends on 0.6.50 or newer it seems, and I can't find such a commit in rcgen. How to progress on this issue? Thanks, Dirk
Re: Backwards compatibility for shared desktop ontologies?
On 05/20/2011 09:35 PM, Dirk Mueller wrote: On Thursday 19 May 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote: The beta tagging is due to happen today. As far as I know this hasn't been addressed. Was it more complex than expected or you just didn't have time? I propose that we revert the dependency bump and tell packagers they need to package a version of SDO 0.7.0. Then when the issue is fixed in rcgen it can go through the usual feature freeze exemption process. Hi Sebastian, this seems to be still unresolved in kdelibs, at least it still depends on 0.6.50 or newer it seems, and I can't find such a commit in rcgen. How to progress on this issue? Oops, sorry. This issue should now be resolved. rcgen has been patched in kdelibs master to restore source compatibility. See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268595. Thanks, Dirk
Re: [Kde-pim] Re: Backwards compatibility for shared desktop ontologies?
Hey Dirk http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs/1f796983aa8385da77f30813041b40e208c17391 This fixes the problem. On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Dirk Mueller muel...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday 19 May 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote: The beta tagging is due to happen today. As far as I know this hasn't been addressed. Was it more complex than expected or you just didn't have time? I propose that we revert the dependency bump and tell packagers they need to package a version of SDO 0.7.0. Then when the issue is fixed in rcgen it can go through the usual feature freeze exemption process. Hi Sebastian, this seems to be still unresolved in kdelibs, at least it still depends on 0.6.50 or newer it seems, and I can't find such a commit in rcgen. How to progress on this issue? Thanks, Dirk ___ KDE PIM mailing list kde-...@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/ -- Vishesh Handa
Objections to stop creating nightly tarballs from svn?
Hi, As known, sysadmin is trying to transfer services away from ktown. One of the current tasks of ktown is to provide nightly snapshots of svn to this location: ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/unstable/snapshots/ We are wondering if it is worth to move this service or to stop it. Arguments to stop it are: 1) needs svn checkout on the replacement server and 2) less and less usage of it as svn is 'old' technology. The only user we know of these snapshots is kdesrc-build, and I'm pretty sure that app will cope fine without the tarballs. If there are other users, we would like to know. Does anyone feel this service should remain? If so, that's fine, but we just need some arguments for it. projects.kde.org does create tarballs for the git repo's and will continue to do so. This is only about the svn counterpart. Best, -- Tom Albers KDE Sysadmin
Re: A Qt replacement for KGlobal::ref and deref
Thiago Macieira thiago at kde.org writes: so just to be painfully clear (it's a monday morning here, i worked all weekend and i still have house packing to do, please excuse my obtuseness ;): IF a refcoutning patch is offered which ties all window visibility (setQuitOnLastWindowClosed, QSystemTray, etc) to the refcounting behind the scenes but which also exposes said refcounting as the quit-on-last-window feature with stern and accurate descriptions on how it works, that would be accepted? I think so. You'd have my support. But I'm not the maintainer for QApplication. I'm revisiting this issue now. Who is the maintainer of QApplication? Can I get an irc nick or email address suitable for public mailing lists? Thanks, Steve.
