Re: http://commitfilter.kde.org/ ?
See http://markmail.org/thread/hekkp2rcdvir732q http://markmail.org/thread/b6neyhjak2h4g2yd On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Martin Koller wrote: > Should http://commitfilter.kde.org/ still exist ? > Currently I get "unknown host" > > -- > Best regards/Schöne Grüße > > Martin > A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion > Q: Why is top posting bad? > > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\- against proprietary attachments > > Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.lillehus.at > >
Re: http://commitfilter.kde.org/ ?
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Martin Koller wrote: > > Should http://commitfilter.kde.org/ still exist ? > > Currently I get "unknown host" On Sonntag, 29. Oktober 2017 22:33:20 CET Harald Sitter wrote: > See > > http://markmail.org/thread/hekkp2rcdvir732q > http://markmail.org/thread/b6neyhjak2h4g2yd rephrasing: is there still a way to receive commit mails to the various git repositories or is this feature completely gone ? -- Best regards/Schöne Grüße Martin A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q: Why is top posting bad? () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\- against proprietary attachments Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.lillehus.at
Re: http://commitfilter.kde.org/ ?
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Martin Koller wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Martin Koller wrote: >> > Should http://commitfilter.kde.org/ still exist ? >> > Currently I get "unknown host" > > On Sonntag, 29. Oktober 2017 22:33:20 CET Harald Sitter wrote: >> See >> >> http://markmail.org/thread/hekkp2rcdvir732q >> http://markmail.org/thread/b6neyhjak2h4g2yd > > rephrasing: is there still a way to receive commit mails to the various git > repositories > or is this feature completely gone ? At this time, the functionality is not available. Anyone who is interested in writing and maintaining replacement functionality should get in touch with me as mentioned in my previous mail in the second link there. > > -- > Best regards/Schöne Grüße Cheers, Ben > > Martin > A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion > Q: Why is top posting bad? > > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\- against proprietary attachments > > Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.lillehus.at > >
Re: http://commitfilter.kde.org/ ?
On 10/30/2017 08:38 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > Anyone who is interested in writing and maintaining replacement > functionality should get in touch with me as mentioned in my previous > mail in the second link there. I don't think much "implementation effort" would be required here - Phabricator provides most of this out-of-the-box through Herald rules. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: http://commitfilter.kde.org/ ?
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Elias Probst wrote: > On 10/30/2017 08:38 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Anyone who is interested in writing and maintaining replacement >> functionality should get in touch with me as mentioned in my previous >> mail in the second link there. > > I don't think much "implementation effort" would be required here - > Phabricator provides most of this out-of-the-box through Herald rules. > Hi Elias, As mentioned in a previous email, Phabricator Herald rules have a small overhead of ~1ms per rule for processing. This is a problem because Herald rules are processed whenever tasks or reviews (among other items, just about everything triggers Herald rules) are created or updated. As such we've restricted access to Herald to protect the performance of Phabricator (it only takes 100 or so people to create a couple of rules each and you've added half a seconds worth of processing to every update). Cheers, Ben
Re: http://commitfilter.kde.org/ ?
Hi, On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Martin Koller wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Martin Koller wrote: >>> > Should http://commitfilter.kde.org/ still exist ? >>> > Currently I get "unknown host" >>> >> On Sonntag, 29. Oktober 2017 22:33:20 CET Harald Sitter wrote: >>> See >>> >>> http://markmail.org/thread/hekkp2rcdvir732q >>> http://markmail.org/thread/b6neyhjak2h4g2yd >> >> rephrasing: is there still a way to receive commit mails to the various git >> repositories >> or is this feature completely gone ? My solution was to subscribe to kde-comm...@kde.org + add filters there. Even if getting emails from phabricator would work, I'm pretty sure I would not like the format. The mails send from our commit scripts to kde-comm...@kde.org are exactly what I want, with the information just right, and not too much noise. Greetings Dominik
Re: http://commitfilter.kde.org/ ?
My solution, to follow all *digiKam* is to susbcribe to kde-commits mailing list and to make a mail filter with "digikam" inside. All others go to trash as well. It work well. It's not the best because it require more mail workflow from the server to send all commits mail, the filtering is done on my side. Cheer Gilles Caulier 2017-11-03 15:07 GMT+01:00 Dominik Haumann : > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Martin Koller wrote: > >>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Martin Koller wrote: > >>> > Should http://commitfilter.kde.org/ still exist ? > >>> > Currently I get "unknown host" > >>> > >> On Sonntag, 29. Oktober 2017 22:33:20 CET Harald Sitter wrote: > >>> See > >>> > >>> http://markmail.org/thread/hekkp2rcdvir732q > >>> http://markmail.org/thread/b6neyhjak2h4g2yd > >> > >> rephrasing: is there still a way to receive commit mails to the various > git repositories > >> or is this feature completely gone ? > > My solution was to subscribe to kde-comm...@kde.org + add filters there. > > Even if getting emails from phabricator would work, I'm pretty sure I > would not like the format. > > The mails send from our commit scripts to kde-comm...@kde.org are > exactly what I want, with the information just right, and not too much > noise. > > Greetings > Dominik >
