Re: Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review5969 --- This review has been submitted with commit a47e3211681aa3123a7aa5b2d6384d0e347047de by Björn Ricks to branch frameworks. - Commit On July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m., Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ > --- > > (Updated July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > --- > > kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available > > > Diffs > - > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern > >
Re: Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review5929 --- This review has been submitted with commit 71109e44500859a412a81e2b738ddaf8419708ff by Björn Ricks to branch KDE/4.7. - Commit On July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m., Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ > --- > > (Updated July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > --- > > kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available > > > Diffs > - > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern > >
Re: Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
> On Aug. 17, 2011, 1:19 p.m., Allen Winter wrote: > > Has this been committed? If so, please close this review; else please > > commit and close this review. > > > > Bjoern Ricks wrote: > Commit to trunk and/or 4.7? > > Allen Winter wrote: > Only master -- better not muck around with 4.7 too much. > > The real solution is to finally make Soprano a hard requirement. On second thought, please commit to the 4.7 branch as well. master is frozen now so you should commit into the frameworks branch. - Allen --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review5772 --- On July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m., Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ > --- > > (Updated July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > --- > > kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available > > > Diffs > - > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern > >
Re: Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
> On Aug. 17, 2011, 1:19 p.m., Allen Winter wrote: > > Has this been committed? If so, please close this review; else please > > commit and close this review. > > > > Bjoern Ricks wrote: > Commit to trunk and/or 4.7? Only master -- better not muck around with 4.7 too much. The real solution is to finally make Soprano a hard requirement. - Allen --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review5772 --- On July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m., Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ > --- > > (Updated July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > --- > > kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available > > > Diffs > - > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern > >
Re: Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
> On Aug. 17, 2011, 1:19 p.m., Allen Winter wrote: > > Has this been committed? If so, please close this review; else please > > commit and close this review. > > Commit to trunk and/or 4.7? - Bjoern --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review5772 --- On July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m., Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ > --- > > (Updated July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > --- > > kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available > > > Diffs > - > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern > >
Re: Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review5772 --- Has this been committed? If so, please close this review; else please commit and close this review. - Allen On July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m., Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ > --- > > (Updated July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > --- > > kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available > > > Diffs > - > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern > >
Re: Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review4755 --- Ship it! The compilation issue was not personally talkative enough when I tried to build kdelibs without sdo installed (it has not been packaged for this architecture that time). I have tested it more times in scratchbox for Harmattan, N9 and it works just fine without shared-desktop-ontologies installed. - Laszlo On July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m., Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ > --- > > (Updated July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > --- > > kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available > > > Diffs > - > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern > >
Re: Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review4751 --- Ship it! Looks OK to me. - Raphael On July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m., Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ > --- > > (Updated July 14, 2011, 2:40 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs. > > > Summary > --- > > kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available > > > Diffs > - > > kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff > > > Testing > --- > > > Thanks, > > Bjoern > >
Review Request: Only include nepomuk directories if nepomuk is available
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/ --- Review request for kdelibs. Summary --- kdelibs build fails if sdo and/or soprano aren't available Diffs - kparts/CMakeLists.txt db76613 Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/diff Testing --- Thanks, Bjoern
