Re: Shift for parts of the CI system to Qt 5.15
On Saturday, 20 June 2020 10:11:04 CEST Volker Krause wrote: > On Saturday, 20 June 2020 08:20:18 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > > - kaffeine > > This doesn't look like something caused by Qt 5.15, more like an issue with > the FreeBSD DVB headers, builds on Linux. https://invent.kde.org/multimedia/kaffeine/-/merge_requests/1 There's a weird bundled set of includes, which in normal packaging we were rm -rf'ing, but in the CI builds they're there. The MR ignores them more gracefully. [ade] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Shift for parts of the CI system to Qt 5.15
On samedi 20 juin 2020 12:25:42 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > - ktorrent (when linking with taglib) Looks like the fix I made to fix ktorrent (failing to link with taglib) also fixed the FreeBSD issue you mention. https://build.kde.org/job/Extragear/job/ktorrent/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/ -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5
Re: Winding down Phabricator
Hi Ben, We GSoC students (at least in the Krita project) have been requested to keep track of our progress via Phabricator tasks. Must we manually link to changes now? On 21/06/2020 03:38, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, With the completion of Phase 1 of our move to Gitlab, all code review activity should now be taking place on Gitlab, with only residual reviews being cleaned out of Phabricator (which hopefully we're already well underway with - please start this if you haven't already) This leaves just Tasks left on Phabricator. As interacting with repositories isn't a core requirement for this functionality, we've now taken the step of disabling all repository functionality on Phabricator. This means that going forward, repositories will no longer be browsable on Phabricator, nor will commit information be visible on Phabricator. Additionally, actions normally taken via hooks (such as "Differential Revision" and "Fixes Txxx") will no longer work. Should anyone have any questions regarding this, please let us know. Thanks, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin Best regards, amyspark -- amyspark 🌸 https://www.amyspark.me
Re: Winding down Phabricator
Phabricator will stay running for now since there are many pending tasks and reviews on it. We also need to archive reviews for read-only access before we shut it down, which will take some time. - You can continue using Phabricator tasks. - Phabricator code reviews still work, but we *really* want people to use GitLab merge requests instead for new reviews. We may disable creation of new Phabricator reviews in the future. - Automatic closing of tasks and reviews based on commit messages (like "Fixes T1234") doesn't work anymore, so you will have to close them manually. -- Nicolas > On 21 Jun 2020, at 13:21, L. E. Segovia wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > We GSoC students (at least in the Krita project) have been requested to keep > track of our progress via Phabricator tasks. Must we manually link to changes > now? > >> On 21/06/2020 03:38, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> Hi all, >> With the completion of Phase 1 of our move to Gitlab, all code review >> activity should now be taking place on Gitlab, with only residual >> reviews being cleaned out of Phabricator (which hopefully we're >> already well underway with - please start this if you haven't already) >> This leaves just Tasks left on Phabricator. >> As interacting with repositories isn't a core requirement for this >> functionality, we've now taken the step of disabling all repository >> functionality on Phabricator. >> This means that going forward, repositories will no longer be >> browsable on Phabricator, nor will commit information be visible on >> Phabricator. Additionally, actions normally taken via hooks (such as >> "Differential Revision" and "Fixes Txxx") will no longer work. >> Should anyone have any questions regarding this, please let us know. >> Thanks, >> Ben Cooksley >> KDE Sysadmin > > Best regards, > > amyspark > -- > amyspark 🌸 https://www.amyspark.me
Re: Winding down Phabricator
Hi, thanks for putting so much effort in the transition. We, as the German translation team, use Phabricator for reviewing the work of casual contributors. I wonder how other teams handle this. I am not saying, Phabricator going away will break our workflow completely but it is a good way to discuss changes and keep track of the discussion. Cheers Frederik On 6/21/20 5:38 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, With the completion of Phase 1 of our move to Gitlab, all code review activity should now be taking place on Gitlab, with only residual reviews being cleaned out of Phabricator (which hopefully we're already well underway with - please start this if you haven't already) This leaves just Tasks left on Phabricator. As interacting with repositories isn't a core requirement for this functionality, we've now taken the step of disabling all repository functionality on Phabricator. This means that going forward, repositories will no longer be browsable on Phabricator, nor will commit information be visible on Phabricator. Additionally, actions normally taken via hooks (such as "Differential Revision" and "Fixes Txxx") will no longer work. Should anyone have any questions regarding this, please let us know. Thanks, Ben Cooksley KDE Sysadmin