Re: let's get ready for Google Summer of Code 2014
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Lydia Pintscher ly...@kde.org wrote: Hey everyone :) It is time to get ready for GSoC 2014. It's another great chance to get some large projects done this year and welcome new enthusiastic people to KDE. I am working on our application. I have started our ideas page at http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas Please go and add projects proposals that you think would be awesome to have a student work on them. Please only add proposals where either you or someone you know are willing to mentor them. If you have ideas but don't have a mentor for them please find a mentor first on the appropriate mailinglist. The ideas page needs to be in good shape by 14 February at 19:00 UTC. Go go go go! ;-) http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas In case of questions please ask on #kde-soc or kde-soc-men...@kde.org. Hey folks :) *poke* about this. The ideas page is still looking rather empty and the application deadline is getting closer. Please help with filling up the ideas page. If you have questions or are unsure about a project please ping me to discuss it. Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher KDE e.V. Board of Directors / KDE Community Working Group http://kde.org - http://open-advice.org ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115541: Build fix for Mac OS X
On Feb. 8, 2014, 10:07 a.m., David Faure wrote:
Urgh, we were hoping this wouldn't be an issue.
This commit would break #include attica/event.h, so it cannot go in.
All namespaced frameworks do it this way already btw, see kparts for
instance:
-- Up-to-date:
/d/kde/inst/kde_frameworks/include/KF5/KParts/KParts/ReadWritePart
-- Up-to-date:
/d/kde/inst/kde_frameworks/include/KF5/KParts/kparts/readwritepart.h
Since there is no filename clash, what is the issue if these end up in the
same folder on Mac OSX?
Harald Fernengel wrote:
Here's the layout after make install on OS X:
include/KF5/KParts/textextension.h contains:
#include /tmp/kf5-kparts-ty2Y/src/textextension.h
^^^ this is broken, points to the temporary build dir...? What should
this include?
Then, we have include/KF5/KParts/KParts/ which contains both lower case
and upper case headers.
include/KF5/KParts/KParts/textextension.h is the actual header
include/KF5/KParts/KParts/TextExtension contains:
#include kparts/textextension.h
Ah, I see. The local forwarding includes which are supposed to only be used
during compilation of kparts, get installed because they end up in KParts/
instead of kparts/ (and the cmakelists.txt file just installs the whole
directory).
I can think of two solutions...
1) put local forwarders into ./local/kparts instead of ./kparts, to ensure they
stay out of ./KParts
2) change cmakelists.txt to install a list of camelcase headers instead of just
the whole directory (which gives surprises with an unclean builddir,
installing old stuff still lying around)
The first one seems simpler.
In kparts/src:
- target_include_directories(KF5Parts PUBLIC
$BUILD_INTERFACE:${KParts_BINARY_DIR})
+ target_include_directories(KF5Parts PUBLIC
$BUILD_INTERFACE:${KParts_BINARY_DIR}/local)
And in CEM:
diff --git a/modules/ECMGenerateHeaders.cmake b/modules/ECMGenerateHeaders.cmake
index e98a22e..38839f2 100644
--- a/modules/ECMGenerateHeaders.cmake
+++ b/modules/ECMGenerateHeaders.cmake
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ function(ECM_GENERATE_HEADERS)
endif()
if(NOT EGH_OUTPUT_DIR)
-set(EGH_OUTPUT_DIR ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR})
+set(EGH_OUTPUT_DIR ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/local)
endif()
# Make sure EGH_RELATIVE is /-terminated when it's not empty
Can you try it?
- David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115541/#review49240
---
On Feb. 7, 2014, 7:37 p.m., Harald Fernengel wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115541/
---
(Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 7:37 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: attica
Description
---
Case-insensitive filesystems don't like the Attica vs. attica pathes, when
installing, the headers would all be messed up. Instead, install everything
to include/KF5/Attica to be in line with the other frameworks.
Note - this might not be the best solution, but we need one in order to
deploy on Mac OS X :)
Diffs
-
src/CMakeLists.txt 676c8a8e78420371bba19414b3f090180a49758d
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115541/diff/
Testing
---
Only on Mac OS X
Thanks,
Harald Fernengel
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115586: Improve attica tests
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115586/#review49343 --- All looks good, but I'm not sure about removing the broken PrivateDataParser test (the class still exists, but is not exported and has a private parseXml method; it could be exported for the test and the test class marked as friend, for instance?). sandsmark, can you confirm or deny removal of the autotest? - David Faure On Feb. 8, 2014, 7:52 p.m., Michael Palimaka wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115586/ --- (Updated Feb. 8, 2014, 7:52 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: attica Description --- - Use BUILD_TESTING from ECM instead of custom ATTICA_ENABLE_TESTS - Remove enable_testing since this is done automatically by KDECMakeSettings - Mark tests - Remove old test that doesn't build, which tests API that no longer exists Diffs - CMakeLists.txt 445503efba2b49546137ce1548b3ddcddb2a0ebb autotests/CMakeLists.txt e4a455730fd1faddf547b6c91d4477d707f41551 autotests/privatedatatest.cpp e5c2d2675b1f33631f2b31a2ce0eb5db28f3406a tests/projecttest/CMakeLists.txt 0fce1bf8b2f9f93b9ee5b7961a12aeecdc8828a8 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115586/diff/ Testing --- Builds. Tests pass when enabled, and do not run when not. Thanks, Michael Palimaka ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115586: Improve attica tests
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115586/ --- (Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 2:49 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark. Repository: attica Description --- - Use BUILD_TESTING from ECM instead of custom ATTICA_ENABLE_TESTS - Remove enable_testing since this is done automatically by KDECMakeSettings - Mark tests - Remove old test that doesn't build, which tests API that no longer exists Diffs - CMakeLists.txt 445503efba2b49546137ce1548b3ddcddb2a0ebb autotests/CMakeLists.txt e4a455730fd1faddf547b6c91d4477d707f41551 autotests/privatedatatest.cpp e5c2d2675b1f33631f2b31a2ce0eb5db28f3406a tests/projecttest/CMakeLists.txt 0fce1bf8b2f9f93b9ee5b7961a12aeecdc8828a8 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115586/diff/ Testing --- Builds. Tests pass when enabled, and do not run when not. Thanks, Michael Palimaka ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Review Request 115597: Move customization directory from ksgmltools2 to kdoctools5
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115597/ --- Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdoctools Description --- A name more in line with the module name is better, I think. Diffs - KF5DocToolsConfig.cmake.in aba1626 src/CMakeLists.txt 7526041 src/meinproc.cpp f340845 src/xslt.cpp 79578ed Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115597/diff/ Testing --- Documentation of higher level frameworks (kio) and applications (kate, konsole) compiles. Thanks, Luigi Toscano ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Review Request 115602: Rename kactivitymanagerd
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić. Repository: kactivities Description --- ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix Diffs - src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be src/service/CMakeLists.txt 348f8a3 src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 tests/core/Process.cpp b6279d0 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/ Testing --- Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both installed. Thanks, Hrvoje Senjan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115602: Rename kactivitymanagerd
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review49377 --- This is not something I'd give a green light for. ActivityManager/KF5 is a drop-in replacement for the current one. They should *not* be installed side-by-side. - Ivan Čukić On Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/ --- (Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić. Repository: kactivities Description --- ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix Diffs - src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be src/service/CMakeLists.txt 348f8a3 src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 tests/core/Process.cpp b6279d0 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/ Testing --- Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both installed. Thanks, Hrvoje Senjan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115602: Rename kactivitymanagerd
On Feb. 9, 2014, 7:12 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote: This is not something I'd give a green light for. ActivityManager/KF5 is a drop-in replacement for the current one. They should *not* be installed side-by-side. kactivitymanagerd might be drop in, but the rest of the framework is not. Any consumers that are not ported to KF5 will need to be dropped by packagers if it's not coinstallable. - Michael --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review49377 --- On Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/ --- (Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić. Repository: kactivities Description --- ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix Diffs - src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be src/service/CMakeLists.txt 348f8a3 src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 tests/core/Process.cpp b6279d0 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/ Testing --- Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both installed. Thanks, Hrvoje Senjan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115602: Rename kactivitymanagerd
On Feb. 9, 2014, 7:12 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote: This is not something I'd give a green light for. ActivityManager/KF5 is a drop-in replacement for the current one. They should *not* be installed side-by-side. Michael Palimaka wrote: kactivitymanagerd might be drop in, but the rest of the framework is not. Any consumers that are not ported to KF5 will need to be dropped by packagers if it's not coinstallable. The library is co-installable. And the old clients will continue working fine. I don't want someone starting a libkactivities/kf5 client with a kactivitymanagerd/kf4 I would accept porting the KACTIVITIES_LIBRARY_ONLY build option from the kf5 branch to kf4 version. - Ivan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review49377 --- On Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/ --- (Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić. Repository: kactivities Description --- ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix Diffs - src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be src/service/CMakeLists.txt 348f8a3 src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 tests/core/Process.cpp b6279d0 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/ Testing --- Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both installed. Thanks, Hrvoje Senjan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Review Request 115605: Rename plasmapkg
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Sebastian Kügler. Repository: plasma-framework Description --- ...so it can be co-installed in the same prefix as kde-runtime(4) Diffs - src/plasmapkg/CMakeLists.txt a9e186f Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/diff/ Testing --- Builds Thanks, Hrvoje Senjan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115602: Rename kactivitymanagerd
On Feb. 9, 2014, 7:12 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote: This is not something I'd give a green light for. ActivityManager/KF5 is a drop-in replacement for the current one. They should *not* be installed side-by-side. Michael Palimaka wrote: kactivitymanagerd might be drop in, but the rest of the framework is not. Any consumers that are not ported to KF5 will need to be dropped by packagers if it's not coinstallable. Ivan Čukić wrote: The library is co-installable. And the old clients will continue working fine. I don't want someone starting a libkactivities/kf5 client with a kactivitymanagerd/kf4 I would accept porting the KACTIVITIES_LIBRARY_ONLY build option from the kf5 branch to kf4 version. Michael Palimaka wrote: Are you suggesting to ship kactivitymanagerd in KF5 package only, and have kactivities consumers depend on both kactivities 4 and 5? Ivan, we (distros) cannot make 'LTS' workspace depened on unreleased code, but we would like to provide both kactivities4 and kf5 version to users. As said, at least the most used clients, work with this patch without further adjusting on their side. - Hrvoje --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review49377 --- On Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/ --- (Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić. Repository: kactivities Description --- ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix Diffs - src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be src/service/CMakeLists.txt 348f8a3 src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 tests/core/Process.cpp b6279d0 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/ Testing --- Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both installed. Thanks, Hrvoje Senjan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: let's get ready for Google Summer of Code 2014
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Lydia Pintscher ly...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Lydia Pintscher ly...@kde.org wrote: Hey everyone :) It is time to get ready for GSoC 2014. It's another great chance to get some large projects done this year and welcome new enthusiastic people to KDE. I am working on our application. I have started our ideas page at http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas Please go and add projects proposals that you think would be awesome to have a student work on them. Please only add proposals where either you or someone you know are willing to mentor them. If you have ideas but don't have a mentor for them please find a mentor first on the appropriate mailinglist. The ideas page needs to be in good shape by 14 February at 19:00 UTC. Go go go go! ;-) http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas In case of questions please ask on #kde-soc or kde-soc-men...@kde.org. Hey folks :) *poke* about this. The ideas page is still looking rather empty and the application deadline is getting closer. Please help with filling up the ideas page. If you have questions or are unsure about a project please ping me to discuss it. Cheers Lydia (only leaving kde-soc-mentor in cc) I do have an idea for KIO in the next GSoC. Revive the KioFuse code to todays KIO version and update it. The start is there [1] and it's even working on kdelibs 4.0 (don't know it's current state). But it would be very wonderful if that could be working and then integrated in Dolphin (and obviously in my Accretion ^_^) Having this would resolve the issue that opening a network file from Dolphin in (for example) mplayer downloads the entire file to your hdd/ssd before opening it in mplayer. The code is here, the opportunity (due to GSoC) is here. All we need now is a student willing to take on this massive task and someone to mentor the student. [1] http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KioFuse ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Review Request 115606: Ommit ontologies/ dir from installing
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115606/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić. Repository: kactivities Description --- So kf5 kactivities can be co-installed with kactivities4. First approach is just to comment out the dir. I don't know what are the plans, so potentially i can git rm the dir, considering the emerge of baloo with 4.13 Diffs - src/CMakeLists.txt 8a00cf8 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115606/diff/ Testing --- Builds. Thanks, Hrvoje Senjan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115602: Rename kactivitymanagerd
On Feb. 9, 2014, 7:12 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote: This is not something I'd give a green light for. ActivityManager/KF5 is a drop-in replacement for the current one. They should *not* be installed side-by-side. Michael Palimaka wrote: kactivitymanagerd might be drop in, but the rest of the framework is not. Any consumers that are not ported to KF5 will need to be dropped by packagers if it's not coinstallable. Ivan Čukić wrote: The library is co-installable. And the old clients will continue working fine. I don't want someone starting a libkactivities/kf5 client with a kactivitymanagerd/kf4 I would accept porting the KACTIVITIES_LIBRARY_ONLY build option from the kf5 branch to kf4 version. Michael Palimaka wrote: Are you suggesting to ship kactivitymanagerd in KF5 package only, and have kactivities consumers depend on both kactivities 4 and 5? Hrvoje Senjan wrote: Ivan, we (distros) cannot make 'LTS' workspace depened on unreleased code, but we would like to provide both kactivities4 and kf5 version to users. As said, at least the most used clients, work with this patch without further adjusting on their side. This might not be clear: libkactivities/5 *needs* kactivitymanagerd/5 -- When we get the next workspace and all, Qt4/KDElibs4 clients will require libkactivities/4, Qt5/KF5 clients will require libkactivities/5. And kamd/qt5 will be the only choice. In the transition period, the packagers can easily create a meta-package called kactivitymanager that depends on either 4 or 5 (with those versions mutually exclusive), and libkactivities/qt4 would depend on that one. libkactivities/qt5 would depend on kactivitymanager-kf5. @Hrvoje I do get that. But, if you want kactivities5 clients, you *need* the kactivities5 service, and thus you need the unreleased code. And you get the problems of config files not being converted etc. With that said, the packagers can use this patch if they want to. That way, if somebody reports bugs due to the library being newer than the service (the new library uses added apis), I can freely mark them as downstream. Or you can install the unreleased things in a different prefix (like it was usually done for kde4 while it was in development) to tell the user 'this is not ready'. Still, I'd rather have the situation above, all relevant distros have package management systems that can handle things like these. - Ivan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review49377 --- On Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/ --- (Updated Feb. 9, 2014, 6:45 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić. Repository: kactivities Description --- ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix Diffs - src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be src/service/CMakeLists.txt 348f8a3 src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 tests/core/Process.cpp b6279d0 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/ Testing --- Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both installed. Thanks, Hrvoje Senjan ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Review Request 115610: Hide private method behind the d-pointer in KLineEdit
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115610/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kcompletion Description --- Hide private method behind the d-pointer in KLineEdit Also: --Move declaration of KLineEditPrivate to klineedit_p.h and leave implementation in klineedit.cpp --For coherence, change initWidget() for init() --Un-include headers not used In another patch I will hide other private methods and private slots Diffs - src/klineedit.h bea787a src/klineedit.cpp 73e91df src/klineedit_p.h 333135c Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115610/diff/ Testing --- It builds. Tests pass. Thanks, David Gil Oliva ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: let's get ready for Google Summer of Code 2014
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Mark Gaiser mark...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Lydia Pintscher ly...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Lydia Pintscher ly...@kde.org wrote: Hey everyone :) It is time to get ready for GSoC 2014. It's another great chance to get some large projects done this year and welcome new enthusiastic people to KDE. I am working on our application. I have started our ideas page at http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas Please go and add projects proposals that you think would be awesome to have a student work on them. Please only add proposals where either you or someone you know are willing to mentor them. If you have ideas but don't have a mentor for them please find a mentor first on the appropriate mailinglist. The ideas page needs to be in good shape by 14 February at 19:00 UTC. Go go go go! ;-) http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas In case of questions please ask on #kde-soc or kde-soc-men...@kde.org. Hey folks :) *poke* about this. The ideas page is still looking rather empty and the application deadline is getting closer. Please help with filling up the ideas page. If you have questions or are unsure about a project please ping me to discuss it. Cheers Lydia (only leaving kde-soc-mentor in cc) I do have an idea for KIO in the next GSoC. Revive the KioFuse code to todays KIO version and update it. The start is there [1] and it's even working on kdelibs 4.0 (don't know it's current state). But it would be very wonderful if that could be working and then integrated in Dolphin (and obviously in my Accretion ^_^) Having this would resolve the issue that opening a network file from Dolphin in (for example) mplayer downloads the entire file to your hdd/ssd before opening it in mplayer. The code is here, the opportunity (due to GSoC) is here. All we need now is a student willing to take on this massive task and someone to mentor the student. [1] http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KioFuse ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel Hi Mark, Feel free to add the proposal yourself. :) It's a wiki. Aleix ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: let's get ready for Google Summer of Code 2014
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Mark Gaiser mark...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Lydia Pintscher ly...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Lydia Pintscher ly...@kde.org wrote: Hey everyone :) It is time to get ready for GSoC 2014. It's another great chance to get some large projects done this year and welcome new enthusiastic people to KDE. I am working on our application. I have started our ideas page at http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas Please go and add projects proposals that you think would be awesome to have a student work on them. Please only add proposals where either you or someone you know are willing to mentor them. If you have ideas but don't have a mentor for them please find a mentor first on the appropriate mailinglist. The ideas page needs to be in good shape by 14 February at 19:00 UTC. Go go go go! ;-) http://community.kde.org/GSoC/2014/Ideas In case of questions please ask on #kde-soc or kde-soc-men...@kde.org. Hey folks :) *poke* about this. The ideas page is still looking rather empty and the application deadline is getting closer. Please help with filling up the ideas page. If you have questions or are unsure about a project please ping me to discuss it. Cheers Lydia (only leaving kde-soc-mentor in cc) I do have an idea for KIO in the next GSoC. Revive the KioFuse code to todays KIO version and update it. The start is there [1] and it's even working on kdelibs 4.0 (don't know it's current state). But it would be very wonderful if that could be working and then integrated in Dolphin (and obviously in my Accretion ^_^) Having this would resolve the issue that opening a network file from Dolphin in (for example) mplayer downloads the entire file to your hdd/ssd before opening it in mplayer. The code is here, the opportunity (due to GSoC) is here. All we need now is a student willing to take on this massive task and someone to mentor the student. [1] http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KioFuse ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel Hi Mark, Feel free to add the proposal yourself. :) It's a wiki. Aleix ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel I know :) Posting this here to see if anyone would be interested in mentoring this. Will add it to the wiki somewhere tomorrow. ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115530: Find Qt5::X11Extras only if X11 is found
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115530/ --- (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 6:56 a.m.) Status -- This change has been marked as submitted. Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kwindowsystem Description --- Find Qt5::X11Extras only if X11 is found No need to have a required dependency on X11Extras if we don't build for X11. Diffs - CMakeLists.txt 6cebf0cb22f5c0192e0423c4084f12b9dda75151 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115530/diff/ Testing --- compiles with and without X11 Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115528: Suppress warnings if built without X11 support
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115528/#review49409 --- This review has been submitted with commit 0cceeaeda740adf8d5e0e28818a13e6157515bcd by Martin Gräßlin to branch master. - Commit Hook On Feb. 7, 2014, 8:30 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115528/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 8:30 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kwindowsystem Description --- Suppress warnings if built without X11 support Diffs - src/kusertimestamp.cpp 1fe7cd4379892ded9ac22378b675b6974f385022 src/kstartupinfo.cpp d0022512748d11462409e2111ce6f592ebfa656a Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115528/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115528: Suppress warnings if built without X11 support
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115528/ --- (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 6:56 a.m.) Status -- This change has been marked as submitted. Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kwindowsystem Description --- Suppress warnings if built without X11 support Diffs - src/kusertimestamp.cpp 1fe7cd4379892ded9ac22378b675b6974f385022 src/kstartupinfo.cpp d0022512748d11462409e2111ce6f592ebfa656a Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115528/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115530: Find Qt5::X11Extras only if X11 is found
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115530/#review49408 --- This review has been submitted with commit 757fc25af49a5cdd1971d37f618e5581f562c505 by Martin Gräßlin to branch master. - Commit Hook On Feb. 7, 2014, 8:46 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115530/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 8:46 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kwindowsystem Description --- Find Qt5::X11Extras only if X11 is found No need to have a required dependency on X11Extras if we don't build for X11. Diffs - CMakeLists.txt 6cebf0cb22f5c0192e0423c4084f12b9dda75151 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115530/diff/ Testing --- compiles with and without X11 Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115531: Only build kx(utils|errorhandler).cpp if we HAVE_X11
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115531/#review49410 --- This review has been submitted with commit bc473053b1fe3b78b15c99ff0da5b0112156e6e3 by Martin Gräßlin to branch master. - Commit Hook On Feb. 7, 2014, 8:51 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115531/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 8:51 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kwindowsystem Description --- Only build kx(utils|errorhandler).cpp if we HAVE_X11 The name even says it's x specific... Diffs - src/CMakeLists.txt 9c1d4523d7f630c7df8aff4eff984d25b2116db9 src/kxerrorhandler.cpp 7bd9af3eb54cef697662e3bcf72a0e100f636706 src/kxutils.cpp d7b89024a4fc8d3cc48f5ddc9ca86ba159a4da5a Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115531/diff/ Testing --- built with and without X11 Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115531: Only build kx(utils|errorhandler).cpp if we HAVE_X11
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115531/ --- (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 6:56 a.m.) Status -- This change has been marked as submitted. Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kwindowsystem Description --- Only build kx(utils|errorhandler).cpp if we HAVE_X11 The name even says it's x specific... Diffs - src/CMakeLists.txt 9c1d4523d7f630c7df8aff4eff984d25b2116db9 src/kxerrorhandler.cpp 7bd9af3eb54cef697662e3bcf72a0e100f636706 src/kxutils.cpp d7b89024a4fc8d3cc48f5ddc9ca86ba159a4da5a Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115531/diff/ Testing --- built with and without X11 Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115527: Remove not needed HAVE_X11
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115527/ --- (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 6:59 a.m.) Status -- This change has been marked as submitted. Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kio Description --- Remove not needed HAVE_X11 KWindowSystem::setState is not X11 specific. If a platform does not support KeepAbove it just doesn't set it. Diffs - src/ioslaves/http/kcookiejar/kcookiewin.cpp 8c3250af2d7f51866f1bce9046beaec7dadce84b Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115527/diff/ Testing --- compiles on X11, warning about not-defined HAVE_X11 gone Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115517: Do not crash if there is no QMimeData in decodeIsCutSelection
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/ --- (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 6:59 a.m.) Status -- This change has been marked as submitted. Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure. Repository: kio Description --- Do not crash if there is no QMimeData in decodeIsCutSelection On Wayland the QMimeData is null and thus the Open File dialog crashed when trying to enter a directory. Diffs - src/filewidgets/kfilepreviewgenerator.cpp cdc18a18508eceb58b9fbcad9b68b47bf534996c Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/diff/ Testing --- Kate on Wayland can open files now: http://paste.opensuse.org/79557635 Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115527: Remove not needed HAVE_X11
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115527/#review49412 --- This review has been submitted with commit 3daf0a4900aff9d16b749b40e8c5b3ab9efab60b by Martin Gräßlin to branch master. - Commit Hook On Feb. 7, 2014, 8:01 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115527/ --- (Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 8:01 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kio Description --- Remove not needed HAVE_X11 KWindowSystem::setState is not X11 specific. If a platform does not support KeepAbove it just doesn't set it. Diffs - src/ioslaves/http/kcookiejar/kcookiewin.cpp 8c3250af2d7f51866f1bce9046beaec7dadce84b Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115527/diff/ Testing --- compiles on X11, warning about not-defined HAVE_X11 gone Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Re: Review Request 115517: Do not crash if there is no QMimeData in decodeIsCutSelection
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/#review49411 --- This review has been submitted with commit 7ce81bd9a1bf95a5813f59c4c39a3aa482410af8 by Martin Gräßlin to branch master. - Commit Hook On Feb. 6, 2014, 1:37 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/ --- (Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 1:37 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure. Repository: kio Description --- Do not crash if there is no QMimeData in decodeIsCutSelection On Wayland the QMimeData is null and thus the Open File dialog crashed when trying to enter a directory. Diffs - src/filewidgets/kfilepreviewgenerator.cpp cdc18a18508eceb58b9fbcad9b68b47bf534996c Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/diff/ Testing --- Kate on Wayland can open files now: http://paste.opensuse.org/79557635 Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
Review Request 115613: Drop platform name from default user agent string
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115613/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kio Description --- Drop platform name from default user agent string The platform name (e.g. X11) was currently broken on compile time. On Linux it returned unknown and on all other platforms the same name as already included in the OS name. We cannot really determine the platform name as this is a core application and the Qt's platform name is only available in a GUI application. Compile time is no solution as we cannot know whether the binary is executed on X11, Wayland, Android or whatever. Diffs - src/core/kprotocolmanager.cpp f81b6797887eebd868c36b98e867eb055b05a1e2 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115613/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Martin Gräßlin ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
