D6102: KUrlRequester: Set NOTIFY signal to textChanged() for text property.

2017-06-10 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
apol added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> elvisangelaccio wrote in kurlrequester.h:71
> Don't we need to add apidox with the @since tag?

Well not really, maybe if we documented the properties instead of the methods 
(which could be a sensible thing to do on the other hand).

REPOSITORY
  R241 KIO

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D6102

To: arrowdodger, #frameworks
Cc: apol, elvisangelaccio, kfunk


KDE CI: Frameworks attica kf5-qt5 WindowsQt5.7 - Build # 10 - Fixed!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD SUCCESS
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20attica%20kf5-qt5%20WindowsQt5.7/10/
 Project:
Frameworks attica kf5-qt5 WindowsQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:04:13 +
 Build duration:
2 min 50 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

build.log
Description: Binary data


D6180: Makefile: Remove invalid keyword entries in makefile.xml

2017-06-10 Thread Orgad Shaneh
orgads added a reviewer: arichardson.

REPOSITORY
  R216 Syntax Highlighting

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D6180

To: orgads, #framework_syntax_hightlighting, arichardson
Cc: #frameworks


D6180: Makefile: Remove invalid keyword entries in makefile.xml

2017-06-10 Thread Orgad Shaneh
orgads created this revision.
Restricted Application added a project: Frameworks.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Frameworks.

REVISION SUMMARY
  Those keywords are mapped to undefined lists.
  
  Reported in https://phabricator.kde.org/D3621#inline-17949

REPOSITORY
  R216 Syntax Highlighting

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D6180

AFFECTED FILES
  data/syntax/makefile.xml

To: orgads, #framework_syntax_hightlighting
Cc: #frameworks


D6102: KUrlRequester: Set NOTIFY signal to textChanged() for text property.

2017-06-10 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
elvisangelaccio added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> kurlrequester.h:71
>  Q_PROPERTY(QString placeholderText READ placeholderText WRITE 
> setPlaceholderText)
> -Q_PROPERTY(QString text READ text WRITE setText)
> +Q_PROPERTY(QString text READ text WRITE setText NOTIFY textChanged)
>  Q_PROPERTY(Qt::WindowModality fileDialogModality READ fileDialogModality 
> WRITE setFileDialogModality)

Don't we need to add apidox with the @since tag?

REPOSITORY
  R241 KIO

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D6102

To: arrowdodger, #frameworks
Cc: elvisangelaccio, kfunk


KDE CI: Frameworks threadweaver kf5-qt5 XenialQt5.7 - Build # 9 - Unstable!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20threadweaver%20kf5-qt5%20XenialQt5.7/9/
 Project:
Frameworks threadweaver kf5-qt5 XenialQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 10:08:30 +
 Build duration:
10 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 7 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 8 test(s)Failed: TestSuite.ThreadWeaverJobTests
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report100%
(2/2)80%
(55/69)80%
(55/69)78%
(1479/1896)44%
(1143/2598)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests100%
(11/11)100%
(11/11)100%
(413/413)51%
(493/962)src76%
(44/58)76%
(44/58)72%
(1066/1483)40%
(650/1636)

build.log
Description: Binary data


KDE CI: Frameworks krunner kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7 - Build # 11 - Fixed!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD SUCCESS
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20krunner%20kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.7/11/
 Project:
Frameworks krunner kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:57:55 +
 Build duration:
11 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 1 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)

build.log
Description: Binary data


KDE CI: Frameworks kpty kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7 - Build # 14 - Still Unstable!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20kpty%20kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.7/14/
 Project:
Frameworks kpty kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:56:42 +
 Build duration:
11 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 0 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 1 test(s)Failed: TestSuite.kptyprocesstest

build.log
Description: Binary data


KDE CI: Frameworks knewstuff kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7 - Build # 21 - Still Unstable!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20knewstuff%20kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.7/21/
 Project:
Frameworks knewstuff kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:52:49 +
 Build duration:
14 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 2 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 3 test(s)Failed: TestSuite.kmoretoolstest

build.log
Description: Binary data


KDE CI: Frameworks kpackage kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7 - Build # 14 - Still Unstable!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20kpackage%20kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.7/14/
 Project:
Frameworks kpackage kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:54:31 +
 Build duration:
10 min and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 8 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 9 test(s)Failed: TestSuite.plasma-packagestructuretest

build.log
Description: Binary data


KDE CI: Frameworks kservice kf5-qt5 XenialQt5.7 - Build # 14 - Unstable!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20kservice%20kf5-qt5%20XenialQt5.7/14/
 Project:
Frameworks kservice kf5-qt5 XenialQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:58:22 +
 Build duration:
2 min 27 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 10 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 11 test(s)Failed: TestSuite.ksycocathreadtest
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report86%
(6/7)89%
(76/85)89%
(76/85)68%
(5489/8028)48%
(3003/6264)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests100%
(14/14)100%
(14/14)93%
(1465/1571)50%
(908/1820)src.kbuildsycoca100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)91%
(61/67)65%
(13/20)src.kdeinit0%
(0/2)0%
(0/2)0%
(0/326)0%
(0/262)src.plugin67%
(2/3)67%
(2/3)47%
(47/100)38%
(36/96)src.services97%
(30/31)97%
(30/31)58%
(1767/3046)40%
(770/1904)src.sycoca84%
(26/31)84%
(26/31)73%
(2041/2798)59%
(1242/2112)tests.pluginlocator100%
(3/3)100%
(3/3)90%
(108/120)68%
(34/50)

build.log
Description: Binary data


KDE CI: Frameworks kcoreaddons kf5-qt5 XenialQt5.7 - Build # 22 - Still Unstable!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20kcoreaddons%20kf5-qt5%20XenialQt5.7/22/
 Project:
Frameworks kcoreaddons kf5-qt5 XenialQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:37:54 +
 Build duration:
6 min 31 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 3 test(s), Passed: 22 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 25 test(s)Failed: TestSuite.kdirwatch_fam_unittestFailed: TestSuite.kdirwatch_inotify_unittestFailed: TestSuite.kdirwatch_qfswatch_unittest
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report100%
(10/10)85%
(79/93)85%
(79/93)73%
(6039/8239)43%
(10830/25227)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests83%
(33/40)83%
(33/40)97%
(2599/2682)49%
(6620/13503)src.desktoptojson100%
(3/3)100%
(3/3)79%
(84/106)38%
(146/384)src.lib67%
(2/3)67%
(2/3)56%
(302/536)22%
(192/893)src.lib.caching100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)45%
(352/787)18%
(195/1086)src.lib.io90%
(9/10)90%
(9/10)58%
(817/1397)29%
(932/3214)src.lib.jobs71%
(5/7)71%
(5/7)52%
(159/304)39%
(57/146)src.lib.plugin100%
(8/8)100%
(8/8)86%
(646/748)44%
(1035/2326)src.lib.randomness100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)67%
(66/99)58%
(45/78)src.lib.text63%
(5/8)63%
(5/8)46%
(349/764)40%
(794/1981)src.lib.util100%
(10/10)100%
(10/10)81%
(665/816)50%
(814/1616)

build.log
Description: Binary data


KDE CI: Frameworks kconfig kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7 - Build # 12 - Unstable!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20kconfig%20kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.7/12/
 Project:
Frameworks kconfig kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:36:46 +
 Build duration:
4 min 59 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 34 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 35 test(s)Failed: TestSuite.kconfigcore-kconfigtest

build.log
Description: Binary data


KDE CI: Frameworks baloo kf5-qt5 XenialQt5.7 - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

2017-06-10 Thread no-reply
BUILD UNSTABLE
 Build URL
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/Frameworks%20baloo%20kf5-qt5%20XenialQt5.7/11/
 Project:
Frameworks baloo kf5-qt5 XenialQt5.7
 Date of build:
Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:29:26 +
 Build duration:
7 min 38 sec and counting
   JUnit Tests
  Name: (root) Failed: 1 test(s), Passed: 38 test(s), Skipped: 0 test(s), Total: 39 test(s)Failed: TestSuite.kinotifytest
   Cobertura Report
  
   Project Coverage Summary
  
   Name
  PackagesFilesClassesLinesConditionalsCobertura Coverage Report100%
(12/12)77%
(111/144)77%
(111/144)73%
(5039/6932)50%
(2613/5194)Coverage Breakdown by Package
Name
   FilesClassesLinesConditionalsautotests.benchmarks100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)100%
(42/42)89%
(16/18)autotests.integration100%
(3/3)100%
(3/3)95%
(242/255)64%
(140/220)autotests.unit.codecs100%
(3/3)100%
(3/3)100%
(40/40)57%
(25/44)autotests.unit.engine100%
(17/17)100%
(17/17)100%
(736/736)53%
(390/740)autotests.unit.file100%
(11/11)100%
(11/11)97%
(788/809)51%
(438/864)autotests.unit.lib100%
(6/6)100%
(6/6)97%
(315/326)52%
(156/302)src.codecs100%
(5/5)100%
(5/5)87%
(120/138)76%
(32/42)src.engine97%
(38/39)97%
(38/39)79%
(1607/2038)58%
(796/1379)src.file39%
(17/44)39%
(17/44)45%
(678/1506)38%
(374/980)src.file.extractor100%
(2/2)100%
(2/2)69%
(20/29)58%
(7/12)src.file.extractor.autotests100%
(1/1)100%
(1/1)100%
(22/22)61%
(11/18)src.lib55%
(6/11)55%
(6/11)43%
(429/991)40%
(228/575)

build.log
Description: Binary data


Re: Application usage statistics and targeted user surveys

2017-06-10 Thread Volker Krause
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 01:36:44 CEST Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Albert Astals Cid  wrote:
> > El dissabte, 3 de juny de 2017, a les 11:49:00 CEST, Volker Krause va
> > 
> > escriure:
> >> On Thursday, 25 May 2017 12:33:49 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 18:31:35 CEST Aleix Pol wrote:
> >> > > I would have looked into fixing it, but I'm not sure I understand why
> >> > > there's all the RPATH logic in place, so I'd prefer to hear from you
> >> > > first.
> >> > 
> >> > I have removed the remains of the pre-ECM rpath handling. This also
> >> > changed
> >> > binary output directories on Linux to follow KDE standards, so you
> >> > might
> >> > want to do a clean build to avoid issues with outdated binaries in the
> >> > build dir.
> >> > 
> >> > > A good next step would also be to get it running on build.kde.org, so
> >> > > we can identify these issues.
> >> > 
> >> > Indeed, I've requested CI coverage now.
> >> 
> >> Looks like in order to get CI coverage we need to move to kdereview
> >> (which
> >> is fine, I think it's ready for that), but that requires to know where
> >> this
> >> should end up afterwards.
> >> 
> >> I guess the candidates are extragear/libs or frameworks? frameworks seems
> >> conceptually like the right place, but putting something there that is
> >> still fairly new and has seen little field testing seems sub-optimal.
> >> Opinions?> 
> > To me it seems a few releases from extragear would make sense before
> > moving to frameworks and promise full API/ABI compatibility.

Sounds sensible to me, let's do that.

> > OTOH when moving from extreagear to frameworks we may have to rename
> > library (to have the KF5 suffix) which would break also API (at least at
> > the cmake level).
> > 
> > How do people feel having libs in extreager having the KF5 "cmake naming"
> > in the understanding that we're stabilizing them to be part of frameworks
> > eventually?
> 
> IMO it's a bit weird and unsettling. But then, we're already doing it
> for many pim libraries (not in extragear but in applications, still
> not part of KF5).

But isn't the rename the least of our problems if we start in extragear/libs 
exactly to be able to still do ABI, API and behavior changes until we are 
happy with things for frameworks?

I'll try to get all currently pending API changes in ASAP, and then get it 
moved to kdereview within this month.

Regards,
Volker


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.