Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz

2016-03-06 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Sunday 06 March 2016, a les 08:38:14, Boudhayan Gupta va escriure:
> On 6 March 2016 at 01:26, Martin Koller  wrote:
> > Who is in charge of the old SVN repos ?
> > Who is in charge of qimageblitz ?
> 
> I asked around on IRC and it seems QIB is "community maintained" and
> as such doesn't have a maintainer.
> 
> You should just be able to file a sysadmin ticket to get it migrated
> from SVN to Git.

It was my understanding that qimageblitz is actually not something we want to 
port to Qt5 and we should just try to use Qt's own stuff for this.

If qimageblitz gets ported to Qt5 it should basically be a Tier 0 frameworks 
so CC'ing the frameworks devel list.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> -- Boudhayan Gupta

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz

2016-03-06 Thread Martin Koller
On Sunday 06 March 2016 12:35:32 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Sunday 06 March 2016, a les 08:38:14, Boudhayan Gupta va escriure:
> > On 6 March 2016 at 01:26, Martin Koller  wrote:
> > > Who is in charge of the old SVN repos ?
> > > Who is in charge of qimageblitz ?
> > 
> > I asked around on IRC and it seems QIB is "community maintained" and
> > as such doesn't have a maintainer.
> > 
> > You should just be able to file a sysadmin ticket to get it migrated
> > from SVN to Git.
> 
> It was my understanding that qimageblitz is actually not something we want to 
> port to Qt5 and we should just try to use Qt's own stuff for this.

AFAIK Qt does not provide the features of qimageblitz, e.g. emboss etc.

> If qimageblitz gets ported to Qt5 it should basically be a Tier 0 frameworks 
> so CC'ing the frameworks devel list.

It WAS already ported to Qt5. I did not do any porting, I just created a patch 
which allows
to co-install the Qt4 and the Qt5 built version.

-- 
Best regards/Schöne Grüße

Martin
A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q: Why is top posting bad?

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\- against proprietary attachments

Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.lillehus.at
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz

2016-03-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Tuesday 08 March 2016, a les 17:55:30, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Martin Koller  wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 March 2016 08:38:14 Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
> >> On 6 March 2016 at 01:26, Martin Koller  wrote:
> >> > Who is in charge of the old SVN repos ?
> >> > Who is in charge of qimageblitz ?
> >> 
> >> I asked around on IRC and it seems QIB is "community maintained" and
> >> as such doesn't have a maintainer.
> >> 
> >> You should just be able to file a sysadmin ticket to get it migrated
> >> from SVN to Git.
> > 
> > I started to create a sysadmin ticket, but I don't know
> > - "Initial maintainer identity user names, separated by ;"
> 
> Not sure how this can be clearer
> Username in this case is the same as the one in kde-common/accounts.
> 
> > - "Intended location on projects.kde.org, "
> 
> This is the location in the legacy tree.

I guess for that we need to decide if it should be a framework first or not.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben
> 
> > --
> > Best regards/Schöne Grüße
> > 
> > Martin
> > A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
> > Q: Why is top posting bad?
> > 
> > ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
> > /\- against proprietary attachments
> > 
> > Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.lillehus.at

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel