Review Request 117277: KDatePicker: override changeEvent() instead of setEnabled()

2014-04-01 Thread Alex Merry

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/
---

Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Feck.


Repository: kwidgetsaddons


Description
---

KDatePicker: override changeEvent() instead of setEnabled()

As the comment noted, setEnabled() is not virtual.  Also, there was no
need to separately enabled/disable the individual components, when they
are children of the KDatePicker widget.  Instead, we override
changeEvent() and use it to focus the table (as before).

This also extends the kdatepicktest to temporarily disable the picker.


Diffs
-

  src/kdatepicker.h 855aeb01ff457394cfbcff57845a57a9eae0a103 
  src/kdatepicker.cpp 345ee2d97632647789e6762e5e155e75802c2191 
  tests/kdatepicktest.cpp 5f29110f2335bb110b3470007a59f9cb8b6bcfee 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/diff/


Testing
---

Builds.  Tests pass.  Played around with kdatepicktest; behaviour seems 
unchanged.


Thanks,

Alex Merry

___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 117277: KDatePicker: override changeEvent() instead of setEnabled()

2014-04-01 Thread Christoph Feck

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/#review54813
---


Probably should only try to set the focus if the widget is going to be enabled?

- Christoph Feck


On April 1, 2014, 10:35 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/
 ---
 
 (Updated April 1, 2014, 10:35 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Feck.
 
 
 Repository: kwidgetsaddons
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 KDatePicker: override changeEvent() instead of setEnabled()
 
 As the comment noted, setEnabled() is not virtual.  Also, there was no
 need to separately enabled/disable the individual components, when they
 are children of the KDatePicker widget.  Instead, we override
 changeEvent() and use it to focus the table (as before).
 
 This also extends the kdatepicktest to temporarily disable the picker.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/kdatepicker.h 855aeb01ff457394cfbcff57845a57a9eae0a103 
   src/kdatepicker.cpp 345ee2d97632647789e6762e5e155e75802c2191 
   tests/kdatepicktest.cpp 5f29110f2335bb110b3470007a59f9cb8b6bcfee 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Builds.  Tests pass.  Played around with kdatepicktest; behaviour seems 
 unchanged.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Alex Merry
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 117277: KDatePicker: override changeEvent() instead of setEnabled()

2014-04-01 Thread Christoph Feck

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/#review54816
---

Ship it!


On the other hand, Qt hopefully won't remove the focus from a previous widget, 
if activating a disabled widget fails.

- Christoph Feck


On April 1, 2014, 10:35 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/
 ---
 
 (Updated April 1, 2014, 10:35 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Feck.
 
 
 Repository: kwidgetsaddons
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 KDatePicker: override changeEvent() instead of setEnabled()
 
 As the comment noted, setEnabled() is not virtual.  Also, there was no
 need to separately enabled/disable the individual components, when they
 are children of the KDatePicker widget.  Instead, we override
 changeEvent() and use it to focus the table (as before).
 
 This also extends the kdatepicktest to temporarily disable the picker.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/kdatepicker.h 855aeb01ff457394cfbcff57845a57a9eae0a103 
   src/kdatepicker.cpp 345ee2d97632647789e6762e5e155e75802c2191 
   tests/kdatepicktest.cpp 5f29110f2335bb110b3470007a59f9cb8b6bcfee 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Builds.  Tests pass.  Played around with kdatepicktest; behaviour seems 
 unchanged.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Alex Merry
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel


Re: Review Request 117277: KDatePicker: override changeEvent() instead of setEnabled()

2014-04-01 Thread Commit Hook

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/#review54821
---


This review has been submitted with commit 
d1e542627f907c9512859c0f002210d9bf8b221b by Alex Merry to branch master.

- Commit Hook


On April 1, 2014, 10:35 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/
 ---
 
 (Updated April 1, 2014, 10:35 a.m.)
 
 
 Review request for KDE Frameworks and Christoph Feck.
 
 
 Repository: kwidgetsaddons
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 KDatePicker: override changeEvent() instead of setEnabled()
 
 As the comment noted, setEnabled() is not virtual.  Also, there was no
 need to separately enabled/disable the individual components, when they
 are children of the KDatePicker widget.  Instead, we override
 changeEvent() and use it to focus the table (as before).
 
 This also extends the kdatepicktest to temporarily disable the picker.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   src/kdatepicker.h 855aeb01ff457394cfbcff57845a57a9eae0a103 
   src/kdatepicker.cpp 345ee2d97632647789e6762e5e155e75802c2191 
   tests/kdatepicktest.cpp 5f29110f2335bb110b3470007a59f9cb8b6bcfee 
 
 Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117277/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Builds.  Tests pass.  Played around with kdatepicktest; behaviour seems 
 unchanged.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Alex Merry
 


___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel