[kde-freebsd] Re: [SVN Commit] area51/QT

2011-03-09 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Tue,  8 Mar 2011 16:28:11 -0800 (PST), Alberto Villa wrote:
> SVN commit 7025 by xzhayon:
> 
> - Revert QT4_OPTIONS removal.
> - Add a comment to better explain why they're there.
> 
> It's been a nice adventure, but I was wrong. `svn log` and KDE 4
> failing to build, plus some debugging, revealed that my solution was
> not good. But this one isn't, as well. A new one is about to be
> tested. Sorry to makc for messing his original work. :)
> 
> No cookies to:me

It seems to me Gentoo has something similar to your solution. You can look 
what they do. Of course the ideal solution would be split Qt4 upstream. While 
not, I'm pretty satisfied with my workarounds :)

Max
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information


[kde-freebsd] Re: [SVN Commit] area51/QT

2011-03-09 Thread Alberto Villa
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 14:28:31 Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> It seems to me Gentoo has something similar to your solution. You can 
look
> what they do.

i'll have a look, thanks!

> Of course the ideal solution would be split Qt4 upstream.

indeed i wanted to add No cookies to: Qt developers :)

> While not, I'm pretty satisfied with my workarounds :)

well, i agree, it just works for our needs
-- 
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer 
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla

There's a fine line between courage and foolishness.  Too bad it's not
a fence.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information


[kde-freebsd] Re: [SVN Commit] area51/QT

2011-03-09 Thread Alberto Villa
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 14:28:31 Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> It seems to me Gentoo has something similar to your solution.

ok, they do the very same thing. if miwi says that it's acceptable for 
portmgr to have a file which keeps changing in include/, i'll implement the 
solution (but after qt 4.7.2 commit)
-- 
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer 
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla

I never take work home with me; I always leave it in some bar along the 
way.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information


[kde-freebsd] Re: [SVN Commit] area51/QT

2011-03-10 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:14:32 +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 March 2011 14:28:31 Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> > It seems to me Gentoo has something similar to your solution.
> 
> ok, they do the very same thing. if miwi says that it's acceptable for
> portmgr to have a file which keeps changing in include/, i'll implement the
> solution (but after qt 4.7.2 commit)

Sure ask portmgr, if you like to hear 'no' :)
I'd prefer to not record qconfig.h in qt4-corelib port at all and generate it 
on install the same manner as you proposed for other qt4 ports, so each port 
should do on install:
create qconfig.h if not exists
merge qconfig-${port_name}.h to qconfig.h

and reverse procedure on deinstall:
unmerge qconfig-${port_name}.h
delete qconfig.h if empty

Max
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information


[kde-freebsd] Re: [SVN Commit] area51/QT/Mk

2011-04-22 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Alberto Villa  writes:

> SVN commit 7193 by avilla:
>
> - Disable also SSE3 when PACKAGE_BUILDING is set.

What's the rationale?
___
kde-freebsd mailing list
kde-freebsd@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information