Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
> On Dec 24, 2018, at 1:39 PM, Tobias C. Berner wrote: > > Maybe check why portupgrade does this and fails with it, maybe the developers > of portupgrade can help you out there. > I don't see that there is anything for kde@ to do here, as this seems to be > an issue with the tool used to upgrade rather > than the ports tree. I might agree if any other ports besides qt-* were failing. They’re not.
Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
---> Preserving /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Network.so.5 as /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libQt5Network.so.5 cp: symlink: libQt5Network.so.5.12.0: File exists Maybe check why portupgrade does this and fails with it, maybe the developers of portupgrade can help you out there. I don't see that there is anything for kde@ to do here, as this seems to be an issue with the tool used to upgrade rather than the ports tree. mfg Tobias On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 at 22:32, Paul Beard wrote: > > > On Dec 24, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Tobias C. Berner wrote: > > I mean how are you "building" the updates :) > > > portupgrade -a >
Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
> On Dec 24, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Tobias C. Berner wrote: > > I mean how are you "building" the updates :) > portupgrade -a
Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
I mean how are you "building" the updates :) On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 at 21:01, Paul Beard wrote: > > > > On Dec 24, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Tobias C. Berner > wrote: > > > > How are you updating the ports? > > ? Through svn, same as for all of them, same as I have done for years. > > Seems like this message is trying to tell us something… > > > pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec > > >
Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
> On Dec 24, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Tobias C. Berner wrote: > > How are you updating the ports? ? Through svn, same as for all of them, same as I have done for years. Seems like this message is trying to tell us something… > pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec
Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
Moin moin How are you updating the ports? Mfg Tobias Am Mo., 24. Dez. 2018, 18:42 hat Paul Beard geschrieben: > > > On Dec 17, 2018, at 5:15 AM, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > I suppose that's the error message from whatever tool you were using -- > portupgrade? Since subsequent deinstall from the port *did* work, I'd like > to > chalk this up to "something was wrong once”. > > > Subsequent deinstall does work but I don’t see much value in a pkg/ports > system that requires a manual step for a subset of ports. Happens with > every qt-* port. > > > > Compressing man pages (compress-man) > ===> Installing ldconfig configuration file > ---> Build of net/qt5-network ended at: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:28:38 -0800 > (consumed 00:11:11) > ---> Updating dependency info > ---> Uninstallation of qt5-network-5.12.0 started at: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 > 09:28:38 -0800 > ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a package > ---> Backing up the old version > ---> Uninstalling the old version > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 550 packages found - done] > ---> Deinstalling 'qt5-network-5.12.0' > ---> Preserving /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Network.so.5 as > /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libQt5Network.so.5 > cp: symlink: libQt5Network.so.5.12.0: File exists > Copy failed! > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 550 packages found - done] > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > ! qt5-network-5.12.0(copy failed) > ---> Uninstallation of qt5-network-5.12.0 ended at: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 > 09:28:41 -0800 (consumed 00:00:02) > ---> Upgrade of net/qt5-network ended at: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:28:41 -0800 > (consumed 00:11:14) > ---> ** Upgrade tasks 1: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed > ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > ! net/qt5-network (qt5-network-5.12.0) (uninstall error) > > > /usr/ports/net/qt5-network]# make deinstall reinstall > ===> Deinstalling for qt5-network > ===> Deinstalling qt5-network-5.12.0 > Updating database digests format: 100% > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 > packages in the universe): > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > qt5-network-5.12.0 > > Number of packages to be removed: 1 > > The operation will free 2 MiB. > [1/1] Deinstalling qt5-network-5.12.0... > [1/1] Deleting files for qt5-network-5.12.0: 100% > ===> Installing for qt5-network-5.12.0_1 > ===> Registering installation for qt5-network-5.12.0_1 > pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec > Installing qt5-network-5.12.0_1... >
Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
> On Dec 17, 2018, at 5:15 AM, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > I suppose that's the error message from whatever tool you were using -- > portupgrade? Since subsequent deinstall from the port *did* work, I'd like to > chalk this up to "something was wrong once”. Subsequent deinstall does work but I don’t see much value in a pkg/ports system that requires a manual step for a subset of ports. Happens with every qt-* port. > Compressing man pages (compress-man) ===> Installing ldconfig configuration file ---> Build of net/qt5-network ended at: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:28:38 -0800 (consumed 00:11:11) ---> Updating dependency info ---> Uninstallation of qt5-network-5.12.0 started at: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:28:38 -0800 ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a package ---> Backing up the old version ---> Uninstalling the old version [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 550 packages found - done] ---> Deinstalling 'qt5-network-5.12.0' ---> Preserving /usr/local/lib/qt5/libQt5Network.so.5 as /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libQt5Network.so.5 cp: symlink: libQt5Network.so.5.12.0: File exists Copy failed! [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 550 packages found - done] ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! qt5-network-5.12.0(copy failed) ---> Uninstallation of qt5-network-5.12.0 ended at: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:28:41 -0800 (consumed 00:00:02) ---> Upgrade of net/qt5-network ended at: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:28:41 -0800 (consumed 00:11:14) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 1: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! net/qt5-network (qt5-network-5.12.0) (uninstall error) /usr/ports/net/qt5-network]# make deinstall reinstall ===> Deinstalling for qt5-network ===> Deinstalling qt5-network-5.12.0 Updating database digests format: 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): Installed packages to be REMOVED: qt5-network-5.12.0 Number of packages to be removed: 1 The operation will free 2 MiB. [1/1] Deinstalling qt5-network-5.12.0... [1/1] Deleting files for qt5-network-5.12.0: 100% ===> Installing for qt5-network-5.12.0_1 ===> Registering installation for qt5-network-5.12.0_1 pkg-static: Warning: @exec is deprecated, please use @[pre|post][un]exec Installing qt5-network-5.12.0_1...
Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
> On Dec 17, 2018, at 5:15 AM, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > I suppose that's the error message from whatever tool you were using -- > portupgrade? Since subsequent deinstall from the port *did* work, I'd like to > chalk this up to "something was wrong once". More like “every time.” I am noting each failed port and wrapping them in a for loop to fix this. Seems like I shouldn’t have to do that for just one special family of ports but whatever. I have been through several cycles of this now. -- This space intentionally left blank.
Re: devel/qt5-core upgrade failure
On Sunday, 16 December 2018 18:51:36 CET Paul Beard wrote: > ! devel/qt5-core (qt5-core-5.11.2_2)(uninstall error) I suppose that's the error message from whatever tool you were using -- portupgrade? Since subsequent deinstall from the port *did* work, I'd like to chalk this up to "something was wrong once". [ade]
