[Bug 189575] "Reply to All" converts all To: recipients to CC: ones
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189575 David Lee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davidomu...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from David Lee 2010-04-19 08:06:33 --- What would be the correct behavior? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 225602] Kmail is extremely slow and uses CPU without any reason
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225602 --- Comment #18 from Martin L ü c h e m 2010-04-19 00:04:12 --- Hi Thomas, > Hi, > > On Sunday 18 April 2010 14:14:37 you wrote: >> this vid to show you, how KMail uses CPU without any action. > > Yep, the video matches your description. I can of course not tell anything > more from that video. > Are you sure it is not doing a mail check in the background? I thought about that. But therefore I sent you the statistics that shows all "mail processes". Don't you think, that the imap- and pop3-processes should react in this case? Or are there other processes that I can monitor? Regards, Martin Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010, um 23:57:38 schrieb Martin L ü c h e m: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225602 > > > > > > --- Comment #17 from Martin L ü c h e m 2010-04-18 > 23:57:37 --- Hello Thomas, > > Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010, um 23:25:52 schrieb Thomas McGuire: > > > Well, this is exactly the situation that describes the bug: No active > > > processes in KMail but KMail "eats" CPU ressources! > > > > I guess you mean active threads, not processes. KMail can not use CPU > > without having active threads, I guess your timing for the backtraces > > was just unlucky. > > This is all I can do and all I can say. A little bit simpler: KMail heats > my Notebook while I am doing nothing. And the video I sent you describes > what I can see in ksysguard. What else could I do? When I kill KMail, the > usage of CPU decreases. > > > > another question: What can we do to exclude that the reason for the > > > problem is the power managment (ACPI)? > > > > It would surprise me if this bug had anything to do with ACPI, that is > > lower level than all of the KMail code. > > Why do you think it could be related? > > Well sometimes the Notebook seems to be slower when woken up out of > "suspend- to-ram". Who knows if that has anything to do with this > KMail-Problem? > > Tell me what I can do to clarify the situation! > > Thanks for your help! Martin > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 225602] Kmail is extremely slow and uses CPU without any reason
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225602 --- Comment #17 from Martin L ü c h e m 2010-04-18 23:57:37 --- Hello Thomas, Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010, um 23:25:52 schrieb Thomas McGuire: > > Well, this is exactly the situation that describes the bug: No active > > processes in KMail but KMail "eats" CPU ressources! > > I guess you mean active threads, not processes. KMail can not use CPU > without having active threads, I guess your timing for the backtraces was > just unlucky. This is all I can do and all I can say. A little bit simpler: KMail heats my Notebook while I am doing nothing. And the video I sent you describes what I can see in ksysguard. What else could I do? When I kill KMail, the usage of CPU decreases. > > > another question: What can we do to exclude that the reason for the > > problem is the power managment (ACPI)? > > It would surprise me if this bug had anything to do with ACPI, that is > lower level than all of the KMail code. > Why do you think it could be related? > Well sometimes the Notebook seems to be slower when woken up out of "suspend- to-ram". Who knows if that has anything to do with this KMail-Problem? Tell me what I can do to clarify the situation! Thanks for your help! Martin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 119677] kmail line wraps inserted file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119677 Sérgio Durigan Júnior changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergio...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Sérgio Durigan Júnior 2010-04-18 23:56:04 --- Hi, I would like to know what's the current status of this bug. I completely agree with Andrey here, and I think that Kmail should provide an option and let the user decide whether (s)he wants to wrap the inserted file or not. Also, I'm not happy with the solution provided by Mike, although I constantly use it. Is it so hard to include an option which deals with wrapping specifically on inserted files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 225602] Kmail is extremely slow and uses CPU without any reason
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225602 --- Comment #16 from Thomas McGuire 2010-04-18 23:25:46 --- > Well, this is exactly the situation that describes the bug: No active > processes in KMail but KMail "eats" CPU ressources! I guess you mean active threads, not processes. KMail can not use CPU without having active threads, I guess your timing for the backtraces was just unlucky. > another question: What can we do to exclude that the reason for the problem > is the power managment (ACPI)? It would surprise me if this bug had anything to do with ACPI, that is lower level than all of the KMail code. Why do you think it could be related? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 232001] kmail does not honour umask on saving emails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=232001 Thomas McGuire changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #6 from Thomas McGuire 2010-04-18 23:12:11 --- SVN commit 1116206 by tmcguire: Honor umask setting when saving mails. BUG: 232001 Thanks to Jörg Steffens for the patch! I modified the patch slightly, to take into account duplicated code in viewer_p.cpp and Ingo's suggestions. M +3 -1 kmail/filterlog.cpp M +5 -5 kmail/kmcommands.cpp M +12 -0 messageviewer/util.cpp M +7 -0 messageviewer/util.h M +6 -6 messageviewer/viewer_p.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1116206 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 234680] build fails - illegal operation in exportcertificatecommand.cpp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234680 Thomas McGuire changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Thomas McGuire 2010-04-18 23:11:23 --- SVN commit 1116192 by tmcguire: Fix build Sun Studio 12. BUG: 234680 M +1 -1 exportcertificatecommand.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1116192 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 234750] New: Empfange nur noch Mail ohne Betreff und unbekanten Absender und mit datum 01.01.1970
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234750 Summary: Empfange nur noch Mail ohne Betreff und unbekanten Absender und mit datum 01.01.1970 Product: kmail Version: 1.9.9 Platform: unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: gil...@arcor.de Version: 1.9.9 (using 3.5.10, Debian Package 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-0lenny4 (5.0.3)) Compiler: Target: i486-linux-gnu OS:Linux (i686) release 2.6.26-2-486 seit drei Tagen erhalte ich nur noch Mail mit folgenden Format: - kein Betreff - unbekannter Absender - 01.01.1970 00:59 Die Mails haben alle keinen Inhalt, obwohl auf dem abholenden Server sehr wohl konkrete Mails zur Abholung bereit liegen. Bisher habe ich alle *.index Files gelöscht, ja sogar kmail autoremove und wieder via Konsole Installiert, ohne Erfolg. Muss ich mir ein anderes Mail Programm suchen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 233386] Margin missing in folder properties dialog
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233386 Thomas McGuire changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|LO |VLO --- Comment #2 from Thomas McGuire 2010-04-18 16:16:16 --- Much better now, although the View and the templates tabs seem to have slightly different margins (can be seen with the checkbox on the top-left corner) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 234711] New: Kontact crashes while trying to configure Address Book
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234711 Summary: Kontact crashes while trying to configure Address Book Product: kontact Version: 4.4.2 Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: crash Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: ricky88yk...@gmail.com Application: kontact (4.4.2) KDE Platform Version: 4.4.2 (KDE 4.4.2) Qt Version: 4.6.2 Operating System: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic-pae i686 Distribution: Ubuntu lucid (development branch) -- Information about the crash: I use Kubuntu Lucid Beta 2. I removed duplicated address book "Personal Contacts" (I had three of them in list) and then I tried to configure address book (using rigth-click in the first field). Suddenly Kontact crashed and I had to kill it from system monitor. Hope backtrace would be helpful. -- Backtrace: Application: Kontact (kontact), signal: Segmentation fault [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0xb3743990 (LWP 1985))] Thread 2 (Thread 0xaed39b70 (LWP 1997)): #0 0xb4301e16 in clock_gettime () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 #1 0xb6e166fb in qt_gettime () at kernel/qcore_unix.cpp:111 #2 0xb6e1b825 in QTimerInfoList::updateCurrentTime (this=0xa025b1c) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_unix.cpp:340 #3 0xb6e1b86a in QTimerInfoList::timerWait (this=0xa025b1c, tm=...) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_unix.cpp:443 #4 0xb6e19818 in timerSourcePrepareHelper (src=, timeout=0xaed390ac) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:136 #5 0xb6e198a5 in timerSourcePrepare (source=0x0, timeout=0xb4305ff4) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:169 #6 0xb4272aca in g_main_context_prepare () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #7 0xb4272ee9 in ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #8 0xb42734b8 in g_main_context_iteration () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #9 0xb6e1960f in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents (this=0xa025b80, flags=...) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:414 #10 0xb6dec059 in QEventLoop::processEvents (this=0xaed39270, flags=) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:149 #11 0xb6dec4aa in QEventLoop::exec (this=0xaed39270, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:201 #12 0xb6ce85a8 in QThread::exec (this=0xa01fa20) at thread/qthread.cpp:487 #13 0xb6dcbc1b in QInotifyFileSystemWatcherEngine::run (this=0xa01fa20) at io/qfilesystemwatcher_inotify.cpp:248 #14 0xb6ceb32e in QThreadPrivate::start (arg=0xa01fa20) at thread/qthread_unix.cpp:248 #15 0xb456096e in start_thread () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 #16 0xb6075a0e in clone () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 Thread 1 (Thread 0xb3743990 (LWP 1985)): [KCrash Handler] #6 QModelIndex (this=0xa24ab60, _c=QMetaObject::InvokeMetaMethod, _id=7, _a=0xbf8cdc18) at /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qabstractitemmodel.h:65 #7 Akonadi::StandardContactActionManager::Private::configureAddressBookTriggered (this=0xa24ab60, _c=QMetaObject::InvokeMetaMethod, _id=7, _a=0xbf8cdc18) at ../../kaddressbook/standardcontactactionmanager.cpp:225 #8 Akonadi::StandardContactActionManager::qt_metacall (this=0xa24ab60, _c=QMetaObject::InvokeMetaMethod, _id=7, _a=0xbf8cdc18) at ./standardcontactactionmanager.moc:94 #9 0xb6df2c9a in QMetaObject::metacall (object=0xa24ab60, cl=3054498752, idx=11, argv=0xbf8cdc18) at kernel/qmetaobject.cpp:237 #10 0xb6e013d5 in QMetaObject::activate (sender=0xa2549d0, m=0xb6c65d58, local_signal_index=1, argv=0xbf8cdc18) at kernel/qobject.cpp:3293 #11 0xb6336bd9 in QAction::triggered (this=0xa2549d0, _t1=false) at .moc/release-shared/moc_qaction.cpp:263 #12 0xb6338dcc in QAction::activate (this=0xa2549d0, event=QAction::Trigger) at kernel/qaction.cpp:1255 #13 0xb67dc60c in QMenuPrivate::activateCausedStack (this=0x9ef1d28, causedStack=..., action=0xa2549d0, action_e=QAction::Trigger, self=true) at widgets/qmenu.cpp:1011 #14 0xb67e2abb in QMenuPrivate::activateAction (this=0x9ef1d28, action=0xa2549d0, action_e=QAction::Trigger, self=) at widgets/qmenu.cpp:1103 #15 0xb67e3ac7 in QMenu::mouseReleaseEvent (this=0x9f1bee0, e=0xbf8ce4b0) at widgets/qmenu.cpp:2312 #16 0xb7434f65 in KMenu::mouseReleaseEvent (this=0x9f1bee0, e=0xbf8ce4b0) at ../../kdeui/widgets/kmenu.cpp:471 #17 0xb639b7f8 in QWidget::event (this=0x9f1bee0, event=0xbf8ce4b0) at kernel/qwidget.cpp:7998 #18 0xb67e50cc in QMenu::event (this=0x9f1bee0, e=0xbf8ce4b0) at widgets/qmenu.cpp:2414 #19 0xb633d4dc in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper (this=0x98af1a0, receiver=0x9f1bee0, e=0xbf8ce4b0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4300 #20 0xb63449f7 in QApplication::notify (this=0xbf8cfec4, receiver=0x9f1bee0, e=0xbf8ce4b0) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:3865 #21 0xb733ef2a in KApplication::notify (this=0xbf8cfec4, receiver=0x9f1bee0, event=0xbf8ce4b0) at ../../kdeui/kernel/kapplication.cpp:302 #22 0xb6deda3b in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal (this=0xbf8cfec4, receiver=0x9f1bee0, event=0xbf8ce4b0) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:704 #23 0xb6343952 in QCoreApplication::sendEvent (receiver=0x9f1bee0, event=0xbf8ce4b0, al
[Bug 230084] "resp." is not the English translation of "bzw."
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230084 Thomas McGuire changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Thomas McGuire 2010-04-18 15:38:59 --- SVN commit 1116039 by tmcguire: Fix incorrect usage of "resp." in translatable string. BUG: 230084 M +3 -3 kmail_options.h WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1116039 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 230466] Emails being composed are no longer autosaved, and lost on Kmail/Kontact shutdown.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230466 Thomas McGuire changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sibsk...@mail.ru --- Comment #2 from Thomas McGuire 2010-04-18 15:10:50 --- *** Bug 232666 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 232666] [regression] Composing mail(s) are not restored on KMail crash
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=232666 Thomas McGuire changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Thomas McGuire 2010-04-18 15:10:50 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 230466 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 223441] Port, fix and test objecttreeparser
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223441 --- Comment #9 from Thomas McGuire 2010-04-18 15:07:38 --- > 1) Make sure that saving the message as mbox saves the original encrypted >message, not the modified one Fixed, as the OTP doesn't modify the original message anymore. mStoredMessagePayload can also be removed again. > 2) What should happen when deleting/edit an attachment that is part of the >encrypted message? Check what KMail 1 does in this case. This is buggy in KMail 1, attachment deletion and editing inside of decrypted nodes does not work. Easiest way around this is to just disable those actions for those temp nodes. > 3) Be careful when saving back the message (for some other reason than >deleting/editing attachments), it should save back the original message, >not the modified one Fixed as well, same reason as 1). > a) In the viewer, the original encrypted nodes are shown as attachments in >the viewer. Didn't happen in KMail 1. Fixed according to Andras. > b) The signature is marked as invalid, even though it is valid Fixed as well. > storeDisplayedMessagesUnencrypted(). For all of the store unencrypted message stuff, we discussed that it is probably best to rewrite objectTreeToDecryptedMsg() and base it on the temporary nodes createAndParseChildNodes() creates. > 6) Make sure insertAndParseChildNode() works, and check all if all callers >work. One example are old-style mailman messages, but I think there are > more Old style mailman messages are fixed, and crypto stuff probably as well. > 7) trueFromAddress() was incorrectly ported This is fixed now I guess, after processRfc822Subtype was changed. I might need to double-check this though. > Right now, createAndParseTempNode() deletes the node after calling > parseObjectTree() on it. We decided on store the newly created nodes in the NodeHelper so that the nodes can be found again when the OTP is run again on the same tree, in async mode. > The attachment quick list in the fancy header right now does not work Probably the easiest way to fix this it to change the AttachmentUrlHander to take attachments inside of temp nodes into account. This would probably also fix attachments actions such as save as and others. It might be an idea to make the mime tree model aware of temp nodes as well, since we need to be able to see the decrypted nodes in the mime tree viewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 225602] Kmail is extremely slow and uses CPU without any reason
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225602 --- Comment #15 from Martin L ü c h e m 2010-04-18 14:31:15 --- Hi, another question: What can we do to exclude that the reason for the problem is the power managment (ACPI)? Regards, Martin Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010, um 10:45:27 schrieb Martin Lüchem: > Hello Thomas, > > Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010, um 00:29:27 schrieb Thomas McGuire: > > However, you only interrupted KMail when it was > > actually not busy, which is indicated by the the backtrace, where > > __GI___poll is always on top, which means KMail is idle and waiting for > > events. > > Well, this is exactly the situation that describes the bug: No active > processes in KMail but KMail "eats" CPU ressources! > > So, what can we do now? > > Regards, Martin > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 233715] Kontact crashes on launch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233715 --- Comment #3 from2010-04-18 13:21:58 --- Created an attachment (id=42872) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=42872) New crash information added by DrKonqi Don't know why my bug report got merged with another. Kontact crashes on launch. Every single time unless kmail is open separately. Then everythong works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 233715] Kontact crashes on launch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233715 diseb...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||diseb...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 198561] Kmail crashes after getting stuck loading an imap account / on start [null KIO::Slave::slaveProtocol, KIO::Scheduler::*, KMail::SearchJob::searchCompleteFolder]
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198561 --- Comment #12 from2010-04-18 12:15:36 --- Hello everybody Updating to Version KDE 4.4.3 did not fix the issue for me. If you need more data on this please let me know. At the moment this is for me a show stopper. I cannot use email on this client. Does have anybody some directions for me on howto resolve this or any help on howto get my client up an running again without loosing my local stored mails and data, please. Thank you in advanced. Kind regards, Dr.Allcome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 233382] No default calendar and addressbook created
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233382 Volker Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Volker Krause 2010-04-18 11:36:12 --- SVN commit 1115967 by vkrause: Move the firstrun and catalog intialization code from Control to ServerManager so it's still executed with the new auto-starting code. BUG: 233382 M +0 -9 control.cpp M +14 -3 servermanager.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1115967 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 225602] Kmail is extremely slow and uses CPU without any reason
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225602 --- Comment #14 from Martin L ü c h e m 2010-04-18 10:45:30 --- Hello Thomas, Am Sonntag, 18. April 2010, um 00:29:27 schrieb Thomas McGuire: > However, you only interrupted KMail when it was > actually not busy, which is indicated by the the backtrace, where > __GI___poll is always on top, which means KMail is idle and waiting for > events. > Well, this is exactly the situation that describes the bug: No active processes in KMail but KMail "eats" CPU ressources! So, what can we do now? Regards, Martin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 234681] New: hide tray icon if no new mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234681
Summary: hide tray icon if no new mails
Product: kmail
Version: 1.13.2
Platform: unspecified
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
Priority: NOR
Component: general
AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org
ReportedBy: kaini1...@gmx.at
Version: 1.13.2 (using 4.4.2 (KDE 4.4.2), Kubuntu packages)
Compiler: cc
OS:Linux (x86_64) release 2.6.31-20-generic
Hello,
I would love to see a feature to "hide" the KMail tray icon if there are no new
mails.
I know there is a feature to completely remove it when there are no new mails,
but I would much prefer if the icon was hidden like the printer-applet is. (It
is always visible if I click < in the tray icon area but when there are some
printing jobs it will be visible without clicking < too)
Here is an example how it could look like:
("closed" tray icon area /// "opened" tray icon area)
no new mail: <(Other Icons) /// >(Other Icons)(KMail)
new mail:<(Other Icons)(KMail: 1) /// >(Other Icons)(KMail: 1)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 234680] build fails - illegal operation in exportcertificatecommand.cpp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234680 --- Comment #1 from tropikhajma 2010-04-18 10:17:34 --- Created an attachment (id=42869) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=42869) patch not sure if this is the correct approach but at least it compiles with it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 234680] New: build fails - illegal operation in exportcertificatecommand.cpp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234680 Summary: build fails - illegal operation in exportcertificatecommand.cpp Product: kleopatra Version: unspecified Platform: Compiled Sources OS/Version: Solaris Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: tropikha...@gmail.com CC: m...@kde.org Version:(using Devel) Compiler: Sun Studio 12 U1 OS:Solaris Installed from:Compiled sources building kdepim fails with ... [ 21%] Building CXX object kleopatra/CMakeFiles/kleopatra_bin.dir/commands/exportcertificatecommand.o "/.../srcdir/kleopatra/commands/exportcertificatecommand.cpp", line 255: Error: The operation "QMap[const QPointer]" is illegal. (http://my.cdash.org/viewBuildError.php?buildid=60364) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
