[Bug 306965] Various resource config windows have no icon
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306965 --- Comment #12 from Markus S. --- (In reply to comment #11) > I think I got all the ones you mentioned (except bookmarks ) > > please double check what else I may have missed. At least Address book resource is not fixed in 4.9.4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 67516] Support content type message/partial (RFC 2046) reassembling messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67516 --- Comment #11 from Allan Sandfeld --- This is very common in newsgroup readers. Perhaps you can find code to handle it in knode. In email-clients it is mostly common in those that share backend with newsreaders like Outlook express and such. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 67516] Support content type message/partial (RFC 2046) reassembling messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67516 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- (In reply to comment #8) > hm, what would it take to reconsider? Certainly, a rock solid patch. A nicer attitude would help, too. And some testcase would be the minimum. Finally, this is really no must-have feature, which to my knowledge atm is supported only by TheBat. Thunderbird has an open issue that didn't receive any comment in 6 years (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71189). > > Kavol, could you please post an example? > no, because 10 MiB attachments are not allowed here Is the single partial message 10 MiBs? If yes, is there a chance to produce a smaller testcase? Otherwise a file uploading service would be the way to go. > these days, they are *still* produced by multipurpose office machines when > sending large emails (bix scans and faxes converted to emails) > [...] > I still need this when receiving large attachments from our office machine; > meanwhile, the number of people employed in the same office, thus using the > same machine, has grown ... Okay. Now, it would be interesting to know if this is used by just your multipurpose office machines and maybe a few more, or if it is something like an industry-standard. The declining demand for adding this feature suggests that it isn't widely used (anymore). But if you have other evidence, just bring it up! > btw, isn't a reference to a document that is more than ten years old a bit > inappropriate when you are talking about "these days"? Not per se. Clamav seems to be able to scan partial messages, Exchange Server blocks them, other solutions still might let them slip through. We can't take care of everything, but we need to know. > yes, this is the point of this RFE that we, the humble users, are asking > you, the mighty developers, to write it ... Yes, and this will happen, if the maintainers are convinced that this, at least to some extent, is a priority. > btw, I really do not understand what do you mean by demanding a code that > has its own UI? - kmail is *the* UI, what do you need is the backend which > will compose the parts into one message ... Surely the backend is central piece of the solution, something like uudeview or nmh's nhstore would do it. But then: is it worth shipping another library or adding a dependency? Also we need to figure out how to store partial messages, especially in IMAP environments. Do we just reassemble on the client-side? How do we quarantaine message parts until their last piece arrived? And then, how does this integrate with our messagelist model? And: do we cache the reassembled messages in Akonadi? Or do we even sync them up to the server? And if for security reasons we don't want to reassemble automatically, then we even more need a UI for all of that. So please refrain from downplaying this to "just some backend and voilà - there it is". It's not, and I'm still not convinced it's worth the pain, but am of course open for good arguments. To get it started, this might be interesting: - http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/1521/24.htm - http://rand-mh.sourceforge.net/book/mh/cosemime.html#ParMes - http://rand-mh.sourceforge.net/book/mh/remime.html#PartMess - http://securityvulns.com/Ldocument310.html Regards, Pancho -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 187217] Column order is not remembered between sessions when having used drag and drop
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187217 Christoph Feck changed: What|Removed |Added Component|new message list|message list Version|1.11.90 |4.9.4 Assignee|pra...@kvirc.net|kdepim-bugs@kde.org Product|kmail |kmail2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 131710] Kmail does not remember sender identity in folders for IMAP accounts
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131710 Christoph Feck changed: What|Removed |Added Component|IMAP|folders Version|1.9.1 |4.9.3 Product|kmail |kmail2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 233524] cannot add tags to emails through filters
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233524 Laurent Montel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version Fixed In||4.10 Resolution|--- |FIXED Latest Commit||http://commits.kde.org/kdep ||im/690fc0be681e2307b7eb86d7 ||46b0bcc7e3fb1dfd --- Comment #3 from Laurent Montel --- Git commit 690fc0be681e2307b7eb86d746b0bcc7e3fb1dfd by Montel Laurent. Committed on 05/12/2012 at 21:56. Pushed by mlaurent into branch 'master'. Fix Bug 233524 - cannot add tags to emails through filters It was never works. List was always empty Don't call query each time that we apply a filter FIXED-IN: 4.10 M +7-31 mailcommon/filter/filteractionaddtag.cpp M +1-4mailcommon/filter/filteractionaddtag.h M +69 -1mailcommon/filter/filtermanager.cpp M +16 -0mailcommon/filter/filtermanager.h http://commits.kde.org/kdepim/690fc0be681e2307b7eb86d746b0bcc7e3fb1dfd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 67516] Support content type message/partial (RFC 2046) reassembling messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67516 Laurent Montel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mon...@kde.org --- Comment #9 from Laurent Montel --- We can't fix it if we don't have test-case. Sorry but I don't have time to search on google for it. And I don't know which client can generate it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 67516] Support content type message/partial (RFC 2046) reassembling messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67516 --- Comment #8 from kavol --- (In reply to comment #5) > I've never seen such partial messages... great, and I've never had any music in MusePack or WavePack or some other formats that are supported by Qmmp - yet it hadn't prevented me from translating the respective plugins when I was working on Qmmp translation to Czech, and it doesn't prevent me from building these plugins (and resolving any build issues associated with them) when maintaining the Qmmp package in Fedora ... > Kavol, could you please post an example? no, because 10 MiB attachments are not allowed here (In reply to comment #7) > Yes, I remember and found some evidence that they are still produced by > recent Outlook versions. However, these days they seem to be mostly used for > obfuscating malware, because split up attachments can't be checked by > antivirus software. please do more research these days, they are *still* produced by multipurpose office machines when sending large emails (bix scans and faxes converted to emails) > The security problems are so large that even Exchange Server 2007 blocks > them, as well as Qmail and probably more mail servers and antivirus > software. Finally, US-CERT explicitely warns from automatically reassembling > the partial messages (https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836088) and proposes > rejecting partial messages. ahem, isn't this a bit incomplete? - US-CERT mentions blocking this type as one of *four* possible solutions ... btw, isn't a reference to a document that is more than ten years old a bit inappropriate when you are talking about "these days"? > So if some really stable code I'm just sad that kmail team hadn't demanded "really stable code" also when transitioning to Akonadi ... > with secure logics and a foolproof UI existed, > we might want to think about it. > But it doesn't, yes, this is the point of this RFE that we, the humble users, are asking you, the mighty developers, to write it ... btw, I really do not understand what do you mean by demanding a code that has its own UI? - kmail is *the* UI, what do you need is the backend which will compose the parts into one message ... as for the UI, you even have a solid basis in kmail for this - it could be the same like when kmail is asking about displaying html content or reading the external links > and the demand has been ceasing, [Citation needed] I still need this when receiving large attachments from our office machine; meanwhile, the number of people employed in the same office, thus using the same machine, has grown ... > so I think it's really not worth the hassle. > Therefore I'm marking this WONTFIX. hm, what would it take to reconsider? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 105139] kmail systray behaves diferent from others
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105139 Maarten De Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||de.meyer.maar...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #11 from Maarten De Meyer --- (In reply to comment #10) > This bug has been resolved in r1200286, by a patch submitted to resolve Bug > 74938. KMail will now appear at the virtual desktop that the user is in > (when minimised), and not the virtual desktop where it was minimised. Thank you, closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 119790] Consider reintroducing Spam/Ham/Answered markers
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119790 Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC||pancho...@riseup.net Component|general |message list Version|1.9 |4.10 pre Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |--- Product|kmail |kmail2 Summary|Unable to mark messages as |Consider reintroducing |Spam/Ham/Answered |Spam/Ham/Answered markers --- Comment #20 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- Still applies to kmail2, is a valid wishlist item. Might possibly be a WONTFIX, but requires careful consideration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 67516] Support content type message/partial (RFC 2046) reassembling messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67516 Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |WONTFIX Summary|KMail does not seem to |Support content type |suppost the RFC 2046|message/partial (RFC 2046) |standard for content type: |reassembling messages |message/partial. (at least | |partial messages I receive | |are not reassembled)| --- Comment #7 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- Yes, I remember and found some evidence that they are still produced by recent Outlook versions. However, these days they seem to be mostly used for obfuscating malware, because split up attachments can't be checked by antivirus software. The security problems are so large that even Exchange Server 2007 blocks them, as well as Qmail and probably more mail servers and antivirus software. Finally, US-CERT explicitely warns from automatically reassembling the partial messages (https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836088) and proposes rejecting partial messages. So if some really stable code with secure logics and a foolproof UI existed, we might want to think about it. But it doesn't, and the demand has been ceasing, so I think it's really not worth the hassle. Therefore I'm marking this WONTFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 140747] Usability: Distinguish or merge concepts of "mail templates" and "custom templates"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140747 Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pancho...@riseup.net Component|templates |UI Version|unspecified |4.10 pre Product|kmail |kmail2 Summary|Mail templates for new |Usability: Distinguish or |messages not available |merge concepts of "mail ||templates" and "custom ||templates" Severity|normal |wishlist --- Comment #11 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- Still applies to kmail2. This is basically "by design", but the design isn't good usability-wise. We can either distinguish the two concepts more, or try to merge them. Either way, this needs improvement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311191] Inconsistent usage of "Configure" vs. "Modify" vs. "Edit"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311191 Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Inconsistantly "Configure" |Inconsistent usage of |vs. "Modify" vs. "Edit" |"Configure" vs. "Modify" |outgoing accounts |vs. "Edit" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 259439] Kmail2 gets stuck retrieving folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259439 Philippe Paravicini changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #9 from Philippe Paravicini --- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 310736] Offer mailing list specific options only for list mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310736 Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > We can't add it. Otherwise size of menu will too big. That might unfortunately be true. However, the main aspect of this issue (disable mailing-list options, if inapplicable) remains relevant (see description + comment #2). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311191] Inconsistantly "Configure" vs. "Modify" vs. "Edit" outgoing accounts
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311191 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- (In reply to comment #2) > Will change it in 4.11 we are in string freeze now. Sure. This is a continuing effort anyway. Does this mean that you agree with my consideration that the term "Configure" would be the most suitable one to settle for, at least in the cases of identities, outgoing and incoming accounts? If this is agreed upon, this might be a great junior job which I would assign myself for as my first KDE patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 310861] IMAP: Emails with many bcc recipients are saved, but in no folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310861 --- Comment #4 from Martin Tlustos --- I checked the settings in the identities and they point to the right place (the (/sent folder on my imap account). I have four imap accounts set up by the way, and each sent mail is normally saved to the /sent folder on the appropriate account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309312] Syncing kaddresbook with google fails with "Could not create collection My Contacts" error
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309312 Dan Vrátil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Dan Vrátil --- Great, please reopen (or create a new ticket) if this problem should appear again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309315] kaddresbook shows contacts that aren't stored on google
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309315 Dan Vrátil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version Fixed In||0.4.4 Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 307621] akonadi_googlecontacts_resource crashes randomly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307621 --- Comment #5 from Dan Vrátil --- Luis, can you please test current kdepim-runtime master with this fix? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 307621] akonadi_googlecontacts_resource crashes randomly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307621 --- Comment #4 from Dan Vrátil --- Git commit 88f11fff5290c28bc152d21b126794ad6ccd2a3a by Dan Vrátil. Committed on 05/12/2012 at 15:32. Pushed by dvratil into branch 'master'. Don't fetch contacts from server in retrieveItem() Google Contacts resource does not use item parts, thus there no point in fetching contact again in retrieveItem(). Just call itemRetrieved() instead, because the Item already contains full payload. M +3-53 resources/google/contacts/contactsresource.cpp M +0-1resources/google/contacts/contactsresource.h http://commits.kde.org/kdepim-runtime/88f11fff5290c28bc152d21b126794ad6ccd2a3a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309315] kaddresbook shows contacts that aren't stored on google
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309315 --- Comment #4 from karaluh --- (In reply to comment #3) > However I'm still interested in reason why the contact was not uploaded to > Google servers :) If you are able to reproduce with a specific contact, > could you please provide some more information about the contact? It was either XML unsafe characters or custom IM protocol, so both should be resolved now :) Good to see PIM finaly getting mature, it was too buggy to use for too long. Thank you, very much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309315] kaddresbook shows contacts that aren't stored on google
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309315 --- Comment #3 from Dan Vrátil --- (In reply to comment #2) > This bug is about the fact, that despite the contact not being copied, > kaddresbook shows it as if > it was. That is Akonadi/KAddressbook issue, not a specific issue of the akonadi_googlecontacts_resource. I have already reported this issue with KAddressbook some time ago, see bug 309324. However I'm still interested in reason why the contact was not uploaded to Google servers :) If you are able to reproduce with a specific contact, could you please provide some more information about the contact? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309318] Can't save contacts with custom IM protocol
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309318 Dan Vrátil changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|"Bad request" error when|Can't save contacts with |copying contact to google |custom IM protocol |contacts resource | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309318] "Bad request" error when copying contact to google contacts resource
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309318 Dan Vrátil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version Fixed In||0.4.4 Resolution|--- |FIXED Latest Commit||http://commits.kde.org/akon ||adi-google/fc8a7991257a3cac ||091388d9eb4566cadd7b11d4 --- Comment #5 from Dan Vrátil --- Git commit fc8a7991257a3cac091388d9eb4566cadd7b11d4 by Dan Vrátil. Committed on 05/12/2012 at 15:14. Pushed by dvratil into branch 'LibKGAPI/0.4'. Support custom IM protocols For IM protocols that Google does not officially support (i.e. they don't have scheme URL for them), we should not create our own scheme, but just send the name of the protocol in 'protocol' attribute of the gd:im element. FIXED-IN: 0.4.4 M +14 -4libkgapi/objects/contact.cpp M +11 -0libkgapi/services/contacts.cpp http://commits.kde.org/akonadi-google/fc8a7991257a3cac091388d9eb4566cadd7b11d4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311199] New: Mail filters not always applied when messages come in too fast
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311199 Bug ID: 311199 Severity: normal Version: 4.9 Priority: NOR Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Summary: Mail filters not always applied when messages come in too fast Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: r...@fietze-home.de Hardware: Other Status: UNCONFIRMED Component: Mail Filter Agent Product: Akonadi Test scenario: - KMail 4.9.4 - IMAP account setup and working properly, here Cyrus IMAP server on the same machine as KMail for testing - Filter defined, so all messages for the IMAP account (advanced tab) will be moved to local inbox, matching all messages (empty match text fields) Earlier versions of KMail/akonadi ignored the filter if not applied manually, but this is kind of working now. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Send a single message to the host and the IMAP server. 2. The message appears for a very short moment in IMAP/Inbox and is moved to local/inbox right away, reappearing there. So good so far, that's fine. 3. Now set up a loop like this: for i in 01 02 03 04 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 do echo$i; date | mail -s Test$i localusername; sleep 0.1 done When the sleep goes below a certain limit some of the messages remain in the IMAP/Inbox, on my host about 1 out of 5. On my host, which is an openSUSE 12.1 inside a VirtualBox on a fast host this limit is about 0.1s. Manually applying all filters on all messages in IMAP/Inbox after something went wrong finally moves them where they should have been gone the first time. Actual Results: Messages remaining in IMAP/Inbox. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309315] kaddresbook shows contacts that aren't stored on google
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309315 --- Comment #2 from karaluh --- (In reply to comment #1) > Could this issue be caused by bug 309314? It depends on what issue you are talking about. It doesn't matter what bug caused the contact to not copy to google resource. This bug is about the fact, that despite the contact not being copied, kaddresbook shows it as if it was. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309312] Syncing kaddresbook with google fails with "Could not create collection My Contacts" error
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309312 --- Comment #2 from karaluh --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is this issue still valid? I wasn't experiencing it lately, so either it's fixed, or additional steps are needed to reproduce this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 233524] cannot add tags to emails through filters
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233524 Laurent Montel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mon...@kde.org --- Comment #2 from Laurent Montel --- yes it's right in 4.9.4 too... will fix soon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 310736] Offer mailing list specific options only for list mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310736 Jonathan Marten changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@keelhaul.me.uk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309315] kaddresbook shows contacts that aren't stored on google
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309315 --- Comment #1 from Dan Vrátil --- Could this issue be caused by bug 309314? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309312] Syncing kaddresbook with google fails with "Could not create collection My Contacts" error
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309312
--- Comment #1 from Dan Vrátil ---
Is this issue still valid?
If it is, can you please open Akonadi Console, go to "DB Browser" tab, select
"collectiontable" and verify, that there is no "My Contacts" collection with
resourceId 25?
In "resourcetable", can you verify, that resource with id 25 is the resource in
question here ("akonadi_googlecontact_resource0") ? If there is, please try
removing and adding the Contacts resource again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 310741] Akonadi-google contacts stays in "syncing folder 'Other Contacts'(0%)"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310741 --- Comment #4 from Dan Vrátil --- (In reply to comment #3) > > on a related note, I still have the old akonadi_googledata_resource0 in the > list of resources I can browse through in akonadiconsole - I don't know how > to get rid of this as it is not available as in the agents tab anymore (I > guess I should have deleted it before upgrading to the new google resources) > -> may this be the cause?! Hard to say, but let's try to get rid of it first. If you are 100% you don't have the old googledata binary available anymore, use the steps I described here [0]. After that go to ~/.kde/share/config and delete any akonadi_googledata_*rc files (forgot to mention that in the forum post). Also please remove all the new Google resources (both Calendar and Contacts), open KWallet manager and delete the "Akonadi Google" folder (this deletes the auth tokens). Restart Akonadi (akonadictl restart) and add and configure the Google resources again. Let me know if it still misbehaves. [0] http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=215&t=106850#p247707 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 233524] cannot add tags to emails through filters
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233524 Yann Neveu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yne...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Yann Neveu --- Same problem here (kde 4.10 beta2 on archlinux). It seems that in ~/.kde4/share/config/akonadi_mailfilter_agentrc , action-args-0 attribute is empty: [Filter #1] Applicability=0 AutomaticName=true ConfigureShortcut=false ConfigureToolbar=false Enabled=true Icon=system-run StopProcessingHere=true ToolbarName=: bureautique.boulo...@ccmbenchmark.com action-args-0= action-name-0=add tag actions=1 apply-on=check-mail,manual-filtering contentsA=x...@example.com contentsB=y...@example.com fieldA=To fieldB=CC funcA=contains funcB=contains identifier=TORHjDEwPZ1kF21S name=: z...@example.com operator=or rules=2 Filter was created using kmail filter edition. But it seems that there is a problem in filter creation. When you chosse the tat you want to be applied to filtered mail. Click on apply, the dropbox will be resetted to first choice in the list... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 309891] Filter buttons and context menu option are not shown
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309891 Dennis Schridde changed: What|Removed |Added CC||devuran...@gmx.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 310861] IMAP: Emails with many bcc recipients are saved, but in no folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310861 --- Comment #3 from Laurent Montel --- could you look at in identity config if sent folder is ok ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311191] Inconsistantly "Configure" vs. "Modify" vs. "Edit" outgoing accounts
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311191 Laurent Montel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mon...@kde.org --- Comment #2 from Laurent Montel --- Will change it in 4.11 we are in string freeze now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311191] Inconsistantly "Configure" vs. "Modify" vs. "Edit" outgoing accounts
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311191 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- Same holds for incoming accounts, where it is clearly a matter of configuration, rather than editing, also making it consistent with Akonadi Console. So for all rather complex tasks handled by a dialog box, I'd propose using "Configure", while for simple editing of a field (subject prefixes, charsets, attachment keywords...) "Edit" is fine. "Modify" should IMHO rather be avoided in the UI because it is quite uncommon in UIs and therefore sounds a bit awkward. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311191] New: Inconsistantly "Configure" vs. "Modify" vs. "Edit" outgoing accounts
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311191 Bug ID: 311191 Severity: wishlist Version: 4.10 pre Priority: NOR Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Summary: Inconsistantly "Configure" vs. "Modify" vs. "Edit" outgoing accounts Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: pancho...@riseup.net Hardware: Ubuntu Packages Status: NEW Component: config dialog Product: kmail2 In 4.10, the list of outgoing accounts is equipped with both buttons and a context menu. However, while the button says "Modify", the context menu says "Edit" and the dialog is called "Configure". Also the shortcuts are widely differing. I'm not completely sure what is the best terminology. While "modify" is pretty uncommon, "edit" largely refers to manual editing, both reflect that accounts can be completely changed, not just configured. On the other side, from a UI perspective, "configure" seems to be better than the others. And finally, while editing an account beyond modification, is indeed possible, but a rather advanced (or erroneous) usage, which might affect identities as well. So I'd propose consistantly using "configure". Same might hold for Identities, but this should be subject of both a separate consideration and ticket. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311185] New: Akonadi/postgresql fail to start due to isVirtual column type
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311185 Bug ID: 311185 Severity: normal Version: 4.10 Priority: NOR Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Summary: Akonadi/postgresql fail to start due to isVirtual column type Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: yne...@gmail.com Hardware: Archlinux Packages Status: UNCONFIRMED Component: general Product: Akonadi Hi, I've tried to use postgresql as database for akonadi. I've created user, base an started akonadi. Table was created but i think column 'isvirtual' in table 'collectiontable' has wrong type, when akonadi start: Sql error: ERROR: column "isvirtual" is of type boolean but expression is of type integer LIGNE 1 : ...sourceId,name,parentId,isVirtual) VALUES (1,'Search',NULL,1) ^ ASTUCE : You will need to rewrite or cast the expression. QPSQL: Unable to create query Query: INSERT INTO CollectionTable (resourceId,name,parentId,isVirtual) VALUES (1,'Search',NULL,1)" Unable to initialize database. "[ 0: akonadiserver(_Z11akBacktracev+0x34) [0x454584] 1: akonadiserver() [0x4548c1] 2: /usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x35050) [0x7f852cfb9050] 3: /usr/lib/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35) [0x7f852cfb8fd5] 4: /usr/lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x148) [0x7f852cfba458] 5: /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4(_Z17qt_message_output9QtMsgTypePKc+0x74) [0x7f852ea70414] 6: akonadiserver(_ZN15FileDebugStream9writeDataEPKcx+0x9b) [0x45663b] 7: /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4(_ZN9QIODevice5writeEPKcx+0xb4) [0x7f852eb0ab54] 8: /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4(+0x1167ff) [0x7f852eb157ff] 9: /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4(_ZN11QTextStreamD1Ev+0x3b) [0x7f852eb1ddfb] 10: akonadiserver(_ZN7Akonadi13AkonadiServerC1EP7QObject+0x5e5) [0x4586e5] 11: akonadiserver(_ZN7Akonadi13AkonadiServer8instanceEv+0x47) [0x459897] 12: akonadiserver(main+0x1a0) [0x44d170] 13: /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f852cfa5725] 14: akonadiserver() [0x44d971] ] I've tried to manually change type with psql but then: Error during executing query "INSERT INTO CollectionTable (remoteId, remoteRevision, name, resourceId, cachePolicyInherit, cachePolicyCheckInterval, cachePolicyCacheTimeout, cachePolicySyncOnDemand, cachePolicyLocalParts, isVirtual) VALUES (:0, :1, :2, :3, :4, :5, :6, :7, :8, :9) RETURNING id" : "ERROR: parameter $10 of type boolean cannot be coerced to the expected type smallint Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. create pgql base with user. Configure akonadi to use it 2. start akonadi 3. Actual Results: in akonadi logs: Sql error: ERROR: column "isvirtual" is of type boolean but expression is of type integer LIGNE 1 : ...sourceId,name,parentId,isVirtual) VALUES (1,'Search',NULL,1) ^ ASTUCE : You will need to rewrite or cast the expression. QPSQL: Unable to create query Query: INSERT INTO CollectionTable (resourceId,name,parentId,isVirtual) VALUES (1,'Search',NULL,1)" Unable to initialize database. "[ 0: akonadiserver(_Z11akBacktracev+0x34) [0x454584] 1: akonadiserver() [0x4548c1] 2: /usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x35050) [0x7f852cfb9050] 3: /usr/lib/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35) [0x7f852cfb8fd5] 4: /usr/lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x148) [0x7f852cfba458] 5: /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4(_Z17qt_message_output9QtMsgTypePKc+0x74) [0x7f852ea70414] 6: akonadiserver(_ZN15FileDebugStream9writeDataEPKcx+0x9b) [0x45663b] 7: /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4(_ZN9QIODevice5writeEPKcx+0xb4) [0x7f852eb0ab54] 8: /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4(+0x1167ff) [0x7f852eb157ff] 9: /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4(_ZN11QTextStreamD1Ev+0x3b) [0x7f852eb1ddfb] 10: akonadiserver(_ZN7Akonadi13AkonadiServerC1EP7QObject+0x5e5) [0x4586e5] 11: akonadiserver(_ZN7Akonadi13AkonadiServer8instanceEv+0x47) [0x459897] 12: akonadiserver(main+0x1a0) [0x44d170] 13: /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f852cfa5725] 14: akonadiserver() [0x44d971] ] Expected Results: akonadi should start -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311158] Make "filename" attribute take precedence to "name" attribute
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311158 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- "filename" is the RFC-standard attribute, according to the IETF (see http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/msg05023.html). The "name" attribute isn't RFC-standard (and has been only erroneously for some limited time). Mostly it is only result of a wrong but widespread implementation, so for compatibility it is still recommended to be sent as a redundancy, but shouldn't take precedence when receiving a message. (This is potentially security-relevant. Still I'm aware and sorry that these are nit-picking details compared to the "real", the major bugs that are still waiting to be fixed... :) But in the end, I can (and will) just report whatever I come across. Thanks for being so responsive!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311184] New: Everlasting "Please wait while the message is transferred"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311184 Bug ID: 311184 Severity: major Version: 4.9.3 Priority: NOR Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Summary: Everlasting "Please wait while the message is transferred" Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: pancho...@riseup.net Hardware: Chakra Status: NEW Component: general Product: kmail2 For some reasons, my preview pane now always keeps showing "Retrieving Folder Contents" even though Akonadi has finished syncing. Doubleclicking a mail, the message viewer doesn't open, and editing a message leads to a dialog "Please wait while the message is transferred". A restart of kmail doesn't help. Don't know exactly how I borked this, but did probably a bit too much testing. Last thing I can remember is that saving a message as draft failed, because the draft folder wasn't set up for the identity. After setting it up, saving the message as draft still failed with the message window being greyed out. So I closed the individual windows. Also, the sent-mail and drafts folders I set up for my identity don't get stored always disappearing. ATM, my kmail isn't usable anymore, so I should probably configure my kmail from the scratch on this machine. However, in order to get the bug fixed, I will refrain from it for now... :) Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311179] Rename "name" field to "filename"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311179 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- IMHO, of course. Usability arguments might be opposing, but I think that this is just as intuitive and - regarding the properties dialog - is rather advanced usage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311158] Make "filename" attribute take precedence to "name" attribute
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311158 --- Comment #6 from Laurent Montel --- So what we must to show ?: name or filename ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 267884] akonadi imap doesn't work with gssapi authentication
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267884 --- Comment #18 from eifert+...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 75634 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=75634&action=edit Cleaned up patch file (now against KDE 4.9.4) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311158] Make "filename" attribute take precedence to "name" attribute
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311158 Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Attachment properties |Make "filename" attribute |dialog doesn't understand |take precedence to "name" |"filename" attribute|attribute -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311158] Attachment properties dialog doesn't understand "filename" attribute
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311158 Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- Severity|minor |normal --- Comment #5 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- Aspect #4 is now split off to the new Bug #311179. Reopening as a normal bug because of security implications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311179] New: Rename "name" field to "filename"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311179 Bug ID: 311179 Severity: wishlist Version: 4.10 pre Priority: NOR Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Summary: Rename "name" field to "filename" Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: pancho...@riseup.net Hardware: Other Status: NEW Component: general Product: kmail2 In order to proliferate a standards-conform use of headers the corresponding fields should be renamed to "filename": - in the attachment's properties dialog - in composer's attachments listing Reproducible: Always For named MIME-parts, the use of the "filename" parameter within the Content-Disposition header is strongly preferred to a non-standard "name" parameter within the Content-Type header. The latter is only an optional redundancy in order to be compatible with older systems that don't adhere to the RFCs. (See: http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/msg05023.html) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 311158] Attachment properties dialog doesn't understand "filename" attribute
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311158 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Oliver Sünderhauf --- Created attachment 75633 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=75633&action=edit another test case regarding aspect #3 Regarding aspect #3, the case of contradicting filename and name properties, here's a second test case: filename says "dangerouscode.doc", while name says "justsome.txt". Now, - Enterprise or fancy headers pretends "justsome.txt" and shouldn't - Editing the message pretends "justsome.txt" and shouldn't This is security-relevant just because the file is correctly saved to "dangerouscode.doc" Other places seem to be fine. The case of contradicting MIME headers and filename extensions might also be security relevant, but is not subject of this bug ticket. Finally, aspect #4 should be split off to a separate ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 310781] Kontact crashes when the Kalendar application is accessed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310781 David Montero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Montero --- It doesn't crash in version 4.9.4 anymore -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 297723] KMail crashed after killing virtuoso-t and nepomukindexer
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297723 Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Martin --- I did not run into this bug since then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
