[akregator] [Bug 336417] Akregator crashes when being closed

2015-01-23 Thread diego.pignedoli
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336417

--- Comment #28 from diego.pigned...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 90614
  -- https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=90614action=edit
New crash information added by DrKonqi

akregator (4.14.2) on KDE Platform 4.14.2 using Qt 4.8.6

- What I was doing when the application crashed:
closin' it.
nothing more else than closing it.
Really, just closing it! (asks for more words, or I can't send the bug report
:-))

-- Backtrace (Reduced):
#6  0x7f139be89782 in Akregator::Frame::signalCompleted(Akregator::Frame*)
() from /usr/lib/libakregatorprivate.so.4
#7  0x7f139be805b8 in
Akregator::Frame::slotSetState(Akregator::Frame::State) () from
/usr/lib/libakregatorprivate.so.4
#8  0x7f138133d1f7 in Akregator::MainWidget::slotFetchingStopped() () from
/usr/lib/kde4/akregatorpart.so
[...]
#10 0x7f139be80039 in Akregator::FetchQueue::slotAbort() () from
/usr/lib/libakregatorprivate.so.4
#11 0x7f139be800aa in Akregator::FetchQueue::~FetchQueue() () from
/usr/lib/libakregatorprivate.so.4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[akregator] [Bug 336417] Akregator crashes when being closed

2015-01-23 Thread diego.pignedoli
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336417

diego.pigned...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||diego.pigned...@gmail.com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[akregator] [Bug 343086] Akregator annoying behaviour

2015-01-23 Thread Christoph Feck
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343086

Christoph Feck cf...@kde.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |BACKTRACE
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
   Severity|wishlist|crash
 CC||cf...@kde.org

--- Comment #2 from Christoph Feck cf...@kde.org ---
I guess it is bug 336417, which is fixed in version 4.14.3.

If you are using that version, or a newer version, we need the backtrace to
investigate the bug. For more information, please see
https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/How_to_create_useful_crash_reports

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[kmail2] [Bug 311990] Problem connetcing to dovecot-managesieve with STARTTLS and auth=CRAM-MD5 /LOGIN

2015-01-23 Thread alex
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311990

alex jus...@gmx.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jus...@gmx.de

--- Comment #11 from alex jus...@gmx.de ---
Confirmed the bug still exists:
Qt: 4.8.6
KDE: 4.14.3
KMail: 4.14.3
So switching from LOGIN to PLAIN worked for me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[kmail2] [Bug 342668] Kmail Crash on Close

2015-01-23 Thread Laurent Montel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342668

Laurent Montel mon...@kde.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
  Latest Commit||http://commits.kde.org/kdep
   ||im/cb586e14cc6e2cbe695ccc6a
   ||f4acfb75b155d9b2

--- Comment #2 from Laurent Montel mon...@kde.org ---
Git commit cb586e14cc6e2cbe695ccc6af4acfb75b155d9b2 by Montel Laurent.
Committed on 23/01/2015 at 22:04.
Pushed by mlaurent into branch 'master'.

Fix Bug 342668 - Kmail Crash on Close

M  +1-0messageviewer/viewer/mimeparttreeview.cpp

http://commits.kde.org/kdepim/cb586e14cc6e2cbe695ccc6af4acfb75b155d9b2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[kleopatra] [Bug 343075] cannot start kleopatra because of an user rights error

2015-01-23 Thread Christoph Feck
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343075

Christoph Feck cf...@kde.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |grave

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[kmail2] [Bug 343186] New: Timeout trying to get lock on each start of kmail

2015-01-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343186

Bug ID: 343186
   Summary: Timeout trying to get lock on each start of kmail
   Product: kmail2
   Version: 4.14.2
  Platform: Debian unstable
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: grave
  Priority: NOR
 Component: general
  Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org
  Reporter: mar...@lichtvoll.de

Before I only had it something on high load, but now after redoing Akonadi from
scratch due to what seems to me a loss of the MySQL database, I get it
everytime I start KMail. Even after Akonadi indexed the local maildir.


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
I have no idea.

Maybe have a large one million mail local maildir, wipe all of Akonadi and let
it reindex it and then try?

Actual Results:  
After only a few seconds, after starting KMail, and while I am able to see the
folder list and mail lists just fine, I get the following dialog from KMail:



The Email program encountered a fatal error and will terminate now.
The error was:
Timeout trying to get lock.


I can only press Ok and then kmail finished.




martin@merkaba:~ LANG=C kmail
QDBusConnection: session D-Bus connection created before QCoreApplication.
Application may misbehave.
QDBusConnection: session D-Bus connection created before QCoreApplication.
Application may misbehave.
Hspell: can't open /usr/share/hspell/hebrew.wgz.sizes.
kmail2(3146) KDirWatch::removeDir: doesn't know
/home/martin/.kde/share/apps/messageviewer/themes/ 
kmail2(3146) KDirWatch::removeDir: doesn't know
/usr/share/kde4/apps/messageviewer/themes/ 
martin@merkaba:~ kmail2(3146)/libakonadi
Akonadi::GetLockJob::Private::timeout: Timeout trying to get lock. Check who
has acquired the name org.kde.pim.SpecialCollections on DBus, using qdbus or
qdbusviewer. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi
Akonadi::SpecialCollectionsRequestJobPrivate::lockResult: Failed to get lock:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146) MailCommon::Kernel::emergencyExit: The Email program encountered
a fatal error and will terminate now.
The error was:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi Akonadi::GetLockJob::Private::timeout: Timeout trying
to get lock. Check who has acquired the name org.kde.pim.SpecialCollections
on DBus, using qdbus or qdbusviewer. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi
Akonadi::SpecialCollectionsRequestJobPrivate::lockResult: Failed to get lock:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146) MailCommon::Kernel::emergencyExit: The Email program encountered
a fatal error and will terminate now.
The error was:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi Akonadi::GetLockJob::Private::timeout: Timeout trying
to get lock. Check who has acquired the name org.kde.pim.SpecialCollections
on DBus, using qdbus or qdbusviewer. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi
Akonadi::SpecialCollectionsRequestJobPrivate::lockResult: Failed to get lock:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146) MailCommon::Kernel::emergencyExit: The Email program encountered
a fatal error and will terminate now.
The error was:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi Akonadi::GetLockJob::Private::timeout: Timeout trying
to get lock. Check who has acquired the name org.kde.pim.SpecialCollections
on DBus, using qdbus or qdbusviewer. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi
Akonadi::SpecialCollectionsRequestJobPrivate::lockResult: Failed to get lock:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146) MailCommon::Kernel::emergencyExit: The Email program encountered
a fatal error and will terminate now.
The error was:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi Akonadi::GetLockJob::Private::timeout: Timeout trying
to get lock. Check who has acquired the name org.kde.pim.SpecialCollections
on DBus, using qdbus or qdbusviewer. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi
Akonadi::SpecialCollectionsRequestJobPrivate::lockResult: Failed to get lock:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146) MailCommon::Kernel::emergencyExit: The Email program encountered
a fatal error and will terminate now.
The error was:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi Akonadi::GetLockJob::Private::timeout: Timeout trying
to get lock. Check who has acquired the name org.kde.pim.SpecialCollections
on DBus, using qdbus or qdbusviewer. 
kmail2(3146)/libakonadi
Akonadi::SpecialCollectionsRequestJobPrivate::lockResult: Failed to get lock:
Timeout trying to get lock. 
kmail2(3146) MailCommon::Kernel::emergencyExit: The Email program encountered
a fatal error and will terminate now.
The error was:
Timeout trying to get lock. 

Expected Results:  
KMail just works.

I think I will try these steps next:

1) Log out, make sure no user processes anymore, wipe out /tmp and /var/tmp KDE
stuff, login, retry

2) Wipe KMail 2 configuration as well after I have wiped out and redone all of
Akonadi due to the major breakage yesterday I reported in kde-pim-ml just a
moment ago.

I am using database optimized Akonagi 1.13 git master branch. This has not

[kmail2] [Bug 343186] Timeout trying to get lock on start of kmail

2015-01-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343186

Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|grave   |major
Summary|Timeout trying to get lock  |Timeout trying to get lock
   |on each start of kmail  |on start of kmail

--- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
Okay

1) Log out, make sure no user processes anymore, wipe out /tmp and /var/tmp KDE
stuff, login, retry

has helped.

Now I recreate the filter rules from export of them and I configure POP3
account again. Reducing severity as it doesn't happen on each start anymore.
KMail is now working again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[kmail2] [Bug 341909] Reply and Print time is in UTC, not in locale

2015-01-23 Thread Laurent Montel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341909

--- Comment #7 from Laurent Montel mon...@kde.org ---
(In reply to rawi from comment #3)
 Created attachment 90580 [details]
 attempt to print the email in the first attachment
 
 Oh, and I forgot to say: If I need a hard copy of an email for archiving I
 get a print also with the time delay mentioned, which could become
 problematic until dangerous.
 See please this second attachment.


What do you mean by  I need a hard copy of an email for archiving ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[Akonadi] [Bug 338402] File system cache is inneficient : too many file per directory

2015-01-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338402

--- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de ---
With the SizeTreshold=32768 change I get a nice improvement for my work IMAP
account on the laptop (the one I set to download all mails offline).ยน

Before:

ms@merkaba:~/.local/share/akonadi du -sch db_data/akonadi/* | sort -rh | head
-10
2,8Ginsgesamt
2,6Gdb_data/akonadi/parttable.ibd
245Mdb_data/akonadi/pimitemtable.ibd
13M db_data/akonadi/pimitemflagrelation.ibd
248Kdb_data/akonadi/collectionattributetable.ibd
200Kdb_data/akonadi/collectiontable.ibd
136Kdb_data/akonadi/tagtable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagtypetable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagremoteidresourcerelationtable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagattributetable.ibd

ms@merkaba:~/.local/share/akonadi find file_db_data | wc -l
524917


ms@merkaba:~/.local/share/akonadi#130 /usr/bin/time -v du -sch file_db_data
7,0Gfile_db_data
7,0Ginsgesamt
Command being timed: du -sch file_db_data
User time (seconds): 2.14
System time (seconds): 95.93
Percent of CPU this job got: 29%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 5:35.47
Average shared text size (kbytes): 0
Average unshared data size (kbytes): 0
Average stack size (kbytes): 0
Average total size (kbytes): 0
Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 33444
Average resident set size (kbytes): 0
Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 1
Minor (reclaiming a frame) page faults: 8079
Voluntary context switches: 667562
Involuntary context switches: 60715
Swaps: 0
File system inputs: 31509216
File system outputs: 0
Socket messages sent: 0
Socket messages received: 0
Signals delivered: 0
Page size (bytes): 4096
Exit status: 0

After the change and akonadictl fsck:

ms@merkaba:~/.local/share/akonadi find file_db_data | wc -l ;  du -sch
db_data/akonadi/* | sort -rh | head -10
27
7,5Ginsgesamt
7,3Gdb_data/akonadi/parttable.ibd
245Mdb_data/akonadi/pimitemtable.ibd
13M db_data/akonadi/pimitemflagrelation.ibd
248Kdb_data/akonadi/collectionattributetable.ibd
200Kdb_data/akonadi/collectiontable.ibd
136Kdb_data/akonadi/tagtable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagtypetable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagremoteidresourcerelationtable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagattributetable.ibd

Yep, thats 27 files, instead of 50 (after just a week of the last fsck,
which reduced to about 50 files, from 65+).

After a nice vacuuming I even get:

ms@merkaba:~/.local/share/akonadi find file_db_data | wc -l ;  du -sch
db_data/akonadi/* | sort -rh | head -10
27
6,5Ginsgesamt
6,2Gdb_data/akonadi/parttable.ibd
245Mdb_data/akonadi/pimitemtable.ibd
13M db_data/akonadi/pimitemflagrelation.ibd
248Kdb_data/akonadi/collectionattributetable.ibd
200Kdb_data/akonadi/collectiontable.ibd
136Kdb_data/akonadi/tagtable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagtypetable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagremoteidresourcerelationtable.ibd
120Kdb_data/akonadi/tagattributetable.ibd

merkaba:/home/ms/.local/share/akonadi du -sh file_db_data 
6,5Mfile_db_data


I definitely prefer this over the original situation.

Original was 2,8 GiB DB + 7 GiB file_db_local.

Now is 6,5 GiB DB + 6,5 file_db_local and more than 524000 files less to
consider for rsync and our enterprise backup software.

Let's see whether it brings an performance enhancement, but for now I like
this.


[1] Re: Possible akonadi problem?
From: Dmitry Smirnov
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:17:13 +1100
Message-id: 10777191.dsSRuLrDof@debstor

https://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2015/01/msg00055.html

Thanks,
Martin

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[kmail2] [Bug 341909] Reply and Print time is in UTC, not in locale

2015-01-23 Thread rawi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341909

--- Comment #8 from rawi only4...@web.de ---
Sometimes one must keep an important Email also as printed on paper (in
business to archive it, private a bill for taxes etc., to show to which moment
he got an information)

(I hope you could open that one mess of a PDF...)

I printed your first message (comment 1) to PDF, as it reached my
Kontact/Kmail, with the time 21:18:04.
As you could see in the snapshot (1st. attachment) I got one hour earlier in
the reference line of a replay (not sent).

In the second attachment (PDF) I wanted to show, that I get the same time
difference also in a print; that's more troublesome, if I intent to provide
evidence of what time I got a certain information.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs


[nepomuk] [Bug 294320] kmail complains about the semantic destkop not running, when it is

2015-01-23 Thread Vishesh Handa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294320

Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #23 from Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in ---
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report.

The Nepomuk project is no longer included in the KDE Software Compilation. With
Plasma 5, we have replaced most of the underlying technology with Baloo and
other components. Hopefully this will have addressed your concern.

We encourage you to try out Plasma 5 (+Baloo) and let us know if your problem
persists.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs