[kmail2] [Bug 350219] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350219 --- Comment #5 from Timothy Murphy --- I don't understand why the same bug was marked as FIXED, and now a new bug report has been opened concerning exactly the same problem. The statement that the bug was FIXED is manifestly false, since there are reports virtually every month since January 2012 confirming the problem. Also if the problem cannot be solved, the akonadi console workaround should be made available to KMail users, eg by adding it to the KMail Handbook. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 350219] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350219 --- Comment #4 from Nick --- That one is closed as fixed and it doesn't look like anyone is going to reopen it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kontact] [Bug 289140] Crash when opening an appointment email in the Outbox folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289140 Allen Winter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||win...@kde.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #15 from Allen Winter --- 3 years old. Sergio didn't get the info he wanted. probably fixed in the meantime. resolving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 301470] Threading very slow
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301470 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Paysan --- Am Freitag, 11. September 2015, 21:36:26 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301470 > > --- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald --- > Note that it will take till December for 15.12 to be released. Current git > master, buildable with kdesrc-build has quite some improvements already. But > of course you can also wait for 15.12 to appear in your distro. Due to the slow speed, I've split up my folders; the largest one has 3500 deeply threaded messages in it; at the moment (with a 3GHz Core i7, Kmail 4.14.9), it takes 6 seconds to completely thread in interactive mode, and 4.something in batch mode - you can expect that a slow machine with an Atom or so will take a minute or more for that task, which is certainly not tolerable. That's the only folder I've left which is somewhat slow; it used to be worse than that. If you want to get some better feedback, I suggest you add a stop timer while threading and display the final timing after "Ready", bottom left. I've some mailing lists which accumulate deeply threaded messages relatively quickly and will let them grow until I get 15.12. If you want to get a folder full with lots of deeply threaded messages, just subscribe to the Linux kernel mailing list ;-). I suspect the current threading code in 4.14.9 is at least O(n²) or worse, because all folders somewhat below 2000 messages are threaded fast enough. If you need help with an O(n) algorithm for threading messages, I propose the following - requires only two linear walk through the list of messages: First walk: Build a hash message id->message, so you can access each message by its id. That walk you need to do only once when loading the messages from the backend. Second walk: Go through the list of referenced message ids, and if you find a message, append it in the "nested messages" array/vector of that message object. If there's no reference found, append it to the top-level array/vector. Choose a data structure where append is an O(1) function. Next: Sort the arrays from bottom (1st level messages) with the selected sort order, and walk the threading tree downwards to sort the sub-lists. This is O(n log(n)). To make it easier for displaying, in the return path of the tree walk, calculate the number of messages in each sub-thread, and annotate them with their absolute position in in the message list and their nesting depth (that information is easily available in a tree walk). The last walk is then ready to display. IMHO it should at most take some hundred microseconds to thread a few thousand messages that way, where the headers are all in memory, and selection of the right data structures. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 301470] Threading very slow
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301470 --- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald --- Note that it will take till December for 15.12 to be released. Current git master, buildable with kdesrc-build has quite some improvements already. But of course you can also wait for 15.12 to appear in your distro. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 301470] Threading very slow
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301470 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Paysan --- Am Freitag, 11. September 2015, 19:32:01 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they > become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance > improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized > queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, > so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. > I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail > (displaying message list > of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to > improve > message list display speed as well. I will retest with 15.12 when I find time to do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 349637] KMail crashes when filtering a large bunch of messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349637 Andre Heinecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC||aheine...@intevation.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|kdepim-bugs@kde.org |aheine...@intevation.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 350219] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350219 Bruno Friedmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||br...@ioda-net.ch --- Comment #3 from Bruno Friedmann --- This one is a duplicate of https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=292418 Let redo the work here if it's what devs want. The status is over over over confirmed, and has nothing to do with kubuntu package, this bug is availiable in almost all flavor of linux distribution. openSUSE, fedora, debian, kubuntu, arch linux etc ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 352401] Regression kMail 5.0.0: "Add/remove Quote Characters" feature in composer always disabled
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352401 --- Comment #5 from Gunter Ohrner --- Created attachment 94511 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=94511&action=edit The same editor window after invoking "Add Quote Characters". The last line has been joined to the previous one, which is not what I expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 352401] Regression kMail 5.0.0: "Add/remove Quote Characters" feature in composer always disabled
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352401 --- Comment #4 from Gunter Ohrner --- Created attachment 94510 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=94510&action=edit First screenshot showing selected text in plaintext editor, the cursor is in the last line in front of the dash character. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 352401] Regression kMail 5.0.0: "Add/remove Quote Characters" feature in composer always disabled
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352401 Gunter Ohrner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED --- Comment #3 from Gunter Ohrner --- (I'm talking about the plain text composer here, I did not test the rich text composer.) I just tested the fixed feature and it behaves strangely if you select multiple rows and the cursor is at the start of the row just below the selected block. This is always the case eg. if you select multiple rows using the keyboard by pressing "Shift+Downarrow". If you then chose "Add Quote Characters", the unselected row which contains the cursor will be joined to the previous row. I'll attach some screenshots to illustrate this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 333528] Sending multiple emails at once causes some sent mail not to be save in Sent folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333528 --- Comment #3 from bib --- It's worse in the latest versions. Now it does not save ANY emails. root@eth7 ~L: rpm -qa | egrep -i "kdepim|akonadi" akonadi-runtime-1.13.0-7.1.x86_64 kdepim4-4.14.10-1.1.x86_64 akonadi-4.14.10-1.1.x86_64 python-kde4-akonadi-4.14.3-8.2.x86_64 kdepim4-runtime-4.14.10-1.1.x86_64 libakonadiprotocolinternals1-1.13.0-7.1.x86_64 libkdepimlibs4-4.14.10-1.1.x86_64 kdepimlibs4-4.14.10-1.1.x86_64 libakonadi4-4.14.10-1.1.x86_64 plasma-addons-akonadi-4.14.3-12.6.x86_64 libkdepim4-4.14.10-1.1.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 292909] IMAP access often very slow or hangs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=292909 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED --- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald --- Hello Aaron and Geert, thank you for your report and comment. Sorry for taking such a long time to answer. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see performance issues please open new reports. But please follow the following guide lines to avoid unnecessary work for the developers: - Ideally test with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.08. It contains some performance improvements like the binary protocol. - Otherwise at least use KDEPIM 4.14.10 and newest Akonadi 1.13 you can get as it already contains some performance improvements. - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail (displaying message list of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to improve message list display speed as well. - Please also always report only one issue per report and check for duplicates before reporting. Specifically with IMAP I already saw quite some improvements with KDEPIM 4.14 and latest Akonadi 1.13 already, but now its even better. It even works with Microsoft Exchange since then. Thank you and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 294690] Kmail/akonadi creates duplicate messages with slow IMAP connections
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294690 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED --- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald --- Thank you Telmo and all the commenters for your report and comments. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see performance issues please open new reports. But please follow the following guide lines to avoid unnecessary work for the developers: - Ideally test with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.08. It contains some performance improvements like the binary protocol. - Otherwise at least use KDEPIM 4.14.10 and newest Akonadi 1.13 you can get as it already contains some performance improvements. - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail (displaying message list of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to improve message list display speed as well. - Please also always report only one issue per report and check for duplicates before reporting. Thank you and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 257976] Message list scrolling is very slow (regression)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257976 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald --- Thank you Gael for your report and Andrei and Fuchs for your comments. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see performance issues please open new reports. But please follow the following guide lines to avoid unnecessary work for the developers: - Ideally test with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.08. It contains some performance improvements like the binary protocol. - Otherwise at least use KDEPIM 4.14.10 and newest Akonadi 1.13 you can get as it already contains some performance improvements. - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail (displaying message list of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to improve message list display speed as well. Thank you and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 301470] Threading very slow
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301470 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED --- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald --- Thank you Bernd for your report and sorry for taking such a long time to answer it. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see performance issues please open new reports. But please follow the following guide lines to avoid unnecessary work for the developers: - Ideally test with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.08. It contains some performance improvements like the binary protocol. - Otherwise at least use KDEPIM 4.14.10 and newest Akonadi 1.13 you can get as it already contains some performance improvements. - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail (displaying message list of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to improve message list display speed as well. Thank you and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 258729] KMail2 launch is very slow
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258729 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED --- Comment #8 from Martin Steigerwald --- Thank you Valentin for your report and all the commenters for your comments. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see performance issues please open new reports. But please follow the following guide lines to avoid unnecessary work for the developers: - Ideally test with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.08. It contains some performance improvements like the binary protocol. - Otherwise at least use KDEPIM 4.14.10 and newest Akonadi 1.13 you can get as it already contains some performance improvements. - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail (displaying message list of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to improve message list display speed as well. Thank you and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 333528] Sending multiple emails at once causes some sent mail not to be save in Sent folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333528 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED --- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald --- Hello bib, thank you for your report and sorry for taking this long to answer it. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see this issue please reopen the report. Please test at least against KDEPIM 4.14 and latest Akonadi 1.13. Thanks and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 325521] There is no way to get rid of the message "The contend of the folder will be fetched" (Der Inhalt des Ordners wird abgeholt)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325521 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald --- Thank Tammo for your report and Marc for your comment. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see performance issues please open a new report. But please follow the following guide lines to avoid unnecessary work for the developers: - Ideally test with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.08. It contains some performance improvements like the binary protocol. - Otherwise at least use KDEPIM 4.14.10 and newest Akonadi 1.13 you can get as it already contains some performance improvements. - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail (displaying message list of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to improve message list display speed as well. Thank you and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 299417] Incorrect local Maildir handling
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299417 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED --- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald --- Ivan, thank you for your detailed bug report which contains more than one report in one. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see performance issues please open new reports. But please follow the following guide lines to avoid unnecessary work for the developers: - Ideally test with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.08. It contains some performance improvements like the binary protocol. - Otherwise at least use KDEPIM 4.14.10 and newest Akonadi 1.13 you can get as it already contains some performance improvements. - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail (displaying message list of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to improve message list display speed as well. - Also please report just one issue per bug. I would like if you could specically verify whether the maildir related issues still exist. If so please open a separate bug for each issue you find. Please test at least against KMail from KDEPIM 4.14 and latest Akonadi 1.13 you can get. Thank you and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 314523] Kmail is slow to move large amount of mails to wastebin then empty wastebin - pop account
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314523 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald --- Hi Philip, thank for your report and sorry for taking so long to answer it. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If you still see performance issues please open new reports. But please follow the following guide lines to avoid unnecessary work for the developers: - Ideally test with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.08. It contains some performance improvements like the binary protocol. - Otherwise at least use KDEPIM 4.14.10 and newest Akonadi 1.13 you can get as it already contains some performance improvements. - If you can wait, please retest with KDEPIM and Akonadi 15.12 once they become available for you. Akonadi 15.12 will contain *massive* performance improvements implemented by Dan due to new database indexes, optimized queries and leveled file_db directory. All of these are in master already, so if you dare use kdesrc-build to compile KF5, kdepim and kdepim-runtime. I am using this currently and it basically moves the bottleneck to KMail (displaying message list of huge folder). It is a *huge* improvement. And also Volker and Dan work to improve message list display speed as well. Thank you and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 284252] possibility for user to control data location
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284252 --- Comment #4 from Frits Spieker --- Hi Martin, Thank you very much for the very informative and lengthy answer. This is much appreciated! I had -almost- forgotten about it already again, but your email gives me some good ideas. I actually have a good NFS storage at home (with regular backups) and it really is worth looking into either storing it there or alternatively do it on a separate /Mail partition using some of the techniques you outline. So once again, thank you VERY much! At least it is a workable solution, although having an option in the " configure Kmail" where to store email would still be nice. A nice to have. Not a must to have. And I must say that KMail (and Kontakt) as a whole is actually behaving quite good lately. Still have the odd "duplicate messages" in folders sometimes, but have not been able to pinpoint what is causing it. I am really looking forward to the Plasma 5 version of Kontakt! Kind regards and my compliments to the development team! Frits -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 335162] KMail hangs while trying to delete a message with calendar information
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335162 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #9 from Martin Steigerwald --- Thanks, Rudolf. Closing. Greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 350219] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350219 --- Comment #2 from Tom Chiverton --- Ack, Kubuntu 15.04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 335162] KMail hangs while trying to delete a message with calendar information
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335162 --- Comment #8 from Rudolf Lohner --- This week I upgraded to KDE 4.14.10 which now has KMail 4.14.10 and for me this misbehaviour of KMail has completely disappeard! All mails containing ics calender events are now treated just as normal as any other mail and KMail does not hang any more. Thanks a lot to whoever or whatever made this annoyance disappear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 350219] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350219 Éric Brunet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.bru...@lps.ens.fr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 350219] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350219 --- Comment #1 from Nick --- Can confirm. You can actually create a top level folder though Akonadi Console. Also if you rename the account in Kmail it will work for a short period of time before breaking again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 350219] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350219 Nick changed: What|Removed |Added CC||futurepi...@gmx.us -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 352570] New: KMail crash when deleteing folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352570 Bug ID: 352570 Summary: KMail crash when deleteing folder Product: kmail2 Version: unspecified Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: drkonqi Severity: crash Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: deze...@gmail.com Application: kmail (4.14.6) KDE Platform Version: 4.14.6 Qt Version: 4.8.6 Operating System: Linux 3.19.0-28-generic x86_64 Distribution: Ubuntu 15.04 -- Information about the crash: - What I was doing when the application crashed: I have tried to delete a folder named Configuration on my IMAP account. -- Backtrace: Application: KMail (kmail), signal: Segmentation fault Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f0bdb6f2800 (LWP 14296))] Thread 6 (Thread 0x7f0bb36ac700 (LWP 14299)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7f0bccd6581d in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtWebKit.so.4 #2 0x7f0bccd65859 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtWebKit.so.4 #3 0x7f0bd62336aa in start_thread (arg=0x7f0bb36ac700) at pthread_create.c:333 #4 0x7f0bd8990eed in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 5 (Thread 0x7f0b72501700 (LWP 14300)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7f0bccaa620d in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtWebKit.so.4 #2 0x7f0bccd94fd6 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtWebKit.so.4 #3 0x7f0bd62336aa in start_thread (arg=0x7f0b72501700) at pthread_create.c:333 #4 0x7f0bd8990eed in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 4 (Thread 0x7f0b71851700 (LWP 14301)): #0 0x7f0bd89858dd in poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 #1 0x7f0bd05f8ebc in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7f0bd05f8fcc in g_main_context_iteration () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #3 0x7f0bda02987e in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents (this=0x7f0b640008c0, flags=...) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:452 #4 0x7f0bd9ff8d21 in QEventLoop::processEvents (this=this@entry=0x7f0b71850dd0, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:149 #5 0x7f0bd9ff9085 in QEventLoop::exec (this=this@entry=0x7f0b71850dd0, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:204 #6 0x7f0bd9eece89 in QThread::exec (this=) at thread/qthread.cpp:538 #7 0x7f0bd9eef6ff in QThreadPrivate::start (arg=0x1d78e00) at thread/qthread_unix.cpp:349 #8 0x7f0bd62336aa in start_thread (arg=0x7f0b71851700) at pthread_create.c:333 #9 0x7f0bd8990eed in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 3 (Thread 0x7f0b6bfff700 (LWP 14302)): #0 0x7f0bd063d7a4 in g_mutex_unlock () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #1 0x7f0bd05f8fd6 in g_main_context_iteration () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7f0bda02987e in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents (this=0x7f0b68c0, flags=...) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:452 #3 0x7f0bd9ff8d21 in QEventLoop::processEvents (this=this@entry=0x7f0b6bffed80, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:149 #4 0x7f0bd9ff9085 in QEventLoop::exec (this=this@entry=0x7f0b6bffed80, flags=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:204 #5 0x7f0bd9eece89 in QThread::exec (this=this@entry=0x1794d90) at thread/qthread.cpp:538 #6 0x7f0bd9fd9493 in QInotifyFileSystemWatcherEngine::run (this=0x1794d90) at io/qfilesystemwatcher_inotify.cpp:265 #7 0x7f0bd9eef6ff in QThreadPrivate::start (arg=0x1794d90) at thread/qthread_unix.cpp:349 #8 0x7f0bd62336aa in start_thread (arg=0x7f0b6bfff700) at pthread_create.c:333 #9 0x7f0bd8990eed in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 2 (Thread 0x7f0b6abac700 (LWP 14372)): #0 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185 #1 0x7f0bc41ffa7a in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtScript.so.4 #2 0x7f0bc41ffaa9 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtScript.so.4 #3 0x7f0bd62336aa in start_thread (arg=0x7f0b6abac700) at pthread_create.c:333 #4 0x7f0bd8990eed in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109 Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f0bdb6f2800 (LWP 14296)): [KCrash Handler] #6 0x7f0bd52da039 in Akonadi::FavoriteCollectionsModel::removeCollection (this=0x0, collection=...) at ../../akonadi/favoritecollectionsmodel.cpp:294 #7 0x7f0bda43f4cc in KMMainWidget::slotCollectionRemoved (this=, col=...) at ../../kmail/kmmainwidget.cpp:4501 #8 0x7f0bda53f92e in KMMainWidget::qt_static_metacall (_o=, _c=, _id=, _a=) at moc_kmmainwidget.cpp:488 #9 0x7f0bda00f1ec in QMetaObject::activate (sender=0x192d3d
[kmail2] [Bug 350219] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350219 Maximilian Engelhardt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@daemonizer.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 292418] Kmail can't create IMAP top level folders
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=292418 Wolfgang Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wba...@tmo.at --- Comment #53 from Wolfgang Bauer --- This bug has been fixed, but apparently this broke again somehow. But there's no point in reopening this bug report, there's another open one anyway. See Bug#350219 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kontact] [Bug 352550] future events show all - not only activated Calendar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352550 Wolfgang Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||wba...@tmo.at --- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Bauer --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 343625 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kontact] [Bug 343625] Summary shows tasks from calendars which are not selected
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343625 Wolfgang Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mes...@debian.org --- Comment #4 from Wolfgang Bauer --- *** Bug 320160 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kontact] [Bug 343625] Summary shows tasks from calendars which are not selected
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343625 Wolfgang Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s.sut...@gmx.de --- Comment #5 from Wolfgang Bauer --- *** Bug 352550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kontact] [Bug 320160] Home page always displays all calendars
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320160 Wolfgang Bauer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||wba...@tmo.at Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Bauer --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 343625 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Akonadi] [Bug 331486] creation of 1000s of 1byte files in inbox/new/ for "ghost" mails on start
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331486 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #7 from Martin Steigerwald --- As I have not seen any new 1-byte sized files in local maildir since May 2013 and Aaron, you didn´t answer, I am closing this. Feel free to reopen it, if it still happens for you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Akonadi] [Bug 330895] copy mail folder to other folder on other ressource results in empty mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330895 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO --- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald --- Christoph, thank you for your report. I think that Dan has fixed this as described in comment #1. I didn´t test with moving mails between mixedmaildir / maildir resources yet, so… Christoph, do you still see this with KDEPIM 4.14 or even 15.08 if you can get it already? Thanks and greetings from KDE Randa Meetings, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 279260] 1 byte file makes kmail2 not display any emails in a folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279260 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald --- Sven, thank you for your report. As I haven´t seen 1-byte sized files since May 2013 and Wolfgang also cannot reproduce it anymore while I have seen some before, I am closing this. Feel free to reopen if it still happens for you. Please try to find a pattern that reproduces it and describe it step by step. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Akonadi] [Bug 330895] copy mail folder to other folder on other ressource results in empty mails
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330895 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added CC||br...@clisp.org --- Comment #4 from Martin Steigerwald --- *** Bug 290422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kontact] [Bug 290422] lost many email while moving them from a local folder to a local folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290422 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Martin Steigerwald --- I think this bug #330895, but as Dan referenced the other bug report in his commit that fixes the issue I am marking this one as duplicate of the other one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 330895 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kontact] [Bug 290422] lost many email while moving them from a local folder to a local folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290422 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Martin Steigerwald --- I talked with Dan about this today and according to him this is fixed. On moving mails Akonadi feeds them through the database / file_db_data directory. On huge moves this takes quite some time. In that time an expiry timer to items in the cache fired and Akonadi started removing items that were not moved yet. Thus closing. If I see it again, I reopen. Please do so as well, in case you see it again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 331848] displaying, moving, deleting mails takes 10-20 seconds when Akonadi synchronizes in background
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331848 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |UNMAINTAINED --- Comment #11 from Martin Steigerwald --- Settings to resolved unmainted for now. I bet it will be better with current KDEPIM/Akonadi from git master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 322958] KMail: duplicate special folder causes endless loop "Emitting defaultFoldersChanged"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322958 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED --- Comment #20 from Martin Steigerwald --- I didn´t see this in ages anymore. Also it is about a version of KMail that uses Nepomuk and is unmaintained. Thus closing. If it still happens, please reopen. Thanks, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 322958] KMail: duplicate special folder causes endless loop "Emitting defaultFoldersChanged"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322958 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|UNMAINTAINED|WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[akregator] [Bug 352512] 5.0.xx after a crash, the restore session pops up twice then akregator crashes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352512 soee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kont...@soee.pl --- Comment #1 from soee --- I have similar issue on Kubutnu 15.10 with Applications 15.08: Application: Akregator (akregator), signal: Segmentation fault Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [KCrash Handler] #6 QString::QString (other=..., this=this@entry=0x7fffed4f8040) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qstring.h:811 #7 Akregator::SearchBar::text (this=0x2435c90) at ../../../akregator/src/searchbar.cpp:125 #8 0x7f55b47af7ff in Akregator::MainWidget::saveProperties (this=0x2409e60, config=...) at ../../../akregator/src/mainwidget.cpp:1183 #9 0x7f55b47a9934 in Akregator::Part::autoSaveProperties (this=this@entry=0x23e0e70) at ../../../akregator/src/akregator_part.cpp:871 #10 0x7f55b47a99c9 in Akregator::Part::slotOnShutdown (this=this@entry=0x23e0e70) at ../../../akregator/src/akregator_part.cpp:349 #11 0x7f55b47aa028 in Akregator::Part::~Part (this=this@entry=0x23e0e70, __in_chrg=, __vtt_parm=) at ../../../akregator/src/akregator_part.cpp:422 #12 0x7f55b47aa079 in Akregator::Part::~Part (this=0x23e0e70, __in_chrg=, __vtt_parm=) at ../../../akregator/src/akregator_part.cpp:426 #13 0x7f55d695030a in QMetaObject::activate (sender=sender@entry=0x2409e60, signalOffset=, local_signal_index=local_signal_index@entry=0, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffed4f8290) at kernel/qobject.cpp:3717 #14 0x7f55d6950b07 in QMetaObject::activate (sender=sender@entry=0x2409e60, m=m@entry=0x7f55d6b4d0e0 , local_signal_index=local_signal_index@entry=0, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffed4f8290) at kernel/qobject.cpp:3582 #15 0x7f55d6950baf in QObject::destroyed (this=this@entry=0x2409e60, _t1=_t1@entry=0x2409e60) at .moc/moc_qobject.cpp:206 #16 0x7f55d793e265 in QWidget::~QWidget (this=0x2409e60, __in_chrg=) at kernel/qwidget.cpp:1621 #17 0x7f55b47b2ee9 in Akregator::MainWidget::~MainWidget (this=0x2409e60, __in_chrg=) at ../../../akregator/src/mainwidget.cpp:96 #18 0x7f55d69511f0 in QObject::event (this=this@entry=0x2409e60, e=e@entry=0x2135e60) at kernel/qobject.cpp:1236 #19 0x7f55d7941edb in QWidget::event (this=0x2409e60, event=0x2135e60) at kernel/qwidget.cpp:9084 #20 0x7f55d78ffb8c in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper (this=this@entry=0x1d41ec0, receiver=receiver@entry=0x2409e60, e=e@entry=0x2135e60) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:3720 #21 0x7f55d7905230 in QApplication::notify (this=0x7fffed4f8b40, receiver=0x2409e60, e=0x2135e60) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:3503 #22 0x7f55d691fa9b in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal (this=0x7fffed4f8b40, receiver=0x2409e60, event=event@entry=0x2135e60) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:935 #23 0x7f55d6921bd7 in QCoreApplication::sendEvent (event=0x2135e60, receiver=) at ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/kernel/qcoreapplication.h:228 #24 QCoreApplicationPrivate::sendPostedEvents (receiver=receiver@entry=0x0, event_type=event_type@entry=0, data=0x1cdb4d0) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:1552 #25 0x7f55d6922108 in QCoreApplication::sendPostedEvents (receiver=receiver@entry=0x0, event_type=event_type@entry=0) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:1410 #26 0x7f55d69769f3 in postEventSourceDispatch (s=0x1d7f6e0) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:271 #27 0x7f55ce69b037 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #28 0x7f55ce69b290 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #29 0x7f55ce69b33c in g_main_context_iteration () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 #30 0x7f55d6976dff in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents (this=0x1d7efe0, flags=...) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:418 #31 0x7f55d691d2da in QEventLoop::exec (this=this@entry=0x7fffed4f8900, flags=..., flags@entry=...) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:204 #32 0x7f55d6924e4c in QCoreApplication::exec () at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:1188 #33 0x7f55d6c3a09c in QGuiApplication::exec () at kernel/qguiapplication.cpp:1510 #34 0x7f55d78fc025 in QApplication::exec () at kernel/qapplication.cpp:2956 #35 0x00409630 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffed4f8cb8) at ../../../akregator/src/main.cpp:113 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kontact] [Bug 352550] New: future events show all - not only activated Calendar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352550 Bug ID: 352550 Summary: future events show all - not only activated Calendar Product: kontact Version: unspecified Platform: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: summary Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: s.sut...@gmx.de future events show all - not only activated Calendar Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Create some Google-Calendar 2. Deactivate one of the Calendars (means not to show tasks of this Calender in the Calender-View 3. Go to overview... Actual Results: You'll see all Tasks, even the tasks of the not activated one. Expected Results: Don't show Tasks from Calendars which are deactivated -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 284252] possibility for user to control data location
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284252 --- Comment #3 from Martin Steigerwald --- *** Bug 285242 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 285242] reinstallation procedure of kmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285242 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald --- Hello Daniel. Thank you for your report and sorry for taking long time to answer. As I think this is mostly a duplicate of your other bug I am marking it as such. Also the locations where Akonadi stores data are clearly known. For now I recommend to always backup the following at least: - ~/.local/share/akonadi - Data from the resources: - Maildir: ~/.local/share/local-mail or wherever you pointed it to - Contacts: ~/.local/share/contacts or wherever you pointed it to - Calender: ~/.kde/share/apps/kabc/std.vcf (I think) or wherever you pointed it to - see ~/.kde/share/config/akonadi* for the locations the resources point to for example: martin@merkaba:~/.kde/share/config> cat akonadi_maildir_resource_0rc [General] Path[$e]=$HOME/.local/share/local-mail TopLevelIsContainer=true - ~/.config/akonadi - ~/.kde/share/config/akonadi* - Configuration of the apps In other to start new from scratch you would delete these. It is known to the dev team that things are spread around quite a bit. And there are discussions, ideas to simply / unify this. This may take some more time tough. And as usual no promises. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 284252 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 284252] possibility for user to control data location
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284252 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Martin Steigerwald --- Daniel, Frits, thank you for your report and your comment. Sorry for taking long time to answer. The location of the Akonadi cache files is not configurable, thats right. But the location where the mails are stored – usually ~/.local/share/local-mail – permanently is. You can set this path in the maildir resource config. That said, while Akonadi in general is only a cache, there can be an interim time where some mails are only in file_db_data or the database. Also there are links from local filter configuration that are dependent on the database. The development team is aware of both of it and there are ideas to at least let the resource provide an unique ID that is independent of the database, yet it is not sure how to implement this for some of the resources. Also you can have database and mail data on NFS. I had it for years. Depending on backend storage for NFS there can be an issue with the amount of files in file_db_data directory. For that I suggest to use Akonadi 1.13 with patch that avoids leaking files in there. Akonadi 15.12 will also contain a leveled file cache so files are spread into sub directories. Also you can set symlinks to relocate mail directory and database to some other partition. I did this during the time where the amount of files in file_db_data where to much for our backend storage. I relocated the ~/.local/share/akonadi from NFS to Ext4 that way and I am still using that setup. But I will likely switch it back to NFS soon. So at least you can relocate data using symlinks. Thats for some background for you. I can´t promise whether your wish will be implement, but that Akonadi currently at times is more than the cache it was meant to be, is known to the development team. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 280724] Add Attachments via Nepomuk Search Widget in Composer GUI
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280724 Martin Steigerwald changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@lichtvoll.de Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Steigerwald --- Hello David. Thank you for your report. And sorry for taking long time to answer. It is about a version of KMail which uses Nepomuk and is currently unmaintained. But as the wish you have is not implemented in Baloo / Akonadi Search based KMail I will keep this bug open. I set it to confirmed as that feature is not yet available. No promises tough. :) Thank you, Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kmail2] [Bug 298701] kmail message window becomes gray when you click send and does not respond anymore
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298701 --- Comment #18 from Philip Allen --- Speaking for myself, after many years of wrestling with kmail/akonadi I have now switched to mutt on all my platforms, so absence of further reports from me should not be taken to indicate lack of bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
