[kontact] [Bug 162270] Summary View: Display event parameters
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162270 --- Comment #1 from Glen Whitney --- Would still be a desirable enhancement as of korganizer 5.17.3; thunderbird and evolution have the option of displaying at least event locations in their equivalent of agenda view. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kontact] [Bug 162270] Summary View: Display event parameters
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162270 Glen Whitney changed: What|Removed |Added CC||whitney+kde@mynote.space -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[korganizer] [Bug 425920] New: Runaway memory usage at startup
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425920 Bug ID: 425920 Summary: Runaway memory usage at startup Product: korganizer Version: 5.15.0 Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: REPORTED Severity: major Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: whitney+kde@mynote.space Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 131253 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=131253&action=edit standard output when running "korganizer" from the terminal prompt KOrganizer uses an unlimited amount of memory, increasing up to and beyond 30GB (at which point it essentially hangs my system). This memory usage was tracked by LXTask 0.1.9; KOrganizer produced no graphical output during the memory buildup. (It did produce a bit of text to stdout, which I attach below in case it is of value.) STEPS TO REPRODUCE 1. This is a OpenSUSE Tumbleweed system, kept regularly updated, mostly running XFCE with a few various apps from other desktops thrown in -- but without the full KDE installed. 2. (It is probably worth noting that an earlier point, I did have KDE on the system, and tried KOrganizer using several calendars with at least hundreds of events, _maybe_ a thousand or two. However, I not only uninstalled KDE, I also deleted .kde*, .config/korga*, .config/akonadi*, .local/share/korg*, and .local/share/akonadi* -- so I certainly _attempted_ to restore KOrganizer to a "clean install" state. Of course, possibly I did not succeed, and if there are any suggestions of other files/configuration to eliminate to ameliorate the runaway memory usage, I would be glad to hear.) 3. Installed korganizer via "sudo zypper install korganizer." 4. Verified outcome of installation via "korganizer --version", which prints "korganizer 5.15.0 (20.08.0)" OBSERVED RESULT Starting korganizer from the shell produces the attached output to stdout; no window is shown; memory usage as reported by LXTask grows rapidly into the multiple gigabytes, bringing the machine to its knees after approximately five minutes. EXPECTED RESULT KOrganizer would start up, and display a window with its normal functions, using a reasonably normal amount of memory -- hopefully less than a few gigabytes. SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS Linux: OpenSUSE Tumbleweed, running Linux 5.8.0-1 KDE Plasma Version: n/a; installed korganizer a la carte using zypper KDE Frameworks Version: (not sure/how to check? -- whatever Tumbleweed is currently distributing) Qt Version: (ditto) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This and Okular are the only KDE applications I have reinstalled after removing KDE entirely from the system a few months ago. (KOrganizer was definitely my favorite KDE app and I wanted to see if I could perhaps use it in an ecosystem of mainly non-KDE items. I installed Okular because there are few good PDF-processing applications available on Linux, and it runs without notable difficulty.) I am happy to provide further information if anyone reading this can suggest specific experiments to try or commands to post the output of. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kaddressbook] [Bug 396438] New: Import vcard function completely absent in v4.12.3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396438 Bug ID: 396438 Summary: Import vcard function completely absent in v4.12.3 Product: kaddressbook Version: 4.12.3 Platform: Mint (Debian based) OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: NOR Component: general Assignee: kdepim-bugs@kde.org Reporter: glen...@msn.com CC: to...@kde.org Target Milestone: --- Where can I find a .deb copy of v.5.1.3 ?? v.4:17.12.3 has no import function and now fails to launch in Linux Mint 19. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[kdepimlibs] [Bug 317834] Wrong date for Ching Ming Festival (HK holiday)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317834 --- Comment #5 from Glen Ng --- I forgot to mention: In the conversion table a literal translation of "Ching Ming" is used, i.e. "Bright & Clear". (In reply to comment #4) > Ching Ming Festival follows the Chinese Calendar, which most average Hong > Kong people (like me) don't really understand. I remember that I was told > when I was a kid that Ching Ming Festival is always Apr 4, 5 or 6 but I > don't really know the rule behind. I think it might better be hard coded. > > Here's a link from Hong Kong Observatory conversion table between Gregorian > and Chinese Calendar (1901-2100): > http://www.hko.gov.hk/gts/time/conversion.htm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[kdepimlibs] [Bug 317834] Wrong date for Ching Ming Festival (HK holiday)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317834 --- Comment #4 from Glen Ng --- Ching Ming Festival follows the Chinese Calendar, which most average Hong Kong people (like me) don't really understand. I remember that I was told when I was a kid that Ching Ming Festival is always Apr 4, 5 or 6 but I don't really know the rule behind. I think it might better be hard coded. Here's a link from Hong Kong Observatory conversion table between Gregorian and Chinese Calendar (1901-2100): http://www.hko.gov.hk/gts/time/conversion.htm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 254073] request for Hong Kong holidays
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254073 --- Comment #1 from Glen Ng 2010-10-13 16:42:44 --- How can I test the holiday file? I googled but there did not seem to be instructions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 254073] New: request for Hong Kong holidays
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254073 Summary: request for Hong Kong holidays Product: kdepimlibs Version: 4.5 Platform: Archlinux Packages OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: kholidays AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: pariah...@gmail.com CC: j...@layt.net Created an attachment (id=52487) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=52487) the holiday file I tried to write by myself Version: 4.5 (using KDE 4.5.2) OS:Linux Details on Hong Kong General Holidays: The legislation: http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_ind.nsf/CurAllEngDoc/EC16AF2AF1A319BD88256489000ADF4E?OpenDocument Date of the holidays in 2010 and 2011 http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/holiday/2010.htm http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/holiday/ I tried to write the holiday file myself, but I'm not so sure if it is correct. Please see attachment. Thanks! Reproducible: Always -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs