[Bug 163998] provide customized reply feature
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163998 --- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski --- I understand that those are semi-automatic actions, however I will reply for one out of ~160 "spam" I got, just for the record. If someone really thinks, that I will waste another few days *again*, for hunting for bugs, which will sit in bugzilla for another 4-5 years, completely intact, just to be then bombed in 2017 with 170 mails "Kmail2 is now unmaintained, check if this is still relevant in Kmail3", she/he is gravelly mistaken. I could be naive 5 years ago, now I am not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205246] import lotus notes messages: provide full information on error
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205246 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski --- I will not migrate to KDE4 after all (I use KDE 3.5.10 now), and if anything I will move to XFCE + FF + TB, so I close this report as INVALID (I hope it is OK with you). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 163393] first run: allow just run KMail (skip the wizard)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163393 --- Comment #8 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-12-22 08:29:20 --- It does check it -- on startup. So it forces one workflow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 163393] first run: allow just run KMail (skip the wizard)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163393 --- Comment #6 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-12-21 19:59:17 --- And btw. what do you need configuration in the first place (in case of KMail)? Sending and getting mail? Then why not adding little check on those two actions: if (program_is_not_configured_yet) run_wizard(); ? Such transparent design pays off, because user sees interruptions in his/her workflow ONLY when it is needed, not "just in case". So the user experience is much more smooth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 163393] first run: allow just run KMail (skip the wizard)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163393 --- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-12-21 19:50:48 --- Just to clarify, I am not against possibility of running wizard, I am against startup wizard. And again if user is so tech-savvy to install an app, and configure it, she/he is able to click one item in the menu. After all, in case of KMail, how is user supposed to reply to mail (one item on toolbar or menu) if she/he cannot do the same for another item? > Ifaik it will resolve the issue of knowing such values for 80% of > the home-users. Could you please tell my where you get those data from? > Why should someone start Kmail twice without configuring it aka using it? Because the system was reinstalled. Because it is another user. Because it is another computer. > That's why I get a wizard since KDE 4.8 when > configuring Akonadi as a resource for contacts, No, that's why many developers do not have clue about usability and accessibility. The candy-effect pays off better than hard work on usability. That is why we have all the "are you sure" crap instead of undo, that is why why we have all the "tips of the day" junk, that is why we have more and more EULA's. The fact world is shifting in some direction is not a _proof_ the one is right. > Every rogramm that needs to be configued before > use, should have an easy wizard that helps you setting the most important > values. AGAIN, they can have wizards, no problem, but no STARTUP wizards. Use cases (just examples): * Kmail -- I am evaluating import feature to compare it to Thunderbird, what do I need full setup at start for? * Amarok -- I would like to play some audio file, right now, sorry, but I don't need any setup, album settings, and so on If you wonder where this lead, observe Windows -- it is great example of your vision of user-friendliness, you cannot touch app before stating if you want search button with it, toolbar in FF, location, file association, and so on and on and on. And when you have to reinstall the system, or something like this, you get sick, before you even start. Bottom line is -- usability matters. One of its principle is this -- user is in control. Software should allow do things, not push the user around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 163393] first run: allow just run KMail (skip the wizard)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163393 --- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-12-21 10:55:08 --- Let me start by saying, that I consider myself as power user, however I also help weekend users to run computers, among them -- my Mom. So first of all, I am a bit suspicious -- your Mom (as I understood it) is not an expert, but she installs and configures KMail by herself? For me it is the first contradiction (i.e. I am doubtful). The second contradiction is this -- your Mom (or in general, any weekend user) is supposed to understand all the stuff with IMAP/POP3, SSL, plain text, and so on, no problem here, but there _is_ problem with clicking "settings/configure KMail"? Somehow I cannot believe it. Wizard is not shown once. It is shown each time for every not-configured KMail. And I saw it already too many times. And few remarks of general nature. Good solutions scale up. If startup wizard is such a good solution we should introduce it everywhere -- Dolphin, Konqueror, Gwenview, KDE itself, and so on and on. Really? IMHO -- no. It is counter productive. Ideally, installing and running program should not require any user interaction -- it means no EULA's, not installation wizards, no startup wizards. Program should not force user to do anything, it should let do it. This is significant difference. Programs should be usable, user-friendly, that's for sure, but they should not undermine productivity -- if they do, they are more like toys, not tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 53814] 'delete' filter action
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53814 --- Comment #24 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-11-11 13:53:50 --- So by design KMail users have to sift through scams, pornography, vulgar content because ... ? ( please note this is not spam filtering issue, it is another level ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 170271] custom templates: please provide new tag -- quote mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170271 --- Comment #7 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-08-31 15:34:16 --- You should have close it right away without giving any reasons in the first place -- so many bits would be saved. Keep doing good job! 2012, year of KDE for sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 170271] custom templates: please provide new tag -- quote mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170271 --- Comment #6 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-08-31 12:36:10 --- Don't accuse ridiculously people at the same sentence as "good morning" and people will be polite to you, guaranteed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 170271] custom templates: please provide new tag -- quote mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170271 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-08-30 17:12:53 --- Maybe you should ask first, if you understand it? I can always prepare a mail which looks like quotation from somebody else, now what, you block ">" on my keyboard? Please drop that Java attitude. No, it is a way to automatically add a header and footer for quoted mail in consistent way. It was _my_ idea, but maybe there are other usages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 170271] custom templates: please provide new tag -- quote mark
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170271 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2011-08-30 14:27:28 --- And this will add symbol of quotation indicator, right? Rhetorical question -- it won't. Reopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 238136] New: adding group: checking the people's name is too strict policy
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238136 Summary: adding group: checking the people's name is too strict policy Product: kaddressbook Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl CC: to...@kde.org Version:(using KDE 4.4.2) It is required to send a mail to enter receiver name or just an e-mail? The second, right? So why does Kaddressbook check also the name? I know it maybe looks better but: a) from technical POV it is not required b) user does not have to know the name c) entering the name in many occasions is just waste of time (receiver is a company, and name is exactly like the email, off...@google.com) So, the limitation is strictly artificial and it more hurts than helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 238135] New: adding group: missing explicit buttons for adding/removing items
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238135 Summary: adding group: missing explicit buttons for adding/removing items Product: kaddressbook Version: unspecified Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl CC: to...@kde.org Version:(using KDE 4.4.2) Installed from:openSUSE RPMs The UI is too obscure or too smart. It is suitable for computer geek but not for average person. There should be such buttons (explicitly) as "add person" and "delete person". For adding there is even no visual equivalent, for delete there is "-" sign created on-fly, which causes problem when you think how to delete an item (and there is no "-" sign yet). So please add those buttons, usability matters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 237545] New: obscure communication with user: show the reason of the error
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237545 Summary: obscure communication with user: show the reason of the error Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.4.3) This report is not about errors while processing data in Kmail. This report is about showing the error dialogs to users. I upgraded to KDE4.4.3 and when I hit "send" I get error stating there was a problem. Period. A problem. Now, user as a good magician should pull out his/her magical wand and guess what kind of error: * misformed address? * no connection? * authorization failure? Who knows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 237542] New: sending email is no longer possible
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237542 Summary: sending email is no longer possible Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.4.3) Installed from:SuSE RPMs I upgraded to KDE4.4.3 and I cannot any longer send any email. Once I hit "send" I get immediate (so fast, that I doubt the network connection is even checked) error stating there was a problem, and the mail will be sent until I fix the problem or delete the message. What error? KMail didn't reveal that secret. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 206469] toolbar: mark as ham/spam action -- use separate items instead of one confusing combo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206469 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-03-05 22:45:06 --- I am not talking about what is (or not) installed by default, but how it is available. Check your configuration -- probably you see a button "classify as spam" in the toolbar, but in toolbar configuration you won't see such entry (at least I don't see it -- KDE 4.4.0). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 151842] show the attachments list at the end of the mail anyway
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151842 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-26 17:40:53 --- Björn thank you very much for the screenshot (and sorry for late reply). Yes, it is fixed then, looks great! Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 160224] (regression) put the quick search pane for message list as it was before, i.e. switchable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Quick search for message|(regression) put the quick |list gone |search pane for message ||list as it was before, i.e. ||switchable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 161579] composer: group "clear field" and "field type" together
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161579 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-17 09:04:58 --- http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-7390 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 160224] Quick search for message list gone
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|UNMAINTAINED| --- Comment #19 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-17 09:07:12 --- Because it is report to have one. It is really no point in opening massive amounts of reports in such scheme: * please make it configurable -> closed, because of the regression * please put the feature back -> closed, fixed * please make it configurable It will triple the number of reports, quite obvious. Not to mention time wasted on the same reports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 151981] smart copy on wrapped, single line select
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151981 --- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-13 18:58:31 --- Single line -- well, it was single line before KMail wrapped it. About the "risk". Computers are made for doing automatic tasks. When I see task which is essentially deleting characters one by one, over and over, it is an automated task. So it should be done by computer, not by human -- we (humans) should spent time on higher level issues. And about removing quotation marks -- I am not saying it is trivial, but it is not rocket science either. First draft could be -- take the non-alphanumeric common prefix of line of begin of selection and each other. Remove the prefix in copied content. Un-wrap lines. In next iteration of the algorithm it could be enhanced to handle multiple lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 151842] show the attachments list at the end of the mail anyway
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151842 --- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-13 18:47:50 --- Would you be so kind and attach a screenshot? I keep Kmail4 offline for purpose so I don't have any income message. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 149241] folder mail list: awkward subject/sender shortening
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149241 --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-11 17:31:52 --- I didn't migrate to KDE4 so I cannot tell. It happens only after you fetched some new mail (for the fetched mail, not the older ones). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 149496] freeze folder state after search
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149496 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-11 17:13:13 --- The answer depends of the report: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40 (I don't know how to set chain here). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 222240] New: tabs: let the user change the location of tab to any folder
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40 Summary: tabs: let the user change the location of tab to any folder Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.3) Installed from:SuSE RPMs I don't know if it was intended or not, so hard to tell if this is wish/bug, but in general, from behaviour it is a bug. Run KMail. Click on outbox. Create new tab. Click on sent-mail. Click on outbox. You should see outbox in the current tab, but instead KMail switches tab, and leaves the "current" tab not changed at all -- i.e. (1) tab outbox, (2, "current") sent-mail. The correct behaviour would be setting both to outbox, and no switching. Various of reasons: a) user wanted current tab to be X folder, if she/he intended to switch tabs, she/he would do this b) it confuses the user, switch changes context, if you have multiple tabs, how do you get back fast and easily to the original tab? c) this is inconsistent with other KDE apps (Konqueror, Konsole, Kate, ... you name it) d) there is nothing wrong in two views of the same content e) it limits the possibilities, like frozen searches: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149496 So, please just change the folder as user asks, and nothing more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 143966] create new filter -> filter rules -> missing splitter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143966 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-06 17:16:38 --- I know it has a border, but it is fixed. User cannot increase the size of the screen on demand, thus entire size of the window is also limited. The only way to make it bigger is to resize the pane (of course this causes the other one is shrinked, but at least you can see comfortable what you are working on, currently). The dynamic panes should be a standard in KDE in such dialogs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 140946] sorting mail: please improve "date of arrival"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140946 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-03 08:38:32 --- >From user POV it is hard to tell, especially because I only test new KDE, I don't use it. Maybe let's close it is as worksforme if it didn't happen for you, and I will reopen it again, if the issue occurs again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 139244] Vertical white space in list views
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139244 --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-02 14:06:39 --- No, but now I wonder if this should be report for KMail or kdelibs in general, so every font settings would have font size and line height parameter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 139244] Vertical white space in list views
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139244 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2010-01-02 08:44:31 --- In what sense it "works for me"? -- the settings dialog is not changed in that aspect, so changing space is not possible. KDE 4.4 beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 137548] settings - appearance - fonts: provide "folder with unread messages" item
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137548 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-12-31 17:01:27 --- Not really, because someone can implement configuring the color without 3 sections, and on the other hand, somebody can introduce 3 sections without making them configurable. Besides, this report is more like JJ, while the other is slightly more elaborate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 136740] settings dialogs: allow to resize them down
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136740 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-12-30 19:36:29 --- 669 here. So it is still too much. Btw. part of the height is spent on useless subtitle, this issue was discussed on usability ML but it seems the approach is even worse, because somebody put effort even in animating this stuff. I also checked all tabs and sections, and none of them requires so much space. Only two of them are close, but there is still place to put one row of buttons (i.e. it means there is space that can be saved and make the dialog smaller). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 52813] Wish for prompt for save location of edited attachment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52813 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 118160] there isnt a remove a menu to uncheck spam messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118160 --- Comment #7 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-12-24 15:31:35 --- Actually it is worksforme. It is possible to train again classifier by choosing "classify as spam/ham". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 54864] F3 should "Find next", as in Konqueror
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54864 --- Comment #9 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-12-16 17:25:18 --- a) what if there is no search pane -- "find next" means "find next", not "show search pane, focus, and then find next". The difference is important especially for small screens b) it is wrong for even with search pane shown because it is counterproductive (try kate with search pane opened and just imagine what happens when search pane gets focus each time user hits find next), Konqueror does not have caret mode yet (right?) but even with forms it would kill usability -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 214697] New: error while opening/reading file -- do not claim any fact about existence of a file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214697 Summary: error while opening/reading file -- do not claim any fact about existence of a file Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.3) Testcase can be found here: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214696 For example when KMail cannot open file when adding attachment the error says "file does not exist". This is bold and inaccurate statement -- the fact KMail cannot open file, the message should be "file cannot be read/opened (*)" (* one of those two). I just observed how puzzling current message is for users -- they see the file, so obviously file exists, yet another program (KMail) claims the file does not exist. It is very confusing and "of course" admin (me) is called because user cannot sort it out. And the reasons could be various -- bug in Kmail (as in testcase), -r for reading (!), and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 214696] New: adding attachment: cannot open file with quote in filename
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214696 Summary: adding attachment: cannot open file with quote in filename Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.3) Installed from:SuSE RPMs Steps: 1. create file "test".txt 2. run kmail 3. create new message 4. add attachment 5. select created file, accept 6. --> bug, file does not exist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 211014] Configurable behavior of (normal) Reply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211014 --- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-20 13:08:41 --- Properly formed mail -- _with_ reply-to and all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 211014] Configurable behavior of (normal) Reply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211014 --- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-20 08:25:17 --- > If Reply behaves like Reply to Author then it will do exactly what you have > quoted, I know. And much more -- it would reply to author in case of 100% valid posts from ML -- and such behaviour is _unwanted_. IOW the proposal here is stretched too far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 211014] Configurable behavior of (normal) Reply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211014 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl --- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-19 09:33:56 --- It was not the wish of any of the reporter/commenters -- the wish was _in case of broken message_ from ML reply to author. " Please change this back so a basic Reply goes to the sender unless overridden by the sender using Reply-To, Mail-Followup-To. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 109069] replies to mailing lists broken
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069 --- Comment #19 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-19 09:30:00 --- Ingo, about 99% -- I mean most of the mail I have are correct one. Is this ok for ML not to set up reply-to? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 109069] replies to mailing lists broken
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069 --- Comment #15 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-12 17:13:42 --- Torgny, it is in reverse. a) RFC does not state KMail "should", it shouts "SHOULD", so KMail better has some _really_ good reason to ignore this b) in 99% cases KMail violates the fields given in favor of 1% cases c) and now simple use case -- what is worse: 1) send a public message to single person 2) send a private message to public (the world) ? Why all KMail users should be put at risk for some lazy admin (I assume your answer is (2) ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 109069] replies to mailing lists broken
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069 --- Comment #13 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-12 16:35:29 --- Of course. This is the report about the case WHEN the reply-to is missing. So still I don't get how it is a wontfix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 109069] replies to mailing lists broken
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069 --- Comment #11 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-12 16:18:17 --- Thank you. This RFC is quite clear: "In the absence of the "Reply-To:" field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox(es) specified in the "From:" field unless otherwise specified by the person composing the reply." So KMail as well should use "from". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 109069] replies to mailing lists broken
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069 --- Comment #9 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-12 15:23:21 --- And that RFC has a number? I followed the whole discussion and quote or number never appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 109069] replies to mailing lists broken
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109069 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl --- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-10-12 07:41:50 --- This is an absurd: a) instead of KMail doing all dirty work, now all user have to do it, to cover limitation of KMail b) in case of broken ML I could write to admin of such ML. But using KMail would lead to no benefit, since even after fixing problem with ML KMail would be broken Keeping broken behaviour didn't work and won't work for any app. KMail now promote broken ML, because broken, correct -- for KMail it does not matter, it always works buggy. And the logic is also flawed. > If you want to reply to the author, please use the Reply-To-Author action. Why we don't hear "If you want to reply to broken (only!) ML, please use the reply-to-ML action"? It make sense -- in case of wrong mail explicit action is required, but not in case of well formed mail. Do we really have to follow the path of MSIE? I don't think so. Please reopen this report -- KMail should behave properly for proper mails, it cannot be simpler rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 207877] A18Y: do not use hardcoded values for default (color scheme incompatibility)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207877
--- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-09-28 14:51:43
---
Learning how to compile and make patches is on my to do list, so sorry but not
now (yet).
Please take a look:
static const QColor defaultColor[ numColorNames ] = {
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NeutralText ).color(), // *quoted l1
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NeutralText ).color(), // *quoted l2
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NeutralText ).color(), // *quoted l3
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::LinkText ).color(), // link
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::VisitedText ).color(),// visited link
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NegativeText ).color(), // misspelled
words
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::ActiveText ).color(), // *new msg
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NeutralText ).color(), // *unread mgs
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NegativeText ).color(), //* important msg
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::LinkText ).color(), // action item mgs
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::InactiveText ).color(), // *pgp encrypted
scheme.background( KColorScheme::PositiveBackground ).color(), // pgp ok,
trusted key
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NeutralText ).color(), // *pgp ok,
untrusted key
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NeutralText ).color(), // *pgp unchk
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NegativeText ).color(), // *pgp bad
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NegativeText ).color(), //* warning text
color
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NegativeText ).color(), // close to quota
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NormaBackground ).color(), //* colorbar
plain bg
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NormalText ).color(), //* colorbar
plain fg
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NormalBackground ).color(), //
*colorbar html bg
scheme.foreground( KColorScheme::NormalText ).color() //* colorbar
html fg
changed colors are marked with "*" after //. Such set maybe is not beautiful,
but safe and useful -- i.e. it always work no matter what scheme is set for
entire KDE.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 207877] A18Y: do not use hardcoded values for default (color scheme incompatibility)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207877 --- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-09-25 21:26:39 --- Martin, the number is not important (*). The question is what is the more productive and useful way: a) copy colors from KDE scheme to make a match b) force user to customize just "few" colors -- from KMail, Akregator, KNode, who knows from where ad.a) I know the "important message" does not exists in KDE, but if you copy the value from negative, or positive, or normal, or anything like that color -- it is a match. If you hardcoded green, it means, user has to change the colors in KMail (and other apps with hardcoded colors) -- it is unproductive and not useful at all Please reopen this report. Thank you. (*) or it is, but in favor of this report (reopening). Think about 1 million colors. You still think it is better to customize that much colors to make the match, or dynamically copy the values from KDE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 208120] New: html message: switch for dropping colors and layout
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208120 Summary: html message: switch for dropping colors and layout Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs When displaying html message Kmail is on mercy of the html content really -- this includes colors and layout. It would be useful to break such dependency (if required) on fly -- "drop html colors" + "drop html layout". Those switches could be added to "html message" strip (the label next to the message itself). This way, if for example due to the colors set, the message is unreadable, user could quickly remedy the situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 202173] KMail doesn't update shortcuts when changing keyboard layout
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202173 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl --- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-09-21 21:38:14 --- Duplicate of: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 207877] A18Y: do not use hardcoded values for default (color scheme incompatibility)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207877 --- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-09-19 13:59:22 --- It is actually a bug, because KMail does not work correctly with KDE schemes (the default ones, not customized). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 207877] New: A18Y: do not use hardcoded values for default (color scheme incompatibility)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207877 Summary: A18Y: do not use hardcoded values for default (color scheme incompatibility) Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs >From what I see KMail uses for several items hardcoded values (example: unread message). This means KMail is compatible only with selected KDE color schemes -- scheme change (in KDE) can lead to getting dark blue text on dark brown background. Hardly readable. My suggestion: instead of using hardcoded values for defaults for colors not covered by KDE global scheme, "link" internally colors KDE color -> KMail color Since color scheme is well polished, this means with each change whole KMail would change dynamically and correctly. For example such links could be created: KDE active -> KMail new KDE link (not visited) -> KMail unread This guarantees 100% working colors in KMail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 206469] toolbar: mark as ham/spam action -- use separate items instead of one confusing combo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206469 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-09-09 07:39:58 --- There is no such entry as "apply filter "mark as spam"" (or ham). There are: apply filter, apply all filters, ActionList: toolbar_filter_action. I don't use SA but bogofilter (another story if this is really dependant of used filtering mechanism it should not be). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 206421] migrating from KDE3 causes loosing sending accounts settings
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206421 --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-09-09 07:37:30 --- I use KDE3.5.10 too. Maybe you use KMail Enterprise version? I use regular version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 206421] migrating from KDE3 causes loosing sending accounts settings
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206421 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-09-08 22:59:55 --- a) there is no such file b) all data sit in kmailrc file which was of course copied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 206469] New: toolbar: mark as ham/spam action -- use separate items instead of one confusing combo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206469 Summary: toolbar: mark as ham/spam action -- use separate items instead of one confusing combo Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs Currently Kmail handles those two actions as one combo with very confusing name. Please provide the same action as separate entities, so user could add to toolbar (just an example) mark as ham separator mark as spam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 206421] New: migrating from KDE3 causes loosing sending accounts settings
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206421 Summary: migrating from KDE3 causes loosing sending accounts settings Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs I am not talking about migrating data (mail) but I am focused now on migrating accounts meta-data (i.e. settings). I copied *rc files and I got: + identities -- correct (*) + receiving accounts -- correct - sending accounts -- incorrect, all data were lost, KMail set some default account on its own (*) as far as they can be -- since sending accounts are lost, the related entries are set to dummy values as well -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205620] New: make "mark as X" part of undo/redo feature
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 Summary: make "mark as X" part of undo/redo feature Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs So user could for example mark message as read, select another message and undo --> the previous message would get "unread" status again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205248] import lotus notes messages: cannot import data
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205248 --- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-08-28 20:48:10 --- Unfortunately it is "my eyes only" case. But! If you could put some info in this error dialog (I already reported this issue) so I (and all users in such case) could pin-point the message, maybe I could be able to produce some smaller file to import such that I could send ast attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205253] find messages (global): double LMB click is not consistent with open message
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205253 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-08-26 23:02:37 --- Yes, true. Btw. in KDE3 Kmail worked correctly (at least for me, because I use preview mode). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205253] New: find messages (global): double LMB click is not consistent with open message
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205253 Summary: find messages (global): double LMB click is not consistent with open message Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs The find messages dialog: a) double LMB click on the message -> message shows up in separate window b) "open message" button -> message is selected in the main KMail window Bug. 1) the behaviour should be consistent 2) the behaviour should depend on Kmail settings -- if user uses "embedded" preview the (b) behaviour is correct, if not (a) (in both cases) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205248] import lotus notes messages: cannot import data
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205248 --- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-08-26 22:18:10 --- PS. What was imported is actually just a mess, empty messages or with some random characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205248] New: import lotus notes messages: cannot import data
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205248 Summary: import lotus notes messages: cannot import data Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) I try to import LN data -- KMail imported (I assume successfully) around 18% of all messages. From that point (message number ~1020) every next message cause the error: Cannot add message to folder LNotes-Import/ in KMail The whole LN mail file is not extremely big, 2.5MB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205246] New: import lotus notes messages: provide full information on error
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205246 Summary: import lotus notes messages: provide full information on error Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) On importing error occur with message: Cannot add message to folder LNotes-Import/ in KMail There has to be some cause of this error so please show it. Currently it is completely vague, and user does not have the clue what she/he can do about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 205242] New: import lotus notes messages: summarize the errors
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205242 Summary: import lotus notes messages: summarize the errors Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs Usability bug. When you importing messages an error can occur. For me it occurs on every message, or every second message: Cannot add message to folder LNotes-Import/ in KMail this means I am about to press [OK] button for confirming this error around 2000 times. Please, summarize the errors, since user cannot do anything about it, put this as "asynchronous" dialog: -- Importing 50% Error| message Cannot add message to folder LNotes-Import/ in KMail | XYZ ^^ Cannot add message to folder LNotes-Import/ in KMail | ABC || Cannot add message to folder LNotes-Import/ in KMail | GYD vv Total errors: 200 [ STOP ] --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 163609] Wordwrap breaks up URLs with dashes ('-')
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163609 --- Comment #21 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-08-26 22:02:53 --- Last time I checked -> private. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 138773] composer: use only tab to change active widget, not arrow-keys
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138773 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-08-23 21:03:47 --- Thomas, I understand "I like it" part, but my point is it is usability abuse. Two-fold: KDE does not work in fall-off mode, second, even at theoretical level of UI design such thing should not happen, because it leads to fragile UI (i.e. from user POV). More reading: infinite space (and apple menu). IMHO we should aim at consistent, robust UI, not personal preferences. If you don't agree with me, I think this report should be reopened, and new report for KDE posted to provide fall-off mode in KDE (so all apps would behave the same for users who like such mode). But now, Composer is simply exception. Thank you for reading, I hope you will reconsider. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 149310] Ctrl+Home does not select first entry
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149310 --- Comment #3 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-08-22 08:07:42 --- Martin, and when there is no selection? But I am not pointing out where the active element went, but the issue it is not highlighted so the user does not know what message is active one (by looking on the list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 204625] please change the default "Select All" (text) shortcut to Ctrl+A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204625 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-08-21 17:48:00 --- /me too agrees, plus ctrl+shift+a could be used for messages (single): ctrl+a -- selects focused message part, if none, body of the message (w/o headers) ctrl+shift+a -- selects entire message (with headers), no matter which part is focused So it would be slight backward compatibility break, but since ctrl+a was annoying for single message before, this break would be useful actually. @Finex, thanks for CC, but about votes -- I am out of any for such popular programs as KMail for lng time ago :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 147815] Usability: After adding an new filter the rename-popup should show up instantly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147815 --- Comment #11 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-08-15 19:05:30 --- I would have to take back other votes for KMail :-) and besides, there are so many issues and so little developers, that I doubt it changes anything really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 203606] New: composing mail: ability to alter entire message
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203606 Summary: composing mail: ability to alter entire message Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs I mean -- any bit (almost). I see two possibilities: a) view all headers would really reveal all headers, not only selected ones (it could be actually a preset what "all" means, for weekend users current "all" is sufficient, but for more advanced users it would be better to see all-all headers) b) or -- ability to switch "view source" of composed mail into edit mode (on user demand I mean) Or even both. This way user would be in control without having to look on disk where the message is stored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 203511] New: disable "send pending messages" entries when there is no message pending
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203511 Summary: disable "send pending messages" entries when there is no message pending Product: knode Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs disable "send pending messages" entries when there is no message pending. This way it will more obvious information feedback the queue is empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 203088] New: cannot select whole message content (ctrl+a)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203088 Summary: cannot select whole message content (ctrl+a) Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: unspecified OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Regression. When I clicked inside message preview in KMail/KDE3 and then I pressed ctrl+a whole message was selected. In KDE4 instead of previewed message, all messages (the list) are selected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 203085] New: message list option: hide tabbar if only one tab is present
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203085 Summary: message list option: hide tabbar if only one tab is present Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.3.0) Installed from:SuSE RPMs It is not usual that user works most of the time or all the time with only one tab in messages tabbar. In such case tabbar takes space with 0 benefit for user -- please provide such option "hide tabbar for only one tab" as it is present in Konqueror. For lowres screen users it is extremely useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 200684] KMail shortcuts violate KDE's HIG
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200684 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 128612] column: date (order of arrival) -- no indicator
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128612 --- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-07-28 10:04:30 --- Nope, because the reports are about different issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 147815] Usability: After adding an new filter the rename-popup should show up instantly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147815 --- Comment #7 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-07-06 12:21:12 --- Not exactly :-) Currently there is search edit box above. My point is to add edit box for entering the name. So the replace could be immediate. However the best would be removing the need of edit box anywhere -- allowing user to rename filter in-place (see Konqueror and press F2 for rename). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 147815] Usability: After adding an new filter the rename-popup should show up instantly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147815 --- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-07-06 10:30:49 --- Please reopen this report -- after all there are duplicates linked here. There is still no edit box for direct creating new filter. So the workflow is unfortunately not changed a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 197145] New: message disposition notification: provide notification text as a template
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197145 Summary: message disposition notification: provide notification text as a template Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.2.90) Installed from:SuSE RPMs More flexibility -- the better, ability to set multilanguage text -- also a plus. I think the wish and the benefits are quite obvious, so end of reasoning :-). Current text: " The message sent on x to with subject "x" has been displayed. This is no guarantee that the message has been read or understood. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 196352] filters: custom filters are deleted on dialog-close because of errors
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196352 --- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-06-13 17:43:34 --- PS. Current behaviour has an absurd side-effect, when there are no filters, the default one is created automatically. User clicks ok, filter is deleted, you go see filters, it is recreated again. And so on... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 137294] create filter: no warning about nonsense filter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137294 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-06-13 17:42:37 --- It is fixed now, although not as I would wish for. See: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196352 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 196352] New: filters: custom filters are deleted on dialog-close because of errors
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196352 Summary: filters: custom filters are deleted on dialog-close because of errors Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.2.90) Installed from:SuSE RPMs Some time ago I wrote report about warning user about non valid filters: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137294 In a way it is implemented. Invalid filters are deleted. This is completely wrong -- when you write a program, would you expect compiler output says: "Syntax error: your source file has been deleted" ? I think no. So why deleting filter rules because of user omission: a) warn user, correct b) mark the filter as invalid (inactive) ad.b) let the user _correct_ the filter, don't make him/her start entire filter from scratch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 136555] JJ: No way to use custom tags as search criteria
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136555 --- Comment #8 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-06-12 16:25:39 --- Rigo, I believe the issue you mention is covered in: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99094 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 166062] Mark as SPAM, Mark as HAM Icons Missing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166062 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl --- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-05-17 09:58:10 --- *** Bug 184508 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 184508] toolbar icons: filter classify as ham and spam icons are missing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184508 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-05-17 09:58:10 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 166062 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 192865] New: "waiting for the reply" feature
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192865 Summary: "waiting for the reply" feature Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.2.2) Installed from:SuSE RPMs This wish go further than simple notification of getting the mail of the recipient. I explain how I imagine this feature by example: I write a mail to a friend and I would like to get an answer for that. Normally my friend should be able to answer within 3 days. So I set "reminder" for the reply for 5 days (safety). I send mail, and I can forget about it. If in 5 days I get the reply, you won't tell a difference comparing to current KMail. But if I _don't_ KMail would notify me (how, it is another story) that I have unanswered mail. Several things could occur: a) he didn't get my mail b) I didn't get his c) he forgot to answer d) he get it by it landed in spam folder, and so on... In my case it is usually (c) so it would help me coordinate the discussions. But of course network traffic reliability here is also an issue. Possible options: * list of friends with "sticky" reminders (for this guy set reminder by default to 2 days) * the way of notifying user of unanswered mail -- internal mail (my preferred choice) with important flag, or KDE notify system... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 192855] add "signature" of used account for any fetched mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192855 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-05-16 12:33:10 --- Hmm, I thought of it as rather behaviour for safety reason. It is specialized true, but all users could benefit from it. And I don't see any penalty except few more bytes per each mail. Thank you very much for the explanation -- works like a charm. Actually it takes creating empty criteria, and unchecking options for stopping filtering. Just tested, and it adds tag per each account, so thanks once again, Thomas! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 192855] New: add "signature" of used account for any fetched mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192855 Summary: add "signature" of used account for any fetched mail Product: kmail Version: unspecified Platform: SuSE RPMs OS/Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: wishlist Priority: NOR Component: general AssignedTo: kdepim-bugs@kde.org ReportedBy: bluedz...@wp.pl Version:(using KDE 4.2.2) Installed from:SuSE RPMs This wish is thought as safety in KMail but because of shortcoming of the servers -- however sooner or later even the best server will crash. Example of the problem: I am expecting some important mails, I have to accounts on server X and sever Y. The thing is Y broke this morning and on X I didn't have the messages (but I don't know it). The Y generates N empty e-mails. So when I clicked "check mail in" I get several empty emails but since they are empty I cannot tell if Y broke or X, thus I cannot tell if the mail I am waiting for is gone or not. Such thing happened to me this morning, I get 17 identical, empty "emails", no to, no from, no return path. So the only thing I know that one (?) of the severs went wrong, but which one? What mail is affected, I cannot tell. Thus the wish -- add "internal" data, for KMail user, fetching mail from server X add in header: Fetched-from: X So even if server answer only with bare message thanks to KMail I could still figure out where did it come from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 122198] ask where to send a mail, if there is a reply-to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122198 --- Comment #5 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-09 21:03:50 --- Please re-close this report as duplicate of: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83339 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 67845] make reply-to-list smarter
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67845 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl --- Comment #8 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-09 21:00:55 --- Since it is not a bug report what is exactly the (content of) wish? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 177716] KMail should not reply to a mailing list when not asked to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177716 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 122198] ask where to send a mail, if there is a reply-to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122198 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bluedz...@wp.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 150759] composer: selecting content of header edit-box you can drop out of it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150759 --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-07 12:37:31 --- When you are selecting something program should not break selection. So it should either select more elements or set boundary for selection. In this case selecting next element does not make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 150759] composer: selecting content of header edit-box you can drop out of it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150759 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-07 12:07:34 --- run kmail new message enter "to" field type xxx press home, so the care would be before xxx press and hold shift press 3 times right arrow xxx should be selected press right arrow key once more you fell off the edit box -> bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 160224] Quick search for message list gone
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224 --- Comment #16 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-05 21:56:27 --- How did you get to this conclusion? KDE3 --> QS switchable. KDE4 --> QS non-switchable. Really, it is progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 160224] Quick search for message list gone
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224 --- Comment #14 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-05 20:11:43 --- Yes, this QS we are talking about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 150411] it is possible to quit Kmail while editing filter rules (data loss)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150411 --- Comment #4 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-05 19:30:34 --- > What I'm trying to say is, that there is no bug. Data loss is always a bug. > The only way to prevent that is, to make the filter dialog a modal popup. Adding confirmation dialog "The filters data are modified. Do you really want to quit? [ quit ] [ cancel ]" would prevent accidental data loss or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 150411] it is possible to quit Kmail while editing filter rules (data loss)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150411 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-05 18:00:35 --- But you realize you will loose data? Filter, settings, mail are all data and saying that it is ok to loose some settings because they are not critical is not really acceptable. And nobody said anything about modality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 160224] Quick search for message list gone
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160224 --- Comment #12 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-05 17:57:54 --- What icons has to do with this report? The question is -- is the QS switchable or not. In KDE 4.2.1 it was still non-switchable so this report should still be opened as it is still valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 162839] find messages: outdated info about number of scanned messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162839 Maciej Pilichowski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
[Bug 162839] find messages: outdated info about number of scanned messages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162839 --- Comment #2 from Maciej Pilichowski 2009-04-04 15:37:59 --- I meant status bar of the "find messages" (so it scan all folders) dialog. I cannot tell what about KDE4 because I use it only for testing, so it is empty. If you are sure this info now is reliable (i.e. shows accurate number of scanned messages so far), let's close is as worksforme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
