Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/0] scriptlets: clean up declared installation dependencies, stop calling kernel-install in chroot or container

2022-02-17 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1617#note_846918364

I forgot to add: if the third commit is too much, I'm fine with dropping it.
This can always be revived later if some concrete use cases pops up.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/0] scriptlets: clean up declared installation dependencies, stop calling kernel-install in chroot or container

2022-02-17 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1617#note_846917518

I don't have any immediate use case in mind. This is more a matter of general
principle: dependencies should only be declared if the package genuinely needs
the dependency to function. People tend to use packages in unusual and
innovative ways and we shouldn't have dependencies for things which would
*usually* be used. Less dependencies == more flexibility.

Some contrived cases: a qemu image where the kernel is used externally (`qemu
-kernel -initrd …`), and then you only need the modules in the guest, so you
don't want kernel-install. Such cases would *usually* involve systemd in the
image, but maybe if you're building an single-executable appliance, you don't
have systemd there.

So maybe you're building a container with a qemu and single application
isolated in a VM, and you want the kernel for the qemu in the container, but
no systemd and no boot loader.

Or maybe you're trying to convert Fedora to runit or back to sysvinit, so you
want to drop dependencies on systemd as much as possible ;)

As I said, I don't have a good use case, but I think the general principle is
reasonable.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 1/2] redhat: rh_kabi: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE

2022-02-17 Thread Jiri Benc (via Email Bridge)
From: Jiri Benc on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619#note_846679718

This leaves the semicolon here in the GENKSYMS pass. I don't think we want
that; the kABI checksum would be generated from:

```
union {
unsigned long xyz[_size];
;
}
```

The fix is redefining __RH_KABI_CHECK_SIZE to include the semicolon (and call
it without the semicolon everywhere).
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 2/2] redhat: kABI: add missing RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS Kconfig option

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca 

redhat: kABI: add missing RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS Kconfig option

When the kABI macros were copied from the RHEL kernel to ARK, the
RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS config option was dropped. Without it, the
size checks included in some of the kABI macros can't be enabled.

Add the KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS config option, enable it on regular ARK
configs, and disable it for debug and kgcov kernels.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

diff --git a/Kconfig.redhat b/Kconfig.redhat
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/Kconfig.redhat
+++ b/Kconfig.redhat
@@ -14,4 +14,13 @@ config RHEL_DIFFERENCES
 
  Unless you want a restricted kernel, say N here.
 
+config RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
+   bool "Enables more stringent kabi checks in the macros"
+   depends on RHEL_DIFFERENCES
+   default y
+   help
+ This option enables more stringent kabi checks. Those must
+ be disabled in case of a debug build, because debug builds
+ allow to change struct sizes.
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/ark/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/ark/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS is not set
diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS=y
diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/ark/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/ark/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS is not set
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS is not set

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 1/2] redhat: rh_kabi: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca 

redhat: rh_kabi: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE

This macro is similar to RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE, but with a
different intention.  While RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE is meant to add
new elements that may grow in the future to kABI-protected structures,
RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE should be used to hide existing elements
from kABI checksum computation, while allowing them to be extended in
the future without silently breaking binary compatibility of any field
that follows it.

The implementation differs from RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE so that _size
is included in the kABI checksum. That way, we can't accidentally grow
the reserved space, as that would change the offsets of all the
following fields.

The size check guarantees that binary compatibility is preserved.
Until now, __RH_KABI_CHECK_SIZE was only used in the !__GENKSYMS__
versions of macros, so it wasn't defined in the __GENKSYMS__
case. We need to define it to nothing so that _new is ignored by
checksum computation.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

diff --git a/include/linux/rh_kabi.h b/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
+++ b/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
@@ -306,6 +306,23 @@
  *   of the size is not allowed and would constitute a silent kABI breakage.
  *   Beware that the RH_KABI_EXCLUDE macro does not do any size checks.
  *
+ * RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE
+ *   Like RH_KABI_EXCLUDE, this macro excludes the element from
+ *   checksum generation.  The same warnings as for RH_KABI_EXCLUDE
+ *   apply: use RH_KABI_FORCE_CHANGE.
+ *
+ *   This macro is intended to be used for elements embedded inside
+ *   kABI-protected structures (struct, array). In contrast with
+ *   RH_KABI_EXCLUDE, this macro reserves extra space, so that the
+ *   embedded element can grow without changing the offsets of the
+ *   fields that follow. The provided 'size' is the total space to be
+ *   added in longs (i.e. it's 8 * 'size' bytes), including the size
+ *   of the added element.  It is automatically checked that the new
+ *   element does not overflow the reserved space, now nor in the
+ *   future. The size is also included in the checksum via the
+ *   reserved space, to ensure that we don't accidentally change it,
+ *   which would change the offsets of the fields that follow.
+ *
  * RH_KABI_BROKEN_INSERT
  * RH_KABI_BROKEN_REMOVE
  *   Insert a field to the middle of a struct / delete a field from a struct.
@@ -377,6 +394,8 @@
 # define _RH_KABI_REPLACE(_orig, _new) _orig
 # define _RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(_elem)
 
+# define __RH_KABI_CHECK_SIZE(_item, _size)
+
 #else
 
 # define RH_KABI_ALIGN_WARNING ".  Disable CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS if 
debugging."
@@ -477,6 +496,13 @@
 
 #define RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(_elem) _RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(_elem);
 
+#define RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE(_new, _size) \
+   union { \
+   RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(_new)   \
+   unsigned long RH_KABI_UNIQUE_ID[_size]; \
+   __RH_KABI_CHECK_SIZE(_new, 8 * (_size));\
+   };
+
 #define RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE(_new, _size)  \
RH_KABI_EXTEND(union {  \
_new;   \

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619

This MR introduces a new kABI macro, RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE. The
implementation is identical to RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE, but the meaning is
more in line with RH_KABI_EXCLUDE. The size check and reserved space allows us
to exclude an element embedded inside a kABI-protected structure while
reserving space for it to grow in the future.

The size checks that are part of multiple kABI macros are currently not
enabled because the config option to turn them on is missing. Those size
checks only make sense on regular builds, so they're disabled on debug
kernels.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

---
 include/linux/rh_kabi.h|  26 ++
 redhat/configs/ark/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS  |   1 +
 redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS|   1 +
 redhat/configs/ark/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS  |   1 +
 redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS |   1 +
 Kconfig.redhat |   9 +++
 6 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619#note_846657442

In v3 I modified RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE to only exclude the new element
from the checksum, but include the reserved size, so that we can't
accidentally grow it without breaking the checksum. I also rebased and
addressed Don's and Justin's comments.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619#note_846653940

Ok, addressed in v4 (I missed the 'depends on' in v3). Thanks.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619#note_846653350

Ok, addressed in v4 (I forgot the 'depends on' in v3).
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Don Zickus (via Email Bridge)
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619#note_846563779

@sdubroca - I agree with @jmflinuxtx .  Let's keep Red Hat configs centralized
in Kconfig.redhat.  Adding a 'depends on RHEL_DIFFERENCES' is to help Fedora
keep it disabled.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/0] scriptlets: clean up declared installation dependencies, stop calling kernel-install in chroot or container

2022-02-17 Thread Don Zickus (via Email Bridge)
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1617#note_846539664

@keszybz - thanks for the contribution.  I feel like I am missing something
obvious.

If I follow your assumption, that someone will install a kernel in a virt env
or container that may not have systemd and/or access to /boot, then your
changes make sense and I can see how it prevents the grub error messages you
are seeing.

However, I am stuck on the assumption part.  Is there any value in installing
a kernel in those environments?  The package puts everything under
/lib/modules easily enough, you just loose the /boot and grub setup.  Is that
useful?  It might be, but currently I am thinking all these changes do is
prevent error messages when the developer does something not useful.  And I
could be ok with that, I think. I am probably missing something obvious.
Thoughts?
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Justin M. Forbes (via Email Bridge)
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619#note_846439422

It seems the Kconfig entry for this really belongs in Kconfig.redhat perhaps
even better if it had a dep on RHEL_DIFFERENCES as well.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: configs: Disable team driver

2022-02-17 Thread Hangbin Liu (via Email Bridge)
From: Hangbin Liu 

redhat: configs: Disable team driver

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945477
Upstream Status: RHEL-only

This drivers have been deprecated with RHEL9, so with RHEL10 it is time
to remove it. Disable the NET_TEAM on ARK. No need to set the modes as
they depend on team driver.

Keep the config enabled in Fedora as Fedora user may still need this driver.

Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu 

diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM 
b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# This CONFIG has been disabled in RHEL by RHEL Engineering. Please contact 
Red Hat Support for further assistance.
+# CONFIG_NET_TEAM is not set
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM 
b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM
rename from redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM
rename to redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM
+++ b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP 
b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP
rename from redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP
rename to redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP
+++ b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_BROADCAST 
b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_BROADCAST
rename from redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_BROADCAST
rename to redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_BROADCAST
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_BROADCAST
+++ b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_BROADCAST
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_LOADBALANCE 
b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_LOADBALANCE
rename from redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_LOADBALANCE
rename to redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_LOADBALANCE
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_LOADBALANCE
+++ b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_LOADBALANCE
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_RANDOM 
b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_RANDOM
rename from redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_RANDOM
rename to redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_RANDOM
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_RANDOM
+++ b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_RANDOM
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ROUNDROBIN 
b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ROUNDROBIN
rename from redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ROUNDROBIN
rename to redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ROUNDROBIN
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ROUNDROBIN
+++ b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_NET_TEAM_MODE_ROUNDROBIN

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1620
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 1/2] redhat: rh_kabi: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca 

redhat: rh_kabi: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE

This macro is identical to RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE, but with a
different intention.  While RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE is meant to add
new elements that may grow in the future to kABI-protected structures,
RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE should be used to hide existing elements
from kABI checksum computation, while allowing them to be extended in
the future without silently breaking binary compatibility of any field
that follows it. The size check guarantees that binary compatibility
is preserved.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

diff --git a/include/linux/rh_kabi.h b/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
+++ b/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
@@ -306,6 +306,21 @@
  *   of the size is not allowed and would constitute a silent kABI breakage.
  *   Beware that the RH_KABI_EXCLUDE macro does not do any size checks.
  *
+ * RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE
+ *   Like RH_KABI_EXCLUDE, this macro excludes the element from
+ *   checksum generation.  The same warnings as for RH_KABI_EXCLUDE
+ *   apply: use RH_KABI_FORCE_CHANGE.
+ *
+ *   This macro is intended to be used for elements embedded inside
+ *   kABI-protected structures (struct, array). In contrast with
+ *   RH_KABI_EXCLUDE, this macro reserves extra space, so that the
+ *   embedded element can grow without changing the offsets of the
+ *   fields that follow. The provided 'size' is the total space to be
+ *   added in longs (i.e. it's 8 * 'size' bytes), including the size
+ *   of the added element.  It is automatically checked that the new
+ *   element does not overflow the reserved space, now nor in the
+ *   future.
+ *
  * RH_KABI_BROKEN_INSERT
  * RH_KABI_BROKEN_REMOVE
  *   Insert a field to the middle of a struct / delete a field from a struct.
@@ -477,6 +492,13 @@
 
 #define RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(_elem) _RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(_elem);
 
+#define RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE(_new, _size) \
+   RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(union { \
+   _new;   \
+   unsigned long RH_KABI_UNIQUE_ID[_size]; \
+   __RH_KABI_CHECK_SIZE(_new, 8 * (_size));\
+   })
+
 #define RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE(_new, _size)  \
RH_KABI_EXTEND(union {  \
_new;   \

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 2/2] redhat: kABI: add missing RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS Kconfig option

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca 

redhat: kABI: add missing RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS Kconfig option

When the kABI macros were copied from the RHEL kernel to ARK, the
RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS config option was dropped. Without it, the
size checks included in some of the kABI macros can't be enabled.

Add the KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS config option, enable it on regular ARK
configs, and disable it for debug and kgcov kernels.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/Kconfig
+++ b/Kconfig
@@ -32,3 +32,11 @@ source "lib/Kconfig.debug"
 source "Documentation/Kconfig"
 
 source "Kconfig.redhat"
+
+config RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
+   bool "Enables more stringent kabi checks in the macros"
+   default y
+   help
+ This option enables more stringent kabi checks. Those must
+ be disabled in case of a debug build, because debug builds
+ allow to change struct sizes.
diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/ark/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/ark/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS is not set
diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS=y
diff --git a/redhat/configs/ark/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/ark/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/ark/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS is not set
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS is not set

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619

This MR introduces a new kABI macro, RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE. The
implementation is identical to RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE, but the meaning is
more in line with RH_KABI_EXCLUDE. The size check and reserved space allows us
to exclude an element embedded inside a kABI-protected structure while
reserving space for it to grow in the future.

The size checks that are part of multiple kABI macros are currently not
enabled because the config option to turn them on is missing. Those size
checks only make sense on regular builds, so they're disabled on debug
kernels.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

---
 include/linux/rh_kabi.h|  22 ++
 redhat/configs/ark/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS  |   1 +
 redhat/configs/ark/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS|   1 +
 redhat/configs/ark/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS  |   1 +
 redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS |   1 +
 Kconfig|   8 +++
 6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/0] scriptlets: clean up declared installation dependencies, stop calling kernel-install in chroot or container

2022-02-17 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1617#note_846003134

I added a third commit now.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/0] scriptlets: clean up declared installation dependencies, stop calling kernel-install in chroot or container

2022-02-17 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1617
NOTE: Truncated patchset due to missing public @redhat.com email
  address on your GitLab profile at https://gitlab.com/-/profile.
  Once that is fixed, close and reopen the merge request to
  retrigger sending the emails.



---
 redhat/kernel.spec.template |  30 ++
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Jiri Benc (via Email Bridge)
From: Jiri Benc on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619#note_846001310

Sabrina, I suggest enabling CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS only in
redhat/configs/ark and disabling them in redhat/configs/fedora. That config
option is not useful for Fedora.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCH 0/2] redhat: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE and enable size checks

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619

This MR introduces a new kABI macro, RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE. The
implementation is identical to RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE, but the meaning is
more in line with RH_KABI_EXCLUDE. The size check and reserved space allows us
to exclude an element embedded inside a kABI-protected structure while
reserving space for it to grow in the future.

The size checks that are part of multiple kABI macros are currently not
enabled because the config option to turn them on is missing. Those size
checks only make sense on regular builds, so they're disabled on debug
kernels.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

---
 include/linux/rh_kabi.h|  22 ++
 redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS   |   1 +
 redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS |   1 +
 redhat/configs/common/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS   |   1 +
 Kconfig|  10 
 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCH 2/2] redhat: kABI: add missing RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS Kconfig option

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca 

redhat: kABI: add missing RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS Kconfig option

When the kABI macros were copied from the RHEL kernel to ARK, the
RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS config option was dropped. Without it, the
size checks included in some of the kABI macros can't be enabled.

Add the KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS config option, enable it on regular
configs, and disable it for debug kernels.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/Kconfig
+++ b/Kconfig
@@ -32,3 +32,13 @@ source "lib/Kconfig.debug"
 source "Documentation/Kconfig"
 
 source "Kconfig.redhat"
+
+config RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
+   bool "Enables more stringent kabi checks in the macros"
+   default y
+   help
+ This option enables more stringent kabi checks. Those must
+ be disabled in case of a debug build, because debug builds
+ allow to change struct sizes.
+
+
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/debug/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS is not set
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS=y
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS 
b/redhat/configs/common/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
new file mode 100644
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/redhat/configs/common/kgcov/CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# CONFIG_RH_KABI_SIZE_ALIGN_CHECKS is not set

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCH 1/2] redhat: rh_kabi: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE

2022-02-17 Thread Sabrina Dubroca (via Email Bridge)
From: Sabrina Dubroca 

redhat: rh_kabi: introduce RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE

This macro is identical to RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE, but with a
different intention.  While RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE is meant to add
new elements that may grow in the future to kABI-protected structures,
RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE should be used to hide existing elements
from kABI checksum computation, while allowing them to be extended in
the future without silently breaking binary compatibility of any field
that follows it. The size check guarantees that binary compatibility
is preserved.

Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca 

diff --git a/include/linux/rh_kabi.h b/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
+++ b/include/linux/rh_kabi.h
@@ -306,6 +306,21 @@
  *   of the size is not allowed and would constitute a silent kABI breakage.
  *   Beware that the RH_KABI_EXCLUDE macro does not do any size checks.
  *
+ * RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE
+ *   Like RH_KABI_EXCLUDE, this macro excludes the element from
+ *   checksum generation.  The same warnings as for RH_KABI_EXCLUDE
+ *   apply: use RH_KABI_FORCE_CHANGE.
+ *
+ *   This macro is intended to be used for elements embedded inside
+ *   kABI-protected structures (struct, array). In contrast with
+ *   RH_KABI_EXCLUDE, this macro reserves extra space, so that the
+ *   embedded element can grow without changing the offsets of the
+ *   fields that follow. The provided 'size' is the total space to be
+ *   added in longs (i.e. it's 8 * 'size' bytes), including the size
+ *   of the added element.  It is automatically checked that the new
+ *   element does not overflow the reserved space, now nor in the
+ *   future.
+ *
  * RH_KABI_BROKEN_INSERT
  * RH_KABI_BROKEN_REMOVE
  *   Insert a field to the middle of a struct / delete a field from a struct.
@@ -477,6 +492,13 @@
 
 #define RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(_elem) _RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(_elem);
 
+#define RH_KABI_EXCLUDE_WITH_SIZE(_new, _size) \
+   RH_KABI_EXCLUDE(union { \
+   _new;   \
+   unsigned long RH_KABI_UNIQUE_ID[_size]; \
+   __RH_KABI_CHECK_SIZE(_new, 8 * (_size));\
+   })
+
 #define RH_KABI_EXTEND_WITH_SIZE(_new, _size)  \
RH_KABI_EXTEND(union {  \
_new;   \

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1619
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/0] scriptlets: clean up declared installation dependencies, stop calling kernel-install in chroot or container

2022-02-17 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1617#note_845976933

I think it'd make sense to make calls to kernel-install optional: i.e. do them
only if `/usr/bin/kernel-install` is present. The justification is that on
"normal" systems, systemd is installed and you want to call kernel-install.
But if the kernel is pulled in a container or a build root, you want to skip
the call, and right now we pull in systemd just to detect whether to skip.

Hmm, I wanted to do this at some later point, but if we're touching the
scriptlets here anyway, let's just do it here too.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/0] scriptlets: clean up declared installation dependencies, stop calling kernel-install in chroot or container

2022-02-17 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1617#note_845971647

Thank you for the review. I added `Requires(posttrans,preun):
/usr/bin/systemd-detect-virt` and adjusted the comments on the message a bit.
(It was already pulled in via systemd-udev, but it's better to be explicit.)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/0] scriptlets: clean up declared installation dependencies, stop calling kernel-install in chroot or container

2022-02-17 Thread via Email Bridge
From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek on gitlab.com
Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1617
NOTE: Truncated patchset due to missing public @redhat.com email
  address on your GitLab profile at https://gitlab.com/-/profile.
  Once that is fixed, close and reopen the merge request to
  retrigger sending the emails.



---
 redhat/kernel.spec.template |  28 
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: configs: Disable CONFIG_MPLS for s390x/zfcpdump

2022-02-17 Thread Patrick Talbert (via Email Bridge)
From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1606#note_845967814

@cohuck I've added you to the project so the Approve button should be
available to you now.
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure