✅ PASS: Test report for 6.3.9-100.fc37 (kernel-fedora)
Hi, we tested your kernel and here are the results: Overall result: PASSED Merge: OK Compile: OK Test: OK Tested-by: CKI Project Kernel information: Brew / Koji Task ID: 102426024 You can find all the details about the test run at https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/checkouts/93290 One or more kernel tests failed: We also see the following known issues which are not related to your changes: Issue: NFS Connectathon: SELinux prevents rpcbind URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1758147 Affected tests: aarch64 - NFS Connectathon ppc64le - NFS Connectathon s390x - NFS Connectathon x86_64 - NFS Connectathon Issue: (kernel-fedora) Storage - blktests - nvmeof-mp: FAIL: Configured NVMe target driver URL: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/tests/kernel/kernel-tests/-/issues/1610 Affected tests: ppc64le - Storage - blktests - nvmeof-mp Issue: Storage blktests - blk: scsi/007: Reading from scsi_debug failed URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027550 Affected tests: s390x - Storage - blktests - blk If you find a failure unrelated to your changes, please ask the test maintainer to review it. This will prevent the failures from being incorrectly reported in the future. Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective. ,-. ,-. ( C ) ( K ) Continuous `-',-.`-' Kernel ( I ) Integration `-' __ ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] scsi: sd: Add "probe_type" module parameter to allow synchronous probing
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2504#note_1440757633 > What I would like to avoid is RH coming up with its own scheme which was not what other vendors adopt. This is my main concern. I don't want to carry a patch forever. As for the contents of this patch, I don't have a problem with it. It is a matter of what is upstream's solution to this problem. If they have a solution which does not flow well with what RHEL 9 users are expecting, a temporary fix for RHEL 9 is acceptable. But it seems long term we need a better solution that works with upstream. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] scsi: sd: Add "probe_type" module parameter to allow synchronous probing
From: Ewan D. Milne on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2504#note_1440687749 I'm happy to change it to however we would like the process to work, if we want. At LSF/MM Martin Petersen said that Oracle had some device labeling changes w/udev so that customer did not have to use hard-to-remember /dev/by-id/xxx names (some of only differ by a few characters in the middle of a string like "naa.600601603390400037c9ddb0cdcde811") but could instead define their own names. He was going to see if that could be released as open source, so for RHEL 10 we could have a better solution. What I would like to avoid is RH coming up with its own scheme which was not what other vendors adopt. I could add a warning message that this option will be deprecated in RHEL 9 and removed in RHEL 10 once we have a plan for an alternate solution. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: aarch64: move CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 to common
From: pbrobinson on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2526#note_1440622555 Why is RHEL enabling that option given it doesn't enable ARCH_ROCKCHIP? ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 0/9] CI: script cleanup part2
From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2518#note_1440561343 @ezulian - I understand the concern. My main reason for this flexibility (and initially when we wrote this years ago) was the ability to use a different area to test. Currently my gitlab_url is pointed at gitlab.com/dzickusrh. This allows me to test some of the automation without messing up the kernel- ark project. The main user of this script is our nightly cronjob which has the GITLAB_URL defined correctly. Happy to hear better ways to test this that reduces variables! ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/configs: aarch64: move CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 to common
From: Mark Salter redhat/configs: aarch64: move CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 to common Fedora and RHEL have the same config, move it to common. Signed-off-by: Mark Salter diff --git a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/arm/aarch64/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 b/redhat/configs/common/generic/arm/aarch64/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 rename from redhat/configs/fedora/generic/arm/aarch64/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 rename to redhat/configs/common/generic/arm/aarch64/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/arm/aarch64/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/arm/aarch64/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 diff --git a/redhat/configs/rhel/generic/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 b/redhat/configs/rhel/generic/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 deleted file mode 100644 index blahblah..blahblah 0 --- a/redhat/configs/rhel/generic/CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001 +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ERRATUM_3588001=y -- https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2526 ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv12 0/13] redhat: Add realtime and arm64 64k-page-size build and packaging logic
Thank you all! On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:29 AM Patrick Talbert (via Email Bridge) < cki-git...@redhat.com> wrote: > From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com > > https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2403#note_1439334412 > > No backsies. > ___ > kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/kernel.spec.template: Disable 'extracting debug info' messages
From: Prarit Bhargava
redhat/kernel.spec.template: Disable 'extracting debug info' messages
debugedit's find_debuginfo.sh script outputs an 'extracting debug info'
message for every binary file that is packaged. On a recent ELN build
these messages are responsible for 4631 out of 11464 (40%) of build log
messages on x86_64 [1]. They serve little or no purpose and are noise in the
build log. These messages have already been disabled in Fedora, so
disable them for CentOS and ELN builds as well.
Disable 'extracting debug info' messages for all builds and add a
note on how to re-enable them if necessary.
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2218314
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -684,11 +684,9 @@ BuildConflicts: dwarves < 1.13
%undefine _debugsource_packages
%undefine _debuginfo_subpackages
-%if 0%{?fedora}
+# Remove -q option below to provide 'extracting debug info' messages
%global _find_debuginfo_opts -r -q
-%else
-%global _find_debuginfo_opts -r
-%endif
+
%global _missing_build_ids_terminate_build 1
%global _no_recompute_build_ids 1
%endif
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2525
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2] kernel.spec: drop obsolete ldconfig
From: Jan Stancek on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2503#note_1439636993 rebased ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv2] kernel.spec: drop obsolete ldconfig
From: Jan Stancek
kernel.spec: drop obsolete ldconfig
This ldconfig is misplaced and over the years it was just
added to whatever sub-package %post section happened to be
the last one preceding it, e.g. zfcdump, kdump, xen, etc.
The weird side effect of this was a strange error for rtonly builds:
/sbin/ldconfig: Can't create temporary cache file /etc/ld.so.cache~:
Permission denied
This happened because all %post sections were behind %if conditions
that were never true. So instead of this ldconfig landing in %post somewhere
"randomly", it became part of commands for %install section and got
executed inside the build.
Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -3390,13 +3390,6 @@ fi\
%endif
%endif
-%ifnarch noarch %{nobuildarches}
-if [ -x /sbin/ldconfig ]
-then
-/sbin/ldconfig -X || exit $?
-fi
-%endif
-
###
### file lists
###
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2503
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv12 0/13] redhat: Add realtime and arm64 64k-page-size build and packaging logic
From: Patrick Talbert on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2403#note_1439334412 No backsies. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
