[OS-BUILD PATCH] configs: make CONFIG_EDAC_GHES a module
From: Aristeu Rozanski configs: make CONFIG_EDAC_GHES a module Since 802e7f1dfed7cc7fb309995e0c4138f08977fdfc it's possible to build ghes_edac as module and this is useful for customers that want to unload it during runtime. Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES rename from redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES rename to redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES +++ b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES diff --git a/redhat/configs/rhel/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES b/redhat/configs/rhel/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES new file mode 100644 index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- /dev/null +++ b/redhat/configs/rhel/generic/CONFIG_EDAC_GHES @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +CONFIG_EDAC_GHES=m -- https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2914 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 4/5] Remove separate license tag for libperf
From: Justin M. Forbes
Remove separate license tag for libperf
Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbes
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -1135,13 +1135,11 @@ This package provides debug information for the perf
python bindings.
%if %{with_libperf}
%package -n libperf
Summary: The perf library from kernel source
-License: GPL-2.0-only AND (LGPL-2.1-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
%description -n libperf
This package contains the kernel source perf library.
%package -n libperf-devel
Summary: Developement files for the perf library from kernel source
-License: GPL-2.0-only AND (LGPL-2.1-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
%description -n libperf-devel
This package includes libraries and header files needed for development
of applications which use perf library from kernel source.
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907
--
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 3/5] Don't use upstream bpftool version for Fedora package
From: Justin M. Forbes
Don't use upstream bpftool version for Fedora package
Upstream bpftool went with their own versioning. While this works in
rawhide and RHEL where release is bumped wth every build, it does not
work with Fedora. Because bpftool sublevel is not bumped with stable
updates, and we don't update the release in Fedora when the version has
changed, we ended up with a failure because the bpftool subpackage
version already exists. For Fedora, we will stick with the kernel
versioning for the package. bpftool -V still displays the upstream
bpftool version number.
Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbes
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -1227,7 +1227,14 @@ analysing the logical and timing behavior of Linux.
%if %{with_bpftool}
+%if 0%{?fedora}
+# bpftoolverion doesn't bump with stable updates so let's stick with
+# upstream kernel version for the package name. We still get correct
+# output with bpftool -V.
+%define bpftoolversion %specrpmversion
+%else
%define bpftoolversion %%SPECBPFTOOLVERSION%%
+%endif
%package -n bpftool
Summary: Inspection and simple manipulation of eBPF programs and maps
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907
--
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 1/5] add libperf packages and enable perf, libperf, tools and bpftool packages
From: Thorsten Leemhuis
add libperf packages and enable perf, libperf, tools and bpftool packages
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -224,6 +224,8 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%define with_cross_headers %{?_without_cross_headers: 0}
%{?!_without_cross_headers: 1}
# perf
%define with_perf %{?_without_perf: 0} %{?!_without_perf: 1}
+# libperf
+%define with_libperf %{?_without_libperf: 0} %{?!_without_libperf: 1}
# tools
%define with_tools %{?_without_tools: 0} %{?!_without_tools: 1}
# bpf tool
@@ -300,9 +302,10 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
# no stablelist
%define with_kernel_abi_stablelists 0
# Fedora builds these separately
-%define with_perf 0
-%define with_tools 0
-%define with_bpftool 0
+%define with_perf 1
+%define with_libperf 1
+%define with_tools 1
+%define with_bpftool 1
# No realtime fedora variants
%define with_realtime 0
%define with_arm64_64k 0
@@ -388,6 +391,7 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%define with_realtime 0
%define with_vdso_install 0
%define with_perf 0
+%define with_libperf 0
%define with_tools 0
%define with_bpftool 0
%define with_kernel_abi_stablelists 0
@@ -402,6 +406,7 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%define with_base 0
%define with_vdso_install 0
%define with_perf 0
+%define with_libperf 0
%define with_tools 0
%define with_bpftool 0
%define with_kernel_abi_stablelists 0
@@ -417,6 +422,7 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%define with_debuginfo 0
%define with_vdso_install 0
%define with_perf 0
+%define with_libperf 0
%define with_tools 0
%define with_bpftool 0
%define with_kernel_abi_stablelists 0
@@ -480,6 +486,7 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%define with_cross_headers 0
%define with_tools 0
%define with_perf 0
+%define with_libperf 0
%define with_bpftool 0
%define with_selftests 0
%define with_debug 0
@@ -572,6 +579,7 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%define with_debuginfo 0
%define with_perf 0
+%define with_libperf 0
%define with_tools 0
%define with_bpftool 0
%define with_selftests 0
@@ -1124,6 +1132,23 @@ This package provides debug information for the perf
python bindings.
# with_perf
%endif
+%if %{with_libperf}
+%package -n libperf
+Summary: The perf library from kernel source
+License: GPL-2.0-only AND (LGPL-2.1-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%description -n libperf
+This package contains the kernel source perf library.
+
+%package -n libperf-devel
+Summary: Developement files for the perf library from kernel source
+License: GPL-2.0-only AND (LGPL-2.1-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%description -n libperf-devel
+This package includes libraries and header files needed for development
+of applications which use perf library from kernel source.
+
+# with_libperf
+%endif
+
%if %{with_tools}
%package -n %{package_name}-tools
Summary: Assortment of tools for the Linux kernel
@@ -2728,6 +2753,12 @@ chmod +x tools/perf/check-headers.sh
%{perf_make} DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT all
%endif
+%if %{with_libperf}
+%global libperf_make \
+ %{__make} %{?make_opts} EXTRA_CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}"
LDFLAGS="%{__global_ldflags}" %{?cross_opts} -C tools/lib/perf V=1
+%{libperf_make} DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+%endif
+
%global tools_make \
CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" LDFLAGS="%{__global_ldflags}" %{make} %{?make_opts}
@@ -3009,6 +3040,10 @@ mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man1
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/traceevent
%endif
+%if %{with_libperf}
+%{libperf_make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} prefix=%{_prefix} libdir=%{_libdir}
install install_headers
+%endif
+
%if %{with_tools}
%ifarch %{cpupowerarchs}
%{make} -C tools/power/cpupower DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT libdir=%{_libdir}
mandir=%{_mandir} CPUFREQ_BENCH=false install
@@ -3494,6 +3529,37 @@ fi\
# with_perf
%endif
+%if %{with_libperf}
+%files -n libperf
+%{_libdir}/libperf.so.0
+%{_libdir}/libperf.so.0.0.1
+
+%files -n libperf-devel
+%{_libdir}/libperf.so
+%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libperf.pc
+%{_includedir}/internal/*.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/bpf_perf.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/core.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/cpumap.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/perf_dlfilter.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/event.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/evlist.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/evsel.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/mmap.h
+%{_includedir}/perf/threadmap.h
+%{_mandir}/man3/libperf.3.gz
+%{_mandir}/man7/libperf-counting.7.gz
+%{_mandir}/man7/libperf-sampling.7.gz
+%{_docdir}/libperf/examples/sampling.c
+%{_docdir}/libperf/examples/counting.c
+%{_docdir}/libperf/html/libperf.html
+%{_docdir}/libperf/html/libperf-counting.html
+%{_docdir}/libperf/html/libperf-sampling.html
+
+# with_libperf
+%endif
+
+
%if %{with_tools}
%ifnarch %{cpupowerarchs}
%files -n %{package_name}-tools
@@ -3543,6 +3609,8 @@ fi\
%files -n %{package_name}-tools-libs-devel
%{_libdir}/libcpupower.so
%{_includedir}/cpufreq.h
+%{_includedir}/cpuidle.h
+%{_includedir}/powercap.h
%endif
%files -n rtl
[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 5/5] Remove defines forcing tools on, they override cmdline
From: Justin M. Forbes Remove defines forcing tools on, they override cmdline Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbes diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template index blahblah..blahblah 100644 --- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template +++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template @@ -301,11 +301,6 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel %define with_ipaclones 0 # no stablelist %define with_kernel_abi_stablelists 0 -# Fedora builds these separately -%define with_perf 1 -%define with_libperf 1 -%define with_tools 1 -%define with_bpftool 1 # No realtime fedora variants %define with_realtime 0 %define with_arm64_64k 0 -- https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 2/5] Don't ship libperf.a in libperf-devel
From: Justin M. Forbes
Don't ship libperf.a in libperf-devel
Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbes
diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -3042,6 +3042,8 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/traceevent
%if %{with_libperf}
%{libperf_make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} prefix=%{_prefix} libdir=%{_libdir}
install install_headers
+# This is installed on some arches and we don't want to ship it
+rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libperf.a
%endif
%if %{with_tools}
--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907
--
___
kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[OS-BUILD PATCHv3 0/5] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com Merge Request: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907 When kernel-tools was split out to a separate package in Fedora, it was due to several factors. Most of those issues have been mitigated in other ways, and there are advantages to building tools with the kernel build. Let's turn on tools for Fedora. To do so, we need to add the libperf packages, but this enables them for Fedora only. It is worth noting that the Fedora package for bpftool will retain the upstream kernel versioning. This is because the bpftool versioning scheme is incompatible with the stable Fedora process. --- redhat/kernel.spec.template | 78 ++-- 1 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749975554 I believe you are correct. Will fix it up. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749970833 @jmflinuxtx ah I think I have an idea, the spec file now has the following lines for Fedora: ``` %define with_libperf 1 %define with_tools 1 ``` with these, is it even possible to disable tools and libperf build via `--without libperf --without tools`? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749965091 I'll keep on digging... -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749916656 I do not expect that it would hit Makefile.perf for any reason. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749908405 @jmflinuxtx do you have an idea whether it is expected that the above rpmbuild command still hits Makefile.perf? ``` 00:33:18 make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:251: sub-make] Error 2 ``` -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749901619 ok, one mistake found: the Rawhide pipeline was never restarted with the change in https://gitlab.com/cki-project/pipeline- definition/-/merge_requests/1879, so the `--without --libperf` was missing in the cross-compile `build` jobs I recreated a new child pipeline for `ark_merge_request` that should pick up these changes. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749892200 checking an ELN log, the same error is present there 🤦 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749878052 the first failure is 30 seconds into the build: ``` > /usr/bin/make CROSS_COMPILE=ppc64le-linux-gnu- ... vmlinux > 00:00:28 cc1: error: bad value ‘power8’ for ‘-mtune=’ switch ``` I'm a bit at a loss why this `cc1` is not the cross compiler, but the native one; the same seems (?) to work fine on ELN -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749873338 As I said above, this particular MR is include in releases because I need koji building these packages. Since pipelines now run on include in releases, this MR should be impacting others too. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749872330 aaah the builds merge `ark-latest` now 🤦 -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749870876 I assumed it has nothing to do with native tools as https://gitlab.com/cki- project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2912 is also impacted? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749868492 Why would we remove arches which should work fine? If we can build tools for ELN with the native_tools bit, we should be able to do the same for rawhide, no? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749868378 same for the Clang pipeline which seem to be red everywhere, @dzickusrh should we remove them as well? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749864890 This is a cross-compile issue so is not visible in Brew; if this is not something you want to keep green for Fedora/Rawhide, should we remove the ppc64le/s390x arches for the Rawhide pipelines? -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749862756 To enable native tools for Rawhide similar to ELN, the only change to `.gitlab-ci.yml` is ```yaml .trigger_rawhide: variables: native_tools: 'true' ``` As the Rawhide non-debug pipelines are the only ones affected by this, the above issue needs to be fixed first to be able to validate that `native_tools: true` is indeed also working for Rawhide. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Justin M. Forbes on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749862624 This MR is "include in release" so it is being tested in all pipelines. -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/4] Add libperf packages and build kernel tools for Fedora
From: Michael Hofmann on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2907#note_1749852844 whatever is failing the Rawhide pipeline in this MR is also failing e.g. https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2912, so this particular breakage seems to be caused by something that was merged before. ppc64le build from this MR - https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-hat-ci- tools/kernel/cki-internal-pipelines/cki-trusted- contributors/-/jobs/6052447795#L105: > 00:00:24 + /usr/bin/make CROSS_COMPILE=ppc64le-linux-gnu- -s HOSTCFLAGS= HOSTLDFLAGS= ARCH=powerpc 'KCFLAGS= ' WITH_GCOV=0 -j24 vmlinux > 00:00:28 cc1: error: bad value ‘power8’ for ‘-mtune=’ switch ppc64le build from !2912 - https://gitlab.com/redhat/red-hat-ci- tools/kernel/cki-internal-pipelines/cki-trusted- contributors/-/jobs/6033136409#L106: > 00:00:22 + /usr/bin/make CROSS_COMPILE=ppc64le-linux-gnu- -s HOSTCFLAGS= HOSTLDFLAGS= ARCH=powerpc 'KCFLAGS= ' WITH_GCOV=0 -j24 vmlinux > 00:00:26 cc1: error: bad value ‘power8’ for ‘-mtune=’ switch -- ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
