Re: fedora.git upstream 0-Day build testing
On 08/09/2016 11:32 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi kernel people, Recently the upstream 0-Day build testing project started building the exploded kernel git tree for Fedora on kernel.org: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/fedora.git/ That was somewhat of a surprise. It has found a few things here and there, mostly in building for configurations or architectures that Fedora does not support. Sometimes this causes maintainers to be mailed about build failures somewhat unexpectedly. The most recent case as the crash driver on openrisc. The 0-Day maintainer said they can disable it, but I wanted to run it past the team first. I can see value in doing it, even if it isn't directly applicable to Fedora itself at the moment. Thoughts? josh I'm for this if we can limit it to only arches Fedora supports. Even if Fedora doesn't officially support some of the configurations right now it could in the future and compiling is a pretty low bar. Thanks, Laura ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora.git upstream 0-Day build testing
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Josh Boyer > wrote: > > Hi kernel people, > > > > Recently the upstream 0-Day build testing project started building the > > exploded kernel git tree for Fedora on kernel.org: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/fedora.git/ > > > > That was somewhat of a surprise. It has found a few things here and > > there, mostly in building for configurations or architectures that > > Fedora does not support. Sometimes this causes maintainers to be > > mailed about build failures somewhat unexpectedly. The most recent > > case as the crash driver on openrisc. > > > > The 0-Day maintainer said they can disable it, but I wanted to run it > > past the team first. I can see value in doing it, even if it isn't > > directly applicable to Fedora itself at the moment. Thoughts? > > Follow up: Fengguang Wu points out that it can be enabled only for > specific ARCH as well. So that's a possibility. Running only on specific ARCH would be handy. If that can be maintained. Justin ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora.git upstream 0-Day build testing
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > Hi kernel people, > > Recently the upstream 0-Day build testing project started building the > exploded kernel git tree for Fedora on kernel.org: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/fedora.git/ > > That was somewhat of a surprise. It has found a few things here and > there, mostly in building for configurations or architectures that > Fedora does not support. Sometimes this causes maintainers to be > mailed about build failures somewhat unexpectedly. The most recent > case as the crash driver on openrisc. > > The 0-Day maintainer said they can disable it, but I wanted to run it > past the team first. I can see value in doing it, even if it isn't > directly applicable to Fedora itself at the moment. Thoughts? Follow up: Fengguang Wu points out that it can be enabled only for specific ARCH as well. So that's a possibility. josh ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
fedora.git upstream 0-Day build testing
Hi kernel people, Recently the upstream 0-Day build testing project started building the exploded kernel git tree for Fedora on kernel.org: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jwboyer/fedora.git/ That was somewhat of a surprise. It has found a few things here and there, mostly in building for configurations or architectures that Fedora does not support. Sometimes this causes maintainers to be mailed about build failures somewhat unexpectedly. The most recent case as the crash driver on openrisc. The 0-Day maintainer said they can disable it, but I wanted to run it past the team first. I can see value in doing it, even if it isn't directly applicable to Fedora itself at the moment. Thoughts? josh ___ kernel mailing list kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
