[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1258837] Re: [Dell Latitude E7440] ALPS touchpad keeps having state reset

2024-11-06 Thread STEVE
With tousled layers and a mullet-inspired silhouette, the wolf cut
creates a daring style.

https://wolfcut.org/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1258837

Title:
  [Dell Latitude E7440] ALPS touchpad keeps having state reset

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Utopic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Vivid:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Fedora:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  The mouse cursor keeps on jumping around, and these messages appear in the 
log when it happens:
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.133841] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at byte 1
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.134868] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at byte 1
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.137921] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 - driver resynced.
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.138852] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at byte 1
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.148833] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 - driver resynced.

  The touchpad is recognised as a "AlpsPS/2 ALPS DualPoint TouchPad".
  This is occurring with Ubuntu 13.10, though I have also seen this
  behaviour in the version of Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 13.04.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: linux-image-3.11.0-14-generic 3.11.0-14.21
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-14.21-generic 3.11.7
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-14-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  allanc 1852 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  allanc 1852 F pulseaudio
  Date: Sat Dec  7 22:19:22 2013
  HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=a2a36712-35de-4e20-9d1a-df3520f401ec
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-12-07 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Release amd64 
(20131016.1)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E7440
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-14-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=d03a42e6-0dea-4969-a682-eb4d255abc70 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-3.11.0-14-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-3.11.0-14-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware 1.116
  SourcePackage: linux
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/14/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A03
  dmi.board.name: 07F3F4
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 9
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd08/14/2013:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE7440:pvr01:rvnDellInc.:rn07F3F4:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Latitude E7440
  dmi.product.version: 01
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1258837/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1258837] Re: [Dell Latitude E7440] ALPS touchpad keeps having state reset

2024-11-06 Thread STEVE
With tousled layers and a mullet-inspired silhouette, the wolf cut creates a 
daring style.
zhttp://wolfcut.org/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1258837

Title:
  [Dell Latitude E7440] ALPS touchpad keeps having state reset

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Utopic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Vivid:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Fedora:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  The mouse cursor keeps on jumping around, and these messages appear in the 
log when it happens:
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.133841] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at byte 1
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.134868] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at byte 1
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.137921] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 - driver resynced.
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.138852] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost sync at byte 1
  Dec  7 21:57:26 wyvern kernel: [  648.148833] psmouse serio1: DualPoint 
TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 - driver resynced.

  The touchpad is recognised as a "AlpsPS/2 ALPS DualPoint TouchPad".
  This is occurring with Ubuntu 13.10, though I have also seen this
  behaviour in the version of Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 13.04.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: linux-image-3.11.0-14-generic 3.11.0-14.21
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-14.21-generic 3.11.7
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-14-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC1:  allanc 1852 F pulseaudio
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  allanc 1852 F pulseaudio
  Date: Sat Dec  7 22:19:22 2013
  HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=a2a36712-35de-4e20-9d1a-df3520f401ec
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-12-07 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Release amd64 
(20131016.1)
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E7440
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-14-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=d03a42e6-0dea-4969-a682-eb4d255abc70 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-3.11.0-14-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-3.11.0-14-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware 1.116
  SourcePackage: linux
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/14/2013
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A03
  dmi.board.name: 07F3F4
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 9
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd08/14/2013:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE7440:pvr01:rvnDellInc.:rn07F3F4:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Latitude E7440
  dmi.product.version: 01
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1258837/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1988018] Re: [SRU][mlx5] Intermittent VF-LAG activation failure

2024-10-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected,

Accepted netplan.io into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988018

Title:
  [SRU][mlx5] Intermittent VF-LAG activation failure

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in netplan.io package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed
Status in netplan.io source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in netplan.io source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Won't Fix
Status in netplan.io source package in Mantic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  Fix Committed
Status in netplan.io source package in Noble:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

  Due to limitations in how Netplan handles SR-IOV devices, the VF-LAG
  feature found on Mellanox NICs couldn't be used. Certain configuration steps
  must happen in a very specific order and Netplan fails to perform the set up 
correctly.

  Netplan must wait until the backend finishes adding interfaces to the Bond
  and the Mellanox driver reports the VF-LAG feature as "active" before binding 
VFs to
  the driver.

  See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2083008

  This problem is fixed by introducing a proper ordering in the configuration 
process
  and monitoring the driver state until it reports as ready (or times out).

  This fix is available on Ubuntu 24.04.

  [ Test Plan ]

  To reproduce the problem addressed by this SRU one needs to
  have access to specialized hardware (SR-IOV-capable Mellanox NICs).

  The fix for the problem described above was already verified on Ubuntu 22.04 
and
  solved the problem (more details 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/2083008).

  We will work with Canonical's Openstack team to do the fix
  verification.

   * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug

  A configuration file that looks like the one below can be used
  to test the fix.

  After booting the system with this configuration, the Mellanox driver
  should report the LAG state as "active" for all the devices.
  It can be checked in the debugfs file: 
/sys/kernel/debug/mlx5/{pci_addr}/lag/state

  network:
    version: 2
    ethernets:
  ens4f0np0:
    virtual-function-count: 16
    embedded-switch-mode: switchdev
    delay-virtual-functions-rebind: true

  ens4f1np1:
    virtual-function-count: 16
    embedded-switch-mode: switchdev
    delay-virtual-functions-rebind: true

    bonds:
  bond0:
    interfaces:
  - ens4f0np0
  - ens4f1np1
    parameters:
  mode: active-backup

  [ Where problems could occur ]

  These changes should affect only SR-IOV related scenarios.
  Undetected problems could cause Netplan to fail to configure the device
  and Virtual Functions wouldn't be created anymore.

  [ Other Info ]

  Related work:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1988018
  https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/439

  A PPA for Ubuntu 22.04 can be found here
  https://launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/+archive/ubuntu/netplan-sru

   Original bug description 

  During system initialization there is a specific sequence that must be
  followed to enable the use of hardware offload and VF-LAG.

  Intermittently one may see that VF-LAG initialization fails:
  [Thu Jul 21 10:54:58 2022] mlx5_core :08:00.0: lag map port 1:1 port 2:2 
shared_fdb:1
  [Thu Jul 21 10:54:58 2022] mlx5_

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1976184] Re: Linux PV device frontends vulnerable to attacks by backends

2024-09-10 Thread Steve Beattie
Closing out status on this issue, see also
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-23041 for the specific unfixed CVE.

** Changed in: linux-aws (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux-azure-4.15 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: linux-dell300x (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: linux-gcp-4.15 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: linux-kvm (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux-oracle (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux-snapdragon (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976184

Title:
  Linux PV device frontends vulnerable to attacks by backends

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-aws package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-aws-5.15 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-aws-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-azure package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-azure-4.15 package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-azure-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-bluefield package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-dell300x package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-gcp package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-gcp-4.15 package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-gcp-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-gke package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-gke-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-gkeop package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-gkeop-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-hwe-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-ibm package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-ibm-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-intel-iotg-5.15 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-kvm package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.14 package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-oracle package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oracle-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-raspi package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-raspi-5.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-snapdragon package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  The packages listed above are vulnerable to the CVEs below in at least
  one Ubuntu release, as stated in the Ubuntu CVE Tracker, except for
  linux-azure-4.15, linux-dell300x, linux-gcp-4.15 and linux-snapdragon,
  that are only vulnerable to CVE-2022-23041.

  Please release fixed packages.

  Xen released a security advisory on March 10.

  (I was informed by the security team that it does not track security
  issues via Launchpad bugs, but in the Ubuntu CVE Tracker. However, the
  issue is unpatched for over 2.5 months and marked as needed for these
  combinations of source package and Ubuntu version in the Tracker, and
  therefore I am filing this bug.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1976184/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077217] Re: rtw_8821ce: failed to send h2c command

2024-08-19 Thread Steve Haynes
I only noticed the messages that appeared on the terminal

As a general rule, my laptop is always on the charger because the battery
doesn't hold up very well

I went back to '39' to fix the problem but went back and forth between '39'
and '40' to double check

I only get the messages to the terminal on '40'

Hope this helps

Regards,
Steve

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024, 23:20 Bethany Jamison, <2077...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Hello Steve,
> Do you notice any decrease in wifi performance when you see these 'failed
> to send h2c command' messages?
>
> I noticed in your dmesg file you also see 'firmware failed to leave lps
> state' around the same time you see the h2c message - this led me to
> this coversation (https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/61). Does
> this issue seem similar to yours? This may mean the issue is related to
> power saving. If you feel like your issue is similar to this please
> verify some behavior by following these steps from the thread:
>
> Update: the message flood only happens when laptop charger is not
> connected.
> 1) I connected the charger. The "firmware failed to leave lps state"
> message stopped to appear, but "failed to send h2c command" message still
> continuously flooded my dmesg
> 2) I put laptop to sleep, then wake up. Message flood stopped.
> 3) I disconnected the charger, and after few minutes message started to
> come in again.
>
> Thanks -- Bethany
>
> ** Bug watch added: github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues #61
>https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/61
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077217
>
> Title:
>   rtw_8821ce: failed to send h2c command
>
> Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
> command
>   16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
> command
>   16 Aug 16:40:43 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
> command
>   16 Aug 16:38:39 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
> command
>   16 Aug 16:36:35 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
> command
>   16 Aug 16:35:18 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
> command
>   16 Aug 16:34:19 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
> command
>
>   I keep getting loads of these messages on the current kernel:
>   6.8.0-40-generic
>
>   I do not get them in the previous one: 6.8.0-39-generic
>
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
>   Package: linux-image-6.8.0-40-generic 6.8.0-40.40
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40-generic 6.8.12
>   Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64
>   ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
>   Architecture: amd64
>   AudioDevicesInUse:
>USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
>/dev/snd/seq:tigger 2097 F pipewire
>/dev/snd/controlC0:  tigger 2101 F wireplumber
>   CRDA: N/A
>   CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
>   CurrentDesktop: KDE
>   Date: Sat Aug 17 07:41:10 2024
>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-12 (218 days ago)
>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64
> (20231016.1)
>   Lsusb:
>Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
>Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05c8:03ba Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co., Ltd
> (Foxlink) HP TrueVision HD Camera
>Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek
> Bluetooth 4.2 Adapter
>Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
>   MachineType: HP HP Laptop 15-da0xxx
>   ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
>   ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-40-generic
> root=UUID=cc50af48-b63b-4766-a227-126e236350aa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
>   PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No
> PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
>   RelatedPackageVersions:
>linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-40-generic N/A
>linux-backports-modules-6.8.0-40-generic  N/A
>linux-firmware
> 20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.1
>   SourcePackage: linux
>   UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-06-03 (75 days ago)
>   dmi.bios.date: 11/16/2022
>   dmi.bios.release: 15.43
>   dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
>   dmi.bios.version: F.43
>   dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
>   dmi.board.name: 84A6
>   dmi.board.vendor: HP
>   dmi.board.version: 80.50
>   dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag
>   dmi.chassis.type: 10
>   dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
>   dmi.chassis.version: Cha

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077217] Re: rtw_8821ce: failed to send h2c command

2024-08-19 Thread Steve Haynes
Forgot to add

Found it very difficult to access WWW while these messages were
occurring

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024, 23:34 Steve Haynes, 
wrote:

> I only noticed the messages that appeared on the terminal
>
> As a general rule, my laptop is always on the charger because the battery
> doesn't hold up very well
>
> I went back to '39' to fix the problem but went back and forth between
> '39' and '40' to double check
>
> I only get the messages to the terminal on '40'
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2024, 23:20 Bethany Jamison, <2077...@bugs.launchpad.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Steve,
>> Do you notice any decrease in wifi performance when you see these 'failed
>> to send h2c command' messages?
>>
>> I noticed in your dmesg file you also see 'firmware failed to leave lps
>> state' around the same time you see the h2c message - this led me to
>> this coversation (https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/61). Does
>> this issue seem similar to yours? This may mean the issue is related to
>> power saving. If you feel like your issue is similar to this please
>> verify some behavior by following these steps from the thread:
>>
>> Update: the message flood only happens when laptop charger is not
>> connected.
>> 1) I connected the charger. The "firmware failed to leave lps state"
>> message stopped to appear, but "failed to send h2c command" message still
>> continuously flooded my dmesg
>> 2) I put laptop to sleep, then wake up. Message flood stopped.
>> 3) I disconnected the charger, and after few minutes message started to
>> come in again.
>>
>> Thanks -- Bethany
>>
>> ** Bug watch added: github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues #61
>>https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/61
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
>> report.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077217
>>
>> Title:
>>   rtw_8821ce: failed to send h2c command
>>
>> Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
>>   New
>>
>> Bug description:
>>   16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
>> command
>>   16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
>> command
>>   16 Aug 16:40:43 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
>> command
>>   16 Aug 16:38:39 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
>> command
>>   16 Aug 16:36:35 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
>> command
>>   16 Aug 16:35:18 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
>> command
>>   16 Aug 16:34:19 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c
>> command
>>
>>   I keep getting loads of these messages on the current kernel:
>>   6.8.0-40-generic
>>
>>   I do not get them in the previous one: 6.8.0-39-generic
>>
>>   ProblemType: Bug
>>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
>>   Package: linux-image-6.8.0-40-generic 6.8.0-40.40
>>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40-generic 6.8.12
>>   Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64
>>   ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
>>   Architecture: amd64
>>   AudioDevicesInUse:
>>USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
>>/dev/snd/seq:tigger 2097 F pipewire
>>/dev/snd/controlC0:  tigger 2101 F wireplumber
>>   CRDA: N/A
>>   CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
>>   CurrentDesktop: KDE
>>   Date: Sat Aug 17 07:41:10 2024
>>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-12 (218 days ago)
>>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64
>> (20231016.1)
>>   Lsusb:
>>Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
>>Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05c8:03ba Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co., Ltd
>> (Foxlink) HP TrueVision HD Camera
>>Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek
>> Bluetooth 4.2 Adapter
>>Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
>>   MachineType: HP HP Laptop 15-da0xxx
>>   ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
>>   ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-40-generic
>> root=UUID=cc50af48-b63b-4766-a227-126e236350aa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
>>   PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No
>> PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
>>   RelatedPackageVersions:
>>linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-40-generic N/A
>

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077217] [NEW] failed to send h2c command

2024-08-17 Thread Steve Haynes
Public bug reported:

16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
16 Aug 16:40:43 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
16 Aug 16:38:39 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
16 Aug 16:36:35 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
16 Aug 16:35:18 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
16 Aug 16:34:19 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command

I keep getting loads of these messages on the current kernel:
6.8.0-40-generic

I do not get them in the previous one: 6.8.0-39-generic

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: linux-image-6.8.0-40-generic 6.8.0-40.40
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40-generic 6.8.12
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/seq:tigger 2097 F pipewire
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  tigger 2101 F wireplumber
CRDA: N/A
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Sat Aug 17 07:41:10 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-12 (218 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 (20231016.1)
Lsusb:
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05c8:03ba Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co., Ltd 
(Foxlink) HP TrueVision HD Camera
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek Bluetooth 
4.2 Adapter
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
MachineType: HP HP Laptop 15-da0xxx
ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.8.0-40-generic 
root=UUID=cc50af48-b63b-4766-a227-126e236350aa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-6.8.0-40-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-6.8.0-40-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.1
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-06-03 (75 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 11/16/2022
dmi.bios.release: 15.43
dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
dmi.bios.version: F.43
dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: 84A6
dmi.board.vendor: HP
dmi.board.version: 80.50
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 80.50
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.43:bd11/16/2022:br15.43:efr80.50:svnHP:pnHPLaptop15-da0xxx:pvrType1ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn84A6:rvr80.50:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:sku4BA34EA#ABU:
dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV HP Notebook
dmi.product.name: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx
dmi.product.sku: 4BA34EA#ABU
dmi.product.version: Type1ProductConfigId
dmi.sys.vendor: HP

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077217

Title:
  failed to send h2c command

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16 Aug 16:40:51 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16 Aug 16:40:43 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16 Aug 16:38:39 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16 Aug 16:36:35 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16 Aug 16:35:18 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command
  16 Aug 16:34:19 kernel: rtw_8821ce :02:00.0: failed to send h2c command

  I keep getting loads of these messages on the current kernel:
  6.8.0-40-generic

  I do not get them in the previous one: 6.8.0-39-generic

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: linux-image-6.8.0-40-generic 6.8.0-40.40
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-40.40-generic 6.8.12
  Uname: Linux 6.8.0-40-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/seq:tigger 2097 F pipewire
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  tigger 2101 F wireplumber
  CRDA: N/A
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Sat Aug 17 07:41:10 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-01-12 (218 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.10.1 "Mantic Minotaur" - Release amd64 
(20231016.1)
  Lsusb:
   Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
   Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05c8:03ba Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co., Ltd 
(Foxlink) HP TrueVision HD Camera
   Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bda:b00a Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Realtek 
Bluetooth 4.2 Adapter
   Bu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2061747] Re: obsolete out-of-tree ivsc dkms in favor of in-tree one

2024-04-26 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ipu6-drivers into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/0~git202404110253.97c94720-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ipu6-drivers (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061747

Title:
  obsolete out-of-tree ivsc dkms in favor of in-tree one

Status in ipu6-drivers package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ivsc-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in linux-meta-oem-6.8 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in linux-oem-6.8 package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ipu6-drivers source package in Noble:
  Fix Committed
Status in ivsc-driver source package in Noble:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  In Progress
Status in linux-meta source package in Noble:
  Triaged
Status in linux-meta-oem-6.8 source package in Noble:
  Triaged
Status in linux-oem-6.8 source package in Noble:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [SRU Justification]

  BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061747

  [Impact]

  Starting from kernel v6.8, Intel demands the use of in-tree VSC driver
  instead of the out-of-tree dkms originated from
  https://github.com/intel/ivsc-driver.

  [Fix]

  The in-tree vsc driver as of v6.8 still needs a few fixes to achieve
  the same support level to launch Intel IPU6 Camera devices. Commit
  1,3, and 4 are to add supported devices and platforms. Commit 2
  resolves an issue after resumed.

  [Test Case]

  This is supposed to work together with the updated dkms, which shall
  also be built along with the kernel itself as linux-modules-
  ipu6-. Install the corresponding kernel/modules packages and
  test camera functions.

  [Where problems could occur]

  While this is the first time we switch to in-tree VSC driver, and the
  out-of-tree driver is not aligned at the time of transition and
  probably never will, the provided functions and verified stability
  issues may vary.

  [Other Info]

  The dkms is created to be compatible of multiple kernel versions, yet
  the in-tree vsc driver transitioning should only happen for kernel >=
  v6.8. That is, oem-6.8, noble and linux-unstable will be nominated.

  == original bug description ==

  Starting from kernel v6.8 (yet from the code diff it's v6.6), Intel
  demands the use of in-tree IVSC drivers instead of out-of-tree dkms
  from https://github.com/intel/ivsc-driver.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipu6-drivers/+bug/2061747/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060852] Re: nvidia-driver-550-open fails with secure boot enabled

2024-04-14 Thread Steve Langasek
linux-restricted-modules providing 550 is now available, so closing this
blocking bug.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060852

Title:
  nvidia-driver-550-open fails with secure boot enabled

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-550-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  I switched to the 550-open driver to test this out but the module
  fails to load with secureboot enabled.  The key is rejected.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: nvidia-kernel-source-550-open 550.67-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
  Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs
  ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Apr 10 13:45:43 2024
  Dependencies:
   
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-04-10 (366 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Alpha amd64 (20230328)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-10 (0 days ago)
  modified.conffile..etc.default.apport: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.default.apport: 2023-12-15T17:01:26.953508

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-550/+bug/2060852/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060852] Re: nvidia-driver-550-open fails with secure boot enabled

2024-04-10 Thread Steve Langasek
I believe this also applies to 550-open and 550-server, so demoting
these also.

** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550-server (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060852

Title:
  nvidia-driver-550-open fails with secure boot enabled

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-550-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I switched to the 550-open driver to test this out but the module
  fails to load with secureboot enabled.  The key is rejected.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: nvidia-kernel-source-550-open 550.67-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
  Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs
  ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Apr 10 13:45:43 2024
  Dependencies:
   
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-04-10 (366 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Alpha amd64 (20230328)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-10 (0 days ago)
  modified.conffile..etc.default.apport: [modified]
  mtime.conffile..etc.default.apport: 2023-12-15T17:01:26.953508

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-550/+bug/2060852/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2059001] [NEW] proposed-migration for nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu2

2024-03-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Public bug reported:

nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu2 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf.  This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.

** Affects: nvidia-settings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: time-t update-excuse

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059001

Title:
  proposed-migration for nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu2

Status in nvidia-settings package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  nvidia-settings 510.47.03-0ubuntu2 is built in -proposed but not on
  armhf.  This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
  removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress
  armhf availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-settings/+bug/2059001/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2057808] Re: [LTS] cryptsetup-initramfs fails when kernel modules are compressed

2024-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
You say "recent kernel or local kernel." What Ubuntu-provided kernel for
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS do you see this with?

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057808

Title:
  [LTS] cryptsetup-initramfs fails when kernel modules are compressed

Status in cryptsetup package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in cryptsetup source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  This is the same cause as the Mantic bug "cryptsetup autopkgtest fails
  with zstd compressed kernel modules"

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2035120

  where hooks/cryptroot::add_modules() needs postfix wildcards after
  $glob.ko on 2 lines.

  It affects 22.04 LTS with recent kernel or local kernel built with
  CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS_*

  I think the fix needs cherry-picking into LTS release(s).

  https://salsa.debian.org/cryptsetup-
  team/cryptsetup/-/commit/8359ad85a541b76f388cdc28f549229e3d71e750

  At boot-time it results in the cryptic (pun intended) messages:

  device-mapper: table: 253:0 crypt: Error allocating crypto tfm (-ENOENT)
  device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table
  device-mapper: reload ioctl on luks_os (253:0) failed: No such file or 
directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2057808/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2057808] Re: [LTS] cryptsetup-initramfs fails when kernel modules are compressed

2024-03-13 Thread Steve Langasek
It is not clear that this is a behavior change in the kernel that should
have been included as part of the hwe backports.  cryptsetup may not be
the only package affected.

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Also affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057808

Title:
  [LTS] cryptsetup-initramfs fails when kernel modules are compressed

Status in cryptsetup package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in cryptsetup source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  This is the same cause as the Mantic bug "cryptsetup autopkgtest fails
  with zstd compressed kernel modules"

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2035120

  where hooks/cryptroot::add_modules() needs postfix wildcards after
  $glob.ko on 2 lines.

  It affects 22.04 LTS with recent kernel or local kernel built with
  CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS_*

  I think the fix needs cherry-picking into LTS release(s).

  https://salsa.debian.org/cryptsetup-
  team/cryptsetup/-/commit/8359ad85a541b76f388cdc28f549229e3d71e750

  At boot-time it results in the cryptic (pun intended) messages:

  device-mapper: table: 253:0 crypt: Error allocating crypto tfm (-ENOENT)
  device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table
  device-mapper: reload ioctl on luks_os (253:0) failed: No such file or 
directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2057808/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2056178] [NEW] Please link linux-perf against libopencsd-dev

2024-03-05 Thread Steve Capper
Public bug reported:

Hello,
For Arm platforms it is possible to capture Coresight Trace information with 
Linux perf. A library libopencsd-dev is then used to decode the coresight trace 
information.

On Debian, we already have perf linking against libopencsd-dev, this was 
addressed by:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895131

Could we please have a similar change applied to the Ubuntu perf
executables?

To implement this change one would need to:
1) Add libopencsd-dev to the build-deps,
2) Add CORESIGHT=1 to the make flags for perf.

Note that it would be beneficial for all architectures to link against
libopencsd-dev (not just arm64) as this would allow users to decode
coresight trace information on their local machine.

Cheers,
--
Steve Capper

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056178

Title:
  Please link linux-perf against libopencsd-dev

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hello,
  For Arm platforms it is possible to capture Coresight Trace information with 
Linux perf. A library libopencsd-dev is then used to decode the coresight trace 
information.

  On Debian, we already have perf linking against libopencsd-dev, this was 
addressed by:
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895131

  Could we please have a similar change applied to the Ubuntu perf
  executables?

  To implement this change one would need to:
  1) Add libopencsd-dev to the build-deps,
  2) Add CORESIGHT=1 to the make flags for perf.

  Note that it would be beneficial for all architectures to link against
  libopencsd-dev (not just arm64) as this would allow users to decode
  coresight trace information on their local machine.

  Cheers,
  --
  Steve Capper

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2056178/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2049689] Re: partprobe is broken on empty loopback device

2024-02-29 Thread Steve Langasek
** Summary changed:

- partproke is broken on empty loopback device
+ partprobe is broken on empty loopback device

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049689

Title:
  partprobe is broken on empty loopback device

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification:

  [Impact]

  * BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION on an empty loopback device used to return ENXIO
  but now returns EINVAL, breaking partprobe due to commit
  "block: don't add or resize partition on the disk with GENHD_FL_NO_PART"
  introduced in mantic 6.5.0-17 and jammy 5.15.0-94.

  [Fix]

  * backport commit
  "block: Move checking GENHD_FL_NO_PART to bdev_add_partition()"

  [Test Plan]

  * dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/foo bs=1M count=50
  * partprobe $(losetup --find --show /tmp/foo)
  Before the fix this fails.
  After the fix it should work.

  [Where problems could occur]

  * We may see issues on disk partitions operations.

  
  Old description:
  This is with the kernel from jammy-proposed (linux-image-5.15.0-94-generic 
5.15.0-94.104).

  Do this:

  # dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/file bs=1M count=50
  # partprobe "$(losetup --show --find /tmp/file)"

  Notice this very odd error message:

  Error: Partition(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
  16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32,
  33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49,
  50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 on
  /dev/loop2 have been written, but we have been unable to inform the
  kernel of the change, probably because it/they are in use.  As a
  result, the old partition(s) will remain in use.  You should reboot
  now before making further changes.

  That's a result of an ioctl changing its error code in an incompatible
  way between kernel versions 5.15.0.91.88 and 5.15.0.94.91, confusing
  partprobe.

  5.15.0.91.88:
  ioctl(3, BLKPG, {op=BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION, flags=0, datalen=152, data={start=0, 
length=0, pno=1, devname="", volname=""}}) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or 
address)

  5.15.0.94.91:
  ioctl(3, BLKPG, {op=BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION, flags=0, datalen=152, data={start=0, 
length=0, pno=1, devname="", volname=""}}) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)

  This is a userspace API break which impacts GNU parted and util-linux
  (as confirmed by the util-linux maintainer).

  This issue was discovered as part of Cockpit CI here:
  https://github.com/cockpit-project/bots/pull/5793

  This issue is being discussed on LKML here (with a patch likely to
  land soon): https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/1/15/147

  lsb_release -rd:
  Description:  Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
  Release:  22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2049689/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2054439] Re: RM obsolete binaries from noble to allow linux to migrate

2024-02-27 Thread Steve Langasek
this appears to have been done, none of these packages are present in
noble or noble-proposed.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054439

Title:
  RM obsolete binaries from noble to allow linux to migrate

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  currently linux is stuck from migrating because of

  * amd64: linux-modules-ipu6-oem-22.04, linux-modules-ivsc-oem-22.04, 
linux-modules-nvidia-440-oem-20.04, linux-modules-nvidia-450-oem-20.04
  - splitting the component into single items and retrying them

  ipu6 / ivsc are curretnly broken and will be re-introduced once fixed.

  nvidia-440 and nvidia-450 are obsolete and remove from the archive
  and so is oem-20.04 kernel flavour which stopped being a thing in
  jammy.

  Please remove all of those packages from noble & noble-proposed to
  allow linux to migrate

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2054439/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2055162] Re: linux-headers package not being pulled in with linux-image-generic

2024-02-27 Thread Steve Langasek
linux-headers-generic is not a dependency of linux-image-generic.  It IS
a dependency of linux-generic, which is what ubiquity installs.  But any
mismatches here are likely in the kernel dependencies, not the
installer.

** Package changed: ubiquity (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055162

Title:
  linux-headers package not being pulled in with linux-image-generic

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  linux-image-5.15.0-97-generic definitely exists in Ubuntu and it does
  not pull in the correct linux-header package which is required to
  rebuilt nvidia kernel modules.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: ubiquity (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-97.107-generic 5.15.136
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-97-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon 
znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Tue Feb 27 08:29:48 2024
  InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-06-16 (256 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230223)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  Symptom: installation
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2055162/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2028165] Re: nvidia-dkms-* FTBS with linux 6.5

2024-02-22 Thread Steve Langasek
** Tags removed: regression-release

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028165

Title:
  nvidia-dkms-* FTBS with linux 6.5

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-525 source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  ...
  In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/390.157/build/common/inc/nv-linux.h:21,
   from 
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/390.157/build/nvidia/nv-instance.c:13:
  /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/390.157/build/common/inc/nv-mm.h: In function 
‘NV_GET_USER_PAGES_REMOTE’:
  /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/390.157/build/common/inc/nv-mm.h:164:45: error: passing 
argument 1 of ‘get_user_pages_remote’ from incompatible pointer type 
[-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
    164 |return get_user_pages_remote(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, 
flags,
    | ^~~
    | |
    | struct task_struct *
  ...

  
  [Fix]

  Apply the attached fix.

  [How to test]

  Install (and build) the patched packet.

  [Regression potential]

  The fix is composed of two patches:

  1) the first patch simply garbage collect a reference to a function
  that was never used but that had the API changed in Linux 6.5 - so,
  it's a trivial change.

  2) the second patch actually reimplement part of the vma scanning that was 
removed in __get_user_pages_locked() in upstream commit 
b2cac248191b7466c5819e0da617b0705a26e197 "mm/gup: removed vmas
  array from internal GUP functions" - here is where most likely any regression 
could be found.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/+bug/2028165/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1983357] Re: test_021_aslr_dapper_libs from ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on K-5.19 / J-OEM-6.1 / J-6.2 AMD64

2024-02-08 Thread Steve Beattie
I have confirmed that with the 6.5.0-25.25 kernel in mantic-proposed,
shared libraries for 32bit binaries are loaded with some randoness;
specifically, we are back to 7 bits of randomness with this kernel
update:

$ cat /proc/version_signature 
Ubuntu 6.5.0-25.25-generic 6.5.13
$ for ((i = 0 ; i < 5; i++ )) ; do ./aslr32 --report  libs  ; done
0xe8a86e80
0xf4a86e80
0xf2886e80
0xf2a86e80
0xf1686e80
# report the number of distinct values we get:
$ for ((i = 0 ; i < 1; i++ )) ; do ./aslr32 --report  libs  ; done | sort | 
uniq -c | wc -l
129

For reference, on the 6.5.0-17.17 kernel, we had no randomness
whatsoever:

$ cat /proc/version_signature 
Ubuntu 6.5.0-17.17-generic 6.5.8
$ for ((i = 0 ; i < 1; i++ )) ; do ./aslr32 --report libs  ; done | sort | 
uniq -c 
  1 0xf7c86e80

** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-mantic-linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983357

Title:
  test_021_aslr_dapper_libs from ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on
  K-5.19 / J-OEM-6.1 / J-6.2 AMD64

Status in QA Regression Testing:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  Invalid
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-6.1 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Lunar:
  New
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Mantic:
  New
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Noble:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Issue found on 5.19.0-9.9 Kinetic AMD64 systems

  Test log:
   Running test: './test-kernel-security.py' distro: 'Ubuntu 22.10' kernel: 
'5.19.0-9.9 (Ubuntu 5.19.0-9.9-generic 5.19.0-rc5)' arch: 'amd64' uid: 0/0 
SUDO_USER: 'ubuntu')
   test_021_aslr_dapper_libs (__main__.KernelSecurityTest)
   ASLR of libs ... (default libs native) (default libs native rekey) (default 
libs COMPAT) FAIL
   
   ==
   FAIL: test_021_aslr_dapper_libs (__main__.KernelSecurityTest)
   ASLR of libs
   --
   Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 1770, in test_021_aslr_dapper_libs
   self._test_aslr('libs', expected)
 File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 1727, in _test_aslr
   self._test_aslr_all(area, expected, "default %s" % area)
 File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 1720, in _test_aslr_all
   self._test_aslr_exec(area, expected, target, name)
 File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 1703, in _test_aslr_exec
   self.assertShellExitEquals(aslr_expected, ["./%s" % (target), area, 
"--verbose"], msg="%s:\n" % name)
 File 
"/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tmp/ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security/src/qa-regression-testing/scripts/testlib.py",
 line 1203, in assertShellExitEquals
   self.assertEqual(expected, rc, msg + result + report)
   AssertionError: default libs COMPAT:
   Got exit code 1, expected 0
   Command: './aslr32', 'libs', '--verbose'
   Output:
   Checking ASLR of libs:
   0xf7c81790
   0xf7c81790
   0xf7c81790
   FAIL: ASLR not functional (libs always at 0xf7c81790)
   
   
   --
   Ran 1 test in 0.144s
   
   FAILED (failures=1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/+bug/1983357/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1906067] Re: Boot from ISO - exFAT support missing

2024-01-26 Thread Steve Langasek
You've filed a bug in debian against software which is not used in
Ubuntu.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906067

Title:
  Boot from ISO - exFAT support missing

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Please add support for booting the ISO image via grub2 (loopback) in initrd.
  For larger images and a USB sticks, FAT32 is no longer sufficient.
  Most popular distributions already have support for exFAT in initrd (they can 
find and mount ISO on this filesystem).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1906067/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-cfg1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble s390x
libnvidia-common-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble s390x
libnvidia-compute-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-compute-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-compute-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble i386
libnvidia-decode-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-decode-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-decode-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble i386
libnvidia-encode-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-encode-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-encode-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble i386
libnvidia-extra-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-extra-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-extra-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble i386
libnvidia-fbc1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-fbc1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble i386
libnvidia-gl-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-gl-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-gl-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble i386
nvidia-compute-utils-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble 
amd64
nvidia-compute-utils-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble 
arm64
nvidia-dkms-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
nvidia-dkms-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
nvidia-driver-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
nvidia-driver-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
nvidia-headless-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble 
amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble 
arm64
nvidia-kernel-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble 
amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble 
arm64
nvidia-kernel-source-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble 
amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble 
arm64
nvidia-utils-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
nvidia-utils-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in 
noble amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in 
noble arm64
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 pack

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-cfg1-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-common-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-common-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-compute-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-compute-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-compute-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-compute-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-decode-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-decode-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-decode-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-decode-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-encode-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-encode-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-encode-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-encode-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-extra-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-extra-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-extra-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-extra-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-fbc1-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-fbc1-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-gl-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-gl-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-gl-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-gl-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-ifr1-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-ifr1-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
nvidia-compute-utils-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-compute-utils-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-dkms-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-dkms-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-driver-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-driver-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-utils-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-utils-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
Comment: Unsuppor

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Same for 515-server:

$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-decode-510-server   (for libnvidia-decode-515-server)
* libnvidia-encode-510-server   (for libnvidia-encode-515-server)

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: amd64, 
arm64, i386
$

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
All older source packages listed in this bug report have been removed,
and yet:

$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-460
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-decode-455  (for libnvidia-decode-460)
* libnvidia-encode-455  (for libnvidia-encode-460)
* nvidia-headless-455 [amd64]   (for nvidia-headless-460)
* nvidia-kernel-common-455 [amd64]

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: amd64, i386
$

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048782] Re: RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
fabric-manager-515 515.105.01-0ubuntu1 in noble
cuda-drivers-fabricmanager-510 515.105.01-0ubuntu1 in noble 
amd64
nvidia-fabricmanager-510 515.105.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-fabricmanager-dev-510 515.105.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
Comment: Auxiliary package for obsolete driver version; LP: #2048782


** Changed in: fabric-manager-515 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to fabric-manager-515 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048782

Title:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

Status in fabric-manager-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers.

  libnvidia-nscq & fabric-manager are userspace packages related to the
  ERD drivers.

  Once ERD drivers are removed from the archive so should these packages
  too

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/2048782/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048782] Re: RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
libnvidia-nscq-515 515.105.01-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-nscq-510 515.105.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
Comment: Auxiliary package for obsolete driver version; LP: #2048782
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: libnvidia-nscq-515 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to fabric-manager-515 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048782

Title:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

Status in fabric-manager-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers.

  libnvidia-nscq & fabric-manager are userspace packages related to the
  ERD drivers.

  Once ERD drivers are removed from the archive so should these packages
  too

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/2048782/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048782] Re: RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
libnvidia-nscq-510 510.85.02-0ubuntu2 in noble
Comment: Auxiliary package for obsolete driver version; LP: #2048782
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: libnvidia-nscq-510 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to fabric-manager-515 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048782

Title:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

Status in fabric-manager-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers.

  libnvidia-nscq & fabric-manager are userspace packages related to the
  ERD drivers.

  Once ERD drivers are removed from the archive so should these packages
  too

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/2048782/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048782] Re: RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
libnvidia-nscq-460 460.106.00-0ubuntu1 in noble
Comment: Auxiliary package for obsolete driver version; LP: #2048782
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: libnvidia-nscq-460 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to fabric-manager-515 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048782

Title:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

Status in fabric-manager-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers.

  libnvidia-nscq & fabric-manager are userspace packages related to the
  ERD drivers.

  Once ERD drivers are removed from the archive so should these packages
  too

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/2048782/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048782] Re: RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
fabric-manager-450 450.248.02-0ubuntu1 in noble
cuda-drivers-fabricmanager-450 450.248.02-0ubuntu1 in noble 
amd64
nvidia-fabricmanager-450 450.248.02-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-fabricmanager-dev-450 450.248.02-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
Comment: Auxiliary package for obsolete driver version; LP: #2048782
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: fabric-manager-450 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to fabric-manager-515 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048782

Title:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

Status in fabric-manager-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers.

  libnvidia-nscq & fabric-manager are userspace packages related to the
  ERD drivers.

  Once ERD drivers are removed from the archive so should these packages
  too

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/2048782/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048782] Re: RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
fabric-manager-510 510.85.02-0ubuntu2 in noble
Comment: Auxiliary package for obsolete driver version; LP: #2048782
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: fabric-manager-510 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to fabric-manager-515 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048782

Title:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

Status in fabric-manager-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers.

  libnvidia-nscq & fabric-manager are userspace packages related to the
  ERD drivers.

  Once ERD drivers are removed from the archive so should these packages
  too

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/2048782/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048782] Re: RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
libnvidia-nscq-450 450.248.02-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-nscq-450 450.248.02-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
Comment: Auxiliary package for obsolete driver version; LP: #2048782
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: libnvidia-nscq-450 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to fabric-manager-515 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048782

Title:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

Status in fabric-manager-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers.

  libnvidia-nscq & fabric-manager are userspace packages related to the
  ERD drivers.

  Once ERD drivers are removed from the archive so should these packages
  too

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/2048782/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048782] Re: RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
fabric-manager-460 460.106.00-0ubuntu1 in noble
Comment: Auxiliary package for obsolete driver version; LP: #2048782
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: fabric-manager-460 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to fabric-manager-515 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048782

Title:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers

Status in fabric-manager-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fabric-manager-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libnvidia-nscq-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  RM obsolete auxiliary packages for removed nvidia server ERD drivers.

  libnvidia-nscq & fabric-manager are userspace packages related to the
  ERD drivers.

  Once ERD drivers are removed from the archive so should these packages
  too

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric-manager-450/+bug/2048782/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-common-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-compute-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-compute-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-decode-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-decode-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-encode-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-encode-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-extra-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-extra-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-fbc1-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-gl-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-gl-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-ifr1-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
nvidia-compute-utils-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-dkms-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-driver-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-utils-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-common-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-compute-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-compute-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-decode-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-decode-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-encode-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-encode-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-fbc1-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-gl-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-gl-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-ifr1-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
nvidia-compute-utils-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-dkms-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-driver-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-utils-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 515.105.01-0ubuntu3 in noble
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 530.41.03-0ubuntu2 in noble
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The other packages in this listed are reported by reverse-depends to
have non-empty revdeps.  However it looks like these all come from other
packages that have just been removed.  Rather than tracing this manually
and possibly making a mistake, I'll let the others sit for another
round.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-common-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble s390x
libnvidia-compute-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-compute-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-decode-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-decode-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-encode-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-encode-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-fbc1-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-gl-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-gl-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
libnvidia-ifr1-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble i386
nvidia-compute-utils-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-dkms-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-driver-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
nvidia-utils-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble s390x
libnvidia-common-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble s390x
libnvidia-compute-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-compute-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-decode-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-decode-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-encode-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-encode-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-extra-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-extra-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-fbc1-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-gl-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-gl-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
nvidia-compute-utils-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-dkms-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-driver-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-utils-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 435.21-0ubuntu8 in noble
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble
libcuda1-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble amd64
libcuda1-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble armhf
nvidia-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble amd64
nvidia-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble armhf
nvidia-340-dev 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble amd64
nvidia-340-dev 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble armhf
nvidia-340-uvm 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble amd64
nvidia-340-uvm 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble armhf
nvidia-libopencl1-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble amd64
nvidia-opencl-icd-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble amd64
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2048087] Re: RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble s390x
libnvidia-common-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble armhf
libnvidia-common-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-common-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble ppc64el
libnvidia-common-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble riscv64
libnvidia-common-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble s390x
libnvidia-compute-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-compute-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-decode-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-decode-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-encode-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-encode-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-fbc1-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-gl-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-gl-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
libnvidia-ifr1-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble i386
nvidia-compute-utils-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-dkms-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-driver-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
nvidia-utils-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048087

Title:
  RM: obsolete & superseded nvidia-graphics-drivers, leftovers

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=noble§ion=all&arch=any&keywords=nvidia-
  graphics-drivers&searchon=sourcenames

  Currently supported drivers are:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-525-server
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server

  all other drivers are superseded binaries, from obsolete and/or short-
  lived nvidia-graphics-drivers are however still published in the
  archive.

  please remove them.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/+bug/2048087/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2017006] Proposed package removed from archive

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of lttng-modules in the proposed pocket of Lunar that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017006

Title:
  fix build issue for v5.19 kernels (jammy-hwe, kinetic, lunar-riscv)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [ Impact ]

  Upstream stable added a change in the format of jbd2 in 5.15.87 that
  was cherry-picked to kinetic:linux.

  This is incompatible with the current changes in the lttng-module
  kinetic.

  We previously encountered this issue for focal 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2004644
  and we proactively released a new version for kinetic.
  The problem is the fix does not really work as expected.

  As shown in the logs below,
  The build error is triggered because some function declaration does not match 
the kernel's.
  In `include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h` in lttng-modules, there is a 
conditional declaration based on the kernel version. 5.19 is missing there, 
therefore kinetic will fall back to the old declaration. The reason 5.19 is not 
there is probably because this version has reached end of life last year.

  Build logs:
  35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/define_trace.h:87,
    860 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:293,
    861 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:29:
    862 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:133:6:
 error: conflicting types for ‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’; have ‘void(dev_t,  long 
unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  
long unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    863 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   133 | void 
trace_##_name(_proto);
    864 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |  ^~
    865 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:45:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP’
    866 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]45 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP(map, name, map, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
    867 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~~
    868 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:87:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP’
    869 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]87 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP(name, name,  \
    870 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~
    871 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:180:1:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT’
    872 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   180 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT(jbd2_run_stats,
    873 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | ^~
    874 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
./include/trace/events/jbd2.h:9,
    875 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:18:
    876 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:245:28: note: previous definition of 
‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’ with type ‘void(dev_t,  tid_t,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  unsigned int,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    877 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   245 | static inline 
void trace_##name(proto)  \
    878 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |
^~
    879 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2017006] Proposed package removed from archive

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of lttng-modules in the proposed pocket of Lunar that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017006

Title:
  fix build issue for v5.19 kernels (jammy-hwe, kinetic, lunar-riscv)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [ Impact ]

  Upstream stable added a change in the format of jbd2 in 5.15.87 that
  was cherry-picked to kinetic:linux.

  This is incompatible with the current changes in the lttng-module
  kinetic.

  We previously encountered this issue for focal 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2004644
  and we proactively released a new version for kinetic.
  The problem is the fix does not really work as expected.

  As shown in the logs below,
  The build error is triggered because some function declaration does not match 
the kernel's.
  In `include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h` in lttng-modules, there is a 
conditional declaration based on the kernel version. 5.19 is missing there, 
therefore kinetic will fall back to the old declaration. The reason 5.19 is not 
there is probably because this version has reached end of life last year.

  Build logs:
  35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/define_trace.h:87,
    860 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:293,
    861 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:29:
    862 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:133:6:
 error: conflicting types for ‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’; have ‘void(dev_t,  long 
unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  
long unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    863 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   133 | void 
trace_##_name(_proto);
    864 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |  ^~
    865 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:45:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP’
    866 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]45 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP(map, name, map, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
    867 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~~
    868 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:87:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP’
    869 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]87 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP(name, name,  \
    870 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~
    871 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:180:1:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT’
    872 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   180 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT(jbd2_run_stats,
    873 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | ^~
    874 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
./include/trace/events/jbd2.h:9,
    875 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:18:
    876 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:245:28: note: previous definition of 
‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’ with type ‘void(dev_t,  tid_t,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  unsigned int,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    877 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   245 | static inline 
void trace_##name(proto)  \
    878 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |
^~
    879 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2017006] Proposed package removed from archive

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of lttng-modules in the proposed pocket of Lunar that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017006

Title:
  fix build issue for v5.19 kernels (jammy-hwe, kinetic, lunar-riscv)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [ Impact ]

  Upstream stable added a change in the format of jbd2 in 5.15.87 that
  was cherry-picked to kinetic:linux.

  This is incompatible with the current changes in the lttng-module
  kinetic.

  We previously encountered this issue for focal 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2004644
  and we proactively released a new version for kinetic.
  The problem is the fix does not really work as expected.

  As shown in the logs below,
  The build error is triggered because some function declaration does not match 
the kernel's.
  In `include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h` in lttng-modules, there is a 
conditional declaration based on the kernel version. 5.19 is missing there, 
therefore kinetic will fall back to the old declaration. The reason 5.19 is not 
there is probably because this version has reached end of life last year.

  Build logs:
  35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/define_trace.h:87,
    860 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:293,
    861 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:29:
    862 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:133:6:
 error: conflicting types for ‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’; have ‘void(dev_t,  long 
unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  
long unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    863 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   133 | void 
trace_##_name(_proto);
    864 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |  ^~
    865 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:45:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP’
    866 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]45 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP(map, name, map, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
    867 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~~
    868 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:87:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP’
    869 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]87 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP(name, name,  \
    870 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~
    871 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:180:1:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT’
    872 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   180 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT(jbd2_run_stats,
    873 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | ^~
    874 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
./include/trace/events/jbd2.h:9,
    875 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:18:
    876 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:245:28: note: previous definition of 
‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’ with type ‘void(dev_t,  tid_t,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  unsigned int,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    877 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   245 | static inline 
void trace_##name(proto)  \
    878 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |
^~
    879 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2017006] Proposed package removed from archive

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of lttng-modules in the proposed pocket of Lunar that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017006

Title:
  fix build issue for v5.19 kernels (jammy-hwe, kinetic, lunar-riscv)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [ Impact ]

  Upstream stable added a change in the format of jbd2 in 5.15.87 that
  was cherry-picked to kinetic:linux.

  This is incompatible with the current changes in the lttng-module
  kinetic.

  We previously encountered this issue for focal 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2004644
  and we proactively released a new version for kinetic.
  The problem is the fix does not really work as expected.

  As shown in the logs below,
  The build error is triggered because some function declaration does not match 
the kernel's.
  In `include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h` in lttng-modules, there is a 
conditional declaration based on the kernel version. 5.19 is missing there, 
therefore kinetic will fall back to the old declaration. The reason 5.19 is not 
there is probably because this version has reached end of life last year.

  Build logs:
  35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/define_trace.h:87,
    860 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:293,
    861 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:29:
    862 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:133:6:
 error: conflicting types for ‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’; have ‘void(dev_t,  long 
unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  
long unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    863 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   133 | void 
trace_##_name(_proto);
    864 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |  ^~
    865 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:45:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP’
    866 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]45 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP(map, name, map, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
    867 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~~
    868 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:87:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP’
    869 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]87 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP(name, name,  \
    870 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~
    871 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:180:1:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT’
    872 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   180 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT(jbd2_run_stats,
    873 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | ^~
    874 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
./include/trace/events/jbd2.h:9,
    875 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:18:
    876 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:245:28: note: previous definition of 
‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’ with type ‘void(dev_t,  tid_t,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  unsigned int,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    877 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   245 | static inline 
void trace_##name(proto)  \
    878 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |
^~
    879 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2017006] Proposed package removed from archive

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of lttng-modules in the proposed pocket of Jammy that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017006

Title:
  fix build issue for v5.19 kernels (jammy-hwe, kinetic, lunar-riscv)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [ Impact ]

  Upstream stable added a change in the format of jbd2 in 5.15.87 that
  was cherry-picked to kinetic:linux.

  This is incompatible with the current changes in the lttng-module
  kinetic.

  We previously encountered this issue for focal 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2004644
  and we proactively released a new version for kinetic.
  The problem is the fix does not really work as expected.

  As shown in the logs below,
  The build error is triggered because some function declaration does not match 
the kernel's.
  In `include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h` in lttng-modules, there is a 
conditional declaration based on the kernel version. 5.19 is missing there, 
therefore kinetic will fall back to the old declaration. The reason 5.19 is not 
there is probably because this version has reached end of life last year.

  Build logs:
  35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/define_trace.h:87,
    860 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:293,
    861 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:29:
    862 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:133:6:
 error: conflicting types for ‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’; have ‘void(dev_t,  long 
unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  
long unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    863 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   133 | void 
trace_##_name(_proto);
    864 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |  ^~
    865 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:45:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP’
    866 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]45 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP(map, name, map, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
    867 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~~
    868 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:87:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP’
    869 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]87 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP(name, name,  \
    870 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~
    871 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:180:1:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT’
    872 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   180 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT(jbd2_run_stats,
    873 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | ^~
    874 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
./include/trace/events/jbd2.h:9,
    875 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:18:
    876 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:245:28: note: previous definition of 
‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’ with type ‘void(dev_t,  tid_t,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  unsigned int,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    877 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   245 | static inline 
void trace_##name(proto)  \
    878 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |
^~
    879 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2017006] Proposed package removed from archive

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of lttng-modules in the proposed pocket of Jammy that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017006

Title:
  fix build issue for v5.19 kernels (jammy-hwe, kinetic, lunar-riscv)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [ Impact ]

  Upstream stable added a change in the format of jbd2 in 5.15.87 that
  was cherry-picked to kinetic:linux.

  This is incompatible with the current changes in the lttng-module
  kinetic.

  We previously encountered this issue for focal 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2004644
  and we proactively released a new version for kinetic.
  The problem is the fix does not really work as expected.

  As shown in the logs below,
  The build error is triggered because some function declaration does not match 
the kernel's.
  In `include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h` in lttng-modules, there is a 
conditional declaration based on the kernel version. 5.19 is missing there, 
therefore kinetic will fall back to the old declaration. The reason 5.19 is not 
there is probably because this version has reached end of life last year.

  Build logs:
  35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/define_trace.h:87,
    860 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:293,
    861 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:29:
    862 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:133:6:
 error: conflicting types for ‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’; have ‘void(dev_t,  long 
unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  
long unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    863 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   133 | void 
trace_##_name(_proto);
    864 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |  ^~
    865 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:45:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP’
    866 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]45 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP(map, name, map, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
    867 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~~
    868 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:87:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP’
    869 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]87 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP(name, name,  \
    870 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~
    871 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:180:1:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT’
    872 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   180 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT(jbd2_run_stats,
    873 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | ^~
    874 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
./include/trace/events/jbd2.h:9,
    875 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:18:
    876 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:245:28: note: previous definition of 
‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’ with type ‘void(dev_t,  tid_t,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  unsigned int,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    877 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   245 | static inline 
void trace_##name(proto)  \
    878 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |
^~
    879 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2017006] Proposed package removed from archive

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of lttng-modules in the proposed pocket of Jammy that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017006

Title:
  fix build issue for v5.19 kernels (jammy-hwe, kinetic, lunar-riscv)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [ Impact ]

  Upstream stable added a change in the format of jbd2 in 5.15.87 that
  was cherry-picked to kinetic:linux.

  This is incompatible with the current changes in the lttng-module
  kinetic.

  We previously encountered this issue for focal 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2004644
  and we proactively released a new version for kinetic.
  The problem is the fix does not really work as expected.

  As shown in the logs below,
  The build error is triggered because some function declaration does not match 
the kernel's.
  In `include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h` in lttng-modules, there is a 
conditional declaration based on the kernel version. 5.19 is missing there, 
therefore kinetic will fall back to the old declaration. The reason 5.19 is not 
there is probably because this version has reached end of life last year.

  Build logs:
  35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/define_trace.h:87,
    860 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:293,
    861 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:29:
    862 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:133:6:
 error: conflicting types for ‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’; have ‘void(dev_t,  long 
unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  
long unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    863 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   133 | void 
trace_##_name(_proto);
    864 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |  ^~
    865 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:45:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP’
    866 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]45 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP(map, name, map, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
    867 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~~
    868 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:87:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP’
    869 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]87 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP(name, name,  \
    870 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~
    871 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:180:1:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT’
    872 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   180 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT(jbd2_run_stats,
    873 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | ^~
    874 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
./include/trace/events/jbd2.h:9,
    875 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:18:
    876 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:245:28: note: previous definition of 
‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’ with type ‘void(dev_t,  tid_t,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  unsigned int,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    877 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   245 | static inline 
void trace_##name(proto)  \
    878 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |
^~
    879 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2017006] Proposed package removed from archive

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The version of lttng-modules in the proposed pocket of Jammy that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017006

Title:
  fix build issue for v5.19 kernels (jammy-hwe, kinetic, lunar-riscv)

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Kinetic:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in lttng-modules source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [ Impact ]

  Upstream stable added a change in the format of jbd2 in 5.15.87 that
  was cherry-picked to kinetic:linux.

  This is incompatible with the current changes in the lttng-module
  kinetic.

  We previously encountered this issue for focal 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2004644
  and we proactively released a new version for kinetic.
  The problem is the fix does not really work as expected.

  As shown in the logs below,
  The build error is triggered because some function declaration does not match 
the kernel's.
  In `include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h` in lttng-modules, there is a 
conditional declaration based on the kernel version. 5.19 is missing there, 
therefore kinetic will fall back to the old declaration. The reason 5.19 is not 
there is probably because this version has reached end of life last year.

  Build logs:
  35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/define_trace.h:87,
    860 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:293,
    861 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:29:
    862 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:133:6:
 error: conflicting types for ‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’; have ‘void(dev_t,  long 
unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  
long unsigned int,  struct transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    863 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   133 | void 
trace_##_name(_proto);
    864 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |  ^~
    865 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:45:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP’
    866 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]45 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_INSTANCE_MAP(map, name, map, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
    867 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~~
    868 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/lttng/tracepoint-event-impl.h:87:9:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP’
    869 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]87 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT_MAP(name, name,  \
    870 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | 
^~
    871 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/../../include/instrumentation/events/jbd2.h:180:1:
 note: in expansion of macro ‘LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT’
    872 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   180 | 
LTTNG_TRACEPOINT_EVENT(jbd2_run_stats,
    873 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   | ^~
    874 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] In file included from 
./include/trace/events/jbd2.h:9,
    875 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]  from 
/var/lib/dkms/lttng-modules/2.13.8/build/src/probes/lttng-probe-jbd2.c:18:
    876 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout] 
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:245:28: note: previous definition of 
‘trace_jbd2_run_stats’ with type ‘void(dev_t,  tid_t,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’ {aka ‘void(unsigned int,  unsigned int,  struct 
transaction_run_stats_s *)’}
    877 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   245 | static inline 
void trace_##name(proto)  \
    878 02:35:35 DEBUG| [stdout]   |
^~
    879 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2046082] Re: zed.rc: typo in option ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO*US*RE_SLOT_ON_FAULT

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Normally, changing a conffile in an SRU is iffy because this may result
in conffile prompts for the user on upgrade, and will cause unattended-
upgrades to hold the package back.

In this case we're fixing a regression in a conffile that was introduced
already in -updates.  So, ok.

** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046082

Title:
  zed.rc: typo in option ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO*US*RE_SLOT_ON_FAULT

Status in zfs-linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in zfs-linux source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in zfs-linux source package in Noble:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * There's a typo in user-visible option (/etc/zfs/zed.d/zed.rc)
     ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO*US*RE_SLOT_ON_FAULT introduced upstream
     in 2.2.0-rc4 and SRU-ed to Mantic with 2.2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10.

   * This could be fixed in Ubuntu before users start adopting it.

  [Test Plan]

   * Check whether /etc/zfs/zed.d/zed.rc ships the correct option.

   * Actual:
     $ grep ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO /etc/zfs/zed.d/zed.rc
     #ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLOUSRE_SLOT_ON_FAULT=1

   * Expected:
     $ grep ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO /etc/zfs/zed.d/zed.rc
     #ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLOSURE_SLOT_ON_FAULT=1

  [Regression Potential]

   * Users of Mantic who upgraded to zfs-linux 2.2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10
     (published to mantic-updates on 2023-12-08) _and_ enabled the
     option (with typo) would have such functionality disabled.

  [Other Info]

   * This option (with typo) was introduced in commit d19304ffeec5
     ("zed: Add zedlet to power off slot when drive is faulted"),
     and is present in:
     - ZFS 2.2: zfs-2.2.0-rc4 (mantic-updates)
     - ZFS 2.1: zfs-2.1.13

   * It affects Ubuntu Noble and Mantic, but not Lunar or older.

   * Fixed upstream with commit 3c7650491b9a ("zed: fix typo in 
 variable ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO*US*RE_SLOT_ON_FAULT")

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/2046082/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2046082] Please test proposed package

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Mauricio, or anyone else affected,

Accepted zfs-linux into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-
linux/2.2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046082

Title:
  zed.rc: typo in option ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO*US*RE_SLOT_ON_FAULT

Status in zfs-linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in zfs-linux source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in zfs-linux source package in Noble:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * There's a typo in user-visible option (/etc/zfs/zed.d/zed.rc)
     ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO*US*RE_SLOT_ON_FAULT introduced upstream
     in 2.2.0-rc4 and SRU-ed to Mantic with 2.2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10.

   * This could be fixed in Ubuntu before users start adopting it.

  [Test Plan]

   * Check whether /etc/zfs/zed.d/zed.rc ships the correct option.

   * Actual:
     $ grep ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO /etc/zfs/zed.d/zed.rc
     #ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLOUSRE_SLOT_ON_FAULT=1

   * Expected:
     $ grep ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO /etc/zfs/zed.d/zed.rc
     #ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLOSURE_SLOT_ON_FAULT=1

  [Regression Potential]

   * Users of Mantic who upgraded to zfs-linux 2.2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10
     (published to mantic-updates on 2023-12-08) _and_ enabled the
     option (with typo) would have such functionality disabled.

  [Other Info]

   * This option (with typo) was introduced in commit d19304ffeec5
     ("zed: Add zedlet to power off slot when drive is faulted"),
     and is present in:
     - ZFS 2.2: zfs-2.2.0-rc4 (mantic-updates)
     - ZFS 2.1: zfs-2.1.13

   * It affects Ubuntu Noble and Mantic, but not Lunar or older.

   * Fixed upstream with commit 3c7650491b9a ("zed: fix typo in 
 variable ZED_POWER_OFF_ENCLO*US*RE_SLOT_ON_FAULT")

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/2046082/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2041800] Re: [needs-packaging] usbio-drivers

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
The usbio-drivers package that was uploaded to the noble NEW queue has
been rejected due to an incorrect debian/copyright.  The upstream
copyright declarations all indicate that they are GPL 2.0, not GPL 2.0
or any later version.  The debian/copyright uses the correct short name
for the actual license, but includes "or any later version" text in the
body of the license statement, which is incorrect.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041800

Title:
  [needs-packaging] usbio-drivers

Status in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-6.5 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in The Jammy Jellyfish:
  New
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in Noble:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Noble:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Description: USBIO Bridge drivers for Intel MeteoLake platform with Lattice 
AIC
   This package provides kernel drivers for MIPI cameras through the Intel IPU6
   on Intel MeteoLake platform with Lattice AIC.

  Upstream URL: https://github.com/intel/usbio-drivers
  Package source repo: https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/+git/intel-usbio-dkms 
(to request usd-import after created)
  License: GPL v2

  PPA: https://launchpad.net/~vicamo/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-2031412.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2041800/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2024-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
LP: #2048087 has been opened with a superset of removal requests, so
marking invalid the tasks here in favor of that separate bug with
independent history.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

  Also we shomehow have remains of 440-server published in the archive,
  with many superseeded (hostile takeover) of binary packages by
  450-server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2041751] Re: RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

2024-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
I actually agree that we should aim to remove these packages entirely,
rather than merely demoting them.

I think removal of the server is a clear-cut case.  Nobody should need
to run a pptp server nowadays on Ubuntu, and if anyone is, forcing them
to migrate to a better VPN solution on upgrade (or maintaining their own
pptpd without Ubuntu support) is IMHO reasonable.

Removing the client, I think, is less clear-cut.  If you don't have a
pptp server to talk to, then shipping the client is harmless.  If you DO
have a pptp server to talk to, then the client is essential.  Anyone
running a PPTP server on Windows these days should upgrade... but
dropping the client support from Ubuntu doesn't give the Ubuntu users
any more leverage to make their server admin upgrade, it just makes
Ubuntu unusable in such an environment.

So I think we should remove pptpd from the archive for noble, but that
we should propose removal of the clients via discussion with the Debian
maintainers.

** Changed in: pptpd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041751

Title:
  RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in network-manager-pptp package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pptp-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pptpd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

  https://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/protocol-security.phtml

  It has been dead for over 20 years now.

  Current Windows versions natively support IPSec and L2TP as much
  better alternatives.

  https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fwp/ipsec-
  configuration#how-to-use-wfp-to-configure-ipsec-policies

  https://learn.microsoft.com/en-US/troubleshoot/windows-
  server/networking/configure-l2tp-ipsec-server-behind-nat-t-device

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2041751/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2041751] Re: RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

2024-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from noble:
pptpd 1.4.0-12build2 in noble
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble amd64
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble arm64
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble armhf
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble ppc64el
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble riscv64
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble s390x
pptpd 1.4.0-12build2 in noble amd64
pptpd 1.4.0-12build2 in noble arm64
pptpd 1.4.0-12build2 in noble armhf
pptpd 1.4.0-12build2 in noble ppc64el
pptpd 1.4.0-12build2 in noble riscv64
pptpd 1.4.0-12build2 in noble s390x
Comment: server implementation of an obsolete insecure protocol; LP: #2041751
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: pptpd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041751

Title:
  RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in network-manager-pptp package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pptp-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pptpd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

  https://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/protocol-security.phtml

  It has been dead for over 20 years now.

  Current Windows versions natively support IPSec and L2TP as much
  better alternatives.

  https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fwp/ipsec-
  configuration#how-to-use-wfp-to-configure-ipsec-policies

  https://learn.microsoft.com/en-US/troubleshoot/windows-
  server/networking/configure-l2tp-ipsec-server-behind-nat-t-device

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2041751/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2041751] Re: RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

2024-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed:

  Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu
  
  https://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/protocol-security.phtml
  
  It has been dead for over 20 years now.
  
- IPSec OpenVPN Strongswan are much better alternatives.
+ Current Windows versions natively support IPSec and L2TP as much better
+ alternatives.
+ 
+ https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fwp/ipsec-
+ configuration#how-to-use-wfp-to-configure-ipsec-policies
+ 
+ https://learn.microsoft.com/en-US/troubleshoot/windows-
+ server/networking/configure-l2tp-ipsec-server-behind-nat-t-device

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041751

Title:
  RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in network-manager-pptp package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pptp-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pptpd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

  https://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/protocol-security.phtml

  It has been dead for over 20 years now.

  Current Windows versions natively support IPSec and L2TP as much
  better alternatives.

  https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fwp/ipsec-
  configuration#how-to-use-wfp-to-configure-ipsec-policies

  https://learn.microsoft.com/en-US/troubleshoot/windows-
  server/networking/configure-l2tp-ipsec-server-behind-nat-t-device

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2041751/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2046116] Re: bluetooth device connected but not recognised as output device

2024-01-02 Thread Steve Langasek
** Tags added: regression-security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046116

Title:
  bluetooth device connected but not recognised as output device

Status in bluez package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  bluetooth device connected but not recognised as output device

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: bluez 5.64-0ubuntu1.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-37.38~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16
  Uname: Linux 6.2.0-37-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Dec 11 15:28:00 2023
  InterestingModules: rfcomm bnep btusb bluetooth
  MachineType: LENOVO 81EK
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.2.0-37-generic 
root=UUID=6f698382-a806-46af-9a4b-472e96795c6f ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: bluez
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/02/2018
  dmi.bios.release: 1.28
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: 7QCN28WW
  dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
  dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40709 WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 31
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Lenovo YOGA 530-14IKB
  dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.28
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7QCN28WW:bd08/02/2018:br1.28:efr1.28:svnLENOVO:pn81EK:pvrLenovoYOGA530-14IKB:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrSDK0J40709WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct31:cvrLenovoYOGA530-14IKB:skuLENOVO_MT_81EK_BU_idea_FM_YOGA530-14IKB:
  dmi.product.family: YOGA 530-14IKB
  dmi.product.name: 81EK
  dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_81EK_BU_idea_FM_YOGA 530-14IKB
  dmi.product.version: Lenovo YOGA 530-14IKB
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  hciconfig:
   hci0:Type: Primary  Bus: USB
BD Address: 0C:54:15:91:FA:4F  ACL MTU: 1021:5  SCO MTU: 96:6
UP RUNNING PSCAN 
RX bytes:83770 acl:295 sco:0 events:4208 errors:0
TX bytes:879445 acl:1667 sco:0 commands:1184 errors:0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/2046116/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2041751] Re: RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

2023-12-18 Thread Steve Langasek
>From the linked page:

However, that doesn't mean people don't accept the risks. There are many
corporations and individuals using PPTP with full knowledge of these
risks. Some use mitigating controls, and some don't.

No one has ever run pptp on Linux, as either a client or server, because
they thought it was a good protocol.  It was used because compatibility
was required with the other end.

> IPSec OpenVPN Strongswan are much better alternatives.

What is the compatibility story for these on Windows?

The page you link also says:

> Microsoft promote something else.

What, specifically, and what is the Linux compatibility story with that
"something else"?

It should be clear in this removal bug what users should be using
instead of pptp as a Windows-compatible VPN.

** Changed in: pptpd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041751

Title:
  RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in network-manager-pptp package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pptp-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pptpd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

  https://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/protocol-security.phtml

  It has been dead for over 20 years now.

  IPSec OpenVPN Strongswan are much better alternatives.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2041751/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Oh.  To the question of whether there was a systemd change in this
window: yes absolutely, because this is the point at which the riscv64
builders moved from lgw manually-operated qemu with a 20.04 guest image,
to bos03 openstack-operated qemu with a 22.04 guest image.

Which is also why we've moved from 5.13.0-1019-generic to
5.19.0-1021-generic.

But again, it was my understanding that these devices are supposed to be
created synchronously WITHOUT the involvement of udev.  In fact, we had
to make launchpad-buildd changes to make use of these devices at all
because udev would NOT set them up for us.

So if these are now being set up via udev, that's a significant
departure from expectations and it's not clear we even CAN have
synchronous behavior given that they would be set up by the host udev
and not the udev in the lxd container!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:13:28PM -, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Was there any systemd/udev change in this timeframe?  As the device
> files are very much connected to those.

My understanding is that these devices are supposed to be created directly
by the kernel on devtmpfs and NOT via udev, which is part of how we expected
to fix the earlier races.

And systemd did not change in this time frame in any release.  If there was
a change to the HOST udev in this timeframe causing a regression because a
new base image was published that includes a newer udev, we don't have
visibility on it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/544490 is a log from a build
with a new livecd-rootfs that spits out more debugging info on failure.

+ sgdisk binary/boot/disk-uefi.ext4 --print
Disk binary/boot/disk-uefi.ext4: 9437184 sectors, 4.5 GiB
Sector size (logical): 512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): CD1DD3AE-E4C8-4C5F-BD64-9236C39B9824
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
Main partition table begins at sector 2 and ends at sector 33
First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 9437150
Partitions will be aligned on 2-sector boundaries
Total free space is 0 sectors (0 bytes)

Number  Start (sector)End (sector)  Size   Code  Name
   1  235520 9437150   4.4 GiB 8300  
  12  227328  235519   4.0 MiB 8300  CIDATA
  13  342081   1024.0 KiB    loader1
  142082   10239   4.0 MiB   loader2
  15   10240  227327   106.0 MiB   EF00  
+ mount_image binary/boot/disk-uefi.ext4 1
+ trap clean_loops EXIT
+ backing_img=binary/boot/disk-uefi.ext4
+ local rootpart=1
++ losetup --show -f -P -v binary/boot/disk-uefi.ext4
+ loop_device=/dev/loop5
+ '[' '!' -b /dev/loop5 ']'
+ rootfs_dev_mapper=/dev/loop5p1
+ '[' '!' -b /dev/loop5p1 ']'
+ echo '/dev/loop5p1 is not a block device'
/dev/loop5p1 is not a block device
+ ls -l /dev/loop5p1 /dev/loop5p12
brw--- 1 root root 259, 2 Dec  9 04:16 /dev/loop5p1
brw--- 1 root root 259, 3 Dec  9 04:16 /dev/loop5p12
+ exit 1

This clearly shows that:
- there are 5 partitions on the image being passed to losetup
- after losetup exits, /dev/loop5p1 is not present
- after this check fails, an ls of /dev/loop5p* shows devices present for two 
of the partitions - including /dev/loop5p1 that we were looking for in the 
first place - but not all 5.

So this definitely means we have a race after calling losetup -P.

Is this the expected behavior from the kernel?  How do we make this
race-free?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2042090] Re: Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK soundwire support

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected,

Accepted firmware-sof into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-
sof/2.0-1ubuntu4.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042090

Title:
  Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK soundwire support

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-6.5 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Noble:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [SRU Justifications]

  == kernels ==

  [Impact]

  Audio doesn't work on Dell Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK platforms.

  [Fix]

  Kernel driver, ALSA ucm, and firmware fixes are needed. For the kernel part, 
following upstream commits are mandatory:
  * commit e70ca580e9c8 ("ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi-intel-mtl-match: add rt713 
rt1316 config")
  * commit b6d6e5abf645 ("ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw_rt_sdca_jack_common: add rt713 
support")
  * commit 5124d08d0ea4 ("ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw_rt712_sdca: construct 
cards->components by name_prefix")
  * commit 817178e7674b ("ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi: rt713+rt1316, no sdw-dmic 
config"): linux-next

  [Test Case]

  1. enable -proposed pocket and install the latest kernel
  2. browse youtube, hold backspace on virtual terminal or whatever makes some 
noises
  3. expected sound system brought up and reacts accordingly

  [Where problems could occur]

  While this enables new devices on new platforms, we may bump into
  burst noises, power consumption problems at corner cases not covered
  by test program.

  [Other Info]

  This is to enable sof devices on Intel MTL platform, which is only
  supported since 6.5 kernels, e.g. oem-6.5. Nominate Noble, Mantic, and
  Jammy.

  == firmware-sof ==

  [Impact]

  Audio doesn't work on Dell Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK platforms.

  [Fix]

  Kernel driver, ALSA ucm, and firmware fixes are needed. For firmware-
  sof, it's the upstream commit 99466c05f15f ("Add Intel SOF2.7.2
  topology files").

  [Test Case]

  1. enable -proposed pocket and install firmware-sof-signed
  2. browse youtube, hold backspace on virtual terminal or whatever makes some 
noises
  3. expected sound system brought up and reacts accordingly

  [Where problems could occur]

  While this enables new devices on new platforms, we may bump into
  burst noises, power consumption problems at corner cases not covered
  by test program.

  [Other Info]

  This is to enable sof devices on Intel MTL platform, which is only
  supported since 6.5 kernels, e.g. oem-6.5. Nominate Noble, Mantic, and
  Jammy.

  == original bug report ==

  The kernel patches has been applied in the ASoC tree.
  Re: [PATCH 00/23] ASoC: Intel: boards: updates for 6.7 — ALSA Devel 
(spinics.net) [spinics.net]
  https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg167273.html
  We need 3/23, 4/23, 6/23, and 
https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/commit/037809ef79874a610216fd6b6d50f53e069b5176

  And the UCM PR is submitted
  ucm2: soundwire: add rt713 SDCA device by shumingfan · Pull Request #363 · 
alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf (g

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2044330] Re: Update soundwire topology files for Intel RPL platforms

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected,

Accepted firmware-sof into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-
sof/2.0-1ubuntu4.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
jammy to verification-done-jammy. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-jammy. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to firmware-sof in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044330

Title:
  Update soundwire topology files for Intel RPL platforms

Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in firmware-sof source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Old RPL soundwire topology files are found to be muted when doing audio 
capture on left channel.

  [Fix]

  The commit from https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/ is required.
  * 
https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/commit/0abfe1a0aebec57bde94c5cfb9b21d6726bd804d
 (Update v2.2.8 topology files for Intel RPL platforms)

  [Test Case]

  Test audio functions on Dell MayaBay RTL platforms.

  [Where problems could occur]
  Most topology files for Intel RPL are updated. Need more confirmation on 
Intel RPL platforms.

  [Other info]

  Lunar is skipped, as it'll be EOL soon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-sof/+bug/2044330/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2042090] Re: Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK soundwire support

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected,

Accepted firmware-sof into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-
sof/2.2.6-1ubuntu1.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042090

Title:
  Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK soundwire support

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-6.5 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Noble:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [SRU Justifications]

  == kernels ==

  [Impact]

  Audio doesn't work on Dell Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK platforms.

  [Fix]

  Kernel driver, ALSA ucm, and firmware fixes are needed. For the kernel part, 
following upstream commits are mandatory:
  * commit e70ca580e9c8 ("ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi-intel-mtl-match: add rt713 
rt1316 config")
  * commit b6d6e5abf645 ("ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw_rt_sdca_jack_common: add rt713 
support")
  * commit 5124d08d0ea4 ("ASoC: Intel: sof_sdw_rt712_sdca: construct 
cards->components by name_prefix")
  * commit 817178e7674b ("ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi: rt713+rt1316, no sdw-dmic 
config"): linux-next

  [Test Case]

  1. enable -proposed pocket and install the latest kernel
  2. browse youtube, hold backspace on virtual terminal or whatever makes some 
noises
  3. expected sound system brought up and reacts accordingly

  [Where problems could occur]

  While this enables new devices on new platforms, we may bump into
  burst noises, power consumption problems at corner cases not covered
  by test program.

  [Other Info]

  This is to enable sof devices on Intel MTL platform, which is only
  supported since 6.5 kernels, e.g. oem-6.5. Nominate Noble, Mantic, and
  Jammy.

  == firmware-sof ==

  [Impact]

  Audio doesn't work on Dell Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK platforms.

  [Fix]

  Kernel driver, ALSA ucm, and firmware fixes are needed. For firmware-
  sof, it's the upstream commit 99466c05f15f ("Add Intel SOF2.7.2
  topology files").

  [Test Case]

  1. enable -proposed pocket and install firmware-sof-signed
  2. browse youtube, hold backspace on virtual terminal or whatever makes some 
noises
  3. expected sound system brought up and reacts accordingly

  [Where problems could occur]

  While this enables new devices on new platforms, we may bump into
  burst noises, power consumption problems at corner cases not covered
  by test program.

  [Other Info]

  This is to enable sof devices on Intel MTL platform, which is only
  supported since 6.5 kernels, e.g. oem-6.5. Nominate Noble, Mantic, and
  Jammy.

  == original bug report ==

  The kernel patches has been applied in the ASoC tree.
  Re: [PATCH 00/23] ASoC: Intel: boards: updates for 6.7 — ALSA Devel 
(spinics.net) [spinics.net]
  https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg167273.html
  We need 3/23, 4/23, 6/23, and 
https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/commit/037809ef79874a610216fd6b6d50f53e069b5176

  And the UCM PR is submitted
  ucm2: soundwire: add rt713 SDCA device by shumingfan · Pull Request #363 · 
als

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2044330] Re: Update soundwire topology files for Intel RPL platforms

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected,

Accepted firmware-sof into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-
sof/2.2.6-1ubuntu1.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to firmware-sof in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044330

Title:
  Update soundwire topology files for Intel RPL platforms

Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in firmware-sof source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Old RPL soundwire topology files are found to be muted when doing audio 
capture on left channel.

  [Fix]

  The commit from https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/ is required.
  * 
https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/commit/0abfe1a0aebec57bde94c5cfb9b21d6726bd804d
 (Update v2.2.8 topology files for Intel RPL platforms)

  [Test Case]

  Test audio functions on Dell MayaBay RTL platforms.

  [Where problems could occur]
  Most topology files for Intel RPL are updated. Need more confirmation on 
Intel RPL platforms.

  [Other info]

  Lunar is skipped, as it'll be EOL soon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-sof/+bug/2044330/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2044657] Re: Multiple data corruption issues in zfs

2023-12-08 Thread Steve Langasek
zfs-linux (2.2.2-0ubuntu1~23.10) mantic; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release. LP: #2044657
- Address potential data corruption

I'm assuming the plan for fixing it on earlier releases does not involve
updating to 2.2.2.

And this does not fall under a hardware enablement exception.  AND there
are packaging changes under debian/.

The diff for this new upstream release is 9kloc.  I would expect a
cherry-picked fix here for mantic, not a full upstream backport - just
as will be required for releases prior to mantic.

** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044657

Title:
  Multiple data corruption issues in zfs

Status in zfs-linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in zfs-linux source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in zfs-linux source package in Bionic:
  Confirmed
Status in zfs-linux source package in Focal:
  Confirmed
Status in zfs-linux source package in Jammy:
  Confirmed
Status in zfs-linux source package in Lunar:
  Confirmed
Status in zfs-linux source package in Mantic:
  Incomplete
Status in zfs-linux source package in Noble:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

   * Multiple data corruption issues have been identified and fixed in
  ZFS. Some of them, at varying real-life reproducibility frequency have
  been deterimed to affect very old zfs releases. Recommendation is to
  upgrade to 2.2.2 or 2.1.14 or backport dnat patch alone. This is to
  ensure users get other potentially related fixes and runtime tunables
  to possibly mitigate other bugs that are related and are being fixed
  upstream for future releases.

   * For jammy the 2.1.14 upgrade will bring HWE kernel support and also
  compatiblity/support for hardened kernel builds that mitigate SLS
  (straight-line-speculation).

  [ Test Plan ]

   * !!! Danger !!! use reproducer from
  https://zfsonlinux.topicbox.com/groups/zfs-discuss/T12876116b8607cdb
  and confirm if that issue is resolved or not. Do not run on production
  ZFS pools / systems.

   * autopkgtest pass (from https://ubuntu-archive-
  team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/ )

   * adt-matrix pass (from https://kernel.ubuntu.com/adt-matrix/ )

   * kernel regression zfs testsuite pass (from Kernel team RT test
  results summary, private)

   * zsys integration test pass (upgrade of zsys installed systems for
  all releases)

   * zsys install test pass (for daily images of LTS releases only that
  have such installer support, as per iso tracker test case)

   * LXD (ping LXD team to upgrade vendored in tooling to 2.2.2 and
  2.1.14, and test LXD on these updated kernels)

  
  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * Upgrade to 2.1.14 on jammy with SLS mitigations compatiblity will 
introduce slight slow down on amd64 (for hw accelerated assembly code-paths 
only in the encryption primitives)
   
   * Uncertain of the perfomance impact of the extra checks in dnat patch fix 
itself. Possibly affecting speed of operation, at the benefit of correctness.

  [ Other Info ]
   
   * https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15571 is most current consideration of 
affairs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/2044657/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
Failing build had kernel

Kernel version: Linux bos03-riscv64-014 5.19.0-1021-generic
#23~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 22 12:49:35 UTC 2023 riscv64

The build immediately before the first failure had kernel

Kernel version: Linux riscv64-qemu-lgw01-069 5.13.0-1019-generic
#21~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 24 22:36:01 UTC 2022 riscv64

So maybe this is a kernel regression?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
November 16 was 2 days after livecd-rootfs 24.04.4 landed in the noble
release pocket, superseding 24.04.2.

The code delta between 24.04.2 and 24.04.4 includes removal of support
for "legacy" images (SUBPROJECT=legacy) which doesn't apply here; and
some reorganization of code related to "preinstalled" images which could
affect the riscv64+generic image, that is a preinstalled image using the
cpc project, but there were no code changes touching any of the image
partitioning code so it's unclear how those code changes could have
introduced this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2045586] [NEW] livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
Public bug reported:

In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
build.

In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
fails rather often.

It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
device is not available is

  https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
also failed on ppc64el.

  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-rootfs/noble/ppc64el

The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
November 23.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

Title:
  livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous
  partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in livecd-rootfs package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of
  kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race-
  free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image
  build.

  In noble, we are finding that it is no longer reliable, and in fact
  fails rather often.

  It is most noticeable with riscv64 builds, which is the architecture
  where we most frequently ran into problems before with kpartx.  The
  first riscv64+generic build in noble where the expected loop partition
  device is not available is

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
  cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/cpc/+build/531790

  The failure is however not unique to riscv64, and the autopkgtest for
  the latest version of livecd-rootfs (24.04.7) - an update that
  specifically tries to add more debugging code for this scenario - has
  also failed on ppc64el.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-
  rootfs/noble/ppc64el

  The first failure happened on November 16.  While there has been an
  update to the util-linux package in noble, this did not land until
  November 23.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2045586/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2031412] Re: Support mipi camera on Intel Meteor Lake platform

2023-11-27 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ivsc-driver into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ivsc-
driver/0~git202212210258.94ecb88b-0ubuntu0.23.10.3 in a few hours, and
then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ivsc-driver (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031412

Title:
  Support mipi camera on Intel Meteor Lake platform

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in ipu6-drivers package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ivsc-driver package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-6.5 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ipu6-drivers source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in ivsc-driver source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux-firmware source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in ipu6-drivers source package in Mantic:
  In Progress
Status in ivsc-driver source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-firmware source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid
Status in ipu6-drivers source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in ivsc-driver source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  Triaged
Status in linux-firmware source package in Noble:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Noble:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [SRU Justification]

  == ipu6-driver ==

  [Impact]

  Missing Intel MIPI firmware for Meteor Lake platform.

  [Fix]

  Based on upstream tag
  https://github.com/intel/ipu6-drivers/releases/tag/Release_20231019,
  and an additional patch to enable/fix compilation of additional sensor
  modules.

  [Test Case]

  This is verified on MTL Lattice and VSC platforms, as well as previous
  generations e.g. TGL and ADL.

  To actually verify the camera framework:
  ```
  # enable mantic-proposed, update the kernel, make sure you get 6.5.0-14.14
  # reboot into the 6.5.0-14.14 kernel
  $ sudo apt install intel-ipu6-dkms intel-vsc-dkms
  $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:oem-solutions-group/intel-ipu6 -y -u
  $ sudo apt install gstreamer1.0-icamera v4l2-relayd
  ```
  In the above steps, make sure that only gstreamer1.0-icamera, v4l2-relayd, 
and their dependencies, are fetched from the oem-solutions-group PPA. 
Everything else must come from the mantic archive.

  And then browse https://webcamtests.com/ for testing.

  [Where problems could occur]

  This is a new platform. We've been verifying its functions and features, and
  are still polishing it.

  [Other Info]

  While Intel Meteor Lake is only supported by linux-oem-6.5/jammy and
  linux/mantic and on, and yet the lastest stable driver was verified after 
Mantic was released, it's being proposed to Noble instead.

  == ivsc-driver ==

  [Impact]

  Missing Intel MIPI firmware for Meteor Lake platform. Need both
  firmware and driver change to probe the hardware correctly.

  [Fix]

  4 commits from the latest trunk branch on upstream repository
  https://github.com/intel/ivsc-driver.

  [Test Case]

  With all other changes in position, Intel VSC driver modules are to be
  loaded as a soft dependency of some selected camera sensor modules.
  LJCA modules should be loaded automatically on MTL platforms as well.

  To actually verify the camera framework:
  ```
  # enable mantic-proposed, update the kernel, make sure you get 6.5.0-14.14
  # reboot into the 6.5.0-14.14 

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-11-24 Thread Steve Langasek
I'd really recommend not open new bug tasks for further source packages
on a bug like this; we clearly aren't going to remove any of those other
packages from mantic now...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

  Also we shomehow have remains of 440-server published in the archive,
  with many superseeded (hostile takeover) of binary packages by
  450-server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2023201] Re: Add support of Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D on Intel platforms

2023-11-04 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected,

Accepted firmware-sof into lunar-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-
sof/2.2.4+2.2.6-0ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
lunar to verification-done-lunar. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-lunar. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Lunar)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags removed: verification-done
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-lunar

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023201

Title:
  Add support of Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D  on Intel platforms

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux-oem-6.1 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in firmware-sof source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Confirmed
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification for firmware-sof

  [Impact]
  To support Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D, it requires sof-bin v2.2.6

  [Fix]
  Pull sof-bin v2.2.6 and for the completeness pull in v2.2.5, too

  [Test Case]
  Install the fixes on the target platform(RPL Dell SKU 0BDA) and verify the 
audio function.
  1. Install the firmware-sof on platform(RPL) with Audio Smart AMP IC ALC1319D
  2. Make sure the audio works
  3. Also try above steps on other platforms(ADL/TGL) to make sure the audio 
keep working.

  [Where problems could occur]
  New firmware may affect ADL, RPL, and TGL platforms, we need to verify it on 
not only the target platform, but other existing platforms.

  [Misc]
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2.2.5
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2.2.6

  

  [Impact]
  Speaker is not functional on some Dell machines of Intel RPL platforms

  [Fix]
  Here's the patch submitted by Intel.
  
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/patch/20230602202225.249209-16-pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com/

  [Test Case]
  1. Power on the machine and open the audio settings
  2. Verify it's not `Dummy Output` shown on the Audio output option

  [Where problems could occur]
  Only affect specific Intel RPL platforms. The risk of regression is low.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/2023201/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2038263] Re: Add SoF topology support on Intel RaptorLake DELL SKU 0C11

2023-11-04 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected,

Accepted firmware-sof into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-
sof/2.2.6-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
mantic to verification-done-mantic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-mantic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038263

Title:
  Add SoF topology support on Intel RaptorLake DELL SKU 0C11

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-6.1 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.5 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in firmware-sof source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Jusitification for firmware-sof

  [Impact]
  To support audio functions on RPL Dell SKU 0C11, it requires the topology 
file from sof-tplg-v2.2.7

  [Fix]
  Pull the sof-rpl-rt711-l0-rt1316-l12.tplg from 
https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2023.09

  [Test Case]
  Install the fixes on the target platform(RPL Dell SKU 0C11) and verify the 
audio function.
  1. Install the firmware-sof on platform(RPL) Dell SKU 0C11
  2. Make sure the audio output/input devices are not dummy in audio settings.

  [Where problems could occur]
  New firmware is only for the RPL platforms which requires the specific 
topology file.

  [Misc]
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2023.09

  

  [Impact]
  Audio play/capture are not functional on specific Dell machines of Intel RPL 
platforms

  [Fix]
  Backport the fix from Intel in https://github.com/thesofproject/linux

  [Test Case]
  1. Power on the machine and open the audio settings
  2. Verify it's not `Dummy` shown on the Audio output/input option

  [Where problems could occur]
  Only affect specific Intel RPL platforms. The risk of regression is low.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/2038263/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2041741] Re: Fan speed Control not working on RASPERRY PI 5 RUNNING UBUNTU 23.10

2023-10-29 Thread Steve Pringle
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux-raspi (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-raspi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041741

Title:
  Fan speed Control not working on RASPERRY PI 5 RUNNING UBUNTU 23.10

Status in linux-raspi package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The fan speed control when running Ubuntu 23.10 on a Raspberry Pi 5
  does not appear to be working. The fan runs at near maximum speed all
  the time and the cur_state in /sys/class/thermal/cooling_device0/ is
  stuck at the value of 4 no matter what the CPU temperature. I suspect
  it is related to this fault reported on Raspberry Pi OS:
  https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=356881

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2041741/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1983357] Re: test_021_aslr_dapper_libs from ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on K-5.19 / J-OEM-6.1 / J-6.2 AMD64

2023-10-25 Thread Steve Beattie
Thanks for investigating this, Cascardo. I agree that option 3 is likely
the best path forward, either via changing our kernel config defaults or
adjusting the sysctl defaults via the procps package. For reference the
adjustable sysctl setting is vm.mmap_rnd_compat_bits.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983357

Title:
  test_021_aslr_dapper_libs from ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on
  K-5.19 / J-OEM-6.1 / J-6.2 AMD64

Status in QA Regression Testing:
  New
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-6.1 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Jammy:
  New
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Issue found on 5.19.0-9.9 Kinetic AMD64 systems

  Test log:
   Running test: './test-kernel-security.py' distro: 'Ubuntu 22.10' kernel: 
'5.19.0-9.9 (Ubuntu 5.19.0-9.9-generic 5.19.0-rc5)' arch: 'amd64' uid: 0/0 
SUDO_USER: 'ubuntu')
   test_021_aslr_dapper_libs (__main__.KernelSecurityTest)
   ASLR of libs ... (default libs native) (default libs native rekey) (default 
libs COMPAT) FAIL
   
   ==
   FAIL: test_021_aslr_dapper_libs (__main__.KernelSecurityTest)
   ASLR of libs
   --
   Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 1770, in test_021_aslr_dapper_libs
   self._test_aslr('libs', expected)
 File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 1727, in _test_aslr
   self._test_aslr_all(area, expected, "default %s" % area)
 File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 1720, in _test_aslr_all
   self._test_aslr_exec(area, expected, target, name)
 File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 1703, in _test_aslr_exec
   self.assertShellExitEquals(aslr_expected, ["./%s" % (target), area, 
"--verbose"], msg="%s:\n" % name)
 File 
"/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tmp/ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security/src/qa-regression-testing/scripts/testlib.py",
 line 1203, in assertShellExitEquals
   self.assertEqual(expected, rc, msg + result + report)
   AssertionError: default libs COMPAT:
   Got exit code 1, expected 0
   Command: './aslr32', 'libs', '--verbose'
   Output:
   Checking ASLR of libs:
   0xf7c81790
   0xf7c81790
   0xf7c81790
   FAIL: ASLR not functional (libs always at 0xf7c81790)
   
   
   --
   Ran 1 test in 0.144s
   
   FAILED (failures=1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/+bug/1983357/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2039379] Re: boot issue, rollout 1.8 to Lunar or remove 1.7

2023-10-15 Thread Steve Langasek
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2038745 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038745

Thank you for highlighting this.  I have released the update now to
lunar as well.  Marking this as a duplicate of LP: #2038745.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2038745
   NV31 XTX cannot boot into Ubuntu 22.04.3 Desktop with upstream(inbox) driver 
installed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-firmware in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039379

Title:
  boot issue, rollout 1.8 to Lunar or remove 1.7

Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I pulled updates very early this morning (Oct 15) and system was no
  longer booting.

  Turns out linux-firmware 1.7 (Oct 9) fails to boot on RX 7900 series:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/2038745

  Fixed with linux-firmware 1.8 (Oct 10) and deployed to Jammy (Oct 12)
  but it is Oct 15th and Lunar -updates is still serving 1.7, a broken
  package that breaks boot for users??? How is this not critical?

  Fixed by booting into recovery and manually applying the linux-
  firmware 1.8 deb in -proposed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/2039379/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1965303] Re: Migrate from fbdev drivers to simpledrm and DRM fbdev emulation layer

2023-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
This has been marked as fixed in mantic, but this bug does not say what
the plan is for lunar, which is still the supported upgrade path from
jammy.

** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965303

Title:
  Migrate from fbdev drivers to simpledrm and DRM fbdev emulation layer

Status in gdm:
  Fix Released
Status in gdm3 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gdm3 source package in Jammy:
  Incomplete
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Won't Fix
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in gdm3 source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Fedora:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]
  The fbdev subsystem has been deprecated for a long time. We should drop it in 
favour of using simpledrm with fbdev emulation layer.

  This requires Kernel config changes:

  FB_EFI=n
  FB_VESA=n

  fbcon will still require FB to be available, but will use the fbdev
  emulation layer

  When this stack is enabled, it changes boot timing such that some
  drivers may take a longer time to boot and GDM may hang in a black
  screen.

  This issue has been readily reproduced in Ubuntu and reported to upstream 
mutter.
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2909

  [ Test Plan ]
  * Ensure that a kernel with required kernel changes can boot to GDM using DRM 
driver (amdgpu, i915, or nouveau)

  [ Where Problems could occur ]
  * Race conditions could be exposed to DE environments
  * Software that expects to find DRM device at /dev/dri/card0 may have a 
problem.
  * Some older versions of NVIDIA driver might not work properly.

  [ Other Info ]
  * Fedora bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022385

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdm/+bug/1965303/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2031302] Re: test_290_config_hardened_usercopy in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed with J-oem-6.5 / M-linux (HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR does not exist anymore)

2023-10-13 Thread Steve Beattie
Paolo's merge request has been applied in qa-regression-testing, thanks!

** Changed in: qa-regression-testing
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031302

Title:
  test_290_config_hardened_usercopy in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed
  with J-oem-6.5 / M-linux (HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR does not
  exist anymore)

Status in QA Regression Testing:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  New
Status in linux-oem-6.5 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.5 source package in Jammy:
  New

Bug description:
  This test requires HARDENED_USERCOPY to be unset.

  Test log:
   Running 'python3 ./test-kernel-security.py -v 
KernelSecurityConfigTest.test_290_config_hardened_usercopy'
   Running test: './test-kernel-security.py' distro: 'Ubuntu 22.04' kernel: 
'6.5.0-1002.2 (Ubuntu 6.5.0-1002.2-oem 6.5.0-rc4)' arch: 'amd64' init: 
'systemd' uid: 0/0 SUDO_USER: 'ubuntu')
   test_290_config_hardened_usercopy (__main__.KernelSecurityConfigTest)
   Ensure CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is set ... (skipped: HARDENED_USERCOPY 
depends on the allocator and strict devmem) FAIL
   
   ==
   FAIL: test_290_config_hardened_usercopy (__main__.KernelSecurityConfigTest)
   Ensure CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is set
   --
   Traceback (most recent call last):
 File 
"/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tmp/ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security/src/qa-regression-testing/scripts/./test-kernel-security.py",
 line 2724, in test_290_config_hardened_usercopy
   self.assertKernelConfigUnset(config_name)
 File 
"/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tmp/ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security/src/qa-regression-testing/scripts/./test-kernel-security.py",
 line 223, in assertKernelConfigUnset
   self.assertFalse(self._test_config(name),
   AssertionError: True is not false : HARDENED_USERCOPY option was expected to 
be unset in the kernel config
   
   --
   Ran 1 test in 0.007s
   
   FAILED (failures=1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/+bug/2031302/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2023201] Re: Add support of Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D on Intel platforms

2023-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
The firmware-sof upload in lunar-proposed contains a sha256sum.txt with
the checksums of all the firmware.  But every line of this file is
different from every line in the previous version, because the version
number is encoded.  Likewise, the file paths within the package encode
the version.  This makes it very difficult to review this package using
a debdiff.  Can you suggest a method of reviewing the package that
confirms we have only firmware file additions here, and not changes to
existing firmware files that could cause a regression?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023201

Title:
  Add support of Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D  on Intel platforms

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux-oem-6.1 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in firmware-sof source package in Lunar:
  Triaged
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Confirmed
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification for firmware-sof

  [Impact]
  To support Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D, it requires sof-bin v2.2.6

  [Fix]
  Pull sof-bin v2.2.6 and for the completeness pull in v2.2.5, too

  [Test Case]
  Install the fixes on the target platform(RPL Dell SKU 0BDA) and verify the 
audio function.
  1. Install the firmware-sof on platform(RPL) with Audio Smart AMP IC ALC1319D
  2. Make sure the audio works
  3. Also try above steps on other platforms(ADL/TGL) to make sure the audio 
keep working.

  [Where problems could occur]
  New firmware may affect ADL, RPL, and TGL platforms, we need to verify it on 
not only the target platform, but other existing platforms.

  [Misc]
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2.2.5
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2.2.6

  

  [Impact]
  Speaker is not functional on some Dell machines of Intel RPL platforms

  [Fix]
  Here's the patch submitted by Intel.
  
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/patch/20230602202225.249209-16-pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com/

  [Test Case]
  1. Power on the machine and open the audio settings
  2. Verify it's not `Dummy Output` shown on the Audio output option

  [Where problems could occur]
  Only affect specific Intel RPL platforms. The risk of regression is low.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/2023201/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2023201] Re: Add support of Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D on Intel platforms

2023-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed:

- SRU Jusitification for firmware-sof
+ SRU Justification for firmware-sof
  
  [Impact]
  To support Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D, it requires sof-bin v2.2.6
  
  [Fix]
  Pull sof-bin v2.2.6 and for the completeness pull in v2.2.5, too
  
  [Test Case]
  Install the fixes on the target platform(RPL Dell SKU 0BDA) and verify the 
audio function.
  1. Install the firmware-sof on platform(RPL) with Audio Smart AMP IC ALC1319D
  2. Make sure the audio works
  3. Also try above steps on other platforms(ADL/TGL) to make sure the audio 
keep working.
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  New firmware may affect ADL, RPL, and TGL platforms, we need to verify it on 
not only the target platform, but other existing platforms.
  
  [Misc]
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2.2.5
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2.2.6
  
  
  
  [Impact]
  Speaker is not functional on some Dell machines of Intel RPL platforms
  
  [Fix]
  Here's the patch submitted by Intel.
  
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/patch/20230602202225.249209-16-pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com/
  
  [Test Case]
  1. Power on the machine and open the audio settings
  2. Verify it's not `Dummy Output` shown on the Audio output option
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  Only affect specific Intel RPL platforms. The risk of regression is low.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023201

Title:
  Add support of Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D  on Intel platforms

Status in HWE Next:
  New
Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux-oem-6.1 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in firmware-sof source package in Lunar:
  Triaged
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Confirmed
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  SRU Justification for firmware-sof

  [Impact]
  To support Smart Amplifier IC ALC1319D, it requires sof-bin v2.2.6

  [Fix]
  Pull sof-bin v2.2.6 and for the completeness pull in v2.2.5, too

  [Test Case]
  Install the fixes on the target platform(RPL Dell SKU 0BDA) and verify the 
audio function.
  1. Install the firmware-sof on platform(RPL) with Audio Smart AMP IC ALC1319D
  2. Make sure the audio works
  3. Also try above steps on other platforms(ADL/TGL) to make sure the audio 
keep working.

  [Where problems could occur]
  New firmware may affect ADL, RPL, and TGL platforms, we need to verify it on 
not only the target platform, but other existing platforms.

  [Misc]
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2.2.5
  https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin/releases/tag/v2.2.6

  

  [Impact]
  Speaker is not functional on some Dell machines of Intel RPL platforms

  [Fix]
  Here's the patch submitted by Intel.
  
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/patch/20230602202225.249209-16-pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com/

  [Test Case]
  1. Power on the machine and open the audio settings
  2. Verify it's not `Dummy Output` shown on the Audio output option

  [Where problems could occur]
  Only affect specific Intel RPL platforms. The risk of regression is low.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/2023201/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2038292] Re: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535{, -server} lower than in lunar & jammy

2023-10-09 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038292

Title:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535{,-server} lower than in lunar & jammy

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 and nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server are
  lower than in lunar

  meaning we need to sru 535.113 into mantic, before turning on
  upgrades.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-535/+bug/2038292/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2029905] Re: [Ubuntu] mpi3mr: Include the latest patchset from upstream into 22.04.1/later LTS

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
This does not appear to be a blocker for Ubuntu 23.10; removing the
milestone.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
Milestone: ubuntu-23.10 => None

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029905

Title:
  [Ubuntu] mpi3mr: Include the latest patchset from upstream into
  22.04.1/later LTS

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Incomplete
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  Won't Fix
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  This BUG is created to integrate the latest mpi3mr driver available upstream 
into the upcoming Ubuntu LTS OS inbox driver.
  - The mpi3mr inbox driver version available in the latest LTS (22.04.02) is 
8.0.0.69.0. which is 
considerably the base driver + management app support.  
  - The latest mpi3mr driver available in the upstream is 8.4.1.0.0 which has 
various important features and 
critical bugs.

  
  Please include below the latest mpi3mr upstream patset: 

  
  git online commit id and description:

  f762326b2baa scsi: mpi3mr: Propagate sense data for admin queue SCSI I/O
  f762326b2baa scsi: mpi3mr: Propagate sense data for admin queue SCSI I/O
  144679dfb584 scsi: mpi3mr: Fix the type used for pointers to bitmap
  2a954832015d scsi: mpi3mr: Use -ENOMEM instead of -1 in mpi3mr_expander_add()
  2acc635a0e5e scsi: mpi3mr: Use IRQ save variants of spinlock to protect chain 
frame allocation
  a3d27dfdcfc2 scsi: mpi3mr: Handle soft reset in progress fault code (0xF002)
  b85f82f3c92a scsi: mpi3mr: Declare SCSI host template const
  1ea41edd88f2 scsi: mpi3mr: Update driver version to 8.4.1.0.0
  e74f2fbd8b06 scsi: mpi3mr: Update copyright year
  80b8fd0231d5 scsi: mpi3mr: Fix W=1 compilation warnings
  e5f596bc2592 scsi: mpi3mr: Update MPI Headers to revision 27
  f1dec6b1e25e scsi: mpi3mr: Avoid escalating to higher level reset when target 
is removed
  22beef38e52c scsi: mpi3mr: Modify MUR timeout value to 120 seconds
  23b3d1cf1572 scsi: mpi3mr: Fix admin queue memory leak upon soft reset
  3f1254ed01d0 scsi: mpi3mr: Successive VD delete and add causes FW fault
  ce756daa36e1 scsi: mpi3mr: Fix expander node leak in mpi3mr_remove()
  c798304470ca scsi: mpi3mr: Fix memory leaks in mpi3mr_init_ioc()
  d4caa1a4255c scsi: mpi3mr: Fix sas_hba.phy memory leak in mpi3mr_remove()
  d0f3c3728da8 scsi: mpi3mr: Fix mpi3mr_hba_port memory leak in mpi3mr_remove()
  7d2b02172b6a scsi: mpi3mr: Fix config page DMA memory leak
  f305a7b6ca21 scsi: mpi3mr: Fix throttle_groups memory leak
  8e45183978d6 scsi: mpi3mr: Bad drive in topology results kernel crash
  4f297e856a7b scsi: mpi3mr: NVMe command size greater than 8K fails
  ba8a9ba41fbd scsi: mpi3mr: Return proper values for failures in firmware init 
path
  0a319f162949 scsi: mpi3mr: Wait for diagnostic save during controller init
  5b06a7169c59 scsi: mpi3mr: Driver unload crashes host when enhanced logging 
is enabled
  02ca7da2919a scsi: mpi3mr: ioctl timeout when disabling/enabling interrupt
  66b381d874fa scsi: mpi3mr: Remove unneeded version.h include
  e39ea831ebad scsi: mpi3mr: Fix missing mrioc->evtack_cmds initialization
  339e61565f81 scsi: mpi3mr: Use number of bits to manage bitmap sizes
  eeb270aee3e0 scsi: mpi3mr: Remove unnecessary memcpy() to alltgt_info->dmi
  fb428a2005fc scsi: mpi3mr: Fix issues in mpi3mr_get_all_tgt_info()
  ae7d45f5283d scsi: mpi3mr: Fix an issue found by KASAN
  f0a43ba6c66c scsi: mpi3mr: Refer CONFIG_SCSI_MPI3MR in Makefile
  d347a951906b scsi: mpi3mr: Remove usage of dma_get_required_mask() API
  7d21fcfb4095 scsi: mpi3mr: Suppress command reply debug prints
  65244389b1b3 scsi: mpi3mr: Select CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATTRS
  c863a2dcb9b0 scsi: mpi3mr: Remove unnecessary cast
  f616efbee9d6 scsi: mpi3mr: Update driver version to 8.2.0.3.0
  2e31be8697b1 scsi: mpi3mr: Fix scheduling while atomic type bug
  f84e8b5bb57e scsi: mpi3mr: Scan the devices during resume time
  130fc180a481 scsi: mpi3mr: Free enclosure objects during driver unload
  bad2f28da625 scsi: mpi3mr: Handle 0xF003 Fault Code
  f2a79d2030ad scsi: mpi3mr: Graceful handling of surprise removal of PCIe HBA
  7f9f953d537a scsi: mpi3mr: Schedule IRQ kthreads only on non-RT kernels
  47cd930ee6ae scsi: mpi3mr: Support new power management framework
  ee6f2d6bb2a0 scsi: mpi3mr: Update mpi3 header files
  5ba207e55e7f scsi: mpi3mr: Fix error code in mpi3mr_transport_smp_handler()
  a113c02f5738 scsi: mpi3mr: Fix error codes in mpi3mr_report_manufacture()
  7f90bc70d1a6 scsi: mpi3mr: Block I/Os while refreshing target dev objects
  2745ce0e6d30 scsi: mpi3mr: Refresh SAS ports during soft reset
  176d4aa69c6e scsi: mpi3mr: Support SAS transport class callbacks
  2bd37e284914 scsi: mpi3mr: Add framework to issue MPT transport cmds
  7f56c791969e scsi: mpi3mr: Add SAS SATA end devices to STL
  626665e9c38d scsi: mpi3mr: Get targe

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1942260] Re: compress firmware in /lib/firmware

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: linux-firmware-raspi (Ubuntu Mantic)
Milestone: ubuntu-23.10 => mantic-updates

** Changed in: linux-firmware-raspi (Ubuntu Mantic)
Milestone: mantic-updates => None

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-firmware in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942260

Title:
  compress firmware in /lib/firmware

Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-firmware-raspi package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-firmware source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-firmware-raspi source package in Mantic:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  -- initramfs-tools

  [Impact]

   * linux supports xz compressed linux-firmware which saves disk space.
  In focal, initramfs-tools only knows how to included uncompressed
  firmware files (even when kernel supports loading compressed ones).
  Newer releases of linux-firmware may use compressed firmware files
  only, in such cases it would be nice for focal's initramfs-tools to
  support compressed firmware files in case of partial or incomplete
  upgrades (i.e. linux-firmware force installed or upgraded, without
  newer initramfs-tools). The proposed changes to initramfs-tools are
  backwards and forwards compatible, they prefer to include uncompressed
  firmware files; and if missing, include compressed firmware files in
  their uncompressed form. Thus maintaining compatibility with any
  kernels, irrespective of compressed/uncompressed firmware inputs.

  [Test Plan]

   * Compress all files shipped by linux-firmware with xz

   * Rebuild initrd

   * Check that all the same firmware files are still included in the
  initramfs, in their uncompressed form as before

  [Where problems could occur]

   * This SRU is precautionary to prevent accidental installation of
  compressed linux-firmware from generating incorrect initramfs. It
  should be noted that whilst initramfs-tools would create a compatible
  initramfs with any kernels, pre-v5.3 kernels do not support xz
  compressed firmware files at runtime. Mixing this new initramfs with
  compressed firmwares and pre 5.3 kernels may lead to expectations of
  supporting compressed firmware files with them only working at initrd
  stage and not at runtime.

  [Other Info]
  Original bug report

  Some facts:
   - The linux kernel has supported loading xz compressed firmware since 5.3
   - The size of /lib/firmware in impish is ~650Mb (and growing)
   - The compressed size of firmware could be ~230Mb

  It would be nice to install compressed firmware to save space.

  Here are the plans from the Fedora project:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-sof/+bug/1942260/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2038292] Re: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535{, -server} lower than in lunar & jammy

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
My understanding is this will be able to go into the mantic release
pocket with the kernel respin currently in progress, so should not need
to be an SRU.

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038292

Title:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535{,-server} lower than in lunar & jammy

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 and nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server are
  lower than in lunar

  meaning we need to sru 535.113 into mantic, before turning on
  upgrades.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-535/+bug/2038292/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2038567] Re: Disable restricting unprivileged change_profile by default, due to LXD latest/stable not yet compatible with this new apparmor feature

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
marking this fix committed for linux, version 6.5.0-9.9 in mantic-
proposed should contain the fix.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038567

Title:
  Disable restricting unprivileged change_profile by default, due to LXD
  latest/stable not yet compatible with this new apparmor feature

Status in Release Notes for Ubuntu:
  New
Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in lxd package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in snapd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Following upgrade to 6.5.0-7 kernel in mantic cloud images we are
  seeing a regression in our cloud image tests. The test runs the
  following:

  ```
  lxd init --auto --storage-backend dir
  lxc launch ubuntu-daily:mantic mantic
  lxc info mantic
  lxc exec mantic -- cloud-init status --wait
  ```

  The `lxc exec mantic -- cloud-init status --wait` times out after 240s
  and will fail our test as a result.

  I have been able to replicate in a local VM

  ```
  wget 
http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/mantic/20231005/mantic-server-cloudimg-amd64.img 
  wget --output-document=launch-qcow2-image-qemu.sh 
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/philroche/14c241c086a5730481e24178b654268f/raw/7af95cd4dfc8e1d0600e6118803d2c866765714e/gistfile1.txt
 
  chmod +x launch-qcow2-image-qemu.sh 

  ./launch-qcow2-image-qemu.sh --password passw0rd --image 
./mantic-server-cloudimg-amd64.img 
  cat < "./reproducer.sh"
  #!/bin/bash -eux
  lxd init --auto --storage-backend dir
  lxc launch ubuntu-daily:mantic mantic
  lxc info mantic
  lxc exec mantic -- cloud-init status --wait
  EOF
  chmod +x ./reproducer.sh
  sshpass -p passw0rd scp -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o CheckHostIP=no -o 
StrictHostKeyChecking=no -P  ./reproducer.sh ubuntu@127.0.0.1:~/
  sshpass -p passw0rd ssh -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o CheckHostIP=no -o 
StrictHostKeyChecking=no -p  ubuntu@127.0.0.1 sudo apt-get update
  sshpass -p passw0rd ssh -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o CheckHostIP=no -o 
StrictHostKeyChecking=no -p  ubuntu@127.0.0.1 sudo apt-get upgrade 
--assume-yes
  sshpass -p passw0rd ssh -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o CheckHostIP=no -o 
StrictHostKeyChecking=no -p  ubuntu@127.0.0.1 ./reproducer.sh
  ```

  The issue is not present with the 6.5.0-5 kernel and the issue is
  present regardless of the container launched. I tried the jammy
  container to test this.

  From my test VM

  ```
  ubuntu@cloudimg:~$ uname --all
  Linux cloudimg 6.5.0-7-generic #7-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Sep 29 
09:14:56 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  ubuntu@cloudimg:~$ uname --kernel-release
  6.5.0-7-generic
  ```

  This is a regression in our test that will block 23.10 cloud image
  release next week.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/2038567/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from mantic:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic
libnvidia-cfg1-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-cfg1-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-common-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-common-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic arm64
libnvidia-common-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic armhf
libnvidia-common-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-common-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
ppc64el
libnvidia-common-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
riscv64
libnvidia-common-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic s390x
libnvidia-common-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-common-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic arm64
libnvidia-common-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic armhf
libnvidia-common-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-common-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
ppc64el
libnvidia-common-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
riscv64
libnvidia-common-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic s390x
libnvidia-compute-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-compute-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-compute-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-compute-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-decode-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-decode-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-decode-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-decode-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-encode-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-encode-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-encode-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-encode-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-extra-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-extra-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-extra-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-extra-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-fbc1-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-fbc1-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-gl-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-gl-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-gl-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-gl-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-ifr1-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
libnvidia-ifr1-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic i386
nvidia-compute-utils-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-compute-utils-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-dkms-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
nvidia-dkms-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
nvidia-driver-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
nvidia-driver-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
nvidia-headless-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
nvidia-headless-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in 
mantic amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in 
mantic amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-utils-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
nvidia-utils-450-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in mantic amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-440-server 450.248.02-0ubuntu2 in 
mantic amd64
xserver-x

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Now:

$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-decode-440-server   (for libnvidia-decode-450-server)
* libnvidia-encode-440-server   (for libnvidia-encode-450-server)
* libnvidia-fbc1-440-server (for libnvidia-fbc1-450-server)
* libnvidia-ifr1-440-server (for libnvidia-ifr1-450-server)

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: amd64, i386
$

And these are false-positives because built from this source.  (I wonder
if the server implementation has trouble parsing the Sources file for
this, because the Binary: field is strangely split across lines...)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

  Also we shomehow have remains of 440-server published in the archive,
  with many superseeded (hostile takeover) of binary packages by
  450-server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
418 is clean.

$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server
No reverse dependencies found
$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server -a source
No reverse dependencies found
$

Removing packages from mantic:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic
libnvidia-cfg1-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-common-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-common-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic arm64
libnvidia-common-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic armhf
libnvidia-common-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic i386
libnvidia-common-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic 
ppc64el
libnvidia-common-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic 
riscv64
libnvidia-common-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic s390x
libnvidia-compute-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-compute-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic i386
libnvidia-decode-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-decode-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic i386
libnvidia-encode-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-encode-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic i386
libnvidia-fbc1-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic i386
libnvidia-gl-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-gl-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic i386
libnvidia-ifr1-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic i386
nvidia-compute-utils-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-dkms-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
nvidia-driver-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
nvidia-headless-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in 
mantic amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic 
amd64
nvidia-utils-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in mantic amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-418-server 418.226.00-0ubuntu5 in 
mantic amd64
Comment: EOL and obsolete; LP: #2035189
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

  Also we shomehow have remains of 440-server published in the archive,
  with many superseeded (hostile takeover) of binary packages by
  450-server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from mantic:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server 440.95.01-0ubuntu2 in mantic
Comment: EOL, obsolete source package; LP: #2035189
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

  Also we shomehow have remains of 440-server published in the archive,
  with many superseeded (hostile takeover) of binary packages by
  450-server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
The reason for adding bumblebee is that Recommends and alternative
Depends on removed packages can cause them to be retained on end user
systems after upgrade.  Better to remove the references than to try to
work out if nvidia would manage to not be affected.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

  Also we shomehow have remains of 440-server published in the archive,
  with many superseeded (hostile takeover) of binary packages by
  450-server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Ok, on the correct package reverse-depends now shows:

$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-decode-440-server   (for libnvidia-decode-450-server)
* libnvidia-encode-440-server   (for libnvidia-encode-450-server)
* libnvidia-fbc1-440-server (for libnvidia-fbc1-450-server)
* libnvidia-ifr1-440-server (for libnvidia-ifr1-450-server)
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-6.5.0-1004-azure [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-6.5.0-1004-gcp [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-6.5.0-1005-aws [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-6.5.0-1005-oracle [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-6.5.0-5-generic [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-6.5.0-5-lowlatency [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-aws [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-azure [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-gcp [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-generic [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-generic-hwe-22.04 [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-generic-hwe-22.04-edge [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-lowlatency [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-lowlatency-hwe-22.04 [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-lowlatency-hwe-22.04-edge [amd64]
* linux-modules-nvidia-450-server-oracle [amd64]

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: amd64, i386
$

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

  Also we shomehow have remains of 440-server published in the archive,
  with many superseeded (hostile takeover) of binary packages by
  450-server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-03 Thread Steve Langasek
$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-cfg1-430 [amd64](for libnvidia-cfg1-440)
* libnvidia-common-430  (for libnvidia-common-440)
* libnvidia-compute-430 [amd64 i386]
* libnvidia-decode-430 [amd64 i386]
* libnvidia-encode-430 [amd64 i386]
* libnvidia-fbc1-430 [amd64 i386]
* libnvidia-gl-430 [amd64 i386]
* libnvidia-ifr1-430 [amd64 i386]
* nvidia-compute-utils-430 [amd64]
* nvidia-dkms-430 [amd64]   (for nvidia-dkms-440)
* nvidia-driver-430 [amd64] (for nvidia-driver-440)
* nvidia-headless-430 [amd64]   (for nvidia-headless-440)
* nvidia-headless-no-dkms-430 [amd64]
* nvidia-kernel-common-430 [amd64]
* nvidia-kernel-source-430 [amd64]
* nvidia-utils-430 [amd64]  (for nvidia-utils-440)
* xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-430 [amd64]

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: amd64, 
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
$

It looks like nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 would also have to be removed
first?

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-03 Thread Steve Langasek
Removing packages from mantic:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic
libcuda1-384 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-cfg1-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-common-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-common-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic arm64
libnvidia-common-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic armhf
libnvidia-common-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic i386
libnvidia-common-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic ppc64el
libnvidia-common-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic riscv64
libnvidia-common-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic s390x
libnvidia-compute-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-compute-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic i386
libnvidia-decode-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-decode-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic i386
libnvidia-encode-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-encode-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic i386
libnvidia-fbc1-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-fbc1-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic i386
libnvidia-gl-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-gl-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic i386
libnvidia-ifr1-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
libnvidia-ifr1-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic i386
nvidia-384 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-384-dev 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-compute-utils-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-dkms-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-driver-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-headless-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-headless-no-dkms-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-kernel-common-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-kernel-source-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-libopencl1-384 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-opencl-icd-384 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
nvidia-utils-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-390 390.157-0ubuntu8 in mantic amd64
Comment: EOL and obsolete; LP: #2035189
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2035189] Re: RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive, unmaintained upstream drivers

2023-10-03 Thread Steve Langasek
$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-390
Reverse-Depends
===
* bumblebee-nvidia  (for nvidia-driver-390)

$

bumblebee should be updated to drop the reference, so that any users who
still have this installed don't have it kept installed as a result of
this dependency.

** Also affects: bumblebee (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2035189

Title:
  RM: EOL mantic nvidia-graphics-drivers - Remove from the archive,
  unmaintained upstream drivers

Status in bumblebee package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  This legacy driver had the last update on 2022.11.22, and is EOL
  upstream. We should remove it from the archive before the next LTS,
  maybe even before Mantic is released.

  We're planning on migrating the kernel from fbdev drivers to using
  simpledrm, but this old driver doesn't support the fbdev emulation
  layer, meaning that VT's would remain blank when the driver is used.

  Similarly 418-server and 450-server are also EOL and unsupported.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bumblebee/+bug/2035189/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2020469] Re: Package ppc64el/s390x signing certs

2023-09-29 Thread Steve Langasek
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/debian-
cd/+git/ubuntu/commit/?id=3b282009dc2eda1d450b88699d338b001ad43651

Result confirmed in https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-
live/20230928.5/mantic-live-server-s390x.list.

** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-signed in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020469

Title:
  Package ppc64el/s390x signing certs

Status in Ubuntu CD Images:
  Fix Released
Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  In Progress
Status in linux-signed package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed
Status in s390-tools-signed package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Package ppc64el/s390x signing certs

  For ease of using signed boot on opal & sipl platforms, package and
  expose the signing certificate in .pem format in the .deb packages and
  on the isos.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/2020469/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2013236] Re: b43 driver conflicts with bcmwl driver for some Broadcom devices

2023-09-27 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: Incomplete => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-firmware in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2013236

Title:
  b43 driver conflicts with bcmwl driver for some Broadcom devices

Status in broadcom-sta package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-drivers-common package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in broadcom-sta source package in Lunar:
  New
Status in linux-firmware source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-drivers-common source package in Lunar:
  Incomplete
Status in broadcom-sta source package in Mantic:
  New
Status in linux-firmware source package in Mantic:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-drivers-common source package in Mantic:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Specifically for Lunar - using a Macbook Air 2012, its wireless driver
  was not enabled even though I ticked the wireless tickbox on the
  installer.

  A quick look at the installer logs reveals various issues

  syslog:2023-03-29T18:01:25.141599+00:00 ubuntu-budgie kernel: [   43.063747] 
b43 bcma0:1: Direct firmware load for b43/ucode29_mimo.fw failed with error -2
  syslog:2023-03-29T18:01:25.141625+00:00 ubuntu-budgie kernel: [   43.063802] 
b43 bcma0:1: Direct firmware load for b43/ucode29_mimo.fw failed with error -2
  syslog:2023-03-29T18:01:25.141626+00:00 ubuntu-budgie kernel: [   43.063862] 
b43 bcma0:1: Direct firmware load for b43-open/ucode29_mimo.fw failed with 
error -2
  syslog:2023-03-29T18:01:25.141626+00:00 ubuntu-budgie kernel: [   43.063908] 
b43 bcma0:1: Direct firmware load for b43-open/ucode29_mimo.fw failed with 
error -2

  I will attach the installer logs manually since this was captured
  after the installation

  Note - on 20.04.6, 22.04.2 and 22.10 with the same laptop bcmwl was
  installed correctly during the install so this is a regression with
  the 6.2 kernel

  Workaround
  --
  You'll first need to blacklist the b43 driver by adding a blacklist file to 
/etc/modprobe.d/b43.conf with the contents "blacklist b43". Then run 
"update-initramfs -u". Then install the bcmwl-kernel-source package. After a 
reboot your wireless device should be available.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/broadcom-sta/+bug/2013236/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 2013236] Re: b43 driver conflicts with bcmwl driver for some Broadcom devices

2023-09-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:16:52PM -, Brian Murray wrote:
> However, using software-properties-gtk to install the proprietary driver
> (broadcom-sta-dkms) worked and the b43 driver was blacklisted and I was
> able to connect to a wireless network.

Does this mean the driver was not offered to you automatically through
ubuntu-drivers-common?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-firmware in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2013236

Title:
  b43 driver conflicts with bcmwl driver for some Broadcom devices

Status in broadcom-sta package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-drivers-common package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in broadcom-sta source package in Lunar:
  New
Status in linux-firmware source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-drivers-common source package in Lunar:
  Incomplete
Status in broadcom-sta source package in Mantic:
  New
Status in linux-firmware source package in Mantic:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-drivers-common source package in Mantic:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Specifically for Lunar - using a Macbook Air 2012, its wireless driver
  was not enabled even though I ticked the wireless tickbox on the
  installer.

  A quick look at the installer logs reveals various issues

  syslog:2023-03-29T18:01:25.141599+00:00 ubuntu-budgie kernel: [   43.063747] 
b43 bcma0:1: Direct firmware load for b43/ucode29_mimo.fw failed with error -2
  syslog:2023-03-29T18:01:25.141625+00:00 ubuntu-budgie kernel: [   43.063802] 
b43 bcma0:1: Direct firmware load for b43/ucode29_mimo.fw failed with error -2
  syslog:2023-03-29T18:01:25.141626+00:00 ubuntu-budgie kernel: [   43.063862] 
b43 bcma0:1: Direct firmware load for b43-open/ucode29_mimo.fw failed with 
error -2
  syslog:2023-03-29T18:01:25.141626+00:00 ubuntu-budgie kernel: [   43.063908] 
b43 bcma0:1: Direct firmware load for b43-open/ucode29_mimo.fw failed with 
error -2

  I will attach the installer logs manually since this was captured
  after the installation

  Note - on 20.04.6, 22.04.2 and 22.10 with the same laptop bcmwl was
  installed correctly during the install so this is a regression with
  the 6.2 kernel

  Workaround
  --
  You'll first need to blacklist the b43 driver by adding a blacklist file to 
/etc/modprobe.d/b43.conf with the contents "blacklist b43". Then run 
"update-initramfs -u". Then install the bcmwl-kernel-source package. After a 
reboot your wireless device should be available.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/broadcom-sta/+bug/2013236/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2036951] Re: unblock request: please migrate dkms from proposed

2023-09-25 Thread Steve Langasek
it's in the release pocket now.

** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to dkms in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036951

Title:
  unblock request: please migrate dkms from proposed

Status in dkms package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in dkms source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Kernels now use zstd compressed modules.

  dkms autopkgtest was not expecting that correctly.

  autopkgtest was adjusted, and uploaded to proposed but did not migrate
  prior to feature freeze.

  Please unblock dkms to migrate, to resolve all ongoing dkms failures.
  The upload in question  is
  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/3.0.11-1ubuntu10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/2036951/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2037305] Re: installed nvidia-kernel-common-535 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2023-09-25 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Also affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Importance: Critical
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037305

Title:
  installed nvidia-kernel-common-535 package post-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 1

Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 source package in Mantic:
  New

Bug description:
  Installing nvidia-driver-535 in a minimal schroot environment fails:

  ```
  $ schroot-wrapper -p 
linux-headers-generic,linux-image-generic,initramfs-tools,zstd,xserver-xorg-core
 -c mantic -u root
  (mantic)root@host:~# apt-get install --no-install-recommends nvidia-driver-535
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done
  The following additional packages will be installed:
cpp-12 dkms gcc-12 gcc-12-base libgcc-12-dev libnvidia-cfg1-535 
libnvidia-common-535 libnvidia-compute-535 libnvidia-decode-535 
libnvidia-encode-535 libnvidia-extra-535 libnvidia-fbc1-535 libnvidia-gl-535 
lsb-release
nvidia-compute-utils-535 nvidia-dkms-535 nvidia-firmware-535-535.104.05 
nvidia-kernel-common-535 nvidia-kernel-source-535 nvidia-utils-535 
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-535
  Suggested packages:
gcc-12-locales cpp-12-doc menu gcc-12-multilib gcc-12-doc
  Recommended packages:
sudo nvidia-settings nvidia-prime libnvidia-compute-535:i386 
libnvidia-decode-535:i386 libnvidia-encode-535:i386 libnvidia-fbc1-535:i386 
libnvidia-gl-535:i386
  The following NEW packages will be installed:
cpp-12 dkms gcc-12 gcc-12-base libgcc-12-dev libnvidia-cfg1-535 
libnvidia-common-535 libnvidia-compute-535 libnvidia-decode-535 
libnvidia-encode-535 libnvidia-extra-535 libnvidia-fbc1-535 libnvidia-gl-535 
lsb-release
nvidia-compute-utils-535 nvidia-dkms-535 nvidia-driver-535 
nvidia-firmware-535-535.104.05 nvidia-kernel-common-535 
nvidia-kernel-source-535 nvidia-utils-535 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-535
  0 upgraded, 22 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
  Need to get 359 MB of archives.
  After this operation, 924 MB of additional disk space will be used.
  Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
  Get:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/main amd64 lsb-release all 
12.0-2 [6564 B]
  Get:2 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/main amd64 gcc-12-base amd64 
12.3.0-9ubuntu1 [43.5 kB]
  Get:3 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/main amd64 cpp-12 amd64 
12.3.0-9ubuntu1 [10.7 MB]
  Get:4 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/main amd64 libgcc-12-dev 
amd64 12.3.0-9ubuntu1 [2574 kB]
  Get:5 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/main amd64 gcc-12 amd64 
12.3.0-9ubuntu1 [21.6 MB]
  Get:6 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/main amd64 dkms all 
3.0.11-1ubuntu10 [51.3 kB]
  Get:7 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-cfg1-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [108 kB]
  Get:8 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-common-535 all 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [15.4 kB]
  Get:9 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-compute-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [40.2 MB]
  Get:10 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-decode-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [1886 kB]
  Get:11 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-encode-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [97.4 kB]
  Get:12 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-extra-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [72.0 kB]
  Get:13 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-fbc1-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [55.6 kB]
  Get:14 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-gl-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [194 MB]
  Get:15 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
nvidia-compute-utils-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [122 kB]
  Get:16 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
nvidia-kernel-source-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [45.0 MB]
  Get:17 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
nvidia-firmware-535-535.104.05 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [39.5 MB]
  Get:18 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
nvidia-kernel-common-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [209 kB]
  Get:19 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
nvidia-dkms-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [35.9 kB]
  Get:20 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
nvidia-utils-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [403 kB]
  Get:21 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu mantic/restricted amd64 
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-535 amd64 535.104.05-0ubuntu4 [1587 kB]
  Get:22 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubu

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >