[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-mtk/5.15.0-1030.34 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-mtk' to 'verification-done-jammy- linux-mtk'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification- needed-jammy-linux-mtk' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-mtk'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-mtk-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux-mtk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-xilinx- zynqmp/5.15.0-1025.29 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux-xilinx-zynqmp -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-nvidia- tegra-5.15/5.15.0-1018.18~20.04.1 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-focal-linux- nvidia-tegra-5.15' to 'verification-done-focal-linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-focal- linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15' to 'verification-failed-focal-linux-nvidia- tegra-5.15'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-focal-linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15-v2 verification-needed-focal-linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-nvidia-tegra- igx/5.15.0-1005.5 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra- igx' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-igx'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia- tegra-igx' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-igx'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-igx-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-igx -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux- bluefield/5.15.0-1027.29 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-bluefield'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-bluefield'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-bluefield-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-raspi/5.15.0-1040.43 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-raspi' to 'verification-done-jammy- linux-raspi'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification- needed-jammy-linux-raspi' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-raspi'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-raspi-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux-raspi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-nvidia- tegra/5.15.0-1018.18 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux-nvidia-tegra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-aws/5.15.0-1048.53 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-aws' to 'verification-done-jammy- linux-aws'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification- needed-jammy-linux-aws' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-aws'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-aws-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux-aws -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-azure/5.15.0-1050.57 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure' to 'verification-done-jammy- linux-azure'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification- needed-jammy-linux-azure' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux-azure'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-azure-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux-azure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Released Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 5.15.0-86.96 --- linux (5.15.0-86.96) jammy; urgency=medium * jammy/linux: 5.15.0-86.96 -proposed tracker (LP: #2036575) * 5.15.0-85 live migration regression (LP: #2036675) - Revert "KVM: x86: Always enable legacy FP/SSE in allowed user XFEATURES" - Revert "x86/kvm/fpu: Limit guest user_xfeatures to supported bits of XCR0" * Regression for ubuntu_bpf test build on Jammy 5.15.0-85.95 (LP: #2035181) - selftests/bpf: fix static assert compilation issue for test_cls_*.c * `refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.` on hidon w/ 5.15.0-85-generic (LP: #2034447) - crypto: rsa-pkcs1pad - Use helper to set reqsize linux (5.15.0-85.95) jammy; urgency=medium * jammy/linux: 5.15.0-85.95 -proposed tracker (LP: #2033821) * Please enable Renesas RZ platform serial installer (LP: #2022361) - [Config] enable hihope RZ/G2M serial console - [Config] Mark sh-sci as built-in * Request backport of xen timekeeping performance improvements (LP: #2033122) - x86/xen/time: prefer tsc as clocksource when it is invariant * kdump doesn't work with UEFI secure boot and kernel lockdown enabled on ARM64 (LP: #2033007) - [Config]: Enable CONFIG_KEXEC_IMAGE_VERIFY_SIG - kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic - arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature * ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips (LP: #2019880) - selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests: change authentication and encryption algos * ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:tls: 88 failed test cases on jammy/fips (LP: #2019868) - selftests/harness: allow tests to be skipped during setup - selftests: net: tls: check if FIPS mode is enabled * A general-proteciton exception during guest migration to unsupported PKRU machine (LP: 2032164, reverted) - x86/kvm/fpu: Limit guest user_xfeatures to supported bits of XCR0 - KVM: x86: Always enable legacy FP/SSE in allowed user XFEATURES * CVE-2023-4569 - netfilter: nf_tables: deactivate catchall elements in next generation * CVE-2023-20569 - x86/cpu, kvm: Add support for CPUID_8021_EAX - x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation - x86/srso: Add IBPB_BRTYPE support - x86/srso: Add SRSO_NO support - x86/srso: Add IBPB - x86/srso: Add IBPB on VMEXIT - x86/srso: Fix return thunks in generated code - x86/srso: Tie SBPB bit setting to microcode patch detection - x86: fix backwards merge of GDS/SRSO bit - x86/srso: Fix build breakage with the LLVM linker - x86/cpu: Fix __x86_return_thunk symbol type - x86/cpu: Fix up srso_safe_ret() and __x86_return_thunk() - x86/alternative: Make custom return thunk unconditional - objtool: Add frame-pointer-specific function ignore - x86/ibt: Add ANNOTATE_NOENDBR - x86/cpu: Clean up SRSO return thunk mess - x86/cpu: Rename original retbleed methods - x86/cpu: Rename srso_(.*)_alias to srso_alias_\1 - x86/cpu: Cleanup the untrain mess - x86/srso: Explain the untraining sequences a bit more - x86/static_call: Fix __static_call_fixup() - x86/retpoline: Don't clobber RFLAGS during srso_safe_ret() - x86/srso: Disable the mitigation on unaffected configurations - x86/retpoline,kprobes: Fix position of thunk sections with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG - objtool/x86: Fixup frame-pointer vs rethunk - x86/srso: Correct the mitigation status when SMT is disabled - objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess - Ubuntu: [Config]: enable Speculative Return Stack Overflow mitigation * Fix unreliable ethernet cable detection on I219 NIC (LP: #2028122) - e1000e: Use PME poll to circumvent unreliable ACPI wake * Need to get fine-grained control for FAN(TFN) Participant. (LP: #2031333) - ACPI: fan: Separate file for attributes creation - ACPI: fan: Optimize struct acpi_fan_fif - ACPI: fan: Properly handle fine grain control - ACPI: fan: Add additional attributes for fine grain control * [SRU][Ubuntu 22.04.1] Unable to interpret the frequency values in cpuinfo_min_freq and cpuino_max_freq sysfs files. (LP: #2030924) - cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix scaling for hybrid-capable * CVE-2023-40283 - Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_sock_ready_cb * CVE-2023-20588 - x86/bugs: Increase the x86 bugs vector size to two u32s - x86/CPU/AMD: Do not leak quotient data after a division by 0 - x86/CPU/AMD: Fix the DIV(0) initial fix attempt * CVE-2023-4194 - net: tun_chr_open(): set sk_uid from current_fsuid() - net: tap_open(): set sk_uid from current_fsuid() * CVE-2023-4155 - KVM: SEV: Refactor out sev_es_state struct - KVM: SEV: Fall back to vmalloc for SEV-ES scratch area if necessary - KVM: SVM: Do not terminate SEV-ES guests on GHCB validation failure - KVM: SVM: Exit to userspace on ENOMEM/EFAULT GHCB
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
FIPS kernels are no longer failing with these tests. I verified the output of the net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh tests from the following kernels: - j:fips 5.15.0-85.95+fips1 - j:aws-fips 5.15.0-1046.51+fips3 - j:ibm-gt-fips 5.15.0-1045.48+fips1 Test results output: # Tests passed: 14 # Tests failed: 0 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
This bug is awaiting verification that the linux/5.15.0-85.95 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy-linux' to 'verification-done-jammy-linux'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy- linux' to 'verification-failed-jammy-linux'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you! ** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-v2 verification-needed-jammy-linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Roxana Nicolescu (roxanan) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: Roxana Nicolescu (roxanan) => Magali Lemes do Sacramento (magalilemes) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880 Title: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: Invalid Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in linux source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Bug description: These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1. When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below: make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' INSTALL ./usr/include make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux' TAP version 13 1..1 # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # # No qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # netem qdisc on VRF device # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector [ OK ] # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device [FAIL] # # Tests passed: 6 # Tests failed: 8 not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1 make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
