Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:50:21 +0100 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:48 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:33:45 +0100 > > Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:54 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > I tried the patch last night as I said, thought that it was working. > > > > But not long after > > > > sending that email I started seeing those disassociations again (that > > > > not appear at all in 2.6.30). > > > > So doesnt seem like it was due to that after all. :( > > > > > > But then how reliable is your bisect result? The effect of the patch in > > > question would've been completely disabled by this line. > > > > Will have to ask Justin about that. > > Oh, sorry. Maybe you're just running into different bugs that have the > same visible effect? Its quite possible I guess. I will do an bisect and see if I can get anymore output. > > johannes -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:48 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:33:45 +0100 > Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:54 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > > > > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > > > > > + > > > > > I tried the patch last night as I said, thought that it was working. But > > > not long after > > > sending that email I started seeing those disassociations again (that not > > > appear at all in 2.6.30). > > > So doesnt seem like it was due to that after all. :( > > > > But then how reliable is your bisect result? The effect of the patch in > > question would've been completely disabled by this line. > > Will have to ask Justin about that. Oh, sorry. Maybe you're just running into different bugs that have the same visible effect? johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:33:45 +0100 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:54 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > > > > + > > > I tried the patch last night as I said, thought that it was working. But > > not long after > > sending that email I started seeing those disassociations again (that not > > appear at all in 2.6.30). > > So doesnt seem like it was due to that after all. :( > > But then how reliable is your bisect result? The effect of the patch in > question would've been completely disabled by this line. Will have to ask Justin about that. > > johannes -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:54 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > > > + > I tried the patch last night as I said, thought that it was working. But not > long after > sending that email I started seeing those disassociations again (that not > appear at all in 2.6.30). > So doesnt seem like it was due to that after all. :( But then how reliable is your bisect result? The effect of the patch in question would've been completely disabled by this line. johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:42:46 +0100 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 16:29 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > > + > > > hw->queues = 4; > > > hw->max_rates = 4; > > > hw->channel_change_time = 5000; > > > > > > > > > > Johannes, am I correct in thinking that this also solves the decreased > > signal strength > > issue in bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13807 ? > > Unless the driver is really very broken, that's rather unlikely. I tried the patch last night as I said, thought that it was working. But not long after sending that email I started seeing those disassociations again (that not appear at all in 2.6.30). So doesnt seem like it was due to that after all. :( > > johannes -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 16:29 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > + > > hw->queues = 4; > > hw->max_rates = 4; > > hw->channel_change_time = 5000; > > > > > > Johannes, am I correct in thinking that this also solves the decreased signal > strength > issue in bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13807 ? Unless the driver is really very broken, that's rather unlikely. johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
Kristoffer Ericson wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:19:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: On Sunday 22 November 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote: I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results seemed to have worked over here by reverting: 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms if Kristoffer can try reverting this one to see, then we can go from there. So that just means the driver is broken. Please run iwconfig wlan0 power off to fix it then. And the patch below will disable it by default since it's broken. johannes --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c 2009-11-22 11:44:41.0 +0100 +++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c 2009-11-22 11:45:26.0 +0100 @@ -1893,6 +1893,8 @@ void ath_set_hw_capab(struct ath_softc * BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) | BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT); + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; + hw->queues = 4; hw->max_rates = 4; hw->channel_change_time = 5000; OK, so perhaps this patch should be applied until th ath9k driver is fixed? Luis? John? I applied the patch from johannes and it ended my issues atleast. I ran my machine for approx 2 hours without seeing the disconnect issue (which I usually saw after 15-25min). Cant be 100% of course but so far so good. I agree with Justin that we could wait until he gets a chance to test it. It should be accepted after initial merge (and stable trees) after that I think. Rafael thoughts? Also, we should notify the atheros people so they could start fixing the driver (in a perfect world). Best wishes Kristoffer Ericson I can probably test it out, main problem is where I'm headed internet connection might not be strong enough to run any kind of media (hotel connections are only strong enough to retrieve e-mails streaming music/movies can be a bit much). luckily I'm away only for a few days. Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:47:03 +0100 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > > > I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results > > seemed to have worked over here by reverting: > > > > 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a > > cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms > > > > if Kristoffer can try reverting this one > > to see, then we can go from there. > > So that just means the driver is broken. Please run > > iwconfig wlan0 power off > > to fix it then. And the patch below will disable it by default since > it's broken. > > johannes > > --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > 2009-11-22 11:44:41.0 +0100 > +++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c2009-11-22 > 11:45:26.0 +0100 > @@ -1893,6 +1893,8 @@ void ath_set_hw_capab(struct ath_softc * > BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) | > BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT); > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > + > hw->queues = 4; > hw->max_rates = 4; > hw->channel_change_time = 5000; > > Johannes, am I correct in thinking that this also solves the decreased signal strength issue in bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13807 ? -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:19:54 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > On Sunday 22 November 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > > > > > I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results > > > seemed to have worked over here by reverting: > > > > > > 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a > > > cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms > > > > > > if Kristoffer can try reverting this one > > > to see, then we can go from there. > > > > So that just means the driver is broken. Please run > > > > iwconfig wlan0 power off > > > > to fix it then. And the patch below will disable it by default since > > it's broken. > > > > johannes > > > > --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > > 2009-11-22 11:44:41.0 +0100 > > +++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c 2009-11-22 > > 11:45:26.0 +0100 > > @@ -1893,6 +1893,8 @@ void ath_set_hw_capab(struct ath_softc * > > BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) | > > BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT); > > > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > + > > hw->queues = 4; > > hw->max_rates = 4; > > hw->channel_change_time = 5000; > > OK, so perhaps this patch should be applied until th ath9k driver is fixed? > Luis? John? I applied the patch from johannes and it ended my issues atleast. I ran my machine for approx 2 hours without seeing the disconnect issue (which I usually saw after 15-25min). Cant be 100% of course but so far so good. I agree with Justin that we could wait until he gets a chance to test it. It should be accepted after initial merge (and stable trees) after that I think. Rafael thoughts? Also, we should notify the atheros people so they could start fixing the driver (in a perfect world). Best wishes Kristoffer Ericson -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
Johannes Berg wrote: On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote: I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results seemed to have worked over here by reverting: 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms if Kristoffer can try reverting this one to see, then we can go from there. So that just means the driver is broken. Please run iwconfig wlan0 power off to fix it then. And the patch below will disable it by default since it's broken. johannes --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c 2009-11-22 11:44:41.0 +0100 +++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c 2009-11-22 11:45:26.0 +0100 @@ -1893,6 +1893,8 @@ void ath_set_hw_capab(struct ath_softc * BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) | BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT); + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; + hw->queues = 4; hw->max_rates = 4; hw->channel_change_time = 5000; I'm in the process of stepping out of my office for a few days. (can probably give a try where I'm headed, just give me some time). Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Sunday 22 November 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > > > I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results > > seemed to have worked over here by reverting: > > > > 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a > > cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms > > > > if Kristoffer can try reverting this one > > to see, then we can go from there. > > So that just means the driver is broken. Please run > > iwconfig wlan0 power off > > to fix it then. And the patch below will disable it by default since > it's broken. > > johannes > > --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > 2009-11-22 11:44:41.0 +0100 > +++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c2009-11-22 > 11:45:26.0 +0100 > @@ -1893,6 +1893,8 @@ void ath_set_hw_capab(struct ath_softc * > BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) | > BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT); > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > + > hw->queues = 4; > hw->max_rates = 4; > hw->channel_change_time = 5000; OK, so perhaps this patch should be applied until th ath9k driver is fixed? Luis? John? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results > seemed to have worked over here by reverting: > > 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a > cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms > > if Kristoffer can try reverting this one > to see, then we can go from there. So that just means the driver is broken. Please run iwconfig wlan0 power off to fix it then. And the patch below will disable it by default since it's broken. johannes --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c 2009-11-22 11:44:41.0 +0100 +++ wireless-testing/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c 2009-11-22 11:45:26.0 +0100 @@ -1893,6 +1893,8 @@ void ath_set_hw_capab(struct ath_softc * BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) | BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT); + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; + hw->queues = 4; hw->max_rates = 4; hw->channel_change_time = 5000; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
Kristoffer Ericson wrote: On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:38:22 -0800 "Justin P. Mattock" wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results seemed to have worked over here by reverting: 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms if Kristoffer can try reverting this one to see, then we can go from there. In the process of doing that as we speak. Justin P. Mattock cool.. Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:38:22 -0800 "Justin P. Mattock" wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 > > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan > > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson > > Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (59 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 > > > > > > > > > I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results > seemed to have worked over here by reverting: > > 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a > cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms > > if Kristoffer can try reverting this one > to see, then we can go from there. In the process of doing that as we speak. > > Justin P. Mattock > > > -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (59 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results seemed to have worked over here by reverting: 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms if Kristoffer can try reverting this one to see, then we can go from there. Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:01:19AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). FYI I see exactly the same symptoms - tons of probe timeouts, usually very shortly after the association. But I see this with an Intel 5100 AGN so it's either mac80211-related or coincidence. I now went back to 2.6.31 which is perfectly fine for about half an hour. I'll try to bisect it down a bit, but many .32-rc releases hang on very early in ACPI code on this box which might make it a pain or impossible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:04:23 -0800 "Justin P. Mattock" wrote: > Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:07:09 -0800 > > "Justin P. Mattock" wrote: > > > > > >> Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > >> > >>> Im still hitting this so basicly using 2.6.30 until it get sorted. Will > >>> try and make > >>> some time to test the different commits. Last time I waited for it to > >>> disconnect which > >>> could take 10-40min. Since it depends on the network load Im now going to > >>> increase > >>> the load to see if I hit it quicker (and thus finding the error commit). > >>> > >>> So in short, its still valid and I will try and make time to fix it :) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> o.k. so it is something that is enough to > >> cause an inconvenience. > >> > > > > Especially if you are using your computer as a router to other computers > > and they start screaming every time internet goes down. :( > > > > > >> > > > > > > > ah. yeah I'm not doing that over here > just simply connecting to a router and streaming music. > my guess is you can try the commits that I found > but then again might not get you in the right > direction i.g. during the bisect I was watching the > "retry" in dmesg with ath* as soon as I saw that it was git bisect bad > (seems like a new mechanism) as soon as I didn't see > that the commit was good. > > In your case you might be seeing something different(not sure though) > because of having the computer as a router etc.. I think its related since ath was rock solid until 2.6.31. I can go 24/7 without ever getting disconnected from wifihub with 2.6.30. If we both are experiencing issues post 2.6.30 atleast it should be related to same bunch of patches. Will see if I can use gfs computer for a couple of hours tommorow since I need to feed it with traffic. Will start with your commits, will notice if those turn out same for me. > > Justin P. Mattock -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
Kristoffer Ericson wrote: On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:07:09 -0800 "Justin P. Mattock" wrote: Kristoffer Ericson wrote: Im still hitting this so basicly using 2.6.30 until it get sorted. Will try and make some time to test the different commits. Last time I waited for it to disconnect which could take 10-40min. Since it depends on the network load Im now going to increase the load to see if I hit it quicker (and thus finding the error commit). So in short, its still valid and I will try and make time to fix it :) o.k. so it is something that is enough to cause an inconvenience. Especially if you are using your computer as a router to other computers and they start screaming every time internet goes down. :( ah. yeah I'm not doing that over here just simply connecting to a router and streaming music. my guess is you can try the commits that I found but then again might not get you in the right direction i.g. during the bisect I was watching the "retry" in dmesg with ath* as soon as I saw that it was git bisect bad (seems like a new mechanism) as soon as I didn't see that the commit was good. In your case you might be seeing something different(not sure though) because of having the computer as a router etc.. Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:07:09 -0800 "Justin P. Mattock" wrote: > Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > > > Im still hitting this so basicly using 2.6.30 until it get sorted. Will try > > and make > > some time to test the different commits. Last time I waited for it to > > disconnect which > > could take 10-40min. Since it depends on the network load Im now going to > > increase > > the load to see if I hit it quicker (and thus finding the error commit). > > > > So in short, its still valid and I will try and make time to fix it :) > > > > > > > > > o.k. so it is something that is enough to > cause an inconvenience. Especially if you are using your computer as a router to other computers and they start screaming every time internet goes down. :( > > Justin P. mattock -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
Kristoffer Ericson wrote: Im still hitting this so basicly using 2.6.30 until it get sorted. Will try and make some time to test the different commits. Last time I waited for it to disconnect which could take 10-40min. Since it depends on the network load Im now going to increase the load to see if I hit it quicker (and thus finding the error commit). So in short, its still valid and I will try and make time to fix it :) o.k. so it is something that is enough to cause an inconvenience. Justin P. mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:01:19 +0100 (CET) "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson > Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (54 days old) > References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 > > Still valid. -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:53:18 -0800 "Justin P. Mattock" wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 > > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan > > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson > > Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (54 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure(I've been procrastinating on this one > with reverting commits to see if it helps > the guy that reported this). > > From over here though there never was a problem > on my side with the wireless connection(maybe a few disconnects, > but nothing too harsh). > > At this point the best thing to do is to see what the > response is from the two gentlemen who where really > hitting this and seem to be running into issues > then go from there. Im still hitting this so basicly using 2.6.30 until it get sorted. Will try and make some time to test the different commits. Last time I waited for it to disconnect which could take 10-40min. Since it depends on the network load Im now going to increase the load to see if I hit it quicker (and thus finding the error commit). So in short, its still valid and I will try and make time to fix it :) > > Justin P. Mattock > > -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (54 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 I'm not sure(I've been procrastinating on this one with reverting commits to see if it helps the guy that reported this). From over here though there never was a problem on my side with the wireless connection(maybe a few disconnects, but nothing too harsh). At this point the best thing to do is to see what the response is from the two gentlemen who where really hitting this and seem to be running into issues then go from there. Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:31:55 +0100 (CET) "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson > Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old) > References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 > > Still valid and should remain. -- Kristoffer Ericson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Monday 26 October 2009, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:31:55 +0100 (CET) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 > > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan > > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson > > Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (33 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 > > > > > > Still valid and should remain. Thanks for the update. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Monday 12 October 2009, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 > > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan > > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson > > Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (18 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 > > > > > > > > > I attached my bisect log to the bug report, but did not individually test > some of the commits in the log to see if it finds the issue. > (I can try later on and see). > > so for now I say yes keep it open. OK, thanks for the update. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (18 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 I attached my bisect log to the bug report, but did not individually test some of the commits in the log to see if it finds the issue. (I can try later on and see). so for now I say yes keep it open. Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Monday 05 October 2009, Justin Mattock wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 > > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan > > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson > > Date: 2009-09-24 10:16 (8 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 > > > > > > > > Sorry for the delay > (spent some time in bodie). > yes it should be still open. Thanks for the update. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14267] Disassociating atheros wlan
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 > Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan > Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson > Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (8 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4 > > > Sorry for the delay (spent some time in bodie). yes it should be still open. -- Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
