Re: Regarding module init function
I have gone through LDD3 page 31. But it didn't answer my question. It is describing module init and exit when manually loading driver and removing it. I want to know when one of auxdriver (selected in from menuconfig) is built as built-in module. When and Who calls it's init function ? Thanks, Rahul On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Tobias Boege tob...@gambas-buch.de wrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2013, Rahul Bedarkar wrote: Hi, This may be stupid question. When we compile external module and insert it, it's init function is called and when we remove it, it's exit function gets called. What happens in case of built-in modules? When it's init and exit is called? May be take example of one of auxdriver. You can find relevant information in LDD3, pp. 31 ff.. Basically, there is no difference in the use of the init function (it's called at kernel startup, I suppose) but exit is simply discarded in this case, because if your module is built-in, it could never be removed. Regards, Tobi ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
doesn't support DPO or FUA
Hi, When I attach pen-drive, I am seeing following logs. And when I remove pen-drive, file system does not unmount for 10-15 secs. [ 35.183406] usb 1-1: new full-speed USB device number 2 using dwc_otg [ 35.440812] usb 1-1: not running at top speed; connect to a high speed hub [ 35.456740] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0781, idProduct=5572 [ 35.479144] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [ 35.501552] usb 1-1: Product: Cruzer Switch [ 35.513147] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: SanDisk [ 35.535614] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: 4C53250910112450 [ 35.571416] scsi0 : usb-storage 1-1:1.0 [ 36.619687] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access SanDisk Cruzer Switch 1.20 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 [ 36.651795] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 3908352 512-byte logical blocks: (2.00 GB/1.86 GiB) [ 36.682780] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off [ 36.709971] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA [ 36.756973] sda: sda1 what is doesn't support DPO or FUA ? I am using Linux kernel 3.3.0. Thanks, Rahul B. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Regarding module init function
Ok. in init/main.c we call do_basic_setup(). Where do_initcalls call each of init functions from __early_initcall_end to __initcall_end. But I don't know from where these values gets initialized. On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Rahul Bedarkar rpal...@gmail.com wrote: I have gone through LDD3 page 31. But it didn't answer my question. It is describing module init and exit when manually loading driver and removing it. I want to know when one of auxdriver (selected in from menuconfig) is built as built-in module. When and Who calls it's init function ? Thanks, Rahul On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Tobias Boege tob...@gambas-buch.dewrote: On Fri, 04 Jan 2013, Rahul Bedarkar wrote: Hi, This may be stupid question. When we compile external module and insert it, it's init function is called and when we remove it, it's exit function gets called. What happens in case of built-in modules? When it's init and exit is called? May be take example of one of auxdriver. You can find relevant information in LDD3, pp. 31 ff.. Basically, there is no difference in the use of the init function (it's called at kernel startup, I suppose) but exit is simply discarded in this case, because if your module is built-in, it could never be removed. Regards, Tobi ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Regarding module init function
Hi, On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Rahul Bedarkar rpal...@gmail.com wrote: Ok. in init/main.c we call do_basic_setup(). Where do_initcalls call each of init functions from __early_initcall_end to __initcall_end. But I don't know from where these values gets initialized. If you look here: http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/include/linux/init.h#L279 module_init is mapped to __initcall, which is in turn mapped to device_initcall, which sets up a pointer in a section called .initcall6.init If you then look in the kernel linker script: http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S#L175 INIT_CALLS is defined here: http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h#L633 and it defines the __initcall_start and __initcall_end symbols. Dave Hylands ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Regarding module init function
Thanks Dave! I just verified that from System.map. Between __early_initcall_end and __initcall_end, there is list of init calls with levels from 0-7. What is significance of these levels. Thanks, Rahul On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Dave Hylands dhyla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Rahul Bedarkar rpal...@gmail.com wrote: Ok. in init/main.c we call do_basic_setup(). Where do_initcalls call each of init functions from __early_initcall_end to __initcall_end. But I don't know from where these values gets initialized. If you look here: http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/include/linux/init.h#L279http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/include/linux/init.h%23L279 module_init is mapped to __initcall, which is in turn mapped to device_initcall, which sets up a pointer in a section called .initcall6.init If you then look in the kernel linker script: http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S#L175http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S%23L175 INIT_CALLS is defined here: http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h#L633http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h%23L633 and it defines the __initcall_start and __initcall_end symbols. Dave Hylands ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Regarding module init function
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013, Rahul Bedarkar wrote:
Ok. in init/main.c we call do_basic_setup(). Where do_initcalls call each
of init functions from __early_initcall_end to __initcall_end. But I don't
know from where these values gets initialized.
Take a look at include/linux/init.h. There you can find the macros for
declaring various init functions. They all go into special sections. The
rest is linker magic (e.g. arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds{,.S}).
I want to know when one of auxdriver (selected in from menuconfig) is built
as built-in module. When and Who calls it's init function ?
It's, too, in the init.h. There are two definitions of module_init()
depending on whether MODULE is declared or not. The first definition is
accompanied by a useful comment about where the init function is called in
either case.
Regards,
Tobi
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Need a tutorial about `write a simple file system` in linux
Hi all, Is there a good tutorial about how to write a simple file system? I know FUSE is easier. But I want to write a real filesystem based on disk. Any simple code example is ok. -- Thanks, Madper Xie. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Regarding module init function
Hi Rahul, On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Rahul Bedarkar rpal...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Dave! I just verified that from System.map. Between __early_initcall_end and __initcall_end, there is list of init calls with levels from 0-7. What is significance of these levels. The levels basically just control the order that the initcalls are made. Basically, all level 0 functions are called befor level 1 functions, etc. The meaning behind the levels can be discerned from the macros in init.h http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/include/linux/init.h#L207 There is also some docs here: http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl#L736 Dave Hylands ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Cross Compiling a different architechture
Creating Defconfig and menuconfig (options) for all in one system from kernel. I want a clean build rather than an external mount, most I found did not have documentation. TnR, Ganesh From: Mulyadi Santosa mulyadi.sant...@gmail.com To: Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com Cc: Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar chambilketha...@gmail.com; kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 9:18 AM Subject: Re: Cross Compiling a different architechture Hi On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, Any help with some doc's. I see a defconfig for all, but the tree is not clear. Any documentation support for this in .Kconfig and .defconfig? Which config option you're not clear? Asking like this will only put you in the blue, you know -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Need a tutorial about `write a simple file system` in linux
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Madper bbbo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Is there a good tutorial about how to write a simple file system? I know FUSE is easier. But I want to write a real filesystem based on disk. Any simple code example is ok. never write one, but usually whenever I need to check something about filesystem, I check ramfs code. -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Need a tutorial about `write a simple file system` in linux
I too would like to read tutorial like this. Ramfs is not disk based. Reading code of extX or other is a little pain... I was searching for article like this on lwn but there are only tutorials about nondisk fs. Greg 8 sty 2013 15:48, Mulyadi Santosa mulyadi.sant...@gmail.com napisał(a): On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Madper bbbo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Is there a good tutorial about how to write a simple file system? I know FUSE is easier. But I want to write a real filesystem based on disk. Any simple code example is ok. never write one, but usually whenever I need to check something about filesystem, I check ramfs code. -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Cross Compiling a different architechture
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com wrote: Creating Defconfig and menuconfig (options) for all in one system from kernel. I want a clean build rather than an external mount, most I found did not have documentation. there is extensive documentation under Documentation/ directory in kernel source. on simple search I got this link about building kernel on knoppix: http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=422949seqNum=3 pretty much on most distribution, you can install ncurses and go for make menuconfig and then just make(i.e. if you are native compiling the kernel). However the config for distributions are fairly complex these days, so you may require to build few other things like initrd and create devices files and all. Please refer to distro documentation for knoppix: http://knoppix.net/wiki/Main_Page I would recommend that you read these guidelines before asking any question on this list http://kernelnewbies.org/mailinglistguidelines TnR, Ganesh -- *From:* Mulyadi Santosa mulyadi.sant...@gmail.com *To:* Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com *Cc:* Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar chambilketha...@gmail.com; kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org *Sent:* Tuesday, January 8, 2013 9:18 AM *Subject:* Re: Cross Compiling a different architechture Hi On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, Any help with some doc's. I see a defconfig for all, but the tree is not clear. Any documentation support for this in .Kconfig and .defconfig? Which config option you're not clear? Asking like this will only put you in the blue, you know -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Thank you Warm Regards Anuz ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Locating the keyboard driver (and replacing it)
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Peter Teoh htmldevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
This article gave a very indepth coverage of the keyboard processing in
linux:
http://www.phrack.com/issues.html?issue=59id=14mode=txt
http://www.gadgetweb.de/programming/39-how-to-building-your-own-kernel-space-keylogger.html
Not sure about your architecture, but for my Lenovo laptop, when I do a
cat /dev/input/by-path/platform-i8042-serio-0-event-kbd and redirect to a
file, every single key input I entered is captured into the the file.
Therefore, looking into the kernel source, we can infer the files
drivers/input/serio/i8042.c are responsible for the keyboard processing.
Of course, this file is compiled into the kernel, not as a kernel module.
So if u want to make any changes, instead of recompile the kernel and
rebooting, one way to do dynamically is called inline hooking - look
elsewhere for this method. It is explained in the following article:
http://www.phrack.com/issues.html?issue=59id=14mode=txt
but note the difference between the Phrack's interception and intercepting
the API inside the i8042.c: when you do a
cat /dev/input/by-path/platform-i8042-serio-0-event-kbd the keyboard
entry is always captured - irregardless of whichever windows/terminal you
are in. But the Phrack's method is cleaner - it is intercepting at the
tty (eg drivers/tty/n_tty.c:receive_buf() inside the kernel source) level -
so if you switch over to another window, the input got switch away - it is
thus targetted to only that TTY.
And btw, USB keyboard's processing path is altogether different
againanother
http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/Par/arch/usb/download/usbdoc/usbdoc-1.32.pdf
and perhaps u can read here many good writeups:
http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=usb+keyboard+kernel
On Fri1, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:46 PM, manty kuma mantyk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,11
I have written a small module that toggles the capslock LED. To
demonstrate it i want to replace the Existing keyboard module with mine. I
tried lsmod|grep key without any success. also checked /proc/modules. I
couldnot find any clue regarding the name of the module i need to
uninstall. So, How can i remove the existing keyboard module and insert
mine?
Regards,
Manty
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
--
Regards,
Peter Teoh
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Hi Manty
You can share the interrupt from keyboard , in the code above you just need
to change the number 10 for the number of your keyboard interrupt. You can
find that number in cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0:178XT-PIC-XTtimer
1: 1301XT-PIC-XTi8042 this is the old keyboard
interrupt
2: 0XT-PIC-XTcascade
5: 16528XT-PIC-XTahci, Intel 82801AA-ICH
8: 0XT-PIC-XTrtc0
9: 2191XT-PIC-XTacpi, vboxguest
10:488XT-PIC-XTeth0
11: 25XT-PIC-XTohci_hcd:usb1
12:697XT-PIC-XTi8042
14: 3186XT-PIC-XTata_piix
15: 0XT-PIC-XTata_piix
#include linux/kernel.h
#include linux/module.h
#include linux/interrupt.h
#include linux/init.h
struct tasklet_struct task;
unsigned long counter;
irq_handler_t irq_handler (int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
counter++;
printk (Top Half ISR is being hit counter = %d !! \n,(int)counter);
task.data = counter;
tasklet_schedule(task);
return (irq_handler_t) IRQ_HANDLED;
}
void bottom_half(unsigned long data)
{
printk(Executing bottom half.. data = %d\n,(int)data+10);
}
static int init_intkey ()
{
printk(Hi there \n);
tasklet_init(task,bottom_half,(unsigned long)counter);
request_irq (10,(irq_handler_t)irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED,
MyIrqHangingOfAtaDev, (void*)(irq_handler));
return 0;
}
static void exit_intkey(void) {
free_irq(10,(void*)(irq_handler));
tasklet_kill(task);
printk(Sayonara\n);
}
module_init(init_intkey);
module_exit(exit_intkey);
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL);
Hope it helps
Regards
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
netlink execution context
Hello guys, I have a question about the execution context of netlink. I am building a loadable kernel module in my kernel. I try to use it as a netlink server to receive the messages from user space. When the kernel module receives the message from user space and starts to process, is it living in its own context or it's actually borrowing the context of the current task? I want to access functions in user space when the netlink module receives the certain messages from user space. Is it possible to do so? Or it has to live in syscall context? such as using clone to define where the child process to start executing (function pointer as a parameter). Thanks in advance! Terry ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Regarding module init function
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 14:51 +0100, Tobias Boege wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013, Rahul Bedarkar wrote:
Ok. in init/main.c we call do_basic_setup(). Where do_initcalls call each
of init functions from __early_initcall_end to __initcall_end. But I don't
know from where these values gets initialized.
Take a look at include/linux/init.h. There you can find the macros for
declaring various init functions. They all go into special sections. The
rest is linker magic (e.g. arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds{,.S}).
I want to know when one of auxdriver (selected in from menuconfig) is built
as built-in module. When and Who calls it's init function ?
It's, too, in the init.h. There are two definitions of module_init()
depending on whether MODULE is declared or not. The first definition is
How does the individual driver define this MODULE?I think some macro
magic works here.
accompanied by a useful comment about where the init function is called in
either case.
Regards,
Tobi
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: how to flush stdin buffer in linux
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Niroj Pokhrel nirojpokh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I tried to use fflush(stdin) in gcc as I used to in other compilers. But It didn't clear my buffer so I am wondering how can I clear the stdin buffer in GCC. I tried using lseek but got -EPIPE (as tty devices doesn't support lseek operation). Thanx in advance. fflush(stdin) is undefined. -- Thanks, //richard ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: how to flush stdin buffer in linux
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013, Niroj Pokhrel wrote: Hi all, I tried to use fflush(stdin) in gcc as I used to in other compilers. But It didn't clear my buffer so I am wondering how can I clear the stdin buffer in GCC. I tried using lseek but got -EPIPE (as tty devices doesn't support lseek operation). Thanx in advance. If it's a tty, you may want to use tcflush(fd, TCIFLUSH); Regards, Tobi ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: calling system call in arm from user space
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Niroj Pokhrel nirojpokh...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have written a system call and build it with kernel for Arm architecture. However, I'm confused to use it to call it from the user space. As it is in x86, where we can simply call by using sycall() function and the return value is returned by the syscal() itself. In Arm, I tried to write an assembly language program and was able to call the system call using the assembly code but what I'm care to show us how you called system call in assembly in ARM? confused is how to call this function using C program. I tried using inline assembly but it didn't work. Further, if I can implement it using inline assembly then return value will be in r0 and how can I move this value to the user variable. Thanking you in advance. arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S (and kernel/calls.S) pair up together to implement the pre-syscall and post-syscall wrapper as you have asked. perhaps u can try to understand the code first? -- Niroj Pokhrel Software Engineer, Samsung India Software Operations ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Regards, Peter Teoh ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Cross Compiling a different architechture
I do not know why but whether ncurses or menuconfig the build fails at some modules (specially hardware architecture ones), specially at cross compiling architecture build stage. It went smoothly for same system architecture like i386 or x86 but not for arm or arm64. Where is the doc's for Kernel defconfig and kconfig in Kernel.org? I am trying to make and edit each manually for each architecture and then run make all. The problem is it is not allowing me to assemble all sub-architectures for say arm or arm64 as a dynamic module. I have to specify and select each option (sub-hardware architecture) specifically during build of defconfig for the architecture. My x86 is also blocking the build at times. I did not get anything good on my google search. w.r.t. Knoppix, Thank you, let me check the informit link for the architecture and usage relevance. TnR, Ganesh From: Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar chambilketha...@gmail.com To: Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com Cc: Mulyadi Santosa mulyadi.sant...@gmail.com; kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 8:44 PM Subject: Re: Cross Compiling a different architechture On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com wrote: Creating Defconfig and menuconfig (options) for all in one system from kernel. I want a clean build rather than an external mount, most I found did not have documentation. there is extensive documentation under Documentation/ directory in kernel source. on simple search I got this link about building kernel on knoppix: http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=422949seqNum=3 pretty much on most distribution, you can install ncurses and go for make menuconfig and then just make(i.e. if you are native compiling the kernel). However the config for distributions are fairly complex these days, so you may require to build few other things like initrd and create devices files and all. Please refer to distro documentation for knoppix: http://knoppix.net/wiki/Main_Page I would recommend that you read these guidelines before asking any question on this list http://kernelnewbies.org/mailinglistguidelines TnR, Ganesh From: Mulyadi Santosa mulyadi.sant...@gmail.com To: Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com Cc: Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar chambilketha...@gmail.com; kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 9:18 AM Subject: Re: Cross Compiling a different architechture Hi On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Ganesh B ganeshsu...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, Any help with some doc's. I see a defconfig for all, but the tree is not clear. Any documentation support for this in .Kconfig and .defconfig? Which config option you're not clear? Asking like this will only put you in the blue, you know -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Thank you Warm Regards Anuz___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: /usr/ld Not enough room for program headers
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM, horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:34:24AM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote: 2013/1/4 horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com Not enough room for program headers Try to search the Web for this. E. g.: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2002-08/msg00176.html thanks! in my compile option. I have specifiedmy ld-script file ,and there is no SIZEOF_HEADER in that file , can u show us your ld script? according to the msg00176.html above, it is possible to arise because u have place your other section wrongly (eg, .text), and nothing to do with SIZEOF_HEADER. but where this error come from ? ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Regards, Peter Teoh ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
