Re: Module compilation error on another machine
It is not related to challenge. Unfortunated my PC motherboard has crashed. I moved to ofce system some of system compiles successfully. Some not. Problem is with ubuntu versions in office system. Regards Harsh Jain On 4 May 2015 09:36:53 GMT+05:30, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Harsh Jain >wrote: >> Yes,it is eudyptula challenge.Actually same module compiled >successfully on >> my old system. > >oops... you are not supposed to ask anything about the challenge. > >regards >sudip -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Module compilation error on another machine
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Harsh Jain wrote: > Yes,it is eudyptula challenge.Actually same module compiled successfully on > my old system. oops... you are not supposed to ask anything about the challenge. regards sudip ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Eudyptula Mail Format Issue
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG" this ... in any problem you are supposed to ask little. regards sudip ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Eudyptula challenge task 6 reply
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > >> so if your previous task was wrong or not upto the standard then the > >> task which you are trying to do in advance will also be not right. > > That might be right. But when the reply time remains like this (over 2 > > month for me for a simple task), then the challenge takes 40 month in > total. > > > sometimes the scripts get stuck. you can always send an email to > litlle asking him/her about the queue status of that task. > > regards > sudip > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > Hey guys, Anyone got an update ? I sent the task 08, in 11 January 2015. thanks -- Lucas Tanure +55 (19) 988176559 ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Eudyptula Mail Format Issue
Hi Harsh, Little removed me from challenge, it's not fair because i didn't reveal anything even my mail client also.If some thing goes wrong to whom we will ask?. And i done the same thing like so many people i.e "i sent my task results but i didn't got any reply from Little.". I already checked the below is the source of mail in which i couldn't find anything related to base64 if you found anything please let me know Return-Path: Received: from localhost ([103.16.71.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ph4sm10619059pdb.43.2015.05.03.12.41.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 May 2015 12:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 01:11:03 +0530 From: To: lit...@eudyptula-challenge.org Subject: [XX] Task 06 results Message-ID: <20150503194103.GB7383@XXX> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi i am sending my proofs related to Task 06. --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: text/x-csrc; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="helloworld.c" On 4 May 2015 at 02:53, Harsh Jain wrote: > Hi, > > > Surely It is in base64 format.which mail client you are using to submit? > To be sure before sending the mail to Eudyptula,send it to yourself and > check the mail format in "view source" option.It should not have base64 > type. Possibly your logs attachment have some special characters which > converts it to base64. > > Regards > Harsh Jain > > On 4 May 2015 01:19:53 GMT+05:30, me storage > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I has been participating in this challenge from 8 months. I submitted 5 >> tasks. >> Today i submitted my task06 results third time , but intently it's giving >> reply that "the format is *base64,* So please change and resend it again" >> >> So can any please tell me what happened ? because i followed the same >> approach as previous tasks. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> >> Kernelnewbies mailing list >> Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies >> >> > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Module compilation error on another machine
Yes,it is eudyptula challenge.Actually same module compiled successfully on my old system. Regards Harsh Jain On 3 May 2015 18:22:39 GMT+05:30, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >__ >> I would like to see the code first but my feeling is your using 64 >bit >variables of 32 bit machine. > >Is it for the *Eudyptula** Challenge*?? > >regards >sudip > >> Nick -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: running queue processes
On May 3, 2015 9:16:27 AM EDT, Ruben Safir wrote: >On 05/03/2015 08:47 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote: >> remember there being information about this topic being in the Linux >programming interface in chapters 26 through 28. Furthermore find a >copy of this book as it's a rather good reference for when you need >questions like this answered. > > >which book? >The book is called the Linux programming interface and the chapters related to >this question are chapters 26 or 27 I believe. >Kernelnewbies mailing list >Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Eudyptula Mail Format Issue
Hi, Surely It is in base64 format.which mail client you are using to submit? To be sure before sending the mail to Eudyptula,send it to yourself and check the mail format in "view source" option.It should not have base64 type. Possibly your logs attachment have some special characters which converts it to base64. Regards Harsh Jain On 4 May 2015 01:19:53 GMT+05:30, me storage wrote: >Hi All, > >I has been participating in this challenge from 8 months. I submitted 5 >tasks. >Today i submitted my task06 results third time , but intently it's >giving >reply that "the format is *base64,* So please change and resend it >again" > >So can any please tell me what happened ? because i followed the same >approach as previous tasks. > >Thanks. > > > > >___ >Kernelnewbies mailing list >Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Eudyptula Mail Format Issue
Hi All, I has been participating in this challenge from 8 months. I submitted 5 tasks. Today i submitted my task06 results third time , but intently it's giving reply that "the format is *base64,* So please change and resend it again" So can any please tell me what happened ? because i followed the same approach as previous tasks. Thanks. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Suggested environments for kernel development
On Sun, 3 May 2015, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 06:11:35PM +0100, Lewis Clark wrote: > > I would really like to know how you guys do your kernel development. > > What distro do you use and whats the process? > > > > I’m very comfortable with debian, but i’ve heard it’s not the easiest > > distro to build kernels for as you need to build to a .deb and apply > > it that way. > > Not at all, any community-based distro is usually good for kernel > development, pick one you feel comfortable with and use it. if you're going to just manually install the new kernel, then it makes precious little difference. on the other hand, if you really want to go through the packaging, then you can run one of: $ make rpm-pkg $ make deb-pkg other than that, as greg suggests, any even *remotely* current distro should work just fine. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Suggested environments for kernel development
On May 3, 2015 1:44:28 PM EDT, Greg KH wrote: >On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 06:11:35PM +0100, Lewis Clark wrote: >> I would really like to know how you guys do your kernel development. >> What distro do you use and whats the process? >> >> I’m very comfortable with debian, but i’ve heard it’s not the easiest >> distro to build kernels for as you need to build to a .deb and apply >> it that way. > >Not at all, any community-based distro is usually good for kernel >development, pick one you feel comfortable with and use it. > >good luck, > >greg k-h > > Greg is right here however since kernel development is generally bleeding edge I generally recommend Arch as the packages are pulled from upstream including gcc. Running the latest c library and tool chains is a high plus in kernel development in my opinion. Nick >Kernelnewbies mailing list >Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Suggested environments for kernel development
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 06:11:35PM +0100, Lewis Clark wrote: > I would really like to know how you guys do your kernel development. > What distro do you use and whats the process? > > I’m very comfortable with debian, but i’ve heard it’s not the easiest > distro to build kernels for as you need to build to a .deb and apply > it that way. Not at all, any community-based distro is usually good for kernel development, pick one you feel comfortable with and use it. good luck, greg k-h ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Suggested environments for kernel development
I would really like to know how you guys do your kernel development. What distro do you use and whats the process? I’m very comfortable with debian, but i’ve heard it’s not the easiest distro to build kernels for as you need to build to a .deb and apply it that way. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: running queue processes
On 05/03/2015 08:47 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote: > remember there being information about this topic being in the Linux > programming interface in chapters 26 through 28. Furthermore find a copy of > this book as it's a rather good reference for when you need questions like > this answered. which book? ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: running queue processes
On May 2, 2015 11:20:41 AM EDT, Mustafa Hussain wrote: >Is there a way to show processes in running queue only form terminal? > > > > >___ I don't remember the exact system call for this but remember there being information about this topic being in the Linux programming interface in chapters 26 through 28. Furthermore find a copy of this book as it's a rather good reference for when you need questions like this answered. Hope this helps, Nick >Kernelnewbies mailing list >Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Module compilation error on another machine
__ > I would like to see the code first but my feeling is your using 64 bit variables of 32 bit machine. Is it for the *Eudyptula** Challenge*?? regards sudip > Nick ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Module compilation error on another machine
On May 3, 2015 4:35:37 AM EDT, Harsh Jain wrote: >Hi All, > >I am trying to compile simple kernel module. It gives following error. >Same >module compiles succesfully on another 64 bit ubuntu OS.Any idea what >different in environment can cause this. Both machine are ubuntu 12.04. >On >32 ubuntu bit compilation fails. > >In file included from /home/aricent/try5/eudy_misc_driver.c:7:0: >include/asm-generic/uaccess.h:41:0: warning: "access_ok" redefined >[enabled >by default] > #define access_ok(type, addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned >long)(addr),(size)) > ^ >In file included from >/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/sections.h:5:0, > from >/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h:26, > from include/linux/irq.h:368, > from >/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h:5, > from include/linux/preempt_mask.h:5, > from include/linux/sched.h:25, > from include/asm-generic/uaccess.h:9, > from /home/aricent/try5/eudy_misc_driver.c:7: >/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:80:0: >note: this is the location of the previous definition > #define access_ok(type, addr, size) \ > >In file included from /home/aricent/try5/eudy_misc_driver.c:7:0: >include/asm-generic/uaccess.h:337:1: error: static declaration of >‘clear_user’ follows non-static declaration > clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n) > ^ >In file included from >/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/sections.h:5:0, > from >/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h:26, > from include/linux/irq.h:368, > from >/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h:5, > from include/linux/preempt_mask.h:5, > from include/linux/sched.h:25, > from include/asm-generic/uaccess.h:9, > from /home/aricent/try5/eudy_misc_driver.c:7: >/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:525:28: >note: previous declaration of ‘clear_user’ was here >unsigned long __must_check clear_user(void __user *mem, unsigned long >len); > > > >Regards >Harsh Jain > > > > >___ I would like to see the code first but my feeling is your using 64 bit variables of 32 bit machine. Nick >Kernelnewbies mailing list >Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Module compilation error on another machine
Hi All, I am trying to compile simple kernel module. It gives following error. Same module compiles succesfully on another 64 bit ubuntu OS.Any idea what different in environment can cause this. Both machine are ubuntu 12.04. On 32 ubuntu bit compilation fails. In file included from /home/aricent/try5/eudy_misc_driver.c:7:0: include/asm-generic/uaccess.h:41:0: warning: "access_ok" redefined [enabled by default] #define access_ok(type, addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)(addr),(size)) ^ In file included from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/sections.h:5:0, from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h:26, from include/linux/irq.h:368, from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h:5, from include/linux/preempt_mask.h:5, from include/linux/sched.h:25, from include/asm-generic/uaccess.h:9, from /home/aricent/try5/eudy_misc_driver.c:7: /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:80:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition #define access_ok(type, addr, size) \ In file included from /home/aricent/try5/eudy_misc_driver.c:7:0: include/asm-generic/uaccess.h:337:1: error: static declaration of ‘clear_user’ follows non-static declaration clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n) ^ In file included from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/sections.h:5:0, from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h:26, from include/linux/irq.h:368, from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h:5, from include/linux/preempt_mask.h:5, from include/linux/sched.h:25, from include/asm-generic/uaccess.h:9, from /home/aricent/try5/eudy_misc_driver.c:7: /usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-43-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:525:28: note: previous declaration of ‘clear_user’ was here unsigned long __must_check clear_user(void __user *mem, unsigned long len); Regards Harsh Jain ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
