Re: My kernel patch was rejected with comments
22.03.2017, 15:22, "Pranay Srivastava" : > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Prasant J wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:24:47PM +0530, Prasant J wrote: Hi, Hello, firstly, you should attention here, please add rows to the answer lines, all developers like to read and habit. example, you say Hi and I add new line and I say hi :) I submitted a kernel patch and it was rejected with comments from maintainer. Is it important to reply with a new patch against maintainers response mail? Or it it ok if I send a new email with the updated patch? >>> >>> You don't send the new patch as a reply. You may, if you wish, reply >>> to the maintainer (or reviewer) with some comments that you understand >>> and intend on implementing their suggestions (and thanks) or >>> disagreeing as it may be. Please don't send it again, find out why you are being objected and prove your right to be right. we are striving for Linux development here and long as you work for Linux, you can discuss it with thousands of emails, not problem. P.S.: everyone will read those who don't have time will not answer, I don't know. >> @Tobin: Thanks a lot for your response. It is very helpful. >> >> How do I reply to the maintainer or how do people reply to >> maintainers? gmail web gui may not be a good idea.. right? > > Make sure you select plain text mode from gmail web-gui while replying. Please send only text, very simple e-mail. don't include ads, signatures, jpeg or even attachment. it should be reply e-mail just text only :) >> or Should I set up evolution or thunderbird for this? >> (as mentioned here: >> https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/email-clients.html) > > Not really required but yeah nice to have this. > >>> You then re-work your patch and submit it as normal using git >>> send-email. But you put v2 in the subject. You can use >>> >>> git format-patch -X --subject-prefix='PATCH v2' --numbered --cover-letter >>> >>> (where X is the number of commits to add to the series, assuming it is >>> a series). >>> >>> In the cover letter add a section stating the changes since v1, for >>> example >>> >>> v1 -> v2 >>> - use foo() instead of bar() >>> >>> If it is a single patch, you may wish to just edit the subject >>> manually. Make sure you put the version change information below the >>> --- line so it is not included if/when the patch gets merged. >> >> Could you please explain the last para? I did not understand "below >> the --- line" >> >> Thanks & regards, Pj Regards, Ozgur ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: My kernel patch was rejected with comments
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Prasant J wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:24:47PM +0530, Prasant J wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I submitted a kernel patch and it was rejected with comments from >>> maintainer. Is it important to reply with a new patch against >>> maintainers response mail? Or it it ok if I send a new email with the >>> updated patch? >> >> You don't send the new patch as a reply. You may, if you wish, reply >> to the maintainer (or reviewer) with some comments that you understand >> and intend on implementing their suggestions (and thanks) or >> disagreeing as it may be. >> > > @Tobin: Thanks a lot for your response. It is very helpful. > > How do I reply to the maintainer or how do people reply to > maintainers? gmail web gui may not be a good idea.. right? Make sure you select plain text mode from gmail web-gui while replying. > or Should I set up evolution or thunderbird for this? > (as mentioned here: > https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/email-clients.html) > Not really required but yeah nice to have this. > > >> You then re-work your patch and submit it as normal using git >> send-email. But you put v2 in the subject. You can use >> >> git format-patch -X --subject-prefix='PATCH v2' --numbered --cover-letter >> >> (where X is the number of commits to add to the series, assuming it is >> a series). >> >> In the cover letter add a section stating the changes since v1, for >> example >> >> v1 -> v2 >> - use foo() instead of bar() >> >> If it is a single patch, you may wish to just edit the subject >> manually. Make sure you put the version change information below the >> --- line so it is not included if/when the patch gets merged. >> > > Could you please explain the last para? I did not understand "below > the --- line" > > > Thanks & regards, Pj > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- ---P.K.S ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: My kernel patch was rejected with comments
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:24:47PM +0530, Prasant J wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I submitted a kernel patch and it was rejected with comments from >> maintainer. Is it important to reply with a new patch against >> maintainers response mail? Or it it ok if I send a new email with the >> updated patch? > > You don't send the new patch as a reply. You may, if you wish, reply > to the maintainer (or reviewer) with some comments that you understand > and intend on implementing their suggestions (and thanks) or > disagreeing as it may be. > @Tobin: Thanks a lot for your response. It is very helpful. How do I reply to the maintainer or how do people reply to maintainers? gmail web gui may not be a good idea.. right? or Should I set up evolution or thunderbird for this? (as mentioned here: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/drm/process/email-clients.html) > You then re-work your patch and submit it as normal using git > send-email. But you put v2 in the subject. You can use > > git format-patch -X --subject-prefix='PATCH v2' --numbered --cover-letter > > (where X is the number of commits to add to the series, assuming it is > a series). > > In the cover letter add a section stating the changes since v1, for > example > > v1 -> v2 > - use foo() instead of bar() > > If it is a single patch, you may wish to just edit the subject > manually. Make sure you put the version change information below the > --- line so it is not included if/when the patch gets merged. > Could you please explain the last para? I did not understand "below the --- line" Thanks & regards, Pj ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Mapping of virtual to physical addresses
On 3/22/17, Stefan Tatschner wrote: > Hallo everybody, > > currently I am trying to understand the internal memory allocation > mechanisms of the kernel. I am particularly interested in the > translation of virtual memory addresses to physical addresses. > Additionally, how are these physical addresses located in the relevant > RAM Modules? I have read that even in the kernel there are "virtual" > physical addresses... Could somebody give me some pointers to further > literature about this topic? https://www.kernel.org/doc/gorman/pdf/understand.pdf > > During my research, I discovered the /proc/pid/pagemap file [1]. I find > the documentation a bit sparse and I do not understand how I can use > this file properly. If somebody could share some examples, that would be > great! > > Regards, > Stefan > > [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/pagemap.txt > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > -- Regards / Mit besten Grüßen, Denis ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Mapping of virtual to physical addresses
Hello Stefan, have you tried consulting LDD3 (Linux Driver Development, 3rd edition) on the matter? https://lwn.net/Kernel/LDD3/ Chapter 15 may be especially of your interest. On 22.03.2017 08:02, Stefan Tatschner wrote: > Hallo everybody, > > currently I am trying to understand the internal memory allocation > mechanisms of the kernel. I am particularly interested in the > translation of virtual memory addresses to physical addresses. > Additionally, how are these physical addresses located in the relevant > RAM Modules? I have read that even in the kernel there are "virtual" > physical addresses... Could somebody give me some pointers to further > literature about this topic? > > During my research, I discovered the /proc/pid/pagemap file [1]. I find > the documentation a bit sparse and I do not understand how I can use > this file properly. If somebody could share some examples, that would be > great! > > Regards, > Stefan > > [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/pagemap.txt > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: My kernel patch was rejected with comments
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:24:47PM +0530, Prasant J wrote: > Hi, > > I submitted a kernel patch and it was rejected with comments from > maintainer. Is it important to reply with a new patch against > maintainers response mail? Or it it ok if I send a new email with the > updated patch? You don't send the new patch as a reply. You may, if you wish, reply to the maintainer (or reviewer) with some comments that you understand and intend on implementing their suggestions (and thanks) or disagreeing as it may be. You then re-work your patch and submit it as normal using git send-email. But you put v2 in the subject. You can use git format-patch -X --subject-prefix='PATCH v2' --numbered --cover-letter (where X is the number of commits to add to the series, assuming it is a series). In the cover letter add a section stating the changes since v1, for example v1 -> v2 - use foo() instead of bar() If it is a single patch, you may wish to just edit the subject manually. Make sure you put the version change information below the --- line so it is not included if/when the patch gets merged. Good luck, Tobin. > > > I have mutt and git send-mail setup but I can only send mail with > those. How do I reply to a maintainers comment? > > > I manually copied Message-ID from gmail web GUI and tried using it in > "--in-reply-to" with git send email but when I saw the linux mailing > list, it did weird things. It sent a blank reply to maintainers email > and sent a new mail with my updated patch. > > > Is there any tutorial on how can a I setup my workflow? > > > Any inputs will be of great help here! > > > Regards, Pj > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Mapping of virtual to physical addresses
Hallo everybody, currently I am trying to understand the internal memory allocation mechanisms of the kernel. I am particularly interested in the translation of virtual memory addresses to physical addresses. Additionally, how are these physical addresses located in the relevant RAM Modules? I have read that even in the kernel there are "virtual" physical addresses... Could somebody give me some pointers to further literature about this topic? During my research, I discovered the /proc/pid/pagemap file [1]. I find the documentation a bit sparse and I do not understand how I can use this file properly. If somebody could share some examples, that would be great! Regards, Stefan [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/pagemap.txt ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
My kernel patch was rejected with comments
Hi, I submitted a kernel patch and it was rejected with comments from maintainer. Is it important to reply with a new patch against maintainers response mail? Or it it ok if I send a new email with the updated patch? I have mutt and git send-mail setup but I can only send mail with those. How do I reply to a maintainers comment? I manually copied Message-ID from gmail web GUI and tried using it in "--in-reply-to" with git send email but when I saw the linux mailing list, it did weird things. It sent a blank reply to maintainers email and sent a new mail with my updated patch. Is there any tutorial on how can a I setup my workflow? Any inputs will be of great help here! Regards, Pj ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
