out-of-tree configuration

2014-06-18 Thread John Bougs
I am working with a kernel module that has a few kconfig options associated
with it. The makefile for the module as it is does not support out-of-tree
builds. I am trying to change the the makefile to do out-of-tree builds.
Most of this is pretty straight forward, however I can't seem to find any
recomendations on to do local configurations for just the out of tree build.

right now I use the code below, but I don't realy think it is a good
solution because of the possible confilict between the local .config file
and the kernel .config file. Any suggestions on how I should handle this? 



ifneq ($(KERNELRELEASE),)
# kbuild part of makefile

# Optionally, include config file to allow out of tree kernel modules build
-include $(src)/.config

# Core module
obj-$(CONFIG_XXX) += xxx.o
xxx-y += xxx-core.o xxx-sysfs.o 

# drivers
obj-$(CONFIG_XXX_1)+= xxx1.o
obj-$(CONFIG_XXX_2)+= xxx2.o


else
# normal makefile
KDIR ?= /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build

default: .config
$(MAKE) -C $(KDIR) M=$$PWD modules

.config:
@echo need local .config
exit 1

modules_install: 
$(MAKE) -C $(KDIR) M=$$PWD modules_install


clean:
rm -rf *.o *~ core .depend .*.cmd *.ko *.mod.c .tmp_versions \
   modules.order Module.symvers

endif


___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


Re: out-of-tree configuration

2014-06-18 Thread john bougs




On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 6:47 AM, Anders Darander 
anders.daran...@gmail.com wrote:
 


On 18 June 2014 15:03, John Bougs bogusemail98...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I am working with a kernel module that has a few kconfig options associated
 with it. The makefile for the module as it is does not support out-of-tree
 builds. I am trying to change the the makefile to do out-of-tree builds.

First, why do you want to build the module out-of-tree?

For 3rd party modules I can understand that need, OTOH, in that case your
question wouldn't have existed.


I am working with a third party module that I am building out of tree.  I 
trying this across multiple platforms.  I am placing the module code in our 
VCS... out of tree seems to be a cleaner, simpler, les complicated  solution to 
me.

Without  trying to sound confrontational, why not build it out of tree?___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


Re: out-of-tree configuration

2014-06-18 Thread john bougs





On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:31 AM, Anders Darander 
anders.daran...@gmail.com wrote:
 


 
Well, from your first email, I got the impression that you tried to move an 
in-tree module out of the kernel tree. 
What 3rd party module is it that you're building, that is delivered to you in a 
state to only allow in-tree builds? That's a pretty uncommon situation. 
Are the config options you need to be set something that only this module knows 
about, or are they something the rest of the kernel knows about? 
 Without  trying to sound confrontational, why not build it out of tree?
Well, there's nothing wrong to build a true 3rd party module out-of-tree. It 
might very well be your only choice due to a number of factors. 
Though, if you can get it upstreamed, you'll win in the long term. 
Cheers, 

Anders 


I'm playing with a module off of github -  fbtft.   All the config is local to 
the module.  

Thanks









 
Well, from your first email, I got the impression that you tried to move an 
in-tree module out of the kernel tree. 
What 3rd party module is it that you're building, that is delivered to you in a 
state to only allow in-tree builds? That's a pretty uncommon situation. 
Are the config options you need to be set something that only this module knows 
about, or are they something the rest of the kernel knows about? 
 Without  trying to sound confrontational, why not build it out of tree?
Well, there's nothing wrong to build a true 3rd party module out-of-tree. It 
might very well be your only choice due to a number of factors. 
Though, if you can get it upstreamed, you'll win in the long term. 
Cheers, 

Anders ___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies