Re: Doubt Regarding Floating Point Arithmetic
You are welcome. To sidetrack, there is a longstanding vulnerability/security bug or just a "feature" of linux kernel though: If you compile any program with "float" or "double" type declaration, you will see that a lot of "XMM" registers and its instruction set being used. But searching the entire kernel source for XMM, we know the kernel don't touch these registers. So if u were to do your security keys calculation on these registers, then beware that upon being context-switched (which can happened anytime, beyond your control), another process can easily view all the XMM registers contents, and thus potentially looking at your secret keys. Same goes with the GPU as well (which has been commonly used for password cracking) - simply because the kernel don't touch these "memory" sources inside the kernel, and thus cross-process it is possible to have information leakage. On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Prasad Ram wrote: > Thanks @Peter a very good explanation and it's very help full to me. > > > On 29 July 2014 19:49, Peter Teoh wrote: > >> Perhaps a little explanation:anything that can be done at userspace, >> should not be done at the kernel, simply because doing at the kernel >> entailed a lot of security privileges being available. (ie, logic which >> require hardware interaction / access, process scheduling logic or anything >> cutting across processes, sharing of common resources like memory etc) >> floating point arithmetics is a good example which is not necessary to be >> done in the kernel. Lots of hardware registers are available for FPU >> stuff (SSE/SSE2/XMM registers etc): >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSE2 >> http://www.godevtool.com/TestbugHelp/XMMintins.htm >> http://x86.renejeschke.de/html/file_module_x86_id_117.html >> >> and generally their usage entailed a lot of performance hits when used >> extensively (another good reason to avoid it). And more importantly, >> context switching as provided by Intel processor, the hardware operation >> does not include the floating pointers registers (simply because there are >> so many of them, and XMM can be like 128 bytes long?) Context switching >> will swap out the entire registers set when switching from one process to >> another, and if u were to do this for all the process, when 99% of the time >> floating point are not in use, it is a terrible waste of CPU cycle. >> >> Userspace can only interact with the kernel through well-defined syscall >> - for purpose of security, interprocess, or hardware access etc. So >> generally it is not possible to schedule floating point instruction (or any >> user-defined instructions for that matter) to be executed in the kernel. >> >> But it is possible to schedule floating point arithmetics to be executed >> in the kernel indirectly, for example, when u have a special hardware like >> DSP that does floating point arithmetics, and u wrote a driver to schedule >> instructions to be executed in that hardware unit. And u have to worry >> about many processes concurrently sending instructions to the same unit as >> well. >> >> Thanks for the reading. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:15 AM, me storage >> wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> I am reading LDD .In that i didn't understand one point .In Chapter >>> 2(Building and Running Modules) they mentioned that >>> " Kernel code cannot do floating point arithmetic" >>> .My doubt is which code is used for floating point arithmetic that means >>> at low level? >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> ___ >>> Kernelnewbies mailing list >>> Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Peter Teoh >> > > -- Regards, Peter Teoh ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Doubt Regarding Floating Point Arithmetic
Thanks @Peter a very good explanation and it's very help full to me. On 29 July 2014 19:49, Peter Teoh wrote: > Perhaps a little explanation:anything that can be done at userspace, > should not be done at the kernel, simply because doing at the kernel > entailed a lot of security privileges being available. (ie, logic which > require hardware interaction / access, process scheduling logic or anything > cutting across processes, sharing of common resources like memory etc) > floating point arithmetics is a good example which is not necessary to be > done in the kernel. Lots of hardware registers are available for FPU > stuff (SSE/SSE2/XMM registers etc): > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSE2 > http://www.godevtool.com/TestbugHelp/XMMintins.htm > http://x86.renejeschke.de/html/file_module_x86_id_117.html > > and generally their usage entailed a lot of performance hits when used > extensively (another good reason to avoid it). And more importantly, > context switching as provided by Intel processor, the hardware operation > does not include the floating pointers registers (simply because there are > so many of them, and XMM can be like 128 bytes long?) Context switching > will swap out the entire registers set when switching from one process to > another, and if u were to do this for all the process, when 99% of the time > floating point are not in use, it is a terrible waste of CPU cycle. > > Userspace can only interact with the kernel through well-defined syscall - > for purpose of security, interprocess, or hardware access etc. So > generally it is not possible to schedule floating point instruction (or any > user-defined instructions for that matter) to be executed in the kernel. > > But it is possible to schedule floating point arithmetics to be executed > in the kernel indirectly, for example, when u have a special hardware like > DSP that does floating point arithmetics, and u wrote a driver to schedule > instructions to be executed in that hardware unit. And u have to worry > about many processes concurrently sending instructions to the same unit as > well. > > Thanks for the reading. > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:15 AM, me storage > wrote: > >> Hi >> I am reading LDD .In that i didn't understand one point .In Chapter >> 2(Building and Running Modules) they mentioned that >> " Kernel code cannot do floating point arithmetic" >> .My doubt is which code is used for floating point arithmetic that means >> at low level? >> >> Thank you >> >> ___ >> Kernelnewbies mailing list >> Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org >> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Peter Teoh > ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Doubt Regarding Floating Point Arithmetic
Perhaps a little explanation:anything that can be done at userspace, should not be done at the kernel, simply because doing at the kernel entailed a lot of security privileges being available. (ie, logic which require hardware interaction / access, process scheduling logic or anything cutting across processes, sharing of common resources like memory etc) floating point arithmetics is a good example which is not necessary to be done in the kernel. Lots of hardware registers are available for FPU stuff (SSE/SSE2/XMM registers etc): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSE2 http://www.godevtool.com/TestbugHelp/XMMintins.htm http://x86.renejeschke.de/html/file_module_x86_id_117.html and generally their usage entailed a lot of performance hits when used extensively (another good reason to avoid it). And more importantly, context switching as provided by Intel processor, the hardware operation does not include the floating pointers registers (simply because there are so many of them, and XMM can be like 128 bytes long?) Context switching will swap out the entire registers set when switching from one process to another, and if u were to do this for all the process, when 99% of the time floating point are not in use, it is a terrible waste of CPU cycle. Userspace can only interact with the kernel through well-defined syscall - for purpose of security, interprocess, or hardware access etc. So generally it is not possible to schedule floating point instruction (or any user-defined instructions for that matter) to be executed in the kernel. But it is possible to schedule floating point arithmetics to be executed in the kernel indirectly, for example, when u have a special hardware like DSP that does floating point arithmetics, and u wrote a driver to schedule instructions to be executed in that hardware unit. And u have to worry about many processes concurrently sending instructions to the same unit as well. Thanks for the reading. On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:15 AM, me storage wrote: > Hi > I am reading LDD .In that i didn't understand one point .In Chapter > 2(Building and Running Modules) they mentioned that > " Kernel code cannot do floating point arithmetic" > .My doubt is which code is used for floating point arithmetic that means > at low level? > > Thank you > > ___ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies > > -- Regards, Peter Teoh ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Doubt Regarding Floating Point Arithmetic
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:09:31AM +0530, me storage wrote: > Can you please explain me one scenario that lets suppose take calculator > application in lower level it should interact with kernel code So here who is > take care of Floating point calculations? The userspace program does the floating point calculations. The kernel would not interact with a calculator application in a way that would require the kernel to do anything here, it merely schedules the userspace tasks to run. Hope this helps, greg k-h ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Doubt Regarding Floating Point Arithmetic
Can you please explain me one scenario that lets suppose take calculator application in lower level it should interact with kernel code So here who is take care of Floating point calculations? Sorry if i am wrong Thanks for replying me On 23 July 2014 08:45, me storage wrote: > Hi > I am reading LDD .In that i didn't understand one point .In Chapter > 2(Building and Running Modules) they mentioned that > " Kernel code cannot do floating point arithmetic" > .My doubt is which code is used for floating point arithmetic that means > at low level? > > Thank you > ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Re: Doubt Regarding Floating Point Arithmetic
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 08:45:54AM +0530, me storage wrote: > Hi > I am reading LDD .In that i didn't understand one point .In Chapter 2(Building > and Running Modules) they mentioned that > " Kernel code cannot do floating point arithmetic" > .My doubt is which code is used for floating point arithmetic that means at > low > level? I don't understand, what do you mean by this? You should not do any floating point math instructions within kernel code. That's all that is saying. Hope you like the book, greg k-h ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Doubt Regarding Floating Point Arithmetic
Hi I am reading LDD .In that i didn't understand one point .In Chapter 2(Building and Running Modules) they mentioned that " Kernel code cannot do floating point arithmetic" .My doubt is which code is used for floating point arithmetic that means at low level? Thank you ___ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
