Re: [PATCH v2] proc/vmcore: fix clearing user buffer by properly using clear_user()

2021-11-16 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 15.11.21 23:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:27:50 +0100 David Hildenbrand  wrote:
> 
>> To clear a user buffer we cannot simply use memset, we have to use
>> clear_user(). With a virtio-mem device that registers a vmcore_cb and has
>> some logically unplugged memory inside an added Linux memory block, I can
>> easily trigger a BUG by copying the vmcore via "cp":
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Some x86-64 CPUs have a CPU feature called "Supervisor Mode Access
>> Prevention (SMAP)", which is used to detect wrong access from the kernel to
>> user buffers like this: SMAP triggers a permissions violation on wrong
>> access. In the x86-64 variant of clear_user(), SMAP is properly
>> handled via clac()+stac().
>>
>> To fix, properly use clear_user() when we're dealing with a user buffer.
>>
> 
> I added cc:stable, OK?
> 

I was a bit hesitant because this would (beofe the virtio-mem changes)
only trigger under XEN and I was wondering why nobody notices under XEN
so far. But yes, even though it only applies to the kdump kernel,
cc:stable sounds like the right think to do!

Thanks Andrew!

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec


Re: [PATCH v2] proc/vmcore: fix clearing user buffer by properly using clear_user()

2021-11-15 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:27:50 +0100 David Hildenbrand  wrote:

> To clear a user buffer we cannot simply use memset, we have to use
> clear_user(). With a virtio-mem device that registers a vmcore_cb and has
> some logically unplugged memory inside an added Linux memory block, I can
> easily trigger a BUG by copying the vmcore via "cp":
> 
> ...
>
> Some x86-64 CPUs have a CPU feature called "Supervisor Mode Access
> Prevention (SMAP)", which is used to detect wrong access from the kernel to
> user buffers like this: SMAP triggers a permissions violation on wrong
> access. In the x86-64 variant of clear_user(), SMAP is properly
> handled via clac()+stac().
> 
> To fix, properly use clear_user() when we're dealing with a user buffer.
> 

I added cc:stable, OK?

___
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec


[PATCH v2] proc/vmcore: fix clearing user buffer by properly using clear_user()

2021-11-12 Thread David Hildenbrand
To clear a user buffer we cannot simply use memset, we have to use
clear_user(). With a virtio-mem device that registers a vmcore_cb and has
some logically unplugged memory inside an added Linux memory block, I can
easily trigger a BUG by copying the vmcore via "cp":

[   11.327580] systemd[1]: Starting Kdump Vmcore Save Service...
[   11.339697] kdump[420]: Kdump is using the default log level(3).
[   11.370964] kdump[453]: saving to 
/sysroot/var/crash/127.0.0.1-2021-11-11-14:59:22/
[   11.373997] kdump[458]: saving vmcore-dmesg.txt to 
/sysroot/var/crash/127.0.0.1-2021-11-11-14:59:22/
[   11.385357] kdump[465]: saving vmcore-dmesg.txt complete
[   11.386722] kdump[467]: saving vmcore
[   16.531275] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 7f2374e01000
[   16.531705] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
[   16.532037] #PF: error_code(0x0003) - permissions violation
[   16.532396] PGD 7a523067 P4D 7a523067 PUD 7a528067 PMD 7a525067 PTE 
80007048f867
[   16.532872] Oops: 0003 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[   16.533154] CPU: 0 PID: 468 Comm: cp Not tainted 5.15.0+ #6
[   16.533513] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 
rel-1.14.0-27-g64f37cc530f1-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[   16.534198] RIP: 0010:read_from_oldmem.part.0.cold+0x1d/0x86
[   16.534552] Code: ff ff ff e8 05 ff fe ff e9 b9 e9 7f ff 48 89 de 48 c7 c7 
38 3b 60 82 e8 f1 fe fe ff 83 fd 08 72 3c 49 8d 7d 08 4c 89 e9 89 e8 <49> c7 45 
00 00 00 00 00 49 c7 44 05 f8 00 00 00 00 48 83 e7 f81
[   16.535670] RSP: 0018:c973be08 EFLAGS: 00010212
[   16.535998] RAX: 1000 RBX: 002fd000 RCX: 7f2374e01000
[   16.536441] RDX: 0001 RSI: dfff RDI: 7f2374e01008
[   16.536878] RBP: 1000 R08:  R09: c973bc50
[   16.537315] R10: c973bc48 R11: 829461a8 R12: f000
[   16.537755] R13: 7f2374e01000 R14:  R15: 88807bd421e8
[   16.538200] FS:  7f2374e12140() GS:88807f00() 
knlGS:
[   16.538696] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
[   16.539055] CR2: 7f2374e01000 CR3: 7a4aa000 CR4: 00350eb0
[   16.539510] Call Trace:
[   16.539679]  
[   16.539828]  read_vmcore+0x236/0x2c0
[   16.540063]  ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x2f/0x80
[   16.540323]  ? inode_security+0x22/0x60
[   16.540572]  proc_reg_read+0x55/0xa0
[   16.540807]  vfs_read+0x95/0x190
[   16.541022]  ksys_read+0x4f/0xc0
[   16.541238]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[   16.541475]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Some x86-64 CPUs have a CPU feature called "Supervisor Mode Access
Prevention (SMAP)", which is used to detect wrong access from the kernel to
user buffers like this: SMAP triggers a permissions violation on wrong
access. In the x86-64 variant of clear_user(), SMAP is properly
handled via clac()+stac().

To fix, properly use clear_user() when we're dealing with a user buffer.

Fixes: 997c136f518c ("fs/proc/vmcore.c: add hook to read_from_oldmem() to check 
for non-ram pages")
Acked-by: Baoquan He 
Cc: Dave Young 
Cc: Baoquan He 
Cc: Vivek Goyal 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Philipp Rudo 
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux...@kvack.org
Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand 
---

v1 -> v2:
- Extend patch description

---
 fs/proc/vmcore.c | 20 
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
index 30a3b66f475a..509f85148fee 100644
--- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
@@ -154,9 +154,13 @@ ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t count,
nr_bytes = count;
 
/* If pfn is not ram, return zeros for sparse dump files */
-   if (!pfn_is_ram(pfn))
-   memset(buf, 0, nr_bytes);
-   else {
+   if (!pfn_is_ram(pfn)) {
+   tmp = 0;
+   if (!userbuf)
+   memset(buf, 0, nr_bytes);
+   else if (clear_user(buf, nr_bytes))
+   tmp = -EFAULT;
+   } else {
if (encrypted)
tmp = copy_oldmem_page_encrypted(pfn, buf,
 nr_bytes,
@@ -165,12 +169,12 @@ ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t count,
else
tmp = copy_oldmem_page(pfn, buf, nr_bytes,
   offset, userbuf);
-
-   if (tmp < 0) {
-   up_read(_cb_rwsem);
-   return tmp;
-   }
}
+   if (tmp < 0) {
+   up_read(_cb_rwsem);
+   return tmp;
+   }
+
*ppos += nr_bytes;
count -=