Re: [Kicad-developers] Lots of "note" messages regarding std::error_code, std::error_condition, std::ctype_base, etc.

[Steven A. Falco]

Thanks Ian.  Will do.

Steve

On 7/30/20 4:13 PM, Ian McInerney wrote:

You need to upgrade to GCC 10.2 to get rid of them - it was a bug with GCC. I 
think 10.2 has landed in the Fedora stable repos now.

-Ian

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:10 PM Steven A. Falco mailto:stevenfa...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I'm running a build of the master branch on Fedora 32, and I'm seeing a lot of 
"note" messages mentioning std::error_code, std::error_condition, and a few 
others:

/usr/include/c++/10/bits/locale_facets_nonio.h:1770:10: note: 
‘std::messages_base’ defined as ‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/bits/regex.h:80:12: note: ‘std::__cxx11::regex_traits< 
 >’ defined as ‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/bits/valarray_array.h:396:12: note: ‘std::_Array<_Tp>’ 
defined as ‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/complex:1082:12: note: ‘std::complex’ defined as 
‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/complex:1227:12: note: ‘std::complex’ defined 
as ‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/complex:127:12: note: ‘std::complex<_Tp>’ defined as 
‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/complex:1372:12: note: ‘std::complex’ 
defined as ‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/system_error:180:10: note: ‘std::error_code’ defined as 
‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/system_error:278:10: note: ‘std::error_condition’ 
defined as ‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/thread:338:12: note: ‘std::hash’ 
defined as ‘struct’ here
/usr/include/c++/10/x86_64-redhat-linux/bits/ctype_base.h:41:10: note: 
‘std::ctype_base’ defined as ‘struct’ here

The messages don't appear to hurt anything, but I thought folks might want 
to know about them, as they might be unique to Fedora.

Here is the version info:

Application: KiCad

Version: (5.99.0-2487-g310613a94), debug build

Libraries:
         wxWidgets 3.0.4
         libcurl/7.69.1 OpenSSL/1.1.1g-fips zlib/1.2.11 brotli/1.0.7 
libidn2/2.3.0 libpsl/0.21.0 (+libidn2/2.3.0) libssh/0.9.4/openssl/zlib 
nghttp2/1.41.0

Platform: Linux 5.7.10-201.fc32.x86_64 x86_64, 64 bit, Little endian, wxGTK

Build Info:
         Date: Jul 30 2020 15:23:56
         wxWidgets: 3.0.4 (wchar_t,wx containers,compatible with 2.8) GTK+ 
3.24
         Boost: 1.69.0
         OCC: 7.4.0
         Curl: 7.69.1
         ngspice: 32
         Compiler: GCC 10.1.1 with C++ ABI 1014

Build settings:
         KICAD_SCRIPTING=ON
         KICAD_SCRIPTING_MODULES=ON
         KICAD_SCRIPTING_PYTHON3=ON
         KICAD_SCRIPTING_WXPYTHON=ON
         KICAD_SCRIPTING_WXPYTHON_PHOENIX=ON
         KICAD_SCRIPTING_ACTION_MENU=ON
         BUILD_GITHUB_PLUGIN=ON
         KICAD_USE_OCC=ON
         KICAD_SPICE=ON
         KICAD_STDLIB_DEBUG=OFF
         KICAD_STDLIB_LIGHT_DEBUG=OFF
         KICAD_SANITIZE=OFF

I've attached the full build log (gzipped since it is about 4 MB of text).

         Steve

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net 

Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] Lots of "note" messages regarding std::error_code, std::error_condition, std::ctype_base, etc.

[Ian McInerney]

You need to upgrade to GCC 10.2 to get rid of them - it was a bug with GCC.
I think 10.2 has landed in the Fedora stable repos now.

-Ian

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:10 PM Steven A. Falco 
wrote:

> I'm running a build of the master branch on Fedora 32, and I'm seeing a
> lot of "note" messages mentioning std::error_code, std::error_condition,
> and a few others:
>
> /usr/include/c++/10/bits/locale_facets_nonio.h:1770:10: note:
> ‘std::messages_base’ defined as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/bits/regex.h:80:12: note: ‘std::__cxx11::regex_traits<
>  >’ defined as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/bits/valarray_array.h:396:12: note: ‘std::_Array<_Tp>’
> defined as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/complex:1082:12: note: ‘std::complex’ defined
> as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/complex:1227:12: note: ‘std::complex’ defined
> as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/complex:127:12: note: ‘std::complex<_Tp>’ defined as
> ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/complex:1372:12: note: ‘std::complex’
> defined as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/system_error:180:10: note: ‘std::error_code’ defined
> as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/system_error:278:10: note: ‘std::error_condition’
> defined as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/thread:338:12: note: ‘std::hash’
> defined as ‘struct’ here
> /usr/include/c++/10/x86_64-redhat-linux/bits/ctype_base.h:41:10: note:
> ‘std::ctype_base’ defined as ‘struct’ here
>
> The messages don't appear to hurt anything, but I thought folks might want
> to know about them, as they might be unique to Fedora.
>
> Here is the version info:
>
> Application: KiCad
>
> Version: (5.99.0-2487-g310613a94), debug build
>
> Libraries:
> wxWidgets 3.0.4
> libcurl/7.69.1 OpenSSL/1.1.1g-fips zlib/1.2.11 brotli/1.0.7
> libidn2/2.3.0 libpsl/0.21.0 (+libidn2/2.3.0) libssh/0.9.4/openssl/zlib
> nghttp2/1.41.0
>
> Platform: Linux 5.7.10-201.fc32.x86_64 x86_64, 64 bit, Little endian, wxGTK
>
> Build Info:
> Date: Jul 30 2020 15:23:56
> wxWidgets: 3.0.4 (wchar_t,wx containers,compatible with 2.8) GTK+
> 3.24
> Boost: 1.69.0
> OCC: 7.4.0
> Curl: 7.69.1
> ngspice: 32
> Compiler: GCC 10.1.1 with C++ ABI 1014
>
> Build settings:
> KICAD_SCRIPTING=ON
> KICAD_SCRIPTING_MODULES=ON
> KICAD_SCRIPTING_PYTHON3=ON
> KICAD_SCRIPTING_WXPYTHON=ON
> KICAD_SCRIPTING_WXPYTHON_PHOENIX=ON
> KICAD_SCRIPTING_ACTION_MENU=ON
> BUILD_GITHUB_PLUGIN=ON
> KICAD_USE_OCC=ON
> KICAD_SPICE=ON
> KICAD_STDLIB_DEBUG=OFF
> KICAD_STDLIB_LIGHT_DEBUG=OFF
> KICAD_SANITIZE=OFF
>
> I've attached the full build log (gzipped since it is about 4 MB of text).
>
> Steve
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] Net Tie specification?

[Roberto Fernández Bautista]

Thank you all for the messages.

Maybe if  Simon sees this thread, he can send what he has?

The main thing I wanted to ensure was in there was support single pad net
ties (what is commonly known as a "star point"). I believe most of the
existing net tie support relies on separate pads being defined at different
positions.

CADSTAR uses star points which are defined as multiple through hole pads
with the exact same dimensions and same position. At this point I don't
know what KiCad's equivalent might be so wanted to ensure it was at least
considered when designing net tie specification.

Thanks.

Roberto.

On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 07:07, jp charras  wrote:

> Currently, the best doc about net ties ( and microwave components that
> create similar problems) is:
>
> https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg24455.html
> ([RFC] On net ties, microwave tools & custom pad shapes, altogether.)
>
> Le 30/07/2020 à 01:59, Jon Evans a écrit :
> > From this comment, maybe Simon has something that is not published yet?
> > https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/-/merge_requests/85#note_282728454
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:34 PM Seth Hillbrand 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:16 PM Roberto Fernández Bautista <
> roberto.fer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I see from the road map that net ties are planned for v6 (
> https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad/-/wikis/KiCad-6.0-Roadmap). In the
> "current status" it mentions that the specification is in development.
> >>>
> >>> Could someone please send me a link to the work in progress, so I can
> add some comments?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Roberto.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I think Simon had some ideas here but I don't recall seeing a
> specification document.
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp