Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Seth Hillbrand]

Am 2018-12-11 19:08, schrieb Nick Østergaard:

It is fixed, I actually mentally has it in my head that it was
included in Stevens patch. You may need to refresh the page if your
browser caches aggressively.


Thanks Nick!  It now points to 5.0.2.  However, it still includes the 
Eagle crash warning.  We should probably remove that as well.


Best-
Seth

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Nick Østergaard]

It is fixed, I actually mentally has it in my head that it was
included in Stevens patch. You may need to refresh the page if your
browser caches aggressively.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 01:01, Seth Hillbrand  wrote:
>
> Am 2018-12-09 13:13, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
> > I pushed the release announcement to the KiCad website and made the
> > announcement at forum.kicad.info.  Thanks again everyone.  Now it's on
> > to 5.1.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Wayne
>
> Looks like the Windows download website[1] still needs to be updated.
> 5.0.2_1 is in the stable directory but not linked yet.
>
> -S
>
> [1] http://kicad-pcb.org/download/windows/
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Seth Hillbrand]

Am 2018-12-09 13:13, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:

I pushed the release announcement to the KiCad website and made the
announcement at forum.kicad.info.  Thanks again everyone.  Now it's on
to 5.1.

Cheers,

Wayne


Looks like the Windows download website[1] still needs to be updated.  
5.0.2_1 is in the stable directory but not linked yet.


-S

[1] http://kicad-pcb.org/download/windows/

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

I pushed the release announcement to the KiCad website and made the
announcement at forum.kicad.info.  Thanks again everyone.  Now it's on
to 5.1.

Cheers,

Wayne

On 12/8/18 2:28 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> They're here. http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/osx/testing/
> 
> Adam
> 
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:46 PM Adam Wolf  > wrote:
> 
> The two macOS builds were successful, and I'll be uploading them
> within 2 or 3 hours.  I would like another person to install them
> and see if things seem OK, and then we can say they're good!
> 
> Please note that these do have the dark mode patch cherrypicked.
> 
> Adam
> 
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018, 10:45 AM Nick Østergaard   wrote:
> 
> How goes Adam?
> 
> I moved the windows builds from testing to stable now.
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:08, Adam Wolf
>  > wrote:
> >
> > Alright, I can do that then.  I'll be kicking off the test
> builds shortly.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:05 AM Maciej Suminski
> mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, it will. The patch changes only a few Info.plist files
> that are
> >> rarely modified.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Orson
> >>
> >> On 12/7/18 2:46 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >> > I could patch just the macOS build.  Do we know if it will
> apply cleanly?
> >> > (I am away from my dev machine at the moment.)
> >> >
> >> > Adam
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:29 AM Wayne Stambaugh
> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I wasn't planning on cherry picking any more commits into
> the 5.0 branch
> >> >> since we are getting ready to start the march to a 5.1
> release.  Would
> >> >> it possible to just patch the macos build?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 12/7/2018 8:25 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >> >>> I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise
> I would have
> >> >>> said something too.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Adam
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf
>  
> >> >>>  > wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into
> 5.0.2 as soon
> >> >>>     as you can and let me know here :)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     Adam
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski
> >> >>>        > wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>         There is one more macOS-specific patch that
> probably should have
> >> >>>         been
> >> >>>         included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave
> dark mode. As
> >> >>>         far as I
> >> >>>         understand, it does not require a rebuild, only
> replacement of
> >> >>>         configuration files.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>         Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to
> the macOS
> >> >>>         package? I
> >> >>>         apologize for late notice, I was sure that the
> patch had been
> >> >>>         merged a
> >> >>>         long time ago.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>         Cheers,
> >> >>>         Orson
> >> >>>
> >> >>>         On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >> >>>         > Thanks!
> >> >>>         >
> >> >>>         > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard
> >> >>>         mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>         >
> >> >>>         >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs,
> yes, in the same
> >> >>>         location as
> >> >>>         >> usual.
> >> >>>         >>
> >> >>>         >>
> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
> >> >>>         >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh
> >> >>>            >> wrote:
> >> >>>         >>>
> >> >>>         >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you
> should be able to
> >> >>>         download an
> >> >>>         >>> archive file from github.
> >> >>>         >>>
> >> >>>         >>> Cheers,
> >> 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Adam Wolf]

They're here. http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/osx/testing/

Adam

On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:46 PM Adam Wolf 
wrote:

> The two macOS builds were successful, and I'll be uploading them within 2
> or 3 hours.  I would like another person to install them and see if things
> seem OK, and then we can say they're good!
>
> Please note that these do have the dark mode patch cherrypicked.
>
> Adam
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018, 10:45 AM Nick Østergaard 
>> How goes Adam?
>>
>> I moved the windows builds from testing to stable now.
>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:08, Adam Wolf 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Alright, I can do that then.  I'll be kicking off the test builds
>> shortly.
>> >
>> > Adam
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:05 AM Maciej Suminski 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yes, it will. The patch changes only a few Info.plist files that are
>> >> rarely modified.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Orson
>> >>
>> >> On 12/7/18 2:46 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> >> > I could patch just the macOS build.  Do we know if it will apply
>> cleanly?
>> >> > (I am away from my dev machine at the moment.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Adam
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:29 AM Wayne Stambaugh > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I wasn't planning on cherry picking any more commits into the 5.0
>> branch
>> >> >> since we are getting ready to start the march to a 5.1 release.
>> Would
>> >> >> it possible to just patch the macos build?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 12/7/2018 8:25 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> >> >>> I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise I would
>> have
>> >> >>> said something too.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Adam
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf <
>> adamw...@feelslikeburning.com
>> >> >>>  wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as
>> soon
>> >> >>> as you can and let me know here :)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Adam
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski
>> >> >>> mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably
>> should have
>> >> >>> been
>> >> >>> included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark
>> mode. As
>> >> >>> far as I
>> >> >>> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only
>> replacement of
>> >> >>> configuration files.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS
>> >> >>> package? I
>> >> >>> apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had
>> been
>> >> >>> merged a
>> >> >>> long time ago.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >> >>> Orson
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> >> >>> > Thanks!
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard
>> >> >>> mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the
>> same
>> >> >>> location as
>> >> >>> >> usual.
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >>
>> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
>> >> >>> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh
>> >> >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able
>> to
>> >> >>> download an
>> >> >>> >>> archive file from github.
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> Cheers,
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> Wayne
>> >> >>> >>>
>> >> >>> >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> >> >>>  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  Adam
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh
>> >> >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
>> >> >>>  > >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up
>> those
>> >> >>> package
>> >> >>> >> builders.
>> >> >>>  Unless there is an issue, I will make the release
>> >> >>> announcement
>> >> >>> >> Sunday.
>> >> >>>  Great work everyone!
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  Cheers,
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  Wayne
>> >> >>> 
>> >> >>>  On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
>> >> >>>  > The libs are now tagged.
>> >> >>>  >
>> >> >>>  > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> >> >>>  >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were
>> tagged
>> >> >>> for 5.0.2.
>> >> >>>  Where
>> >> >>>  >> do we stand on the library repos?
>> >> >>>  

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Adam Wolf]

The two macOS builds were successful, and I'll be uploading them within 2
or 3 hours.  I would like another person to install them and see if things
seem OK, and then we can say they're good!

Please note that these do have the dark mode patch cherrypicked.

Adam

On Sat, Dec 8, 2018, 10:45 AM Nick Østergaard  How goes Adam?
>
> I moved the windows builds from testing to stable now.
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:08, Adam Wolf 
> wrote:
> >
> > Alright, I can do that then.  I'll be kicking off the test builds
> shortly.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:05 AM Maciej Suminski 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, it will. The patch changes only a few Info.plist files that are
> >> rarely modified.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Orson
> >>
> >> On 12/7/18 2:46 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >> > I could patch just the macOS build.  Do we know if it will apply
> cleanly?
> >> > (I am away from my dev machine at the moment.)
> >> >
> >> > Adam
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:29 AM Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I wasn't planning on cherry picking any more commits into the 5.0
> branch
> >> >> since we are getting ready to start the march to a 5.1 release.
> Would
> >> >> it possible to just patch the macos build?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 12/7/2018 8:25 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >> >>> I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise I would
> have
> >> >>> said something too.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Adam
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf <
> adamw...@feelslikeburning.com
> >> >>>  wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as
> soon
> >> >>> as you can and let me know here :)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Adam
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski
> >> >>> mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch>
> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should
> have
> >> >>> been
> >> >>> included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark
> mode. As
> >> >>> far as I
> >> >>> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement
> of
> >> >>> configuration files.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS
> >> >>> package? I
> >> >>> apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had
> been
> >> >>> merged a
> >> >>> long time ago.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cheers,
> >> >>> Orson
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >> >>> > Thanks!
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard
> >> >>> mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the
> same
> >> >>> location as
> >> >>> >> usual.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
> >> >>> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh
> >> >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able
> to
> >> >>> download an
> >> >>> >>> archive file from github.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> Cheers,
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> Wayne
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >> >>>  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  Adam
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh
> >> >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> >> >>>   >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up
> those
> >> >>> package
> >> >>> >> builders.
> >> >>>  Unless there is an issue, I will make the release
> >> >>> announcement
> >> >>> >> Sunday.
> >> >>>  Great work everyone!
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  Cheers,
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  Wayne
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>  On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> >> >>>  > The libs are now tagged.
> >> >>>  >
> >> >>>  > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >> >>>  >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were
> tagged
> >> >>> for 5.0.2.
> >> >>>  Where
> >> >>>  >> do we stand on the library repos?
> >> >>>  >>
> >> >>>  >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> >> >>>  >>> I should have also mentioned that the
> outstanding
> >> >> items
> >> >>>  milestoned for
> >> >>>  >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Nick Østergaard]

How goes Adam?

I moved the windows builds from testing to stable now.
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:08, Adam Wolf  wrote:
>
> Alright, I can do that then.  I'll be kicking off the test builds shortly.
>
> Adam
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:05 AM Maciej Suminski  
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, it will. The patch changes only a few Info.plist files that are
>> rarely modified.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Orson
>>
>> On 12/7/18 2:46 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> > I could patch just the macOS build.  Do we know if it will apply cleanly?
>> > (I am away from my dev machine at the moment.)
>> >
>> > Adam
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:29 AM Wayne Stambaugh > >
>> >> I wasn't planning on cherry picking any more commits into the 5.0 branch
>> >> since we are getting ready to start the march to a 5.1 release.  Would
>> >> it possible to just patch the macos build?
>> >>
>> >> On 12/7/2018 8:25 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> >>> I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise I would have
>> >>> said something too.
>> >>>
>> >>> Adam
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf > >>>  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as soon
>> >>> as you can and let me know here :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Adam
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski
>> >>> mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should have
>> >>> been
>> >>> included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark mode. As
>> >>> far as I
>> >>> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of
>> >>> configuration files.
>> >>>
>> >>> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS
>> >>> package? I
>> >>> apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had been
>> >>> merged a
>> >>> long time ago.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Orson
>> >>>
>> >>> On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> >>> > Thanks!
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard
>> >>> mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same
>> >>> location as
>> >>> >> usual.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
>> >>> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh
>> >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to
>> >>> download an
>> >>> >>> archive file from github.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> Wayne
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> >>>  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
>> >>> 
>> >>>  Adam
>> >>> 
>> >>>  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh
>> >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
>> >>>  > >>> >> wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>>  Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those
>> >>> package
>> >>> >> builders.
>> >>>  Unless there is an issue, I will make the release
>> >>> announcement
>> >>> >> Sunday.
>> >>>  Great work everyone!
>> >>> 
>> >>>  Cheers,
>> >>> 
>> >>>  Wayne
>> >>> 
>> >>>  On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
>> >>>  > The libs are now tagged.
>> >>>  >
>> >>>  > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> >>>  >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged
>> >>> for 5.0.2.
>> >>>  Where
>> >>>  >> do we stand on the library repos?
>> >>>  >>
>> >>>  >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>> >>>  >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding
>> >> items
>> >>>  milestoned for
>> >>>  >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to
>> >>> include. We've
>> >>> >> been
>> >>>  >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly
>> >>> so tagging
>> >>>  the head
>> >>>  >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement.
>> >>> Breaking
>> >>> >> changes
>> >>>  >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless
>> >>> it was to
>> >>> >> fix an
>> >>>  >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout,
>> >>> footprint pins
>> >>>  swapped,
>> >>>  

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Adam Wolf]

Alright, I can do that then.  I'll be kicking off the test builds shortly.

Adam

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:05 AM Maciej Suminski 
wrote:

> Yes, it will. The patch changes only a few Info.plist files that are
> rarely modified.
>
> Cheers,
> Orson
>
> On 12/7/18 2:46 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > I could patch just the macOS build.  Do we know if it will apply cleanly?
> > (I am away from my dev machine at the moment.)
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:29 AM Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
> >
> >> I wasn't planning on cherry picking any more commits into the 5.0 branch
> >> since we are getting ready to start the march to a 5.1 release.  Would
> >> it possible to just patch the macos build?
> >>
> >> On 12/7/2018 8:25 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >>> I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise I would have
> >>> said something too.
> >>>
> >>> Adam
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf  >>>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as soon
> >>> as you can and let me know here :)
> >>>
> >>> Adam
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski
> >>> mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should
> have
> >>> been
> >>> included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark mode. As
> >>> far as I
> >>> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of
> >>> configuration files.
> >>>
> >>> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS
> >>> package? I
> >>> apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had been
> >>> merged a
> >>> long time ago.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Orson
> >>>
> >>> On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >>> > Thanks!
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard
> >>> mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same
> >>> location as
> >>> >> usual.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
> >>> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh
> >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to
> >>> download an
> >>> >>> archive file from github.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Cheers,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Wayne
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >>>  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> >>> 
> >>>  Adam
> >>> 
> >>>  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh
> >>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> >>>   >>> >> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>  Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those
> >>> package
> >>> >> builders.
> >>>  Unless there is an issue, I will make the release
> >>> announcement
> >>> >> Sunday.
> >>>  Great work everyone!
> >>> 
> >>>  Cheers,
> >>> 
> >>>  Wayne
> >>> 
> >>>  On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> >>>  > The libs are now tagged.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >>>  >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were
> tagged
> >>> for 5.0.2.
> >>>  Where
> >>>  >> do we stand on the library repos?
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> >>>  >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding
> >> items
> >>>  milestoned for
> >>>  >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to
> >>> include. We've
> >>> >> been
> >>>  >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly
> >>> so tagging
> >>>  the head
> >>>  >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement.
> >>> Breaking
> >>> >> changes
> >>>  >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless
> >>> it was to
> >>> >> fix an
> >>>  >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout,
> >>> footprint pins
> >>>  swapped,
> >>>  >>> etc.).
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
> >>>  mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
> >>> >
> >>>  

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Maciej Suminski]

Yes, it will. The patch changes only a few Info.plist files that are
rarely modified.

Cheers,
Orson

On 12/7/18 2:46 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> I could patch just the macOS build.  Do we know if it will apply cleanly?
> (I am away from my dev machine at the moment.)
> 
> Adam
> 
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:29 AM Wayne Stambaugh  
>> I wasn't planning on cherry picking any more commits into the 5.0 branch
>> since we are getting ready to start the march to a 5.1 release.  Would
>> it possible to just patch the macos build?
>>
>> On 12/7/2018 8:25 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>>> I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise I would have
>>> said something too.
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf >>  wrote:
>>>
>>> It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as soon
>>> as you can and let me know here :)
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski
>>> mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should have
>>> been
>>> included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark mode. As
>>> far as I
>>> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of
>>> configuration files.
>>>
>>> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS
>>> package? I
>>> apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had been
>>> merged a
>>> long time ago.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Orson
>>>
>>> On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard
>>> mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same
>>> location as
>>> >> usual.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
>>> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh
>>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to
>>> download an
>>> >>> archive file from github.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Wayne
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>>>  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
>>> 
>>>  Adam
>>> 
>>>  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh
>>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
>>>  >> >> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those
>>> package
>>> >> builders.
>>>  Unless there is an issue, I will make the release
>>> announcement
>>> >> Sunday.
>>>  Great work everyone!
>>> 
>>>  Cheers,
>>> 
>>>  Wayne
>>> 
>>>  On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
>>>  > The libs are now tagged.
>>>  >
>>>  > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>>  >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged
>>> for 5.0.2.
>>>  Where
>>>  >> do we stand on the library repos?
>>>  >>
>>>  >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>>>  >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding
>> items
>>>  milestoned for
>>>  >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to
>>> include. We've
>>> >> been
>>>  >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly
>>> so tagging
>>>  the head
>>>  >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement.
>>> Breaking
>>> >> changes
>>>  >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless
>>> it was to
>>> >> fix an
>>>  >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout,
>>> footprint pins
>>>  swapped,
>>>  >>> etc.).
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
>>>  mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
>>> >
>>>  >>> >>  >> >>  wrote:
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>>  Yay!
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items
>>> in the
>>> >> library
>>>  

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Adam Wolf]

I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise I would have said
something too.

Adam

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf  It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as soon as you
> can and let me know here :)
>
> Adam
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski  wrote:
>
>> There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should have been
>> included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark mode. As far as I
>> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of
>> configuration files.
>>
>> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS package? I
>> apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had been merged a
>> long time ago.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Orson
>>
>> On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same location as
>> >> usual.
>> >>
>> >> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
>> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh 
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to download an
>> >>> archive file from github.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> Wayne
>> >>>
>> >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>>  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
>> 
>>  Adam
>> 
>>  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh >  > wrote:
>> 
>>  Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package
>> >> builders.
>>  Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement
>> >> Sunday.
>>  Great work everyone!
>> 
>>  Cheers,
>> 
>>  Wayne
>> 
>>  On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
>>  > The libs are now tagged.
>>  >
>>  > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>  >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for
>> 5.0.2.
>>  Where
>>  >> do we stand on the library repos?
>>  >>
>>  >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>>  >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items
>>  milestoned for
>>  >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've
>> >> been
>>  >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging
>>  the head
>>  >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking
>> >> changes
>>  >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to
>> >> fix an
>>  >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins
>>  swapped,
>>  >>> etc.).
>>  >>>
>>  >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
>>  mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
>>  >>> > >>>
>>  wrote:
>>  >>>
>>  >>>  Yay!
>>  >>>
>>  >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the
>> >> library
>>  we want
>>  >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of
>>  days and
>>  >>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks
>>  mostly to
>>  >>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so
>> >> you
>>  can see
>>  >>>  what's left
>>  at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>>  >>>  and
>> https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1
>> >> (for
>>  >>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
>>  >>>
>>  >>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
>>  >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
>>  >>
>> >> wrote:
>>  >>>
>>  >>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide
>> >> what we
>>  >>> want
>>  >>>  to do
>>  >>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.
>> >> Rene, any
>>  >>>  thoughts on
>>  >>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of
>> >> changes
>>  >>>  since 5.0.1
>>  >>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
>>  >>>  significantly, I'm
>>  >>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>>  >>>
>>  >>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>>  >>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the
>> >> libraries
>>  >>> or are we
>>  >>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
>>  >>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
>>  >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
>>  >>
>> >> wrote:
>>  >>> 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

I wasn't planning on cherry picking any more commits into the 5.0 branch
since we are getting ready to start the march to a 5.1 release.  Would
it possible to just patch the macos build?

On 12/7/2018 8:25 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise I would have
> said something too.
> 
> Adam
> 
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf   wrote:
> 
> It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as soon
> as you can and let me know here :)
> 
> Adam
> 
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski
> mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch> wrote:
> 
> There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should have
> been
> included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark mode. As
> far as I
> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of
> configuration files.
> 
> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS
> package? I
> apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had been
> merged a
> long time ago.
> 
> Cheers,
> Orson
> 
> On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard
> mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same
> location as
> >> usual.
> >>
> >> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh
> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to
> download an
> >>> archive file from github.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Wayne
> >>>
> >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> 
>  Adam
> 
>  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh
> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
>   >> wrote:
> 
>      Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those
> package
> >> builders.
>      Unless there is an issue, I will make the release
> announcement
> >> Sunday.
>      Great work everyone!
> 
>      Cheers,
> 
>      Wayne
> 
>      On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
>      > The libs are now tagged.
>      >
>      > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>      >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged
> for 5.0.2.
>      Where
>      >> do we stand on the library repos?
>      >>
>      >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>      >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items
>      milestoned for
>      >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to
> include. We've
> >> been
>      >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly
> so tagging
>      the head
>      >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement.
> Breaking
> >> changes
>      >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless
> it was to
> >> fix an
>      >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout,
> footprint pins
>      swapped,
>      >>> etc.).
>      >>>
>      >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
>      mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
> >
>      >>>          wrote:
>      >>>
>      >>>      Yay!
>      >>>
>      >>>      We (librarians) have a few outstanding items
> in the
> >> library
>      we want
>      >>>      to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a
> couple of
>      days and
>      >>>      well within the one week timeline you
> requested. Thanks
>      mostly to
>      >>>      Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature
> of GH so
> >> you
>      can see
>      >>>      what's left
>      at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>      >>>      and
> 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Adam Wolf]

It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as soon as you
can and let me know here :)

Adam

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski  There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should have been
> included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark mode. As far as I
> understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of
> configuration files.
>
> Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS package? I
> apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had been merged a
> long time ago.
>
> Cheers,
> Orson
>
> On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard 
> wrote:
> >
> >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same location as
> >> usual.
> >>
> >> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
> >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to download an
> >>> archive file from github.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Wayne
> >>>
> >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
>  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> 
>  Adam
> 
>  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh   > wrote:
> 
>  Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package
> >> builders.
>  Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement
> >> Sunday.
>  Great work everyone!
> 
>  Cheers,
> 
>  Wayne
> 
>  On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
>  > The libs are now tagged.
>  >
>  > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>  >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.
>  Where
>  >> do we stand on the library repos?
>  >>
>  >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>  >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items
>  milestoned for
>  >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've
> >> been
>  >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging
>  the head
>  >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking
> >> changes
>  >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to
> >> fix an
>  >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins
>  swapped,
>  >>> etc.).
>  >>>
>  >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
>  mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
>  >>>  >>>
>  wrote:
>  >>>
>  >>>  Yay!
>  >>>
>  >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the
> >> library
>  we want
>  >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of
>  days and
>  >>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks
>  mostly to
>  >>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so
> >> you
>  can see
>  >>>  what's left
>  at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>  >>>  and
> https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1
> >> (for
>  >>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
>  >>>
>  >>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
>  >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
>  >>
> >> wrote:
>  >>>
>  >>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide
> >> what we
>  >>> want
>  >>>  to do
>  >>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.
> >> Rene, any
>  >>>  thoughts on
>  >>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of
> >> changes
>  >>>  since 5.0.1
>  >>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
>  >>>  significantly, I'm
>  >>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>  >>>
>  >>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>  >>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the
> >> libraries
>  >>> or are we
>  >>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
>  >>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
>  >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
>  >>
> >> wrote:
>  >>>  >>
>  >>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made
>  to the
>  >>> 5.0
>  >>>  branch.
>  >>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go
> >> with
>  >>>  tagging 5.0.2?

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Adam Wolf]

I could patch just the macOS build.  Do we know if it will apply cleanly?
(I am away from my dev machine at the moment.)

Adam

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:29 AM Wayne Stambaugh  I wasn't planning on cherry picking any more commits into the 5.0 branch
> since we are getting ready to start the march to a 5.1 release.  Would
> it possible to just patch the macos build?
>
> On 12/7/2018 8:25 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > I also thought it had been merged a while ago, otherwise I would have
> > said something too.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 7:25 AM Adam Wolf  >  wrote:
> >
> > It will be fine on my end.  Please get it merged into 5.0.2 as soon
> > as you can and let me know here :)
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 3:06 AM Maciej Suminski
> > mailto:maciej.sumin...@cern.ch> wrote:
> >
> > There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should have
> > been
> > included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark mode. As
> > far as I
> > understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of
> > configuration files.
> >
> > Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS
> > package? I
> > apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had been
> > merged a
> > long time ago.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Orson
> >
> > On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard
> > mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same
> > location as
> > >> usual.
> > >>
> > >> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
> > >> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh
> > mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to
> > download an
> > >>> archive file from github.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> Wayne
> > >>>
> > >>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> >  Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> > 
> >  Adam
> > 
> >  On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh
> > mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> >   > >> wrote:
> > 
> >  Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those
> > package
> > >> builders.
> >  Unless there is an issue, I will make the release
> > announcement
> > >> Sunday.
> >  Great work everyone!
> > 
> >  Cheers,
> > 
> >  Wayne
> > 
> >  On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> >  > The libs are now tagged.
> >  >
> >  > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >  >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged
> > for 5.0.2.
> >  Where
> >  >> do we stand on the library repos?
> >  >>
> >  >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> >  >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding
> items
> >  milestoned for
> >  >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to
> > include. We've
> > >> been
> >  >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly
> > so tagging
> >  the head
> >  >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement.
> > Breaking
> > >> changes
> >  >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless
> > it was to
> > >> fix an
> >  >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout,
> > footprint pins
> >  swapped,
> >  >>> etc.).
> >  >>>
> >  >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
> >  mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
> > >
> >  >>>  >   >  >  wrote:
> >  >>>
> >  >>>  Yay!
> >  >>>
> >  >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items
> > in the
> > >> library
> >  we want
> >  >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a
> > couple of
> >  days and
> >

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Maciej Suminski]

There is one more macOS-specific patch that probably should have been
included in 5.0.2 to address problems with Mojave dark mode. As far as I
understand, it does not require a rebuild, only replacement of
configuration files.

Adam, do you think you can still add the patch to the macOS package? I
apologize for late notice, I was sure that the patch had been merged a
long time ago.

Cheers,
Orson

On 12/7/18 12:07 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> Thanks!
> 
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard  wrote:
> 
>> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same location as
>> usual.
>>
>> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
>> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
>>>
>>> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to download an
>>> archive file from github.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
 Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?

 Adam

 On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh >>> > wrote:

 Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package
>> builders.
 Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement
>> Sunday.
 Great work everyone!

 Cheers,

 Wayne

 On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
 > The libs are now tagged.
 >
 > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
 >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.
 Where
 >> do we stand on the library repos?
 >>
 >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
 >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items
 milestoned for
 >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've
>> been
 >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging
 the head
 >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking
>> changes
 >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to
>> fix an
 >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins
 swapped,
 >>> etc.).
 >>>
 >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
 mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
 >>> >>
 wrote:
 >>>
 >>>  Yay!
 >>>
 >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the
>> library
 we want
 >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of
 days and
 >>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks
 mostly to
 >>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so
>> you
 can see
 >>>  what's left
 at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
 >>>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1
>> (for
 >>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
 >>>
 >>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
 >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
 >>
>> wrote:
 >>>
 >>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide
>> what we
 >>> want
 >>>  to do
 >>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.
>> Rene, any
 >>>  thoughts on
 >>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of
>> changes
 >>>  since 5.0.1
 >>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
 >>>  significantly, I'm
 >>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
 >>>
 >>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
 >>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the
>> libraries
 >>> or are we
 >>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
 >>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
 >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
 >>
>> wrote:
 >>>  >>
 >>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made
 to the
 >>> 5.0
 >>>  branch.
 >>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go
>> with
 >>>  tagging 5.0.2?
 >>>  >>
 >>>  >> Cheers,
 >>>  >>
 >>>  >> Wayne
 >>>  >>
 >>>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
 >>>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show
 stopper
 >>>  bug that I am
 >>>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library,
>> 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Steven A. Falco]

The Fedora build has +2 karma - thanks to Seth and Inie!  One more +plus1 vote 
and we can move from testing to released.  Or we'll just wait 6 days and it 
will happen without added karma. :-)

Steve

On 12/6/18 6:07 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> Thanks! 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard  > wrote:
> 
> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same location as 
> usual.
> 
> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh  > wrote:
> >
> > The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to download an
> > archive file from github.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > > Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh  
> > > >> wrote:
> > >
> > >     Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package 
> builders.
> > >     Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement 
> Sunday.
> > >     Great work everyone!
> > >
> > >     Cheers,
> > >
> > >     Wayne
> > >
> > >     On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> > >     > The libs are now tagged.
> > >     >
> > >     > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> > >     >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.
> > >     Where
> > >     >> do we stand on the library repos?
> > >     >>
> > >     >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> > >     >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items
> > >     milestoned for
> > >     >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've 
> been
> > >     >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging
> > >     the head
> > >     >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking 
> changes
> > >     >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to 
> fix an
> > >     >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins
> > >     swapped,
> > >     >>> etc.).
> > >     >>>
> > >     >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
> > >     mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com> 
> >
> > >     >>>  
>  > >     wrote:
> > >     >>>
> > >     >>>      Yay!
> > >     >>>
> > >     >>>      We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the 
> library
> > >     we want
> > >     >>>      to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of
> > >     days and
> > >     >>>      well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks
> > >     mostly to
> > >     >>>      Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so 
> you
> > >     can see
> > >     >>>      what's left
> > >     at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
> > >     >>>      and 
> https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
> > >     >>>      symbols and footprints, at least).
> > >     >>>
> > >     >>>      On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
> > >     >>>      mailto:stambau...@gmail.com> 
> >
> > >      
>  > >     >>>
> > >     >>>          I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide 
> what we
> > >     >>> want
> > >     >>>          to do
> > >     >>>          about tagging the library and translation repos.  
> Rene, any
> > >     >>>          thoughts on
> > >     >>>          the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of 
> changes
> > >     >>>          since 5.0.1
> > >     >>>          but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
> > >     >>>          significantly, I'm
> > >     >>>          fine with tagging the current head of each library.
> > >     >>>
> > >     >>>          On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> > >     >>>          > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the 
> libraries
> > >     >>> or are we
> > >     >>>          > getting a minor library update as well?
> > >     >>>          > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
> > >     >>>          mailto:stambau...@gmail.com> 
> >
> > >      
> 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Adam Wolf]

Thanks!

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nick Østergaard  wrote:

> I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same location as
> usual.
>
> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
> >
> > The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to download an
> > archive file from github.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > > Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh  > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package
> builders.
> > > Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement
> Sunday.
> > > Great work everyone!
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Wayne
> > >
> > > On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> > > > The libs are now tagged.
> > > >
> > > > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> > > >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.
> > > Where
> > > >> do we stand on the library repos?
> > > >>
> > > >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> > > >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items
> > > milestoned for
> > > >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've
> been
> > > >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging
> > > the head
> > > >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking
> changes
> > > >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to
> fix an
> > > >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins
> > > swapped,
> > > >>> etc.).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
> > > mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  Yay!
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the
> library
> > > we want
> > > >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of
> > > days and
> > > >>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks
> > > mostly to
> > > >>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so
> you
> > > can see
> > > >>>  what's left
> > > at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
> > > >>>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1
> (for
> > > >>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
> > > >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> > > >>
> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide
> what we
> > > >>> want
> > > >>>  to do
> > > >>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.
> Rene, any
> > > >>>  thoughts on
> > > >>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of
> changes
> > > >>>  since 5.0.1
> > > >>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
> > > >>>  significantly, I'm
> > > >>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> > > >>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the
> libraries
> > > >>> or are we
> > > >>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
> > > >>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
> > > >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> > > >>
> wrote:
> > > >>>  >>
> > > >>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made
> > > to the
> > > >>> 5.0
> > > >>>  branch.
> > > >>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go
> with
> > > >>>  tagging 5.0.2?
> > > >>>  >>
> > > >>>  >> Cheers,
> > > >>>  >>
> > > >>>  >> Wayne
> > > >>>  >>
> > > >>>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> > > >>>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show
> > > stopper
> > > >>>  bug that I am
> > > >>>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library,
> doc, and
> > > >>>  translations a
> > > >>>  >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for
> the
> > > >>>  installers to get
> > > >>>  >>> built so I can make the release announcement on
> 12/9.
> > > >>>  Please let me
> > > >>>  >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we
> > > 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Nick Østergaard]

I think he thinks of the precompiled docs, yes, in the same location as usual.

http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/docs/kicad-doc-5.0.2.tar.gz
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 23:24, Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
>
> The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to download an
> archive file from github.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> > Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh  > > wrote:
> >
> > Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package builders.
> > Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement Sunday.
> > Great work everyone!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> > > The libs are now tagged.
> > >
> > > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> > >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.
> > Where
> > >> do we stand on the library repos?
> > >>
> > >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> > >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items
> > milestoned for
> > >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
> > >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging
> > the head
> > >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
> > >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
> > >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins
> > swapped,
> > >>> etc.).
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
> > mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
> > >>> >>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  Yay!
> > >>>
> > >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library
> > we want
> > >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of
> > days and
> > >>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks
> > mostly to
> > >>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you
> > can see
> > >>>  what's left
> > at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
> > >>>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
> > >>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
> > >>>
> > >>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
> > >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we
> > >>> want
> > >>>  to do
> > >>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
> > >>>  thoughts on
> > >>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
> > >>>  since 5.0.1
> > >>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
> > >>>  significantly, I'm
> > >>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
> > >>>
> > >>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> > >>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries
> > >>> or are we
> > >>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
> > >>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
> > >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>  >>
> > >>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made
> > to the
> > >>> 5.0
> > >>>  branch.
> > >>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
> > >>>  tagging 5.0.2?
> > >>>  >>
> > >>>  >> Cheers,
> > >>>  >>
> > >>>  >> Wayne
> > >>>  >>
> > >>>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> > >>>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show
> > stopper
> > >>>  bug that I am
> > >>>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
> > >>>  translations a
> > >>>  >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
> > >>>  installers to get
> > >>>  >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
> > >>>  Please let me
> > >>>  >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we
> > can make
> > >>>  other plans.
> > >>>  >>>
> > >>>  >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string
> > freeze the
> > >>>  development
> > >>>  >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release
> > candidates by
> > >>>  the beginning
> > 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

The doc repo is tagged for 5.0.2 so you should be able to download an
archive file from github.

Cheers,

Wayne

On 12/6/2018 5:17 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?
> 
> Adam
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh  > wrote:
> 
> Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package builders.
> Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement Sunday.
> Great work everyone!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Wayne
> 
> On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> > The libs are now tagged.
> >
> > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2. 
> Where
> >> do we stand on the library repos?
> >>
> >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items
> milestoned for
> >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
> >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging
> the head
> >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
> >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
> >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins
> swapped,
> >>> etc.).
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz
> mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Yay!
> >>>
> >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library
> we want
> >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of
> days and
> >>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks
> mostly to
> >>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you
> can see
> >>>  what's left
> at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
> >>>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
> >>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
> >>>
> >>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
> >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we
> >>> want
> >>>  to do
> >>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
> >>>  thoughts on
> >>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
> >>>  since 5.0.1
> >>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
> >>>  significantly, I'm
> >>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
> >>>
> >>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> >>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries
> >>> or are we
> >>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
> >>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
> >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made
> to the
> >>> 5.0
> >>>  branch.
> >>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
> >>>  tagging 5.0.2?
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> Cheers,
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> Wayne
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >>>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show
> stopper
> >>>  bug that I am
> >>>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
> >>>  translations a
> >>>  >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
> >>>  installers to get
> >>>  >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
> >>>  Please let me
> >>>  >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we
> can make
> >>>  other plans.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string
> freeze the
> >>>  development
> >>>  >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release
> candidates by
> >>>  the beginning
> >>>  >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes
> that you
> >>> are
> >>>  planning to
> >>>  >>> make, now would be a good time.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad
> >>> continues to
> >>>  >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Cheers,
> 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Adam Wolf]

Is there a 5.0.2 docs tarball?

Adam

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:

> Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package builders.
> Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement Sunday.
> Great work everyone!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> > The libs are now tagged.
> >
> > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
> >> do we stand on the library repos?
> >>
> >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
> >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
> >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
> >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
> >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
> >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped,
> >>> etc.).
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz  >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Yay!
> >>>
> >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we
> want
> >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
> >>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
> >>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can
> see
> >>>  what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
> >>>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
> >>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
> >>>
> >>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
> >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we
> >>> want
> >>>  to do
> >>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
> >>>  thoughts on
> >>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
> >>>  since 5.0.1
> >>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
> >>>  significantly, I'm
> >>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
> >>>
> >>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> >>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries
> >>> or are we
> >>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
> >>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
> >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the
> >>> 5.0
> >>>  branch.
> >>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
> >>>  tagging 5.0.2?
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> Cheers,
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> Wayne
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >>>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
> >>>  bug that I am
> >>>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
> >>>  translations a
> >>>  >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
> >>>  installers to get
> >>>  >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
> >>>  Please let me
> >>>  >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
> >>>  other plans.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
> >>>  development
> >>>  >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
> >>>  the beginning
> >>>  >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you
> >>> are
> >>>  planning to
> >>>  >>> make, now would be a good time.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad
> >>> continues to
> >>>  >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Cheers,
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Wayne
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> ___
> >>>  >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>>  >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> >>>  
> >>>  >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>>  >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>
> >>>  ___
> >>>  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>>  Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> >>>  
> >>>  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>>  More help   : 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Steven A. Falco]

Yes, the community can help.  The only barrier is that you need a Fedora login 
in order to leave karma.  It is pretty easy to get a login - just visit:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/

and click on the "New Account" link.

You can download the KiCad 5.0.2 packages here (even without a login):

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1168820

There are rpms for ARM (both 32- and 64-bit) as well as for X86 (again 32- and 
64-bit).  You can test one (or more) of the arches, in either a Fedora 29 VM or 
on a real system.  You would then enter your karma here:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-40a9391ac3

Steve

On 12/4/18 2:03 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> How does a package get karma? Can the community perhaps help out in some way?
> 
> On 04/12/18 19:57, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>> My build of kicad-5.0.2-1.fc29 has completed in the Fedora buildsystem, and 
>> I've submitted it for testing.  Thus, the build should show up in the 
>> updates-testing repo as soon as a release engineer pushes it along - usually 
>> that takes a day or two.
>>
>> After that, if it receives enough (positive) karma, it will move into the 
>> updates repo.
>>
>> I'll note that last time (for 5.0.1), there was insufficient karma, so the 
>> 5.0.1 build had to sit for an extra week in the updates-testing repo before 
>> it became eligible for promotion to the updates repo.
>>
>> Steve
> 
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Rene Pöschl]

How does a package get karma? Can the community perhaps help out in some 
way?


On 04/12/18 19:57, Steven A. Falco wrote:

My build of kicad-5.0.2-1.fc29 has completed in the Fedora buildsystem, and 
I've submitted it for testing.  Thus, the build should show up in the 
updates-testing repo as soon as a release engineer pushes it along - usually 
that takes a day or two.

After that, if it receives enough (positive) karma, it will move into the 
updates repo.

I'll note that last time (for 5.0.1), there was insufficient karma, so the 
5.0.1 build had to sit for an extra week in the updates-testing repo before it 
became eligible for promotion to the updates repo.

Steve


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Steven A. Falco]

My build of kicad-5.0.2-1.fc29 has completed in the Fedora buildsystem, and 
I've submitted it for testing.  Thus, the build should show up in the 
updates-testing repo as soon as a release engineer pushes it along - usually 
that takes a day or two.

After that, if it receives enough (positive) karma, it will move into the 
updates repo.

I'll note that last time (for 5.0.1), there was insufficient karma, so the 
5.0.1 build had to sit for an extra week in the updates-testing repo before it 
became eligible for promotion to the updates repo.

Steve

On 12/4/18 10:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> I just finished installing the 64 bit version on windows 10 pro and
> everything seems to be working as expected.
> 
> On 12/4/2018 9:34 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> Everything looks good for me in regard to packaging, so it should
>> probably be good for others.
>>
>> I have uploaded previews ready for testing on
>> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/windows/testing/
>>
>> It is the kicad-5.0.2_1-i686.exe and kicad-5.0.2_1-x86_64.exe  builds.
>>
>> Please don't hesitate to test them. If there are no issues I will move
>> them to the stable folder.
>> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 15:02, Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
>>>
>>> Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package builders.
>>> Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement Sunday.
>>> Great work everyone!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>> On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
 The libs are now tagged.

 On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
> do we stand on the library repos?
>
> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped,
>> etc.).
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz > > wrote:
>>
>>  Yay!
>>
>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
>>  what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
>>
>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we
>> want
>>  to do
>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
>>  thoughts on
>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
>>  since 5.0.1
>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
>>  significantly, I'm
>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>>
>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries
>> or are we
>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the
>> 5.0
>>  branch.
>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
>>  tagging 5.0.2?
>>  >>
>>  >> Cheers,
>>  >>
>>  >> Wayne
>>  >>
>>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
>>  bug that I am
>>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
>>  translations a
>>  >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
>>  installers to get
>>  >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
>>  Please let me
>>  >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
>>  other plans.
>>  >>>
>>  >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
>>  development
>>  >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
>>  the beginning
>>  

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Nick Østergaard]

Everything looks good for me in regard to packaging, so it should
probably be good for others.

I have uploaded previews ready for testing on
http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/windows/testing/

It is the kicad-5.0.2_1-i686.exe and kicad-5.0.2_1-x86_64.exe  builds.

Please don't hesitate to test them. If there are no issues I will move
them to the stable folder.
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 15:02, Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
>
> Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package builders.
> Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement Sunday.
> Great work everyone!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> > The libs are now tagged.
> >
> > On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
> >> do we stand on the library repos?
> >>
> >> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> >>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
> >>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
> >>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
> >>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
> >>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
> >>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped,
> >>> etc.).
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz  >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Yay!
> >>>
> >>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
> >>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
> >>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
> >>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
> >>>  what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
> >>>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
> >>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
> >>>
> >>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
> >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we
> >>> want
> >>>  to do
> >>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
> >>>  thoughts on
> >>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
> >>>  since 5.0.1
> >>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
> >>>  significantly, I'm
> >>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
> >>>
> >>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> >>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries
> >>> or are we
> >>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
> >>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
> >>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the
> >>> 5.0
> >>>  branch.
> >>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
> >>>  tagging 5.0.2?
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> Cheers,
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> Wayne
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >>>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
> >>>  bug that I am
> >>>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
> >>>  translations a
> >>>  >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
> >>>  installers to get
> >>>  >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
> >>>  Please let me
> >>>  >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
> >>>  other plans.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
> >>>  development
> >>>  >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
> >>>  the beginning
> >>>  >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you
> >>> are
> >>>  planning to
> >>>  >>> make, now would be a good time.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad
> >>> continues to
> >>>  >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Cheers,
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> Wayne
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> ___
> >>>  >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>>  >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> >>>  
> >>>  >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>>  >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>
> >>>  

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

I just finished installing the 64 bit version on windows 10 pro and
everything seems to be working as expected.

On 12/4/2018 9:34 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> Everything looks good for me in regard to packaging, so it should
> probably be good for others.
> 
> I have uploaded previews ready for testing on
> http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/windows/testing/
> 
> It is the kicad-5.0.2_1-i686.exe and kicad-5.0.2_1-x86_64.exe  builds.
> 
> Please don't hesitate to test them. If there are no issues I will move
> them to the stable folder.
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 15:02, Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
>>
>> Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package builders.
>> Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement Sunday.
>> Great work everyone!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
>>> The libs are now tagged.
>>>
>>> On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
 I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
 do we stand on the library repos?

 On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped,
> etc.).
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz  > wrote:
>
>  Yay!
>
>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
>  what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
>  symbols and footprints, at least).
>
>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we
> want
>  to do
>  about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
>  thoughts on
>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
>  since 5.0.1
>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
>  significantly, I'm
>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>
>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries
> or are we
>  > getting a minor library update as well?
>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the
> 5.0
>  branch.
>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
>  tagging 5.0.2?
>  >>
>  >> Cheers,
>  >>
>  >> Wayne
>  >>
>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
>  bug that I am
>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
>  translations a
>  >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
>  installers to get
>  >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
>  Please let me
>  >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
>  other plans.
>  >>>
>  >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
>  development
>  >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
>  the beginning
>  >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you
> are
>  planning to
>  >>> make, now would be a good time.
>  >>>
>  >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad
> continues to
>  >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
>  >>>
>  >>> Cheers,
>  >>>
>  >>> Wayne
>  >>>
>  >>
>  >> ___
>  >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>  >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>  

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

Everything should be tagged and ready to fire up those package builders.
Unless there is an issue, I will make the release announcement Sunday.
Great work everyone!

Cheers,

Wayne

On 12/4/2018 1:23 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> The libs are now tagged.
> 
> On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
>> do we stand on the library repos?
>>
>> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
>>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
>>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
>>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
>>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
>>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped,
>>> etc.).
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz >> > wrote:
>>>
>>>  Yay!
>>>
>>>  We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
>>>  to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
>>>  well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
>>>  Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
>>>  what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>>>  and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
>>>  symbols and footprints, at least).
>>>
>>>  On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
>>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we
>>> want
>>>  to do
>>>  about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
>>>  thoughts on
>>>  the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
>>>  since 5.0.1
>>>  but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
>>>  significantly, I'm
>>>  fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>>>
>>>  On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>>>  > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries
>>> or are we
>>>  > getting a minor library update as well?
>>>  > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
>>>  mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>  >>
>>>  >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the
>>> 5.0
>>>  branch.
>>>  >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
>>>  tagging 5.0.2?
>>>  >>
>>>  >> Cheers,
>>>  >>
>>>  >> Wayne
>>>  >>
>>>  >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>>  >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
>>>  bug that I am
>>>  >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
>>>  translations a
>>>  >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
>>>  installers to get
>>>  >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
>>>  Please let me
>>>  >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
>>>  other plans.
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
>>>  development
>>>  >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
>>>  the beginning
>>>  >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you
>>> are
>>>  planning to
>>>  >>> make, now would be a good time.
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad
>>> continues to
>>>  >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> Cheers,
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>> Wayne
>>>  >>>
>>>  >>
>>>  >> ___
>>>  >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>  >> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>>>  
>>>  >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>  >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>  ___
>>>  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>  Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>>>  
>>>  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>>  More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>> ___
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Rene Pöschl]

The libs are now tagged.

On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:

I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
do we stand on the library repos?

On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:

I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, etc.).

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>> wrote:

 Yay!

 We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
 to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
 well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
 Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
 what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
 and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
 symbols and footprints, at least).

 On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
 mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:

 I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
 to do
 about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
 thoughts on
 the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
 since 5.0.1
 but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
 significantly, I'm
 fine with tagging the current head of each library.

 On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
 > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
 > getting a minor library update as well?
 > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
 mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >>
 >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
 branch.
 >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
 tagging 5.0.2?
 >>
 >> Cheers,
 >>
 >> Wayne
 >>
 >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
 >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
 bug that I am
 >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
 translations a
 >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
 installers to get
 >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
 Please let me
 >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
 other plans.
 >>>
 >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
 development
 >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
 the beginning
 >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are
 planning to
 >>> make, now would be a good time.
 >>>
 >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
 >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
 >>>
 >>> Cheers,
 >>>
 >>> Wayne
 >>>
 >>
 >> ___
 >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
 >> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
 
 >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
 >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
 Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
 
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Rene Pöschl]

I am a bit out of the loop sadly as i had quite a busy month behind me 
(new job plus some old responsibilities)


I created an issue over at the symbol repo. [1] Both to ask the other 
librarians and for a place to report design breaking changes. (A few 
symbols have been changed since 5.0.1 it seems.)
If there are no objections then i will tag tomorrow morning before i go 
to work (~06:45 CET)
A word of warning: My internet seems to be a bit unstable. If i do not 
tag tomorrow then it might have been broken completely.


[1]: https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/issues/1213

On 03/12/18 13:49, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:

I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
do we stand on the library repos?

On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:

I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, etc.).

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>> wrote:

 Yay!

 We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
 to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
 well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
 Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
 what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
 and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
 symbols and footprints, at least).

 On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
 mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:

 I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
 to do
 about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
 thoughts on
 the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
 since 5.0.1
 but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
 significantly, I'm
 fine with tagging the current head of each library.

 On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
 > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
 > getting a minor library update as well?
 > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
 mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >>
 >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
 branch.
 >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
 tagging 5.0.2?
 >>
 >> Cheers,
 >>
 >> Wayne
 >>
 >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
 >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
 bug that I am
 >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
 translations a
 >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
 installers to get
 >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
 Please let me
 >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
 other plans.
 >>>
 >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
 development
 >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
 the beginning
 >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are
 planning to
 >>> make, now would be a good time.
 >>>
 >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
 >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
 >>>
 >>> Cheers,
 >>>
 >>> Wayne
 >>>
 >>
 >> ___
 >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
 >> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
 
 >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
 >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
 Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
 
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




___
Mailing list: 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Steven A. Falco]

It downloaded fine from the url I posted earlier.  Thanks!

Steve

On 12/3/18 1:15 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Hey Steve,
> 
> I went ahead and pushed the source archive so you should be able to
> download it now.  You will still have to wait for the library repos to
> get tagged but I'm guessing the are packaged separately on most if not
> all linux distros.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Wayne
> 
> On 12/3/2018 12:05 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>> The link is based on what I was using for 5.0.0, 5.0.1, etc.  I'd guess that 
>> as soon as you upload the source archive, the link will start working.
>>
>> Once I see your release announcement, I'll start the process of building the 
>> official Fedora packages.
>>
>>  Steve
>>
>> On 12/3/18 11:24 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>> Hey Steve,
>>>
>>> I have not posted the source archive yet.  I'm not sure where the link
>>> you are using came from.  I will post the source archive at the same
>>> time I make the release announcement.  This gives the installer devs a
>>> chance to get the build servers updated and the installers uploaded to
>>> the website.  As soon as the library devs get the library repos tagged,
>>> it shouldn't take more than a week to get most of the installers built.
>>>  My goal is to make the release announcement this weekend.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>> On 12/3/2018 11:15 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
 I see that the source code was tagged with 5.0.2, but I get a 404 when I 
 try to download the tar via:

 https://launchpad.net/kicad/5.0/5.0.2/+download/kicad-5.0.2.tar.xz

 Is that the correct link?  Has the tar been posted yet?

Thanks,
Steve


 On 12/3/18 7:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
> do we stand on the library repos?
>
> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, 
>> etc.).
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz > > wrote:
>>
>> Yay!
>>
>> We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
>> to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
>> well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
>> Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
>> what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>> and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
>> symbols and footprints, at least).
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
>> to do
>> about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
>> thoughts on
>> the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
>> since 5.0.1
>> but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
>> significantly, I'm
>> fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>>
>> On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or 
>> are we
>> > getting a minor library update as well?
>> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
>> branch.
>> >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
>> tagging 5.0.2?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Wayne
>> >>
>> >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
>> bug that I am
>> >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
>> translations a
>> >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
>> installers to get
>> >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9. 
>> Please let me
>> >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
>> other plans.
>> >>>
>> >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
>> development

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

Hey Steve,

I went ahead and pushed the source archive so you should be able to
download it now.  You will still have to wait for the library repos to
get tagged but I'm guessing the are packaged separately on most if not
all linux distros.

Cheers,

Wayne

On 12/3/2018 12:05 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> The link is based on what I was using for 5.0.0, 5.0.1, etc.  I'd guess that 
> as soon as you upload the source archive, the link will start working.
> 
> Once I see your release announcement, I'll start the process of building the 
> official Fedora packages.
> 
>   Steve
> 
> On 12/3/18 11:24 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> Hey Steve,
>>
>> I have not posted the source archive yet.  I'm not sure where the link
>> you are using came from.  I will post the source archive at the same
>> time I make the release announcement.  This gives the installer devs a
>> chance to get the build servers updated and the installers uploaded to
>> the website.  As soon as the library devs get the library repos tagged,
>> it shouldn't take more than a week to get most of the installers built.
>>  My goal is to make the release announcement this weekend.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> On 12/3/2018 11:15 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>>> I see that the source code was tagged with 5.0.2, but I get a 404 when I 
>>> try to download the tar via:
>>>
>>> https://launchpad.net/kicad/5.0/5.0.2/+download/kicad-5.0.2.tar.xz
>>>
>>> Is that the correct link?  Has the tar been posted yet?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/3/18 7:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
 I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
 do we stand on the library repos?

 On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, 
> etc.).
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz  > wrote:
>
> Yay!
>
> We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
> to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
> well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
> Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
> what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
> and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
> symbols and footprints, at least).
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
> to do
> about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
> thoughts on
> the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
> since 5.0.1
> but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
> significantly, I'm
> fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>
> On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are 
> we
> > getting a minor library update as well?
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
> branch.
> >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
> tagging 5.0.2?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Wayne
> >>
> >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
> bug that I am
> >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
> translations a
> >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
> installers to get
> >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9. 
> Please let me
> >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
> other plans.
> >>>
> >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
> development
> >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
> the beginning
> >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are
> planning to
> >>> make, now 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Steven A. Falco]

The link is based on what I was using for 5.0.0, 5.0.1, etc.  I'd guess that as 
soon as you upload the source archive, the link will start working.

Once I see your release announcement, I'll start the process of building the 
official Fedora packages.

Steve

On 12/3/18 11:24 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Hey Steve,
> 
> I have not posted the source archive yet.  I'm not sure where the link
> you are using came from.  I will post the source archive at the same
> time I make the release announcement.  This gives the installer devs a
> chance to get the build servers updated and the installers uploaded to
> the website.  As soon as the library devs get the library repos tagged,
> it shouldn't take more than a week to get most of the installers built.
>  My goal is to make the release announcement this weekend.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Wayne
> 
> On 12/3/2018 11:15 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>> I see that the source code was tagged with 5.0.2, but I get a 404 when I try 
>> to download the tar via:
>>
>> https://launchpad.net/kicad/5.0/5.0.2/+download/kicad-5.0.2.tar.xz
>>
>> Is that the correct link?  Has the tar been posted yet?
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>  Steve
>>
>>
>> On 12/3/18 7:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
>>> do we stand on the library repos?
>>>
>>> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
 I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
 careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
 of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
 haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
 issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, 
 etc.).

 On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz >>> > wrote:

 Yay!

 We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
 to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
 well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
 Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
 what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
 and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
 symbols and footprints, at least).

 On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
 mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:

 I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
 to do
 about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
 thoughts on
 the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
 since 5.0.1
 but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
 significantly, I'm
 fine with tagging the current head of each library.

 On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
 > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are 
 we
 > getting a minor library update as well?
 > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
 mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >>
 >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
 branch.
 >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
 tagging 5.0.2?
 >>
 >> Cheers,
 >>
 >> Wayne
 >>
 >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
 >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
 bug that I am
 >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
 translations a
 >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
 installers to get
 >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9. 
 Please let me
 >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
 other plans.
 >>>
 >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
 development
 >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
 the beginning
 >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are
 planning to
 >>> make, now would be a good time.
 >>>
 >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues 
 to
 >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
 >>>
 >>> Cheers,
 >>>
 >>> Wayne
 >>>
 >>
 >> ___
 >> Mailing list: 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Pedro Martin]

Hi, Wayne,

This is the version I'm using since last week.

Regards,
Pedro.

Application: kicad
Version: 5.0.2-bee76a0~70~ubuntu14.04.1, release build
Libraries:
wxWidgets 3.0.2
libcurl/7.35.0 OpenSSL/1.0.1f zlib/1.2.8 libidn/1.28 librtmp/2.3
Platform: Linux 3.16.0-77-generic x86_64, 64 bit, Little endian, wxGTK
Build Info:
wxWidgets: 3.0.2 (wchar_t,wx containers,compatible with 2.8) GTK+ 2.24
Boost: 1.54.0
OpenCASCADE Community Edition: 6.8.0
Curl: 7.35.0
Compiler: GCC 4.8.4 with C++ ABI 1002

Build settings:
USE_WX_GRAPHICS_CONTEXT=OFF
USE_WX_OVERLAY=OFF
KICAD_SCRIPTING=ON
KICAD_SCRIPTING_MODULES=ON
KICAD_SCRIPTING_WXPYTHON=OFF
KICAD_SCRIPTING_ACTION_MENU=ON
BUILD_GITHUB_PLUGIN=ON
KICAD_USE_OCE=ON
KICAD_USE_OCC=OFF
KICAD_SPICE=ON


El 3/12/18 a las 17:24, Wayne Stambaugh escribió:

Hey Steve,

I have not posted the source archive yet.  I'm not sure where the link
you are using came from.  I will post the source archive at the same
time I make the release announcement.  This gives the installer devs a
chance to get the build servers updated and the installers uploaded to
the website.  As soon as the library devs get the library repos tagged,
it shouldn't take more than a week to get most of the installers built.
  My goal is to make the release announcement this weekend.

Cheers,

Wayne

On 12/3/2018 11:15 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:

I see that the source code was tagged with 5.0.2, but I get a 404 when I try to 
download the tar via:

https://launchpad.net/kicad/5.0/5.0.2/+download/kicad-5.0.2.tar.xz

Is that the correct link?  Has the tar been posted yet?

Thanks,
Steve


On 12/3/18 7:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:

I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
do we stand on the library repos?

On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:

I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, etc.).

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz mailto:evan.shu...@gmail.com>> wrote:

 Yay!

 We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
 to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
 well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
 Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
 what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
 and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
 symbols and footprints, at least).

 On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
 mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:

 I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
 to do
 about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
 thoughts on
 the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
 since 5.0.1
 but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
 significantly, I'm
 fine with tagging the current head of each library.

 On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
 > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
 > getting a minor library update as well?
 > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
 mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >>
 >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
 branch.
 >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
 tagging 5.0.2?
 >>
 >> Cheers,
 >>
 >> Wayne
 >>
 >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
 >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
 bug that I am
 >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
 translations a
 >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
 installers to get
 >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.
 Please let me
 >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
 other plans.
 >>>
 >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
 development
 >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
 the beginning
 >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are
 planning to
 >>> make, now would be a good time.
 >>>
 >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
 >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
 >>>
 >>> Cheers,
 >>>
 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

Hey Steve,

I have not posted the source archive yet.  I'm not sure where the link
you are using came from.  I will post the source archive at the same
time I make the release announcement.  This gives the installer devs a
chance to get the build servers updated and the installers uploaded to
the website.  As soon as the library devs get the library repos tagged,
it shouldn't take more than a week to get most of the installers built.
 My goal is to make the release announcement this weekend.

Cheers,

Wayne

On 12/3/2018 11:15 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I see that the source code was tagged with 5.0.2, but I get a 404 when I try 
> to download the tar via:
> 
> https://launchpad.net/kicad/5.0/5.0.2/+download/kicad-5.0.2.tar.xz
> 
> Is that the correct link?  Has the tar been posted yet?
> 
>   Thanks,
>   Steve
> 
> 
> On 12/3/18 7:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
>> do we stand on the library repos?
>>
>> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
>>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
>>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
>>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
>>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
>>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, etc.).
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz >> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Yay!
>>>
>>> We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
>>> to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
>>> well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
>>> Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
>>> what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>>> and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
>>> symbols and footprints, at least).
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
>>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
>>> to do
>>> about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
>>> thoughts on
>>> the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
>>> since 5.0.1
>>> but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
>>> significantly, I'm
>>> fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>>>
>>> On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>>> > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
>>> > getting a minor library update as well?
>>> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
>>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
>>> branch.
>>> >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
>>> tagging 5.0.2?
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >>
>>> >> Wayne
>>> >>
>>> >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>> >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
>>> bug that I am
>>> >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
>>> translations a
>>> >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
>>> installers to get
>>> >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9. 
>>> Please let me
>>> >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
>>> other plans.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
>>> development
>>> >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
>>> the beginning
>>> >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are
>>> planning to
>>> >>> make, now would be a good time.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
>>> >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Wayne
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> ___
>>> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> >> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>>> 
>>> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>>> Post to     : 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Steven A. Falco]

I see that the source code was tagged with 5.0.2, but I get a 404 when I try to 
download the tar via:

https://launchpad.net/kicad/5.0/5.0.2/+download/kicad-5.0.2.tar.xz

Is that the correct link?  Has the tar been posted yet?

Thanks,
Steve


On 12/3/18 7:49 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
> do we stand on the library repos?
> 
> On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
>> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
>> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
>> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
>> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
>> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
>> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, etc.).
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz > > wrote:
>>
>> Yay!
>>
>> We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
>> to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
>> well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
>> Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
>> what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
>> and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
>> symbols and footprints, at least).
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
>> to do
>> about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
>> thoughts on
>> the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
>> since 5.0.1
>> but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
>> significantly, I'm
>> fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>>
>> On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
>> > getting a minor library update as well?
>> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
>> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
>> branch.
>> >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
>> tagging 5.0.2?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Wayne
>> >>
>> >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
>> bug that I am
>> >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
>> translations a
>> >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
>> installers to get
>> >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9. 
>> Please let me
>> >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
>> other plans.
>> >>>
>> >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
>> development
>> >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
>> the beginning
>> >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are
>> planning to
>> >>> make, now would be a good time.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
>> >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> Wayne
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> >> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>> 
>> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>> ___
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>> 
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
> 
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : 

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

I saw that the translation and doc repos were tagged for 5.0.2.  Where
do we stand on the library repos?

On 11/26/2018 6:49 PM, Evan Shultz wrote:
> I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
> 5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been
> careful not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head
> of each library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes
> haven't been intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an
> issue that might ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, etc.).
> 
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz  > wrote:
> 
> Yay!
> 
> We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want
> to close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and
> well within the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to
> Antonio, we're now using the milestone feature of GH so you can see
> what's left at https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6
> and https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for
> symbols and footprints, at least).
> 
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh
> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want
> to do
> about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any
> thoughts on
> the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes
> since 5.0.1
> but as long as the existing symbols have changed too
> significantly, I'm
> fine with tagging the current head of each library.
> 
> On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
> > getting a minor library update as well?
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh
> mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0
> branch.
> >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with
> tagging 5.0.2?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Wayne
> >>
> >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper
> bug that I am
> >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and
> translations a
> >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the
> installers to get
> >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9. 
> Please let me
> >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make
> other plans.
> >>>
> >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the
> development
> >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by
> the beginning
> >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are
> planning to
> >>> make, now would be a good time.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
> >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Wayne
> >>>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> 
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> 
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Evan Shultz]

I should have also mentioned that the outstanding items milestoned for
5.0.2 are actual fixes which we would like to include. We've been careful
not to pushing breaking changes flippantly so tagging the head of each
library should be safe and an improvement. Breaking changes haven't been
intentionally made since 5.0.0 unless it was to fix an issue that might
ruin a design (wrong pinout, footprint pins swapped, etc.).

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:08 PM Evan Shultz  wrote:

> Yay!
>
> We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want to
> close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and well within
> the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to Antonio, we're now
> using the milestone feature of GH so you can see what's left at
> https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6 and
> https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for symbols and
> footprints, at least).
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh 
> wrote:
>
>> I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want to do
>> about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any thoughts on
>> the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes since 5.0.1
>> but as long as the existing symbols have changed too significantly, I'm
>> fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>>
>> On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
>> > getting a minor library update as well?
>> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0 branch.
>> >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with tagging 5.0.2?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Wayne
>> >>
>> >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I
>> am
>> >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
>> >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to
>> get
>> >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
>> >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other
>> plans.
>> >>>
>> >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the development
>> >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by the
>> beginning
>> >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are planning
>> to
>> >>> make, now would be a good time.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
>> >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> Wayne
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>> ___
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Evan Shultz]

Yay!

We (librarians) have a few outstanding items in the library we want to
close before 5.0.2, but it should only be a couple of days and well within
the one week timeline you requested. Thanks mostly to Antonio, we're now
using the milestone feature of GH so you can see what's left at
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/milestone/6 and
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints/milestone/1 (for symbols and
footprints, at least).

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:05 PM Wayne Stambaugh 
wrote:

> I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want to do
> about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any thoughts on
> the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes since 5.0.1
> but as long as the existing symbols have changed too significantly, I'm
> fine with tagging the current head of each library.
>
> On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> > Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
> > getting a minor library update as well?
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0 branch.
> >> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with tagging 5.0.2?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Wayne
> >>
> >> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
> >>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
> >>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
> >>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
> >>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.
> >>>
> >>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the development
> >>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by the
> beginning
> >>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are planning
> to
> >>> make, now would be a good time.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
> >>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Wayne
> >>>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

I just tagged and pushed 5.0.2 so we need to decide what we want to do
about tagging the library and translation repos.  Rene, any thoughts on
the library repos.  I know there have been a lot of changes since 5.0.1
but as long as the existing symbols have changed too significantly, I'm
fine with tagging the current head of each library.

On 11/26/2018 5:55 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
> getting a minor library update as well?
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
>>
>> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0 branch.
>> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with tagging 5.0.2?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
>>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
>>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
>>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
>>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.
>>>
>>> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the development
>>> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by the beginning
>>> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are planning to
>>> make, now would be a good time.
>>>
>>> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
>>> steadily improve due to your efforts.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Nick Østergaard]

Are we expecting to tag 5.0.1 as 5.0.2 for the libraries or are we
getting a minor library update as well?
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Wayne Stambaugh  wrote:
>
> I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0 branch.
> Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with tagging 5.0.2?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> > I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
> > not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
> > week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
> > built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
> > know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.
> >
> > Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the development
> > branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by the beginning
> > of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are planning to
> > make, now would be a good time.
> >
> > Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
> > steadily improve due to your efforts.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Wayne
> >
>
> ___
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

I just noticed a few last minute changes were made to the 5.0 branch.
Is there anything else pending or am I good to go with tagging 5.0.2?

Cheers,

Wayne

On 11/25/2018 2:01 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.
> 
> Once 5.0.2 is released, I would like to string freeze the development
> branch to start getting ready of 5.1 release candidates by the beginning
> of the year.  If you have any UI string changes that you are planning to
> make, now would be a good time.
> 
> Thank you again everyone for your hard work.  KiCad continues to
> steadily improve due to your efforts.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Wayne
> 

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

On 11/25/2018 2:15 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 25/11/2018 à 20:06, Seth Hillbrand a écrit :
>> Am 2018-11-25 14:01, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
>>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
>>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
>>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
>>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
>>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.
>>
>> Hi Wayne-
>>
>> I'm not sure what is going on with [1].  It doesn't recreate on Linux or
>> Mac but OP has posted a board and procedure.  If it can be recreated on
>> MSW, I think we should address it before 5.0.2
>>
>> Best-
>> Seth
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1803978
>>
> 
> I tested this board on W7-32bits with the current 5.01 master (AKA
> 5.02), and no crash.
> 
> 

I cannot duplicate this either so I'm going to set the status as fix
committed unless someone else can reproduce this.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Wayne Stambaugh]

On 11/25/2018 2:40 PM, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am 25.11.18 um 20:01 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.
> 
> today the Debian maintainers ox the wxWidgets packages gave a short
> information on the current status about the GTK+3 functions and usage in
> the Debian packages of wxWidgets. Maybe something interesting for you as
> this also has impact on all downstreams distro?
> 
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/11/msg00551.html
> 

It would be nice if they would do the same thing with wxPython as well
so we could continue to provide users with a complete Python scripting
solution on Debian based distros.

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Carsten Schoenert]

Hi,

Am 25.11.18 um 20:01 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.

today the Debian maintainers ox the wxWidgets packages gave a short
information on the current status about the GTK+3 functions and usage in
the Debian packages of wxWidgets. Maybe something interesting for you as
this also has impact on all downstreams distro?

https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/11/msg00551.html

-- 
Regards
Carsten Schoenert

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[jp charras]

Le 25/11/2018 à 20:06, Seth Hillbrand a écrit :
> Am 2018-11-25 14:01, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
>> I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
>> not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
>> week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
>> built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
>> know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.
> 
> Hi Wayne-
> 
> I'm not sure what is going on with [1].  It doesn't recreate on Linux or
> Mac but OP has posted a board and procedure.  If it can be recreated on
> MSW, I think we should address it before 5.0.2
> 
> Best-
> Seth
> 
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1803978
> 

I tested this board on W7-32bits with the current 5.01 master (AKA
5.02), and no crash.


-- 
Jean-Pierre CHARRAS

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.0.2 stable release.

[Seth Hillbrand]

Am 2018-11-25 14:01, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:

I plan on tagging 5.0.2 tomorrow unless is a show stopper bug that I am
not aware of.  My goal is to give the library, doc, and translations a
week to get tagged for 5.0.2 and another week for the installers to get
built so I can make the release announcement on 12/9.  Please let me
know if this doesn't fit into your schedule so we can make other plans.


Hi Wayne-

I'm not sure what is going on with [1].  It doesn't recreate on Linux or 
Mac but OP has posted a board and procedure.  If it can be recreated on 
MSW, I think we should address it before 5.0.2


Best-
Seth

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1803978


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp