Re: [Koha] RDA questions WAS: Re: Flippin' Yanks

2013-10-03 Thread Hillyard, Cecil
One can use MarcEdit to batch edit/add RDA fields to existing records. It will 
add 33x, 34x, 38x.  It will change 260 to 264 and it will expand some 
abbreviations.  

One problem has arisen in 3.12.  That if you use frameworks other than default 
when you export your existing records to MarcEdit, have it do its stuff and 
them reimport them back into Koha they get reimported as the default framework.

__
Cecil Hillyard
Washoe County Library
Reno, Nevada

-Original Message-
From: koha-boun...@lists.katipo.co.nz [mailto:koha-boun...@lists.katipo.co.nz] 
On Behalf Of Ramon Andiñach
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 3:45 PM
To: koha mailing list
Subject: [Koha] RDA questions WAS: Re: Flippin' Yanks

Non-professional here, so apologies if these are dumb questions. I'm happy to 
be pointed at links in the right direction.

If I'm understanding correctly, RDA itself is akin to AACR2 in that it contains 
lists of acceptable terms and how to use them; but different in that it's built 
on a different data storage framework (FRBR rather than MARC).

I gather from reading that Koha will now deal with FRBR and MARC.

So, I'm wondering;
1. Are many existing library catalogues doing the complete switch to RDA and 
FRBR, or are most doing the partial switch that Libraries Australia is doing 
(RDA on MARC)?
2. Would a switch be something that could be automated easily? Say a script 
that adapts AACR2 records in Koha to RDA records?
3. Would the Z39.50 server standard still service RDA/FRBR records, or just 
*/MARC records? 

Probably got some others, but those are the three running around in my head at 
the moment.

Cheers,
-ramon.

On 03/10/2013, at 02:25 , glaws wrote:

 RDA! RDA! RDA! RDA! RDA! RDA!
 
 Greg
 
 On 10/02/2013 01:40 PM, Magnus Enger wrote:
 tirsdag 1. oktober 2013 skrev glaws følgende:
 
This does, of course, present the perfect opportunity for a strong
progressive organization outside the U.S. to step in and become
the New
Marc Master of the World.
 
 
 Or we could take it as an opportunity to leave MARC on the scrap heap 
 of history and embrace current technologies instead... :-)
 
 Best regards,
 Magnus Enger
 Libriotech.no
 
 ___
 Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz 
 http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz 
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


Re: [Koha] RDA questions WAS: Re: Flippin' Yanks

2013-10-02 Thread Chris Cormack
* Ramon Andiñach (cust...@westnet.com.au) wrote:
 Non-professional here, so apologies if these are dumb questions. I'm happy to 
 be pointed at links in the right direction.
 
 If I'm understanding correctly, RDA itself is akin to AACR2 in that it 
 contains lists of acceptable terms and how to use them; but different in that 
 it's built on a different data storage framework (FRBR rather than MARC).

Ive never seen RDA implemented in anything other than MARC, I would
love to see it something else. All I have ever seen of RDA in the wild
is MARC21 with some new fields.

 
 I gather from reading that Koha will now deal with FRBR and MARC.
 
 So, I'm wondering;
 1. Are many existing library catalogues doing the complete switch to RDA and 
 FRBR, or are most doing the partial switch that Libraries Australia is doing 
 (RDA on MARC)?

That's all I have seen.

 2. Would a switch be something that could be automated easily? Say a script 
 that adapts AACR2 records in Koha to RDA records?

Nope, thats one of the major problems, there isn't a nice way to move
a record from AACR2 to RDA

 3. Would the Z39.50 server standard still service RDA/FRBR records, or just 
 */MARC records? 
 
 Probably got some others, but those are the three running around in my head 
 at the moment.
 

Basically I am not a fan of RDA in the slightest, I think it is
holding libraries back, not moving them forward. 

https://twitter.com/ranginui/status/369632875689172992

I have a faint hope that Bibframe might provide something more useful
http://bibframe.org/

But I also dread it will suffer the same designed by committees fate
that RDA did. 

People are bound to disagree with me, and that's the great thing about
Koha. They can send patches to implement stuff if they want. But you
won't catch me doing any more work on RDA stuff :)

I'm far more interested in what Oslo Public library are doing with RDF

Chris


 Cheers,
 -ramon.
 
 On 03/10/2013, at 02:25 , glaws wrote:
 
  RDA! RDA! RDA! RDA! RDA! RDA!
  
  Greg
  
  On 10/02/2013 01:40 PM, Magnus Enger wrote:
  tirsdag 1. oktober 2013 skrev glaws følgende:
  
 This does, of course, present the perfect opportunity for a strong
 progressive organization outside the U.S. to step in and become
 the New
 Marc Master of the World.
  
  
  Or we could take it as an opportunity to leave MARC on the scrap heap
  of history and embrace current technologies instead... :-)
  
  Best regards, 
  Magnus Enger
  Libriotech.no
  
  ___
  Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
  Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
  http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
 
 ___
 Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
 Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
 http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

-- 
Chris Cormack
Catalyst IT Ltd.
+64 4 803 2238
PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


Re: [Koha] RDA questions WAS: Re: Flippin' Yanks

2013-10-02 Thread Paul

At 12:05 PM 10/3/2013 +1300, Chris Cormack wrote:

* Ramon Andiñach (cust...@westnet.com.au) wrote:

[snip]

Basically I am not a fan of RDA in the slightest, I think it is
holding libraries back, not moving them forward.


+1 emphatically


People are bound to disagree with me, and that's the great thing about
Koha. They can send patches to implement stuff if they want. But you
won't catch me doing any more work on RDA stuff :)


MARC may or may not be the ultimate, but it works for m|billions of 
biblio records world wide. Improving, for the sake of ethereal improvement 
only, what's not broken is normally an expensive pipe-dream.


Best - Paul

___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha