[Koha-bugs] [Bug 7170] Remove use of XML::Simple

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7170

mathieu saby mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.f
   ||r

--- Comment #11 from mathieu saby mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr ---
Hello
Does someone still work on this bug?
XML::Simple is still used by a lot of files.

Any change that could improve performances would be a good thing! (And yes, I
know Plack and Memcached ;-) )

Using Yaml instead of XML in some cases (particulary for Koha-conf) would also
be a GREAT thing ( some libraries don't want to use Memcached).

M. Saby
Rennes 2 University

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/


[Koha-bugs] [Bug 7170] Remove use of XML::Simple

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7170

--- Comment #12 from Jared Camins-Esakov jcam...@cpbibliography.com ---
(In reply to comment #11)
 Hello
 Does someone still work on this bug?
 XML::Simple is still used by a lot of files.

I was actually thinking about working on this on my flight home tomorrow,
actually. It depends how tired I am. In order to stay awake on flights I work
on projects like this, that do not require any outside input.

 Any change that could improve performances would be a good thing! (And yes,
 I know Plack and Memcached ;-) )

Plack is not ready for production in my opinion, so I wasn't going to suggest
it. Memcached is good, but not a silver bullet. For this, an mmap'd cache might
be useful. I will experiment if I work on the problem.

 Using Yaml instead of XML in some cases (particulary for Koha-conf) would
 also be a GREAT thing ( some libraries don't want to use Memcached).

If we can get drastically better performance using a different XML parser I
think I might prefer that to switching to YAML, even if the other parser
requires some massaging of the output data structure.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/


[Koha-bugs] [Bug 7170] Remove use of XML::Simple

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7170

--- Comment #13 from Jared Camins-Esakov jcam...@cpbibliography.com ---
Also note that if you are not using XML::SAX::ExpatXS as your parser, you
should be. You can do that by setting the environment variable
XML_SIMPLE_PREFERRED_PARSER to 'XML::SAX::ExpatXS'.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/


[Koha-bugs] [Bug 9401] Javascript used for tags handling wants access to CGISESSID cookie

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9401

--- Comment #5 from M. de Rooy m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 This patch has been pushed to Master. Tagging worked for me both before and
 after applying this patch on top of the patch for bug 9102. I am not
 entirely sure why. However, since it worked after, I am pushing the patch
 anyway since it removes unnecessary cruft.

Hi Jared
Tagging worked since the session id from javascript was only plan-B in the
script.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/


[Koha-bugs] [Bug 9536] New: Make it still easier to add to the the list of possible encodings for Z39.50 servers.

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9536

Bug ID: 9536
   Summary: Make it still easier to add to the the list of
possible encodings for Z39.50 servers.
Classification: Unclassified
 Change sponsored?: ---
   Product: Koha
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P5 - low
 Component: Cataloging
  Assignee: gmcha...@gmail.com
  Reporter: egpetri...@yahoo.com
CC: m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl

This is a follow-up to Bug 9497 - Make it easier to add to the the list of
possible encodings for Z39.50 servers and add ISO 8859-1 and a previous
message of mine to the general list (Sep 23, 2012).

The purpose of the suggestion is to make koha more flexible as it regards
Z39.50 targets' encoding.

From what I can see in
http://search.cpan.org/~mirk/Net-Z3950-ZOOM/lib/ZOOM.pod, the calling
application (koha in our case ?) has to set the encoding conversion, and ZOOM
forwards it in turn to the called YAZ module (as per
http://www.indexdata.com/yaz/doc/zoom.records.html). 
YAZ in turn is supposed to be a wrapper for the library system call iconv.
But YAZ' iconv utility also implements conversions on its own (as per
http://www.indexdata.com/yaz/doc/yaz.pdf and
http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/libiconv/documentation/libiconv-1.
13/iconv.1.html). In other words, besides marc8, marc8s, marc8lossy,
marc8lossless, utf8, iso8859-1, iso5426, iso5428:1984, advancegreek and
danmarc, encodings that it natively supports, YAZ is supposed to be able to
handle all the encodings supported by iconv.

In debian at least, the list of encodings that YAZ supports (fully or
partially) is enormous:

iconv -l

The following list contain all the coded character sets known.  This does not
necessarily mean that all combinations of these names can be used for the FROM
and TO command line parameters.  One coded character set can be listed with
several different names (aliases).

  437, 500, 500V1, 850, 851, 852, 855, 856, 857, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 865,
  866, 866NAV, 869, 874, 904, 1026, 1046, 1047, 8859_1, 8859_2, 8859_3, 8859_4,
  8859_5, 8859_6, 8859_7, 8859_8, 8859_9, 10646-1:1993, 10646-1:1993/UCS4,
  ANSI_X3.4-1968, ANSI_X3.4-1986, ANSI_X3.4, ANSI_X3.110-1983, ANSI_X3.110,
  ARABIC, ARABIC7, ARMSCII-8, ASCII, ASMO-708, ASMO_449, BALTIC, BIG-5,
  BIG-FIVE, BIG5-HKSCS, BIG5, BIG5HKSCS, BIGFIVE, BRF, BS_4730, CA, CN-BIG5,
  CN-GB, CN, CP-AR, CP-GR, CP-HU, CP037, CP038, CP273, CP274, CP275, CP278,
  CP280, CP281, CP282, CP284, CP285, CP290, CP297, CP367, CP420, CP423, CP424,
  CP437, CP500, CP737, CP775, CP803, CP813, CP819, CP850, CP851, CP852, CP855,
  CP856, CP857, CP860, CP861, CP862, CP863, CP864, CP865, CP866, CP866NAV,
  CP868, CP869, CP870, CP871, CP874, CP875, CP880, CP891, CP901, CP902, CP903,
  CP904, CP905, CP912, CP915, CP916, CP918, CP920, CP921, CP922, CP930, CP932,
  CP933, CP935, CP936, CP937, CP939, CP949, CP950, CP1004, CP1008, CP1025,
  CP1026, CP1046, CP1047, CP1070, CP1079, CP1081, CP1084, CP1089, CP1097,
  CP1112, CP1122, CP1123, CP1124, CP1125, CP1129, CP1130, CP1132, CP1133,
  CP1137, CP1140, CP1141, CP1142, CP1143, CP1144, CP1145, CP1146, CP1147,
  CP1148, CP1149, CP1153, CP1154, CP1155, CP1156, CP1157, CP1158, CP1160,
  CP1161, CP1162, CP1163, CP1164, CP1166, CP1167, CP1250, CP1251, CP1252,
  CP1253, CP1254, CP1255, CP1256, CP1257, CP1258, CP1282, CP1361, CP1364,
  CP1371, CP1388, CP1390, CP1399, CP4517, CP4899, CP4909, CP4971, CP5347,
  CP9030, CP9066, CP9448, CP10007, CP12712, CP16804, CPIBM861, CSA7-1, CSA7-2,
  CSASCII, CSA_T500-1983, CSA_T500, CSA_Z243.4-1985-1, CSA_Z243.4-1985-2,
  CSA_Z243.419851, CSA_Z243.419852, CSDECMCS, CSEBCDICATDE, CSEBCDICATDEA,
  CSEBCDICCAFR, CSEBCDICDKNO, CSEBCDICDKNOA, CSEBCDICES, CSEBCDICESA,
  CSEBCDICESS, CSEBCDICFISE, CSEBCDICFISEA, CSEBCDICFR, CSEBCDICIT, CSEBCDICPT,
  CSEBCDICUK, CSEBCDICUS, CSEUCKR, CSEUCPKDFMTJAPANESE, CSGB2312, CSHPROMAN8,
  CSIBM037, CSIBM038, CSIBM273, CSIBM274, CSIBM275, CSIBM277, CSIBM278,
  CSIBM280, CSIBM281, CSIBM284, CSIBM285, CSIBM290, CSIBM297, CSIBM420,
  CSIBM423, CSIBM424, CSIBM500, CSIBM803, CSIBM851, CSIBM855, CSIBM856,
  CSIBM857, CSIBM860, CSIBM863, CSIBM864, CSIBM865, CSIBM866, CSIBM868,
  CSIBM869, CSIBM870, CSIBM871, CSIBM880, CSIBM891, CSIBM901, CSIBM902,
  CSIBM903, CSIBM904, CSIBM905, CSIBM918, CSIBM921, CSIBM922, CSIBM930,
  CSIBM932, CSIBM933, CSIBM935, CSIBM937, CSIBM939, CSIBM943, CSIBM1008,
  CSIBM1025, CSIBM1026, CSIBM1097, CSIBM1112, CSIBM1122, CSIBM1123, CSIBM1124,
  CSIBM1129, CSIBM1130, CSIBM1132, CSIBM1133, CSIBM1137, CSIBM1140, CSIBM1141,
  CSIBM1142, CSIBM1143, CSIBM1144, CSIBM1145, CSIBM1146, CSIBM1147, CSIBM1148,
  CSIBM1149, CSIBM1153, CSIBM1154, CSIBM1155, CSIBM1156, CSIBM1157, CSIBM1158,
  CSIBM1160, CSIBM1161, CSIBM1163, CSIBM1164, CSIBM1166, CSIBM1167, CSIBM1364,
  CSIBM1371, 

[Koha-bugs] [Bug 9343] SIP doesn't handle debarred date/status correctly

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9343

Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|Pushed to Master|Pushed to Stable

--- Comment #7 from Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz ---
Pushed to 3.10.x will be in 3.10.3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/


[Koha-bugs] [Bug 9537] New: Add a list of the patches that have been applied to a koha installation

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9537

Bug ID: 9537
   Summary: Add a list of the patches that have been applied to a
koha installation
Classification: Unclassified
 Change sponsored?: ---
   Product: Koha
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P5 - low
 Component: System Administration
  Assignee: koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
  Reporter: egpetri...@yahoo.com
CC: gmcha...@gmail.com

I wonder if it would be useful to add a tab in the home, about koha section,
displaying a list patches that have been applied to the specific koha
installation, similar to the list of pearl modules.

This could prove handy when trying to ascertain why a bug that doesn't exist in
the main distribution manifests itself in some git derivative or other.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/


[Koha-bugs] [Bug 9537] Add a list of the patches that have been applied to a koha installation

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9537

Liz Rea (CatalystIT) l...@catalyst.net.nz changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||l...@catalyst.net.nz
   Assignee|koha-b...@lists.koha-commun |egpetri...@yahoo.com
   |ity.org |

--- Comment #1 from Liz Rea (CatalystIT) l...@catalyst.net.nz ---
This development would be welcomed, however it seems unlikely that it will be
fixed without a code submission by someone who is really interested in seeing
this feature in Koha.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/


[Koha-bugs] [Bug 9516] Item Availability/Data missing from OPAC tag search

2013-02-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9516

--- Comment #6 from David Cook dc...@prosentient.com.au ---
(In reply to comment #4)
 Neither I nor Owen have been able to reproduce this bug.

Hmmm, intriguing!

The more I look at the getRecords and searchResults subs, the more confused I
get by the marc/marcxml/items synchronization. 

If it's working for you guys, it must mean that my sync is off, because using
getRecords seems to return raw marc with embedded item data, while just
querying the marc blob in the database returns raw marc without item data. 

:S

I thought that the marcxml and marc weren't supposed to store item-level data
anymore, but I don't see in these subs where it is being added. In fact, in
searchResults (around line 1729: Pull out the items fields), it seems that
the incoming marcRecord param passed into searchResults should have that
embedded item data :S.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/