[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Bob Ewart bob-ew...@bobsown.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bob-ew...@bobsown.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Mason James m...@kohaaloha.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rel_3_16_candidate | CC||m...@kohaaloha.com Status|Pushed to Master|Pushed to Stable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 vimal kumar vimal0...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vimal0...@gmail.com Version|master |3.16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Jorge de Cardenas jd...@smfpl.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jd...@smfpl.org --- Comment #24 from Jorge de Cardenas jd...@smfpl.org --- I am also getting the same errors as Doug Dearden. Did a package install of Koha 3.16.03 drop the database, created empty database and imported data from 3.10. Then updated the schema. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #25 from Jorge de Cardenas jd...@smfpl.org --- In addition to the issn_idx index I also have isbnidx index. I will be dropping these and later retest. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Doug Dearden dear...@sarsf.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dear...@sarsf.org --- Comment #22 from Doug Dearden dear...@sarsf.org --- updatedatabase.pl at $DBversion = 3.15.00.049 seems to be implementing the changes related to this bug, but references Bug 11268. I got the following error messages during an update to 3.16.0 from upgradedatabase.pl regarding this section: [Fri May 30 16:09:09 2014] [error] [client 192.168.30.196] [Fri May 30 16:09:09 2014] install.pl: [Fri May 30 16:09:09 2014] updatedatabase.pl: DBD::mysql::db do failed: BLOB/TEXT column 'issn' used in key specification without a key length at /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/installer/data/mysql/updatedatabase.pl line 8420., referer: http://192.168.30.13:8080/cgi-bin/koha/installer/install.pl [Fri May 30 16:09:09 2014] [error] [client 192.168.30.196] [Fri May 30 16:09:09 2014] install.pl: , referer: http://192.168.30.13:8080/cgi-bin/koha/installer/install.pl [Fri May 30 16:09:09 2014] [error] [client 192.168.30.196] [Fri May 30 16:09:09 2014] install.pl: [Fri May 30 16:09:09 2014] updatedatabase.pl: DBD::mysql::db do failed: Incorrect prefix key; the used key part isn't a string, the used length is longer than the key part, or the storage engine doesn't support unique prefix keys at /usr/share/koha/intranet/cgi-bin/installer/data/mysql/updatedatabase.pl line 8424., referer: http://192.168.30.13:8080/cgi-bin/koha/installer/install.pl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #23 from Doug Dearden dear...@sarsf.org --- Further investigation on this showed something interesting. I have three databases - main, image, and archive. The original DB is main, later I created image and still later archive - so archive was created on a newer version of Koha than the other two. The update to archive did not throw these errors. When I look at a pre-update version of the biblioitems table in the main and image DBs there are two indexes for issn - one called issn, the other issn_idx . Looking at a post-update version there is only issn_idx - no issn or isbn indexes, and the isbn and issn fields are still varchar(30) and varchar(9). I think adding $dbh-do(ALTER TABLE biblioitems DROP INDEX issn_idx); to the right spot in updatedatabase.pl probably fixes this. I don't know why that old index was there on my main and image databases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Galen Charlton gmcha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Passed QA |Pushed to Master CC||gmcha...@gmail.com --- Comment #21 from Galen Charlton gmcha...@gmail.com --- Pushed to master. Thanks, Kyle! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Galen Charlton gmcha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rel_3_16_candidate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Fridolin SOMERS fridolyn.som...@biblibre.com changed: What|Removed |Added Patch complexity|--- |Small patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Fridolin SOMERS fridolyn.som...@biblibre.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Signed Off |Failed QA CC||jonathan.dru...@biblibre.co ||m --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com --- The DB structure changes should be done on the deletedbiblioitems table too. Marked as Failed QA. Note: I got the following error BLOB/TEXT column 'issn' used in key specification without a key length My issn index was called issn_idx, I have absolutely no idea why... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Kyle M Hall k...@bywatersolutions.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Failed QA |Signed Off -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #14 from Kyle M Hall k...@bywatersolutions.com --- Created attachment 25491 -- http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=25491action=edit Bug 5377 [QA Followup] - Alter deletedbiblioitems to match biblioitems -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Kyle M Hall k...@bywatersolutions.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25491|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #15 from Kyle M Hall k...@bywatersolutions.com --- Created attachment 25492 -- http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=25492action=edit Bug 5377 [QA Followup] - Alter deletedbiblioitems to match biblioitems -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #16 from Kyle M Hall k...@bywatersolutions.com --- The latest followup only alters the isbn index for deletedbiblioitems. The previous iteration from the patch added an issn index that didn't previously exist. I added it to make it make biblioitems, but now I'm removing it because I see no benefit from having it, and at the least having it will cause cost a bit more cpu time and disk space. QA'ers, if you feel for some reason the deletedbiblioitems table *should* have an issn index, just deprecate the followup, and restore the previous iteration of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25470|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com --- Created attachment 25493 -- http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=25493action=edit Bug 5377 - Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN Test Plan: 1) Apply this patch 2) Create a record with 5 ISBNs and 5 ISSNs 3) Create a new report from the following SQL, or execute it from the mysql console: SELECT isbn, issn FROM biblioitems ORDER BY biblionumber DESC LIMIT 1 4) Note that all your ISBNs and ISSNs are listed, separated by the pipe character ( | ) Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz This might be slow to run on big databases, because of the 2 index rebuilds, however it changes no functionality just increases the field size which is safe enough (we store multiple now already) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Signed Off |Passed QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25492|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com --- Created attachment 25494 -- http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=25494action=edit Bug 5377 [QA Followup] - Alter deletedbiblioitems to match biblioitems Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com --- Created attachment 25495 -- http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=25495action=edit Bug 5377: No index on deletedbiblioitems.issn This patch removes a trailing space and remove the issn index deletion (it does not exist on deletedbiblioitems). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Druart jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #16) QA'ers, if you feel for some reason the deletedbiblioitems table *should* have an issn index, just deprecate the followup, and restore the previous iteration of it. I didn't see your comment when I submitted my QA patches. In my opinion, if the index is not in use, it is useless to add it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Kyle M Hall k...@bywatersolutions.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Discussion |Needs Signoff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Kyle M Hall k...@bywatersolutions.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@bywatersolutions.com Assignee|gmcha...@gmail.com |k...@bywatersolutions.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #9 from Kyle M Hall k...@bywatersolutions.com --- Created attachment 25469 -- http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=25469action=edit Bug 5377 - Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN Test Plan: 1) Apply this patch 2) Create a record with 5 ISBNs and 5 ISSNs 3) Create a new report from the following SQL, or execute it from the mysql console: SELECT isbn, issn FROM biblioitems ORDER BY biblionumber DESC LIMIT 1 4) Note that all your ISBNs and ISSNs are listed, separated by the pipe character ( | ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25469|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #11 from Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz --- Created attachment 25470 -- http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=25470action=edit Bug 5377 - Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN Test Plan: 1) Apply this patch 2) Create a record with 5 ISBNs and 5 ISSNs 3) Create a new report from the following SQL, or execute it from the mysql console: SELECT isbn, issn FROM biblioitems ORDER BY biblionumber DESC LIMIT 1 4) Note that all your ISBNs and ISSNs are listed, separated by the pipe character ( | ) Signed-off-by: Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz This might be slow to run on big databases, because of the 2 index rebuilds, however it changes no functionality just increases the field size which is safe enough (we store multiple now already) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz --- Comment #12 from Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz --- We never actually use biblioitems.issn for much of anything, certainly not if using XSLT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Heather Braum hbr...@nekls.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hbr...@nekls.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #7 from Galen Charlton gmcha...@gmail.com --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #3) That said, a new table might be overkill, because ISBN might be the only field in biblioitems that contains multiple values. I'm not 100% sure on this one, as I just took a quick look glance through some sample data. Well, there are a *lot* of fields that are repeatable and where you might well want to display and search on all repeats for a record. Off the top of my head: - EAN/UPCs, as mentioned by Mathieu - arbitrary record identifiers (e.g., from the MARC21 035 field) - chapter and part titles - languages of the work -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #8 from David Cook dc...@prosentient.com.au --- (In reply to Galen Charlton from comment #7) (In reply to David Cook from comment #3) That said, a new table might be overkill, because ISBN might be the only field in biblioitems that contains multiple values. I'm not 100% sure on this one, as I just took a quick look glance through some sample data. Well, there are a *lot* of fields that are repeatable and where you might well want to display and search on all repeats for a record. Off the top of my head: - EAN/UPCs, as mentioned by Mathieu - arbitrary record identifiers (e.g., from the MARC21 035 field) - chapter and part titles - languages of the work Good point, Galen. When I first wrote my comment, I wasn't aware that there were other cases of repeatable MARC fields being put in a single database field with a pipe separator. However, after reading the other comments and taking a more thorough look, I see that more and more. Perhaps a new table, following the model you suggested in 2010, would be the best idea. However, if we were to have a biblio_attributes table, might it make sense to drop the biblioitems table and reduce the scope of the biblio table? That is to say, all bibliographic attributes (not only 'isbn' and 'issn' but also 'title', 'author', 'notes', and other attributes from both the biblio and biblioitems tables) would be stored in biblio_attributes, while the biblio table would still exist with system specific attributes/data such as the 'biblionumber', 'frameworkcode', 'timestamp', and 'datecreated' fields. Conceptually, I like that separation of data. In terms of killing MARC, it might be an idea to make yet another table called biblio_records where the record is stored in a field (i.e. blob) and a metadata descriptor is recorded in another field. However, it would take a massive re-write to the Koha code to make that a reality, no? Also, by putting all that data in to one table, might we suffer some large performance hits for databases with huge amounts of bib records? -- These are just musings on my part. I haven't designed enough databases to know what the best practice is in terms of performance. I wonder sometimes about how much we gain from using the relational database to store bibliographic data. Currently, are we not storing bibliographic data in 4+ places? The biblio table, the biblioitems table, the MARC blob in the biblioitems table, the MARCXML blob in the biblioitems table, and finally the Zebra database? Both in terms of killing MARC and improving data integrity (and perhaps performance), might it not make sense to reduce the number of places we're storing data? Is the idea of storing data in the relational database to improve the speed of retrieval? Do we actually gain speed? No pattern has emerged to me in terms of deciding when to use the MARC record and when to use the database as the source of data in a given script. I know we have the mod scripts which ensure data integrity, but I can't help but think that there must be a better way of storing and retrieving bibliographic data... Sorry for the long comment! I would almost tl;dr it, but I think they're valid questions. biblio, biblio_attributes, and biblio_records? biblio, biblioitems, biblio_attributes? biblio,biblio_records? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 Fridolyn SOMERS fridolyn.som...@biblibre.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |In Discussion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 mathieu saby mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.f ||r --- Comment #4 from mathieu saby mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr --- If someone is working on that bug, please consider applying the same treatment to EAN field in biblioitems table. You say it is not good to have multiple values in a field, but this occurs elsewhere. For example in biblio table, for author, unititle and title (at least in UNIMARC, because they are mapped to repeatable subfields...). Should we do something for that ? M. Saby Rennes 2 University -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #5 from Fridolyn SOMERS fridolyn.som...@biblibre.com --- (In reply to comment #4) If someone is working on that bug, please consider applying the same treatment to EAN field in biblioitems table. Correct, ean is VARCHAR(13). You say it is not good to have multiple values in a field, but this occurs elsewhere. For example in biblio table, for author, unititle and title (at least in UNIMARC, because they are mapped to repeatable subfields...). Should we do something for that ? author, title and unititle are mediumtext, they can accept 16 millions of characters. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 --- Comment #6 from mathieu saby mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr --- author, title and unititle are mediumtext, they can accept 16 millions of characters. I know, I was just reacting to David Cook's remark After all, it's not good practice to be putting multiple values in a single field, right? But if it is only a good practice, I suppose it is not harmfull to have several 200$a (several titles by the same author, in collective works) mapped in biblio.title ? Mathieu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
[Koha-bugs] [Bug 5377] Database fields too small for multiple ISBN and ISSN
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5377 David Cook dc...@prosentient.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dc...@prosentient.com.au Version|rel_3_4 |master --- Comment #3 from David Cook dc...@prosentient.com.au --- I would like to breathe some life back into this bug. I've noticed that the detail pages of the catalogue in the OPAC and the staff client go straight to the MARC to get the ISBNs, but the database field is still used in areas like the Receipt Summary in acquisitions after receiving new items. While it may be trivial, multiple isbns are getting cut off, so that they do not display properly. The easiest solution would be to lengthen like Fridolyn has suggested. However, I think I understand Galen's suggestion to make a different table instead to work with multiple values. After all, it's not good practice to be putting multiple values in a single field, right? That said, a new table might be overkill, because ISBN might be the only field in biblioitems that contains multiple values. I'm not 100% sure on this one, as I just took a quick look glance through some sample data. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
