KR> Jim Morehead's Drag Flap
I am reminded that Jim took his idea from Tony Bingelis. Pictures at the link below. http://krbuilder.org/JimMorehead/index.html Refinance Now 3.7% FIXED $160,000 Mortgage for $547/mo. FREE. No Obligation. Get 4 Quotes! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4ca17ba3d47af598cm04vuc
KR> Throttle cable update
I had a vernier (sp) throttle cable get stuck like that on my Mooney once. Later was able to spray LPS directly on the outside of the whole cable, the oil penetrated right through it, the cable that is. The cable was like new again. I had no idea that would work until a mechanic friend told me to do that. I would have sworn I needed a new cable. Larry H On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:55 PM, "joe.kr2s.buil...@juno.com"wrote: > Dave, > I did not have any good indication that something was going wrong with the > throttle. The clues in hind sight was the first go around that it would not > go to low idle more like 1200 rpm and it went to full throttle fine for go > around. The next try I shut it down on roll out and restarted a few seconds > latter and it dropped to 650 idle on restart. The take off I thought the > rpm's were a hundred low or so but climb was still over 800 per minute and no > other signs of problems. All this I attributed to having a different prop > with a lot more pitch in it. It was not until decent at home that things > became apparent. The throttle started to get caught and it was mostly at the > 1200 rpm area. Altough it did stick at full throttle briefly and at full idle > breifly. >I pulled the entire cable out of the plane yesterday and tore it apart. It > was dirty inside from what seems to be the oil wicking up the cable interior. > It seemed like there was excess dirt and oil in the vernier parts. It appears > that the vernier is meant to be dry with no oil or grease. I may have in the > past gave it a shot of WD-40 thinking that it was good for it. It went back > together and seems to operate smoothly, but it is not going back in the > plane. I have a new one coming tomorrow. My concern is that with all the > yanking and pushing on the cable that the ball bearing could have scared the > interior threads of the vernier and might be able to find that spot again. > Before I pulled the cable out I tried running it on the ground again > beacause I had changed props again and I wanted to see if I could reproduce > it on the ground. After the cable was freed up i could not get it to stick > agiain with out the engine running. I started up and it seemed normal for a > for a few push pulls but i did not rev above 1800 because my truck was still > paked i front of me. Then just a suddenly as before it stuck at 1200 rpm and > would not move again. I let it ruat that for a few minutes to check prop > track and shut it down with just the mixture pull. As soon as i tried it > again after shut down it freed up again and kept working. > The carb was tried for operation without the cable connected and worked > perfactly but that is not going to stop me from pulling the carb out tonight > and making sure the slide is in perfact working condition on the bench. > I am not sure what i could have done differently in my annual, > maintneance or evaluuation of things that would have prevented this latest > adventure. Am I the only one that seems to screw up so much or am I the only > one that admits it? > Joe Horton, > Coopersburg, Pa. > > Mortgage Rates Hit 3.25% > If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program > http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4ca0a2b4ddd15d3f036st05duc > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Re: GPS verification of Airspeed
Todd Thelin wrote: > Ultimately what I am trying to do is calculate the error in my airspeed > indicator, which I'm fairly sure is off by about 20 or 30 MPH at the > higher > Indicated Air Speeds, but appears to be much closer to accurate at traffic > pattern speeds. At the risk of beathing this horse further, that's what I was trying to say earlier. When I do the four-way GPS thing on a calm day I write down both IAS and GPS speeds for each direction (after obtaining "steady state" for a minute or two in each direction). You can hardly go wrong if you're at the same IAS for all four readings, with the GPS speed varying by whatever small amount of wind you have. Then I average all four for both IAS (which should be the same) and GPS speeds and the error between the two falls right out in front of me. With my current airspeed indicator, I'm almost always within 1 mph of GPS speed at anything over about 90 mph, once TAS is calculated based on the IAS. Below that my ASI reads higher than actual, and by doing a four-way test at 80 mph, I have a pretty good idea how much it's off. I also checked the ASI calibration (see http://www.n56ml.com/airspeed_calibration/ ) throughout the normal flying range so I'd know if I had an instrument problem or a static/pitot problem. After you're sure you've got the calibration correct you can do something similar to see if either the static or pitot system leaks, while keeping the water out of the aircraft's lines, of course. Mark Langford N56ML "at" hiwaay.net website at http://www.N56ML.com
KR> Re: GPS verification of Airspeed
Thanks for all the methods posted. I'll have to try some of them and see if they are any easier than just using the old wind triangle method my dad taught me back in the sixties, but which requires an accurate Airspeed Indicator to calculate winds (or if I had an accurate wind speed I could calculate the Airspeed based on the GPS Ground Speed.) Ultimately what I am trying to do is calculate the error in my airspeed indicator, which I'm fairly sure is off by about 20 or 30 MPH at the higher Indicated Air Speeds, but appears to be much closer to accurate at traffic pattern speeds. i.e. flying formation with a buddy, who "thinks his indicator is accurate", mine matches his at around 80 mph IAS, but indicates 170-175 mph when his indicates 145 mph. Since I'm powered by a VW-2180 I'm pretty sure I'm not really cruising at 180 MPH. (Although it feels like I am.) Todd Thelin
KR> Throttle cable update
No, Joe, you are the only one who screws up. The rest of us are not capable of all those screw-ups. But, if we were, I am not sure how many of us would live to tell about it. I would be pointing at the Carb, rather than the cable. See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics See you at the 2010 - KR Gathering in Richmond, Ky - I39 There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for Flying has begun. Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC Am I the only one that seems to screw up so much or am I the only one that admits it? Joe Horton, Coopersburg, Pa.
KR> GPS Verification
" Take the difference between these GPS groundspeeds to get your windspeed." Correction " Take the difference between these GPS groundspeeds and your IAS to get your (close approx) windspeed." --- On Mon, 9/27/10, ttcse/Tomwrote: From: ttcse/Tom Subject: Re: KR> GPS Verification To: "KRnet" List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: Monday, September 27, 2010, 10:37 AM --- On Mon, 9/27/10, Mark Langford wrote: From: Mark Langford Subject: Re: KR> GPS Verification To: "KRnet" List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: Monday, September 27, 2010, 8:33 AM Todd Thelin > Can someone walk me through how to get accurate wind > information at 7500' with only a GPS? > This doesn't answer your question, exactly, but if you're looking for your > true airspeed, one way is to go to http://www.csgnetwork.com/tasgpscalc.html > with your headings (90 degrees apart) and GPS speeds, and fill in the > blanks. ..." > Mark Langford > n5...@hiwaay.net > website www.n56ml.com A very simple approach to both of these...(winds aloft and TAS via GPS)... Fly a nice 360 or 720 at a constant airspeed and rate of turn, say Standard Rate or 1/2 Standard Rate. On a downwind heading you'll get the highest GPS groundspeed, on a upwind heading you'll get the lowest GPS groundspeed (factor in about 1 second GPS thinking time delay) Note these groundspeeds. Average these two to get your TAS. Take the difference between these GPS groundspeeds to get your windspeed. I figured this out long ago with my early Trimble when flying skydivers. Tom
KR> GPS Verification
--- On Mon, 9/27/10, Mark Langfordwrote: From: Mark Langford Subject: Re: KR> GPS Verification To: "KRnet" List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: Monday, September 27, 2010, 8:33 AM Todd Thelin > Can someone walk me through how to get accurate wind > information at 7500' with only a GPS? > This doesn't answer your question, exactly, but if you're looking for your > true airspeed, one way is to go to http://www.csgnetwork.com/tasgpscalc.html > with your headings (90 degrees apart) and GPS speeds, and fill in the > blanks. ..." > Mark Langford > n5...@hiwaay.net > website www.n56ml.com A very simple approach to both of these...(winds aloft and TAS via GPS)... Fly a nice 360 or 720 at a constant airspeed and rate of turn, say Standard Rate or 1/2 Standard Rate. On a downwind heading you'll get the highest GPS groundspeed, on a upwind heading you'll get the lowest GPS groundspeed (factor in about 1 second GPS thinking time delay) Note these groundspeeds. Average these two to get your TAS. Take the difference between these GPS groundspeeds to get your windspeed. I figured this out long ago with my early Trimble when flying skydivers. Tom
KR> Dive Brakes
Hi Netters, Thanks Patrick and Robin for your input.A netter calculated the load on a typical KR dive brake as about 130 lbs,deployed.I tried my brake at 2600 rpm static and while the lever pull was firm it was quite comfortable,and gave me a ball park idea of what to expect. Best Regards, Eric, South Africa
Fw: RE: KR> Throttle cable update
On 09/27/2010 11:44 AM, joe.kr2s.buil...@juno.com wrote: > I'm not trying to change the world, just my life span > Joe Horton Just don't misplace that negative sign! :-) -Dj -- Dj Merrill - N1JOV Glastar Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/ Please use Netiquette Guidelines http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 Kindly TRIM your email replies and post AFTER the relevant text
Fw: RE: KR> Throttle cable update
>Thomas Edison: 10,000 tries to make the light bulb before he got it right >and changed the entire world. I'm not trying to change the world, just my life span Joe Horton ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html Mortgage Rates Hit 3.25% If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4ca0bc22d37c8a776st01duc
KR> GPS Verification
Todd wrote: > Can someone walk me through how to get accurate wind > information at 7500' with only a GPS? Mark Langford wrote: But to answer your question, the guys with a Dynon would just tell you to look at the screen if you want wind direction and velocity... Mark's point about checking your winds by doing runs works. Looking at the Dynon, or MGL will not work unless the pitot/static system is properly calibrated. If the system is five or six knots off, the computer will give you erroneous winds in heading and intensity as it compares to the GPS. >From personal experience with the Dynon D-180 and two different pitot/static systems. IHS, Dave "Zipper" Goodman President, EAA-818
KR> Throttle cable update
> Am I the only one that seems to screw up so much or am I the only one that > admits it? >Joe Horton, Thomas Edison: 10,000 tries to make the light bulb before he got it right and changed the entire world. IHS, Dave "Zipper" Goodman President, EAA-818
KR> GPS Verification
Todd Thelin > Can someone walk me through how to get accurate wind > information at 7500' with only a GPS? This doesn't answer your question, exactly, but if you're looking for your true airspeed, one way is to go to http://www.csgnetwork.com/tasgpscalc.html with your headings (90 degrees apart) and GPS speeds, and fill in the blanks. I usually do it early in the morning on calm days, check winds aloft at http://www.usairnet.com/cgi-bin/Winds/Aloft.cgi , and then do a four way check averaging the four, or even just a two way check flying into and with the wind, averaging the two. I almost always come up with the same exact number, even when I do each method twice. But to answer your question, the guys with a Dynon would just tell you to look at the screen if you want wind direction and velocity... Mark Langford n5...@hiwaay.net website www.n56ml.com
KR> GPS Verification
I've seen reference to using GPS to verify cruise speeds before, and this seems like a great way to get an accurate ground speed, which is a great starting place for calculating airspeed if the actual wind speed and direction is known. Can someone walk me through how to get accurate wind information at 7500' with only a GPS? Todd Thelin Spanaway, WA In a message dated 9/26/2010 4:56:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, n5...@hiwaay.net writes: And then there's always three way GPS verification, assuming the plane is flown at an altitude that is equivalent to 7500' on a standard pressure and temperature day.
KR> Throttle cable update
> Am I the only one that seems to screw up so much or am I the only one that > admits it? >Joe Horton, Are you kidding. I have you beat by miles and miles.. Mark Jones (N886MJ) Stevens Point, WI E-mail: flyk...@charter.net Web: www.flykr2s.com
KR> Cruise Speed/Dive Brakes
Mike wrote: "Jim Morehead's has the right idea for a drag flap. It is large, goes down to almost 90º, has a very nicely designed deployment lever, and worked beautifully. It really slowed the plane down with no fuss. I would copy Jim's design if I were building a KR with a belly drag flap." Having 12 hours in this plane myself I agree that Jim's belly board design was/is excellent. It has three notches of flaps, but the last notch was not usable under most of the circumstances I flew the plane in. When installing and using a belly board, consider your ability to fly away at any setting you may have on it. I am not sure Jim's plane had a fly-away capability with one person in it at temperatures above 90 degrees (SL, VW engine). It did have fly-away capability with two people in it at those temperatures at the second notch of flaps, about 45 degrees as I recall. Two notches dropped the speed 10 MPH and made seeing the runway over the nose very easy No fly-away means the pilot's options are limited to landing on the given pass. I am not comfortable in this realm unless the landing is assured or it is critical to be on the ground on the first pass. Going from two notches to zero caused the plane to pitch downward noticeably, not uncontrollably but enough that it could be a problem if the pilot was trying to get speed brake off the plane in close proximity to the ground and was not paying attention to the nose. The plane was not tested at full speed brake but this effect would certainly have been magnified. Use caution, think everything through, and go for it... wisely. Jim's design was very well thought out and worth looking at, especially the handle design. IHS, Dave "Zipper" Goodman President, EAA-818
KR> Throttle cable update
Joe said, am I the only one to screw up so much or am I the only one that admits it? Joe Horton, Coopersburg, Pa.rous Just look at so many of my posts and you will see I screw up as much or more than you. Remember, I was the one limping around on crutches with a broken foot at the last gathering. That was caused by a screw up with a ladder a chain saw and a tree. If it wasn't for bad luck, I would have no luck at all and I got hit with that luck again last week. By the way Joe, I have some nice video I took at the gathering of your plane. Maybe I can figure out how to get it to you via email. Jeff York Georgetown scott county airport for 2012 Mortgage Rates Hit 3.25% If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4ca0a2b4ddd15d3f036st05duc ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Throttle cable update
Dave, I did not have any good indication that something was going wrong with the throttle. The clues in hind sight was the first go around that it would not go to low idle more like 1200 rpm and it went to full throttle fine for go around. The next try I shut it down on roll out and restarted a few seconds latter and it dropped to 650 idle on restart. The take off I thought the rpm's were a hundred low or so but climb was still over 800 per minute and no other signs of problems. All this I attributed to having a different prop with a lot more pitch in it. It was not until decent at home that things became apparent. The throttle started to get caught and it was mostly at the 1200 rpm area. Altough it did stick at full throttle briefly and at full idle breifly. I pulled the entire cable out of the plane yesterday and tore it apart. It was dirty inside from what seems to be the oil wicking up the cable interior. It seemed like there was excess dirt and oil in the vernier parts. It appears that the vernier is meant to be dry with no oil or grease. I may have in the past gave it a shot of WD-40 thinking that it was good for it. It went back together and seems to operate smoothly, but it is not going back in the plane. I have a new one coming tomorrow. My concern is that with all the yanking and pushing on the cable that the ball bearing could have scared the interior threads of the vernier and might be able to find that spot again. Before I pulled the cable out I tried running it on the ground again beacause I had changed props again and I wanted to see if I could reproduce it on the ground. After the cable was freed up i could not get it to stick agiain with out the engine running. I started up and it seemed normal for a for a few push pulls but i did not rev above 1800 because my truck was still paked i front of me. Then just a suddenly as before it stuck at 1200 rpm and would not move again. I let it ruat that for a few minutes to check prop track and shut it down with just the mixture pull. As soon as i tried it again after shut down it freed up again and kept working. The carb was tried for operation without the cable connected and worked perfactly but that is not going to stop me from pulling the carb out tonight and making sure the slide is in perfact working condition on the bench. I am not sure what i could have done differently in my annual, maintneance or evaluuation of things that would have prevented this latest adventure. Am I the only one that seems to screw up so much or am I the only one that admits it? Joe Horton, Coopersburg, Pa. Mortgage Rates Hit 3.25% If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4ca0a2b4ddd15d3f036st05duc
KR> Cruise Speed/Dive Brakes
6399U ( KR2S ) has been flying now for 10 years, the first 2 wo the belly board. All I can say is the difference is remarkable, if I need to I can get down on an 1800' runway I can, and wo I used up at least another 500' minimum. With the KR it's all about killing the float. I tried brakes with and wo holes---I think the holes helped. Kenny Kutztown, Pa --- On Mon, 9/27/10, laser...@juno.comwrote: From: laser...@juno.com Subject: KR> Cruise Speed/Dive Brakes To: kr...@mylist.net List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: Monday, September 27, 2010, 2:55 AM I've always assumed cruise speed meant, for a normally aspirated engine, full throttle at 7-8 thousand feet. * My belly board has holes. It came that way. A long time ago I was wondering if it would be more effective if I filled in the holes and so did some research regarding why WWII dive bombers had holes in their drag surfaces. It turns out that lightening the metal was a consideration, primary however was that without the holes the planes became very difficult to control once in a dive. Putting holes in the metal helped with this control issue, but it also reduced drag. I found that in covering up my holes with tape did make the drag flap more effective. The tape was a periodic hassle to replace though, so until I get around to cutting some wood to exactly match the various-sized holes - that is to say, doing the job correctly - I'm living with the holes. It only goes down about 45º degrees, if that, and does not make a lot of difference. But it helps, so I always use it. Jim Morehead's has the right idea for a drag flap. It is large, goes down to almost 90º, has a very nicely designed deployment lever, and worked beautifully. It really slowed the plane down with no fuss. I would copy Jim's design if I were building a KR with a belly drag flap. Mike KSEE Moms Asked to Return to School Grant Funding May Be Available to Those That Qualify. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4ca04025a704b1e6676m04vuc ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
KR> Glassing wings
Robin I layed up the whole top and then the whole bottom with a 2" overlap at the leading edge (where its needed). I then propped the wing up on the trailing edge and the laid up the second layer forward of the main spar in one piece. Each to his own... Peter Drake - Original Message - From: "Robin Macdonald"To: "KRnet" Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 8:52 PM Subject: KR> Glassing wings I am in the process of sanding my wings & laying up the glass. Many thanks for your reply Robin, NZ ___ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam. SPAMfighter has removed 197 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len The Professional version does not have this message
KR> Cruise Speed/Dive Brakes
I've always assumed cruise speed meant, for a normally aspirated engine, full throttle at 7-8 thousand feet. * My belly board has holes. It came that way. A long time ago I was wondering if it would be more effective if I filled in the holes and so did some research regarding why WWII dive bombers had holes in their drag surfaces. It turns out that lightening the metal was a consideration, primary however was that without the holes the planes became very difficult to control once in a dive. Putting holes in the metal helped with this control issue, but it also reduced drag. I found that in covering up my holes with tape did make the drag flap more effective. The tape was a periodic hassle to replace though, so until I get around to cutting some wood to exactly match the various-sized holes - that is to say, doing the job correctly - I'm living with the holes. It only goes down about 45º degrees, if that, and does not make a lot of difference. But it helps, so I always use it. Jim Morehead's has the right idea for a drag flap. It is large, goes down to almost 90º, has a very nicely designed deployment lever, and worked beautifully. It really slowed the plane down with no fuss. I would copy Jim's design if I were building a KR with a belly drag flap. Mike KSEE Moms Asked to Return to School Grant Funding May Be Available to Those That Qualify. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/4ca04025a704b1e6676m04vuc