KR> FW: Fuselage dimensions for N729PK, rev 1

2016-02-17 Thread Pete Klapp









Joe
I forgot to mention that that I used the NACA 63009 airfoil and added six 
inches per side to the elevator for a total width of seven (7) feet. The 
vertical stab is an additional 4" taller and I used the NACA 63005 airfoil. The 
wings are RAF 48 as I had the Diehl wing skins and the wing incidence is at 2 
degrees instead of 3-1/2.

> To: n357cj at ptd.net; krnet at list.krnet.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:09:52 -0500
> Subject: KR> Fuselage dimensions for N729PK
> From: krnet at list.krnet.org48
> CC: pkengr at hotmail.com
> 
> Joe
> I used all 14' of the longeron material from Wicks as suggested by Mark 
> Langford. Mine measures 28" (2'4") to the front face of the firewall from the 
> front face of the fwd spar. From the front face of the fwd spar to the aft 
> face of the bottom of the stern post, I measured 141" (11'-9"). I added an 
> addition bay to the fuselage. My fuselage is 4" wider than a std KR-2S. Of 
> the additional length, 3" of it was added forward of the front spar, the rest 
> is aft.
> Pete Klapp
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options






KR> Tail Addition and fuselage lengths

2016-02-17 Thread Jeff Scott
.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
please see other KRnet info at 
http://www.krnet.org/info.html[http://www.krnet.org/info.html]
see 
http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org[http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org]
 to change options
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Jeffs KR.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 29200 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://list.krnet.org/mailman/private/krnet_list.krnet.org/attachments/20160217/7fd06358/attachment.jpg>


KR> Corvair Engine on EBay

2016-02-17 Thread Craig Williams
Saw that but they won't ship.  Their loss.




> On February 17, 2016 at 6:52 PM Dan Prichard via KRnet  list.krnet.org>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> FYI  for anyone looking for a corvair aircraft engine. Follow the long below
> > 
> > http://www.ebay.com/itm/Corvair-Aircraft-Engine-/141905028169?hash=item210a32e449:g:3ysAAOSwezVWwqy0=mtr
> >  
> > Dan Prichard
> > Oregon 
> > 
> >  
> >  
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options



KR> Corvair Engine on EBay

2016-02-17 Thread Dan Prichard
Did you ask them?  Working those eBay buttons get confusing. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 17, 2016, at 4:00 PM, Craig Williams via KRnet  list.krnet.org> wrote:
> 
> Saw that but they won't ship.  Their loss.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On February 17, 2016 at 6:52 PM Dan Prichard via KRnet > list.krnet.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> FYI  for anyone looking for a corvair aircraft engine. Follow the long below
>>> 
>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Corvair-Aircraft-Engine-/141905028169?hash=item210a32e449:g:3ysAAOSwezVWwqy0=mtr
>>> 
>>> Dan Prichard
>>> Oregon
>> ___
>> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
>> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
>> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
>> options
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options



KR> Corvair Engine on EBay

2016-02-17 Thread Dan Prichard
FYI  for anyone looking for a corvair aircraft engine. Follow the long below
> 
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Corvair-Aircraft-Engine-/141905028169?hash=item210a32e449:g:3ysAAOSwezVWwqy0=mtr
>  
> Dan Prichard
> Oregon 
> 
>  
>  


KR> Tail Addition and fuselage lengths

2016-02-17 Thread n357cj
Morning Folks, 
?? I would like some more dimensions for the length of existing KR2 and KR2S 
fuselages, (foreword face of main spar to back side of firewall and foreword 
face of main spar to the intersection point of the tail post to fuselage 
bottom) I have about 10 so far but I would like to get 3 or 4 times that many 
to have a decent data base. ( I would like to hear from more of the overseas 
guys... I'm pretty sure I can figure out how to covert to/from meters)
?? The conversation below brings out the same dimensional issue as I am trying 
to document with the fuselage  when adding what is the total dimension. I 
don't have plans in front of me but are we talking about 5 feet wide, 6 feet, 
or even 7 feet I had mentioned it a few weeks ago with the vertical stab... 
when adding height what is ?that from and to. I mentioned at that time for the 
vertical it might be better to talk in sq. feet.
?? Please send any data to n357cj at ptd.net 
?I would like to get this out posted with inn a month allowing to get as much 
feed back as I can.
Thanks,
Joe Horton
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Langford via KRnet" 


Joe Nunley wrote:

>> How much carbon fiber is enough? I built a 6 inch extension to my
tail surface the way that Mark describe below. When I attach the new 
addition to the airplane I will t88 glue it to the tail and cover in 
carbon fiber. I want o overlap the old and new with carbon fiber. How 
far do I want to overlap? <<

I would have built the extension in place, as a piece of foam glued to 
the end, shaped using the existing airfoil, and then carbon-fibered in 
place, overlapping the existing stabilizer (after sanding to expose raw 
fiberglass) by something like 3"-4". ?T-88 isn't the first epoxy I'd 
have thought of for that job (the way I describe above), but given that 
it's already built, T-88 should work fine, as its thickness would help 
ensure all surfaces are in good contact. ?Rough it all up to ensure lots 
of "tooth", of course.

Mark Langford


___