KR>KR Questions - Stick Control - Prop

2008-10-12 Thread jsmon...@aol.com
Looks like it will be official.. I will be a KR Builder by the end of the 
weekend,   I am purchasing a partially completed kit and will be hauling it 
home 
this weekend!

A couple of quick questions from a beginning KR builder!-

>From the article Mark Langford put up on his website (I think by Neal) - it 
appears that the stick control is over sensitive - 3/4" in either direction is 
all that is needed to fly the KR most of the time.  It would seem that it 
would make sense to shorten the hinge length/bellcrank distance so it would not 
be 
so sensitive, or have a progressive linkage if you couldn't get full motion 
out of the ailerons in a reasonable motion length...


Also on the corvair aircraft engine, it seems like the RPMs for aircraft are 
lower and a higher RPM could yield a lot more horsepower.  I understand the 
prop tip speed limitation, but would it make sense to have a shorter diameter 
prop with more blades?  would that allow higher rpm and still obtain the same 
bite, without exceeding the maximum efficient tip speed???  I see the composite 
propellers often could have up to six blades  - was just thinking about four!

John Monday
Laguna Beach CA
jsmon...@aol.com


KR>KR Questions - Stick Control - Prop

2008-10-12 Thread Ray Fuenzalida
What a coincidence!  I also am picking up a partially completed kit this 
weekend. Although mine is in Florida and I am bringing it back to New Orleans.  
I have just started reading the KR emails, so I hope to get up to speed soon.  
Good luck on yours.
Ray 

jsmon...@aol.com wrote:
Looks like it will be official.. I will be a KR Builder by the end of the 
weekend, I am purchasing a partially completed kit and will be hauling it home 
this weekend!

A couple of quick questions from a beginning KR builder!-

>From the article Mark Langford put up on his website (I think by Neal) - it 
appears that the stick control is over sensitive - 3/4" in either direction is 
all that is needed to fly the KR most of the time. It would seem that it 
would make sense to shorten the hinge length/bellcrank distance so it would not 
be 
so sensitive, or have a progressive linkage if you couldn't get full motion 
out of the ailerons in a reasonable motion length...


Also on the corvair aircraft engine, it seems like the RPMs for aircraft are 
lower and a higher RPM could yield a lot more horsepower. I understand the 
prop tip speed limitation, but would it make sense to have a shorter diameter 
prop with more blades? would that allow higher rpm and still obtain the same 
bite, without exceeding the maximum efficient tip speed??? I see the composite 
propellers often could have up to six blades - was just thinking about four!

John Monday
Laguna Beach CA
jsmon...@aol.com
___
see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html

-
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.


KR>KR Questions - Stick Control - Prop

2008-10-12 Thread Justin
About that corvair. Go here
http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/corvair/index.html

Keep in mind that WW found that 100 and 120HP is the max HP it can produce
and be reliable. I would like to have a CS prop and be able to spin the
engine faster for take off and such but time will tell.

Justin
N116JW
www.geocities.com/attngrabber14/Home
- Original Message -
From: 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 8:40 AM
Subject: KR>KR Questions - Stick Control - Prop


> Looks like it will be official.. I will be a KR Builder by the end of the
> weekend,   I am purchasing a partially completed kit and will be hauling
it home
> this weekend!
>
> A couple of quick questions from a beginning KR builder!-
>
> >From the article Mark Langford put up on his website (I think by Neal) -
it
> appears that the stick control is over sensitive - 3/4" in either
direction is
> all that is needed to fly the KR most of the time.  It would seem that it
> would make sense to shorten the hinge length/bellcrank distance so it
would not be
> so sensitive, or have a progressive linkage if you couldn't get full
motion
> out of the ailerons in a reasonable motion length...
>
>
> Also on the corvair aircraft engine, it seems like the RPMs for aircraft
are
> lower and a higher RPM could yield a lot more horsepower.  I understand
the
> prop tip speed limitation, but would it make sense to have a shorter
diameter
> prop with more blades?  would that allow higher rpm and still obtain the
same
> bite, without exceeding the maximum efficient tip speed???  I see the
composite
> propellers often could have up to six blades  - was just thinking about
four!
>
> John Monday
> Laguna Beach CA
> jsmon...@aol.com
> ___
> see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html
>