failed to upgrade to Kubuntu 11.11
Hi All I failed to upgrade to the new kubuntu version, Oneiric 11.11 due to an error in fetching the updates as follows: Failed to fetch http://it.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/*** *** stands for repository/package There is obviously something wrong with my system or the repository. I've also opened a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873853 Ciao -- Valter Registered Linux User #466410 http://counter.li.org *Open Source is better!* KDE: www.kde.org Kubuntu Linux: www.kubuntu.org LibreOffice: www.libreoffice.org -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: UDS Considerations for Kubuntu
Le 14/10/2011 01:02, Markus Slopianka a écrit : On Donnerstag 13 Oktober 2011 19:02:15 Lydia Pintscher wrote: Markus, would you please at least try to work nicely with KDE's downstream? This discussion isn't helpful. Thanks! So Scott's ranting against upstream is OK? Yes. Definitely much more OK than your unproductive emails. Aurélien (upstream - downstream dual-head creature) -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: UDS Considerations for Kubuntu
Yes. Wrong! -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: failed to upgrade to Kubuntu 11.11
On Oct 14, 2011 2:08 AM, Valter Mura valterm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All I failed to upgrade to the new kubuntu version, Oneiric 11.11 due to an error in fetching the updates as follows: Failed to fetch http://it.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/*** *** stands for repository/package There is obviously something wrong with my system or the repository. I've also opened a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873853 Release day traditionally has been very hard on the download mirrors. Have you tried another one? How about torrenting an ISO and dist-upgrading using it? And, of course, one could wait a few days... :-) Metta, -Dan -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: Re: Re: UDS Considerations for Kubuntu
On Thursday, October 13, 2011 07:11:12 PM Mackenzie Morgan wrote: Please keep this civil and family friendly. Which is to say: cut it out with the f bombs! We have a code of conduct. Please follow it. My apologies, Will do from now on don't know what happened to me yesterday, it was late :p -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: about kmail2 and UDS considerations
Your lucky.. I've been battling with kmail2 since it was first added to the kubuntu experimental ppa for Natty. My usage pattern is probably significantly different to a lot of users and the shear quantity of email I receive is probably a factor. For a start I use IMAPS connecting to a Kolab server which hosts a lot of shared folders. Some of the folders hold in excess of 10K emails. This is due to company policy which dictates a 6 month expiry on a lot of emails such as logwatch reports and these can be quite large emails, so we have quantity in numbers and size. I work remotely most of the time so I have all mail cached localy. Problems so far. Migration from kmail - never got this to work and eventually just downloaded all email again. DB corruption - Akonadi/mysql managed to corrupt itself - redownload all email (which can be a couple of days of a job). Sent emails - disappearing into a black hole. Performance - Opening large email folders can take an age. Go away make a coffee and come back to PC age (and it's not a low spec PC but a dual quad core with 16GB of RAM and a SCSI+SAS disc subsytem with hardware RAID). Astonomical CPU Usage - Nepomuk using 300% CPU (ie 3 full CPU cores on an 8 core machine). Now disabled nepomuk but akonadi complains every boot. Inactivity/lack of feedback - Press Check mail and have kmail2 do nothing. No indication of anything happening, no error messages, no progress bars.. Zip.. kmail2/akonadi is not production ready in my case. Not even close. I've now bitten the bullet and left kmail2 behind on my works account switching to Thunderbird. I'll continue to use kmail2 on my personal account (Nepomuk disabled) which seems to be behaving itself so far. UnfortunatelyI haven't been able to reliably reproduce a lot of the issues so I can't file useful bug reports upstream. It annoys me when people state that part of the problem is a lack of manpower when some of the recent commits to kmail2 have been adding features rather than fixing the multitude of problems with the base project. Surely if kmail2 is that short of developers all hands should be bug fixing until it's stabilised and new features should not be accepted into the codebase? so, i just tried kmail 2 to help bugger it. Got no problems here. dunno what he's spoutin off about. On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Markus Slopianka marku...@kdemail.netwrote: On Donnerstag 13 Oktober 2011 20:01:14 KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: This can't be justified by an understaffed team, if so, just don't do it and users have to wait another year. Yes, it can if there aren't even enough people to maintain two branches at the same time. -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel -- Regards, Rob Hall -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: [kubuntu-devel] Re: UDS Considerations for Kubuntu
On 11-10-13 07:03 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:43:27PM -0400, txwikinger wrote: KDE5? Wouldn't it be better to create a good stable product before always running to new, instable versions? Fear not, KDE Frameworks 5 isn't a rewrite a la KDE 4, it's a reorganisation to make the libraries more modular but only small ABI/API changes. Applications will be largely unchanged. I think we have to rethink some things anyway. I believe we should have stable versions as default, and bleeding edge in PPAs in order to be able to choose what to use. FLOSS is to a big extend really about choice. The non-technical user wants a stable solution, the technical user is usually expert enough to work with PPAs. Generally we do have stable versions by default. Kontact is a problem in this release. Do you have anything else in mind? Jonathan Well, I do not want to sound like everything is bad. However, over the last year I feel the general quality has started to suffer again. While I used to have stable systems, since maverick I started to have system freezes that got more frequent when time went along. And often bugs take a long time to fix. I first raised the kded4 daemon spawning defunct child processes almost a year ago and it got finally fixed a couple of weeks ago (ending up being the kubuntu notification system) I really believe we somehow should get more into TDD and have far more automatic testing. However, that is probably another discussion. Somehow I have to say I only use KDE partially now because of the problems. I still use the desktop, but I use FF for my web development I do (which I get paid for) and mutt/thunderbird for e-mail. I am not very happy with those apps either. FF is becoming more instable every new release and I find both apps far too bloaded. However, on the other hand, I am waiting and waiting for apps in KDE that I can use instead and somehow either they do not have the necessary feature set (non-compliant rendering/js-engine) or are just a continuous disaster like kmail. I do not think I did not have one installation for 2 years for which I got all the background daemons working all without errors and not dragging down the performance of the machine. I continuously disable nepomuk because of performance and akonadi always stops because of errors (not that I am really using it anyway without kmail/kontact). Since I have more to do in my business and hence far less time to tweak my computers I started to understand the normal user who is frustrated when the system does not work out of the box. I guess this is what I mean with stable system. Maybe a lot of these issues are not such a big deal when most of the community is technically very literate and can fix a lot of issues on their own computers. However, this does not allow mainstream users really to enjoy the systems. And yes.. FLOSS means I should do something about it. And I really would like to. Since I am restructuring how I currently work my paid stuff, hopefully I will be able to contribute more in the future again. Maybe we can have some of this in mind during UDS. Since we will have an LTS, quality should be our highest priority. Ralph (txwikinger) -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: UDS Considerations for Kubuntu
Le 14/10/2011 01:10, Markus Slopianka a écrit : You can disagree with my observations but such harsh insults will not be tolerated by me. I demand an apology! Alex words were certainly not the most wisely chosen, but I certainly said similar or even worse things when I was fulminating while reading your messages. The only difference is I managed to refrain myself from writing them down to this list. On the other hand, I would say you did much worse by derailing the discussion of developers investigating difficult decisions for the benefit of their users (yes, not shipping what upstream provides is a difficult decision for Kubuntu) ; instead trying to revive 3 year-old trolls. I mean, come on, D3lphin, KDE3, are we not done with this? What do you expect will come out of that? As such I think *you* owe this list an apology. You made it very clear that you always hated Kubuntu, hate Kubuntu and will hate Kubuntu forever. What is much less clear to me is the reason why you are subscribed to this list. Do you see yourself as a disruptive agent behind enemy lines? Realistically, I do not expect you to apologize for your painful behavior, but maybe you can be convinced to unsubscribe from this list and use your time to do something constructive for KDE? Aurélien -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
Re: [Merge] lp:~bulldog98/kubuntu-packaging/rocs into lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/rocs
Merged, thanks -- https://code.launchpad.net/~bulldog98/kubuntu-packaging/rocs/+merge/74024 Your team Kubuntu Packagers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~bulldog98/kubuntu-packaging/rocs into lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/rocs. -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
[Merge] lp:~rohangarg/kubuntu-packaging/digikam into lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/digikam
Rohan Garg has proposed merging lp:~rohangarg/kubuntu-packaging/digikam into lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/digikam. Requested reviews: Kubuntu Packagers (kubuntu-packagers) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/kubuntu-packaging/digikam/+merge/75909 Digikam 2.1.1 packaging -- https://code.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/kubuntu-packaging/digikam/+merge/75909 Your team Kubuntu Packagers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~rohangarg/kubuntu-packaging/digikam into lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/digikam. === modified file 'debian/changelog' --- debian/changelog 2011-08-27 19:14:59 + +++ debian/changelog 2011-09-18 16:42:34 + @@ -1,6 +1,16 @@ -digikam (2:2.0.0-0ubuntu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low - - * New upstream release (LP: #781128) +digikam (2:2.1.1-0ubuntu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + [ Rohan Garg ] + * New upstream release (LP: #834190) +- debian/control + + Build with libqtwebkit-dev + - debian/kipi-plugins-common + + Install libkvkontakte required by kipi-plugins + - debian/digikam + + Install panoramagui + + [ Philip Muškovac ] + * New upstream release - debian/control: + Add libcv-dev, libcvaux-dev, libhighgui-dev, libboost-graph1.46-dev, libksane-dev, libxml2-dev, libxslt-dev, libqt4-opengl-dev, libqjson-dev, @@ -15,7 +25,7 @@ * Fix typo in digikam-data description (LP: #804894) * Fix Vcs links - -- Philip Muškovac yo...@kubuntu.org Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:13:58 +0200 + -- Rohan Garg shadesla...@kubuntu.org Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:29:37 +0530 digikam (2:1.9.0-1ubuntu2) oneiric; urgency=low === modified file 'debian/control' --- debian/control 2011-08-27 19:14:59 + +++ debian/control 2011-09-18 16:42:34 + @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ libqt4-opengl-dev, libqjson-dev, libgpod-dev, - libqca2-dev + libqca2-dev, + libqtwebkit-dev Standards-Version: 3.8.4 Vcs-Bzr: https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/digikam Vcs-Browser: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/digikam === modified file 'debian/digikam-data.install' --- debian/digikam-data.install 2011-08-27 19:14:59 + +++ debian/digikam-data.install 2011-09-18 16:42:34 + @@ -4,3 +4,7 @@ usr/share/kde4/servicetypes/digikamimageplugin.desktop usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/* usr/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/digikam.mo +usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/actions/panorama.png +usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/actions/panorama.png +usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/actions/panorama.png +usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/actions/panorama.png === modified file 'debian/digikam.install' --- debian/digikam.install 2011-08-27 19:14:59 + +++ debian/digikam.install 2011-09-18 16:42:34 + @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ usr/bin/cleanup_digikamdb usr/bin/digikam usr/bin/digitaglinktree +usr/bin/panoramagui usr/lib/libdigikamcore.so.* usr/lib/libdigikamdatabase.so.* usr/lib/kde4/libexec/digikamdatabaseserver @@ -10,3 +11,4 @@ usr/lib/kde4/kio_digikam* usr/lib/kde4/digikamnepomukservice.so usr/share/applications/kde4/digikam.desktop +usr/share/applications/kde4/panoramagui.desktop === modified file 'debian/kipi-plugins.install' --- debian/kipi-plugins.install 2011-08-27 19:14:59 + +++ debian/kipi-plugins.install 2011-09-18 16:42:34 + @@ -8,3 +8,6 @@ usr/share/applications/kde4/expoblending.desktop usr/share/applications/kde4/scangui.desktop usr/share/applications/kde4/dngconverter.desktop +usr/lib/libkvkontakte.so +usr/lib/libkvkontakte.so.1 +usr/lib/libkvkontakte.so.1.0.0 === modified file 'debian/not-installed' --- debian/not-installed 2011-08-27 19:14:59 + +++ debian/not-installed 2011-09-18 16:42:34 + @@ -22,3 +22,40 @@ # compressed manpages ./usr/share/man/man1/cleanup_digikamdb.1 ./usr/share/man/man1/digitaglinktree.1 + +# devel headers not required +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/albuminfo.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/albumlistjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/allmessageslistjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/allnoteslistjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/authenticationdialog.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/cidsnamesjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/createalbumjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/deletealbumjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/discussionslistjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/editalbumjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/friendlistjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/getapplicationpermissionsjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/getinfojob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/getvariablejob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/libkvkontakte_export.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/messageinfo.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/messageslistjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/noteaddjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/noteinfo.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/notejob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/noteslistjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/photoinfo.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/photojob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/photolistjob.h +./usr/include/libkvkontakte/qintlist.h
