Am Thursday 22 January 2009 12:58:57 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> Right, either inject an exception to the guest (if appropriate for the
> arch), or return -ESOMETHING from ioctl(KVM_RUN).
Ok. What about:
[PATCH] kvm-s390: fix printk on SIGP set arch
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>
KVM on s390 does not support the ESA/390 architecture. We refuse to
change the architecture mode and print a warning. This patch removes
the printk for several reasons:
o A malicious can flood host dmesg
o The old message had no newline
o there is no connection between the message and the failing guest
This patch simply removes the printk. We already set the condition
code to 3 - the guest knows that something went wrong.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Index: kvm/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
+++ kvm/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c
@@ -153,8 +153,6 @@ static int __sigp_set_arch(struct kvm_vc
switch (parameter & 0xff) {
case 0:
- printk(KERN_WARNING "kvm: request to switch to ESA/390 mode"
- " not supported");
rc = 3; /* not operational */
break;
case 1:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
