Re: Hardware support for vt-posted interrupts described in vt-directed-io-spec for assigned devices
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:10 +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > On 03/20/2015 03:04 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:24 +0530, bk rakesh wrote: > >> Adding few more information regarding the setup which i had created to > >> test the vt-d posted interrupts for assigned devices, > >> > >> Hardware used for evaluating vt-posted interrupts > >> cpu "E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz" and "S2600CP server board" > >> > >> I had used kernel-3.18 patched with "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward > >> control(posted by eric.au...@linaro.org)", > > > > IRQ forwarding in an ARM technology for handling level triggered > > interrupts, not Intel, not even x86. > > Hi Alex, > > Feng's series relies on few pacth files in "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward > control", basically for KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE group introduction in > KVM-VFIO. This explains why you find some references to that patch here > I guess. Ah yes, makes sense. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Hardware support for vt-posted interrupts described in vt-directed-io-spec for assigned devices
On 03/20/2015 03:04 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:24 +0530, bk rakesh wrote: >> Adding few more information regarding the setup which i had created to >> test the vt-d posted interrupts for assigned devices, >> >> Hardware used for evaluating vt-posted interrupts >> cpu "E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz" and "S2600CP server board" >> >> I had used kernel-3.18 patched with "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward >> control(posted by eric.au...@linaro.org)", > > IRQ forwarding in an ARM technology for handling level triggered > interrupts, not Intel, not even x86. Hi Alex, Feng's series relies on few pacth files in "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward control", basically for KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE group introduction in KVM-VFIO. This explains why you find some references to that patch here I guess. Best Regards Eric > >> "hierarchy irqdomian(posted >> by jiang@linux.intel.com)" and "VT-d Posted-Interrupts >> support(http://lwn.net/Articles/626050/) and assigned the ixgbe 10G >> NIC via vfio passthrough using qemu-kvm, But resulted in the following >> dmesg output, >> >> [233783.657187] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 602 >> [233783.662926] dmar: INTR-REMAP: Request device [[02:00.0] fault index 47 >> INTR-REMAP:[fault reason 36] Detected reserved fields in the IRTE entry > > This suggests bugs in the patch series for setting bits that are > reserved on the hardware in your test system. > >> I had checked the hardware supported for posted interrupt capability >> via capability register bit 59 (#define cap_pi_support(c)(((c) >> >> 59) & 1)), as described in >> "http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/embedded/technology/virtualization/vt-directed-io-spec.html";, >> Which resulted as not supported, Can anyone suggest that does this hw >> support posted vt-d feature ? > > Your own hardware is telling you that it doesn't support it. > >> if not then which one to use. > > Personally I would have no expectation that any currently shipping > hardware supports this feature. If you watch one of GregKH's talks on > how the Linux community works or follow development for a while, you'll > see and hear that Intel will often pre-enable features before the > hardware that supports it is available. I suspect this is one of those > features. Thanks, > > Alex > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Hardware support for vt-posted interrupts described in vt-directed-io-spec for assigned devices
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:24 +0530, bk rakesh wrote: > Adding few more information regarding the setup which i had created to > test the vt-d posted interrupts for assigned devices, > > Hardware used for evaluating vt-posted interrupts > cpu "E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz" and "S2600CP server board" > > I had used kernel-3.18 patched with "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward > control(posted by eric.au...@linaro.org)", IRQ forwarding in an ARM technology for handling level triggered interrupts, not Intel, not even x86. > "hierarchy irqdomian(posted > by jiang@linux.intel.com)" and "VT-d Posted-Interrupts > support(http://lwn.net/Articles/626050/) and assigned the ixgbe 10G > NIC via vfio passthrough using qemu-kvm, But resulted in the following > dmesg output, > > [233783.657187] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 602 > [233783.662926] dmar: INTR-REMAP: Request device [[02:00.0] fault index 47 > INTR-REMAP:[fault reason 36] Detected reserved fields in the IRTE entry This suggests bugs in the patch series for setting bits that are reserved on the hardware in your test system. > I had checked the hardware supported for posted interrupt capability > via capability register bit 59 (#define cap_pi_support(c)(((c) >> > 59) & 1)), as described in > "http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/embedded/technology/virtualization/vt-directed-io-spec.html";, > Which resulted as not supported, Can anyone suggest that does this hw > support posted vt-d feature ? Your own hardware is telling you that it doesn't support it. > if not then which one to use. Personally I would have no expectation that any currently shipping hardware supports this feature. If you watch one of GregKH's talks on how the Linux community works or follow development for a while, you'll see and hear that Intel will often pre-enable features before the hardware that supports it is available. I suspect this is one of those features. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Hardware support for vt-posted interrupts described in vt-directed-io-spec for assigned devices
Adding few more information regarding the setup which i had created to test the vt-d posted interrupts for assigned devices, Hardware used for evaluating vt-posted interrupts cpu "E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz" and "S2600CP server board" I had used kernel-3.18 patched with "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward control(posted by eric.au...@linaro.org)", "hierarchy irqdomian(posted by jiang@linux.intel.com)" and "VT-d Posted-Interrupts support(http://lwn.net/Articles/626050/) and assigned the ixgbe 10G NIC via vfio passthrough using qemu-kvm, But resulted in the following dmesg output, [233783.657187] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 602 [233783.662926] dmar: INTR-REMAP: Request device [[02:00.0] fault index 47 INTR-REMAP:[fault reason 36] Detected reserved fields in the IRTE entry I had checked the hardware supported for posted interrupt capability via capability register bit 59 (#define cap_pi_support(c)(((c) >> 59) & 1)), as described in "http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/embedded/technology/virtualization/vt-directed-io-spec.html";, Which resulted as not supported, Can anyone suggest that does this hw support posted vt-d feature ? if not then which one to use. Thanks On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:49 PM, bk rakesh wrote: > > Hello, > > I am using the S2600CP server board with cpu "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU > E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz" which supports for APICv, > > Does this hardware support the vt-d posted interrupt feature as described in > "[v3 00/26] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support" and > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014 /12/3/102 , > > Requesting to get any information about the hardware that supports this > feature. > > Thanks, > Rakesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hardware support for vt-posted interrupts described in vt-directed-io-spec for assigned devices
Hello, I am using the S2600CP server board with cpu "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz" which supports for APICv, Does this hardware support the vt-d posted interrupt feature as described in "[v3 00/26] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support" and https://lkml.org/lkml/2014 /12/3/102 , Requesting to get any information about the hardware that supports this feature. Thanks, Rakesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
