Re: [PATCH 0/4] scsi fixes
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de wrote: Hi all, these are some fixes I found during debugging my megasas HBA emulation. This time I've sent them as a separate patchset for inclusion. All of them have been acked, so please apply. Are SCSI patches going through Kevin's tree? If not, perhaps Paolo or I should keep a tree and start doing some sanity testing on the subsystem in the future. Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/4] scsi fixes
Am 11.07.2011 15:34, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de wrote: Hi all, these are some fixes I found during debugging my megasas HBA emulation. This time I've sent them as a separate patchset for inclusion. All of them have been acked, so please apply. Are SCSI patches going through Kevin's tree? If not, perhaps Paolo or I should keep a tree and start doing some sanity testing on the subsystem in the future. As long as we don't have a SCSI maintainer, I'm going to pick them up for the block tree when they have receive some review. Doesn't mean that nobody should be doing sanity testing, of course. If anyone wants to take care of picking up and reviewing all SCSI patches, I'm also happy to pull from a separate tree. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/4] scsi fixes
On 07/11/2011 03:42 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: Am 11.07.2011 15:34, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Hannes Reineckeh...@suse.de wrote: Hi all, these are some fixes I found during debugging my megasas HBA emulation. This time I've sent them as a separate patchset for inclusion. All of them have been acked, so please apply. Are SCSI patches going through Kevin's tree? If not, perhaps Paolo or I should keep a tree and start doing some sanity testing on the subsystem in the future. As long as we don't have a SCSI maintainer, I'm going to pick them up for the block tree when they have receive some review. Doesn't mean that nobody should be doing sanity testing, of course. If anyone wants to take care of picking up and reviewing all SCSI patches, I'm also happy to pull from a separate tree. Patches have already been reviewed and tested, in conjunction with my megasas HBA emulation patchset. This is just a repost as a separate patchset to get them in. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries Storage h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html