Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: X86: Migration is supported

2015-11-12 Thread Paolo Bonzini


On 12/11/2015 08:06, Jian Zhou wrote:
>>
>> I think you can just do this in kvm_x86_ops->set_msr.  The old
>> implementation for DEBUGCTL MSR can be moved to svm.c.
> 
>   I think you mean "moved to vmx.c"?

No, the old implementation is moved from x86.c to svm.c.

The new implementation you have in vmx.c is then called from vmx_set_msr.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: X86: Migration is supported

2015-11-12 Thread Jian Zhou



On 2015/11/12 17:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:



On 12/11/2015 08:06, Jian Zhou wrote:


I think you can just do this in kvm_x86_ops->set_msr.  The old
implementation for DEBUGCTL MSR can be moved to svm.c.


   I think you mean "moved to vmx.c"?


No, the old implementation is moved from x86.c to svm.c.

The new implementation you have in vmx.c is then called from vmx_set_msr.


  I got it, thanks.

  Jian


Paolo

.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: X86: Migration is supported

2015-11-11 Thread Paolo Bonzini


On 23/10/2015 11:15, Jian Zhou wrote:
> data *msr_info)
>   }
>   break;
>   case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
> - if (!data) {
> - /* We support the non-activated case already */
> - break;
> - } else if (data & ~(DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF)) {
> - /* Values other than LBR and BTF are vendor-specific,
> -thus reserved and should throw a #GP */
> + supported = DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF |
> + DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI;
> +
> + if (data & ~supported) {
> + /*
> +  * Values other than LBR/BTF/FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI
> +  * are not supported, thus reserved and should throw a 
> #GP
> +  */
> + vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "%s: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x%llx, 
> nop\n",
> + __func__, data);
>   return 1;
>   }
> - vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "%s: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x%llx, nop\n",
> - __func__, data);
> + if (kvm_x86_ops->set_debugctlmsr) {
> + if (kvm_x86_ops->set_debugctlmsr(vcpu, data))
> + return 1;
> + }
> + else
> + return 1;
> +
>   break;
>   case 0x200 ... 0x2ff:
>   return kvm_mtrr_set_msr(vcpu, msr, data);
> @@ -2078,6 +2090,33 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
> msr_data *msr_info)
>   vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "disabled perfctr wrmsr: "
>   "0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr, data);
>   break;
> + case MSR_LBR_STATUS:
> + if (kvm_x86_ops->set_debugctlmsr) {
> + vcpu->arch.lbr_status = (data == 0) ? 0 : 1;
> + if (data)
> + kvm_x86_ops->set_debugctlmsr(vcpu,
> + DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | 
> DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI);
> + } else
> + vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "lbr is disabled, ignored wrmsr: "
> + "0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr, data);
> + break;
> + case MSR_LBR_SELECT:
> + case MSR_LBR_TOS:
> + case MSR_PENTIUM4_LER_FROM_LIP:
> + case MSR_PENTIUM4_LER_TO_LIP:
> + case MSR_PENTIUM4_LBR_TOS:
> + case MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP:
> + case MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP:
> + case MSR_LBR_CORE2_FROM ... MSR_LBR_CORE2_FROM + 0x7:
> + case MSR_LBR_CORE2_TO ... MSR_LBR_CORE2_TO + 0x7:
> + case MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM ... MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM + 0x1f:
> + case MSR_LBR_NHM_TO ... MSR_LBR_NHM_TO + 0x1f:
> + if (kvm_x86_ops->set_lbr_msr)
> + kvm_x86_ops->set_lbr_msr(vcpu, msr, data);
> + else
> + vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "lbr is disabled, ignored wrmsr: "
> + "0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr, data);

I think you can just do this in kvm_x86_ops->set_msr.  The old
implementation for DEBUGCTL MSR can be moved to svm.c.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: X86: Migration is supported

2015-11-11 Thread Jian Zhou



On 2015/11/11 23:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:



On 23/10/2015 11:15, Jian Zhou wrote:

data *msr_info)
}
break;
case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
-   if (!data) {
-   /* We support the non-activated case already */
-   break;
-   } else if (data & ~(DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF)) {
-   /* Values other than LBR and BTF are vendor-specific,
-  thus reserved and should throw a #GP */
+   supported = DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF |
+   DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI;
+
+   if (data & ~supported) {
+   /*
+* Values other than LBR/BTF/FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI
+* are not supported, thus reserved and should throw a 
#GP
+*/
+   vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "%s: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x%llx, 
nop\n",
+   __func__, data);
return 1;
}
-   vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "%s: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x%llx, nop\n",
-   __func__, data);
+   if (kvm_x86_ops->set_debugctlmsr) {
+   if (kvm_x86_ops->set_debugctlmsr(vcpu, data))
+   return 1;
+   }
+   else
+   return 1;
+
break;
case 0x200 ... 0x2ff:
return kvm_mtrr_set_msr(vcpu, msr, data);
@@ -2078,6 +2090,33 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
msr_data *msr_info)
vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "disabled perfctr wrmsr: "
"0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr, data);
break;
+   case MSR_LBR_STATUS:
+   if (kvm_x86_ops->set_debugctlmsr) {
+   vcpu->arch.lbr_status = (data == 0) ? 0 : 1;
+   if (data)
+   kvm_x86_ops->set_debugctlmsr(vcpu,
+   DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | 
DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI);
+   } else
+   vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "lbr is disabled, ignored wrmsr: "
+   "0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr, data);
+   break;
+   case MSR_LBR_SELECT:
+   case MSR_LBR_TOS:
+   case MSR_PENTIUM4_LER_FROM_LIP:
+   case MSR_PENTIUM4_LER_TO_LIP:
+   case MSR_PENTIUM4_LBR_TOS:
+   case MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP:
+   case MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP:
+   case MSR_LBR_CORE2_FROM ... MSR_LBR_CORE2_FROM + 0x7:
+   case MSR_LBR_CORE2_TO ... MSR_LBR_CORE2_TO + 0x7:
+   case MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM ... MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM + 0x1f:
+   case MSR_LBR_NHM_TO ... MSR_LBR_NHM_TO + 0x1f:
+   if (kvm_x86_ops->set_lbr_msr)
+   kvm_x86_ops->set_lbr_msr(vcpu, msr, data);
+   else
+   vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "lbr is disabled, ignored wrmsr: "
+   "0x%x data 0x%llx\n", msr, data);


I think you can just do this in kvm_x86_ops->set_msr.  The old
implementation for DEBUGCTL MSR can be moved to svm.c.


  I think you mean "moved to vmx.c"?

  Thanks,
  Jian


Paolo

.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html