On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:05:18 -0800
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
-- snip --
As I tested using the root block preference I noticed that if a net_device
slave under the bridge gets the designated root port prior to setting in
userspace the root_block feature enabling the feature won't kick the
bridge to remove that net_device from the designated port. I addressed
that issue and also upkeeping the initial random MAC address given to
the bridge as if othwerwise we'd end up with a zero MAC address bridge
if we root block all ports. I have only done local tests I'd appreciate a
bit more wide test coverage and review.
Stephen,
I should note that even if we discard patches 4-6 patches for an
alternative implementation patches 1-3 should still be applicable for
review. Let me know what you think of those.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I agree with 0-3 as normal improvements.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
