Re: suggesting wording fixes for virtio-spec 0.9.5

2013-04-28 Thread Rusty Russell
Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com writes:
 On 04/23/13 06:05, Rusty Russell wrote:
 Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com writes:
 Hi,

 (I'm not subscribed to either list,)

 using the word descriptor is misleading in the following sections:
 
 Yes, I like the use of 'descriptor chains'.  This is a definite
 improvement.
...
 Not sure if it's customary here or if you need it / want it, but anyway

 Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com

Not needed, but always useful to ahve confirmation that I didn't
introduce another mistake while fixing my old ones!

 (Also I've fixed the OVMF driver; just reposting the patch today with a
 better commit message.)

 Thanks much!
 Laszlo

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: suggesting wording fixes for virtio-spec 0.9.5

2013-04-23 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 04/23/13 06:05, Rusty Russell wrote:
 Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com writes:
 Hi,

 (I'm not subscribed to either list,)

 using the word descriptor is misleading in the following sections:
 
 Yes, I like the use of 'descriptor chains'.  This is a definite
 improvement.
 
 Here's the diff I ended up with (massaged to minimize it).
 
 Thanks!
 Rusty.
 
 --- virtio-spec.txt-old   2013-04-23 13:22:21.339158214 +0930
 +++ virtio-spec.txt   2013-04-23 13:34:14.055176464 +0930
 @@ -482,10 +482,10 @@
  
  2.3.4 Available Ring
  
 -The available ring refers to what descriptors we are offering the 
 -device: it refers to the head of a descriptor chain. The “flags” 
 +The available ring refers to what descriptor chains we are offering the
 +device: each entry refers to the head of a descriptor chain. The “flags”
  field is currently 0 or 1: 1 indicating that we do not need an 
 -interrupt when the device consumes a descriptor from the 
 +interrupt when the device consumes a descriptor chain from the
  available ring. Alternatively, the guest can ask the device to 
  delay interrupts until an entry with an index specified by the “
  used_event” field is written in the used ring (equivalently, 
 @@ -671,16 +671,16 @@
  
  avail-ring[avail-idx % qsz] = head;
  
 -However, in general we can add many descriptors before we update 
 -the “idx” field (at which point they become visible to the 
 -device), so we keep a counter of how many we've added:
 +However, in general we can add many separate descriptor chains before we 
 update
 +the “idx” field (at which point they become visible to the device),
 +so we keep a counter of how many we've added:
  
  avail-ring[(avail-idx + added++) % qsz] = head;
  
  2.4.1.3 Updating The Index Field
  
  Once the idx field of the virtqueue is updated, the device will 
 -be able to access the descriptor entries we've created and the 
 +be able to access the descriptor chains we've created and the 
  memory they refer to. This is why a memory barrier is generally 
  used before the idx update, to ensure it sees the most up-to-date 
  copy.
 

Not sure if it's customary here or if you need it / want it, but anyway

Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com

(Also I've fixed the OVMF driver; just reposting the patch today with a
better commit message.)

Thanks much!
Laszlo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: suggesting wording fixes for virtio-spec 0.9.5

2013-04-22 Thread Rusty Russell
Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com writes:
 Hi,

 (I'm not subscribed to either list,)

 using the word descriptor is misleading in the following sections:

Yes, I like the use of 'descriptor chains'.  This is a definite
improvement.

Here's the diff I ended up with (massaged to minimize it).

Thanks!
Rusty.

--- virtio-spec.txt-old 2013-04-23 13:22:21.339158214 +0930
+++ virtio-spec.txt 2013-04-23 13:34:14.055176464 +0930
@@ -482,10 +482,10 @@
 
 2.3.4 Available Ring
 
-The available ring refers to what descriptors we are offering the 
-device: it refers to the head of a descriptor chain. The “flags” 
+The available ring refers to what descriptor chains we are offering the
+device: each entry refers to the head of a descriptor chain. The “flags”
 field is currently 0 or 1: 1 indicating that we do not need an 
-interrupt when the device consumes a descriptor from the 
+interrupt when the device consumes a descriptor chain from the
 available ring. Alternatively, the guest can ask the device to 
 delay interrupts until an entry with an index specified by the “
 used_event” field is written in the used ring (equivalently, 
@@ -671,16 +671,16 @@
 
 avail-ring[avail-idx % qsz] = head;
 
-However, in general we can add many descriptors before we update 
-the “idx” field (at which point they become visible to the 
-device), so we keep a counter of how many we've added:
+However, in general we can add many separate descriptor chains before we update
+the “idx” field (at which point they become visible to the device),
+so we keep a counter of how many we've added:
 
 avail-ring[(avail-idx + added++) % qsz] = head;
 
 2.4.1.3 Updating The Index Field
 
 Once the idx field of the virtqueue is updated, the device will 
-be able to access the descriptor entries we've created and the 
+be able to access the descriptor chains we've created and the 
 memory they refer to. This is why a memory barrier is generally 
 used before the idx update, to ensure it sees the most up-to-date 
 copy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html