From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.tak...@oss.ntt.co.jp>
The naming convension of hardware_[dis|en]able family is little bit confusing
because only hardware_[dis|en]able_all are using _nolock suffix.
Renaming current hardware_[dis|en]able() to *_nolock() and using
hardware_[dis|en]able() as wrapper functions which take kvm_lock for them
reduces extra confusion.
Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.tak...@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 0fdd911..fb93ff9 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ static struct miscdevice kvm_dev = {
&kvm_chardev_ops,
};
-static void hardware_enable(void *junk)
+static void hardware_enable_nolock(void *junk)
{
int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
int r;
@@ -2087,7 +2087,14 @@ static void hardware_enable(void *junk)
}
}
-static void hardware_disable(void *junk)
+static void hardware_enable(void *junk)
+{
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ hardware_enable_nolock(junk);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+}
+
+static void hardware_disable_nolock(void *junk)
{
int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
@@ -2097,13 +2104,20 @@ static void hardware_disable(void *junk)
kvm_arch_hardware_disable(NULL);
}
+static void hardware_disable(void *junk)
+{
+ spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
+ hardware_disable_nolock(junk);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+}
+
static void hardware_disable_all_nolock(void)
{
BUG_ON(!kvm_usage_count);
kvm_usage_count--;
if (!kvm_usage_count)
- on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
}
static void hardware_disable_all(void)
@@ -2122,7 +2136,7 @@ static int hardware_enable_all(void)
kvm_usage_count++;
if (kvm_usage_count == 1) {
atomic_set(&hardware_enable_failed, 0);
- on_each_cpu(hardware_enable, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(hardware_enable_nolock, NULL, 1);
if (atomic_read(&hardware_enable_failed)) {
hardware_disable_all_nolock();
@@ -2148,16 +2162,12 @@ static int kvm_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block
*notifier, unsigned long val,
case CPU_DYING:
printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: disabling virtualization on CPU%d\n",
cpu);
- spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
hardware_disable(NULL);
- spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
break;
case CPU_STARTING:
printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d\n",
cpu);
- spin_lock(&kvm_lock);
hardware_enable(NULL);
- spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
break;
}
return NOTIFY_OK;
@@ -2188,7 +2198,7 @@ static int kvm_reboot(struct notifier_block *notifier,
unsigned long val,
*/
printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: exiting hardware virtualization\n");
kvm_rebooting = true;
- on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
@@ -2358,7 +2368,7 @@ static void kvm_exit_debug(void)
static int kvm_suspend(struct sys_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
{
if (kvm_usage_count)
- hardware_disable(NULL);
+ hardware_disable_nolock(NULL);
return 0;
}
@@ -2366,7 +2376,7 @@ static int kvm_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
{
if (kvm_usage_count) {
WARN_ON(spin_is_locked(&kvm_lock));
- hardware_enable(NULL);
+ hardware_enable_nolock(NULL);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -2543,7 +2553,7 @@ void kvm_exit(void)
sysdev_class_unregister(&kvm_sysdev_class);
unregister_reboot_notifier(&kvm_reboot_notifier);
unregister_cpu_notifier(&kvm_cpu_notifier);
- on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
+ on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup();
kvm_arch_exit();
free_cpumask_var(cpus_hardware_enabled);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-commits" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
