We're pretty sloppy in virtio right now about phys_ram_base assumptions. This
patch is an incremental step between what we have today and a full blown DMA
API. I backported the DMA API but the performance impact was not acceptable
to me. There's only a slight performance impact with this particular patch.
Since we're no longer assuming guest physical memory is contiguous, we need
a more complex way to validate the memory regions than just checking if it's
within ram_size.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/qemu/hw/virtio.c b/qemu/hw/virtio.c
index 6a50001..a4c9d10 100644
--- a/qemu/hw/virtio.c
+++ b/qemu/hw/virtio.c
@@ -58,6 +58,48 @@
/* virt queue functions */
+static void *virtio_map_gpa(target_phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
+{
+ram_addr_t off;
+target_phys_addr_t addr1;
+
+off = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(addr);
+if ((off ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) != IO_MEM_RAM) {
+ fprintf(stderr, virtio DMA to IO ram\n);
+ exit(1);
+}
+
+off = (off TARGET_PAGE_MASK) | (addr ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
+
+for (addr1 = addr + TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+addr1 TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(addr + size);
+addr1 += TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) {
+ ram_addr_t off1;
+
+ off1 = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(addr1);
+ if ((off1 ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) != IO_MEM_RAM) {
+ fprintf(stderr, virtio DMA to IO ram\n);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ off1 = (off1 TARGET_PAGE_MASK) | (addr1 ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
+
+ if (off1 != (off + (addr1 - addr))) {
+ fprintf(stderr, discontigous virtio memory\n);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+}
+
+return phys_ram_base + off;
+}
+
+static size_t virtqueue_size(int num)
+{
+return TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN((sizeof(VRingDesc) * num) +
+(sizeof(VRingAvail) + sizeof(uint16_t) * num)) +
+ (sizeof(VRingUsed) + sizeof(VRingUsedElem) * num);
+}
+
static void virtqueue_init(VirtQueue *vq, void *p)
{
vq-vring.desc = p;
@@ -127,9 +169,6 @@ int virtqueue_pop(VirtQueue *vq, VirtQueueElement *elem)
do {
struct iovec *sg;
- if ((vq-vring.desc[i].addr + vq-vring.desc[i].len) ram_size)
- errx(1, Guest sent invalid pointer);
-
if (vq-vring.desc[i].flags VRING_DESC_F_WRITE)
sg = elem-in_sg[elem-in_num++];
else
@@ -137,7 +176,9 @@ int virtqueue_pop(VirtQueue *vq, VirtQueueElement *elem)
/* Grab the first descriptor, and check it's OK. */
sg-iov_len = vq-vring.desc[i].len;
- sg-iov_base = phys_ram_base + vq-vring.desc[i].addr;
+ sg-iov_base = virtio_map_gpa(vq-vring.desc[i].addr, sg-iov_len);
+ if (sg-iov_base == NULL)
+ errx(1, Invalid mapping\n);
/* If we've got too many, that implies a descriptor loop. */
if ((elem-in_num + elem-out_num) vq-vring.num)
@@ -198,9 +239,10 @@ static void virtio_ioport_write(void *opaque, uint32_t
addr, uint32_t val)
vdev-vq[vdev-queue_sel].pfn = val;
if (pa == 0) {
virtio_reset(vdev);
- } else if (pa (ram_size - TARGET_PAGE_SIZE)) {
- virtqueue_init(vdev-vq[vdev-queue_sel], phys_ram_base + pa);
- /* FIXME if pa == 0, deal with device tear down */
+ } else {
+ size_t size = virtqueue_size(vdev-vq[vdev-queue_sel].vring.num);
+ virtqueue_init(vdev-vq[vdev-queue_sel],
+ virtio_map_gpa(pa, size));
}
break;
case VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_SEL:
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
