Re: [kvm-devel] [kvm-ia64-devel] [PATCH][02] Change srlz.d to srlz.i foria64_set_psr

2008-01-31 Thread Akio Takebe 
Hi, Xiantao

 void __init
diff --git a/include/asm-ia64/processor.h b/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
index be3b0ae..038642f 100644
--- a/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
+++ b/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ ia64_set_psr (__u64 psr)
 {
   ia64_stop();
   ia64_setreg(_IA64_REG_PSR_L, psr);
-  ia64_srlz_d();
+  ia64_srlz_i();
 }
Why do you remove ia64_srlz_d()?
We should need srlz.d if we change PSR bits(e.g. PSR.dt and so on).
Does srlz.i do also date serialization?

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Re: [kvm-devel] [kvm-ia64-devel] [PATCH][02] Change srlz.d to srlz.i foria64_set_psr

2008-01-31 Thread Zhang, Xiantao 
Akio Takebe wrote:
 Hi, Xiantao
 
 void __init
 diff --git a/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
 b/include/asm-ia64/processor.h index be3b0ae..038642f 100644 ---
 a/include/asm-ia64/processor.h +++ b/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
 @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ ia64_set_psr (__u64 psr)
 {
  ia64_stop();
  ia64_setreg(_IA64_REG_PSR_L, psr);
 -ia64_srlz_d();
 +ia64_srlz_i();
 }
 Why do you remove ia64_srlz_d()?
 We should need srlz.d if we change PSR bits(e.g. PSR.dt and so on).
 Does srlz.i do also date serialization?
Hi, Akio
Srlz.i  implicitly ensures srlz.d  per SDM.  
Thanks
Xiantao


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel