Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-07-11 Thread Alexander Graf

On 05.07.2012, at 14:54, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
 Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:13 PM
 To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
 d...@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org
 Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR
 support in sregs
 
 On 07/05/2012 01:49 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 4:34 PM
 To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
 d...@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org
 Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR
 support in sregs
 
 
 On 25.06.2012, at 14:26, Mihai Caraman wrote:
 
 Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs
 for 64-bit hosts.
 Please also implement a ONE_REG interface while at it. Over time, I'd
 like to move towards ONE_REG instead of the messy regs/sregs API.
 ONE_REG doesn't seem to be implemented at all for book3e, I looked at
 kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg/kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_one_reg in booke.c file.
 
 I can take care of it soon but in a different patch set. It's ok like
 this?
 
 Do it in a different patch, but as part of this patch set.
 
 Hmm ... then if you don't disagree I will do it as a prerequisite patch since 
 I want
 to keep this patchset strictly for 64-bit support.

I don't understand? You just make the same functionality available through 2 
interfaces to user space.

 I am not familiar with ONE_REG, is qemu tailored to use it? I need a way to 
 test it.

ONE_REG is just a more extensible ioctl. Just read up on it in the 
documentation and you'll see what I mean :)


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-07-05 Thread Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 -Original Message-
 From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 4:34 PM
 To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
 d...@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org
 Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR
 support in sregs
 
 
 On 25.06.2012, at 14:26, Mihai Caraman wrote:
 
  Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs
  for 64-bit hosts.
 
 Please also implement a ONE_REG interface while at it. Over time, I'd
 like to move towards ONE_REG instead of the messy regs/sregs API.

ONE_REG doesn't seem to be implemented at all for book3e, I looked at
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg/kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_one_reg in booke.c file.

I can take care of it soon but in a different patch set. It's ok like this?

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-07-05 Thread Alexander Graf

On 07/05/2012 01:49 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:

-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 4:34 PM
To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
d...@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR
support in sregs


On 25.06.2012, at 14:26, Mihai Caraman wrote:


Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs
for 64-bit hosts.

Please also implement a ONE_REG interface while at it. Over time, I'd
like to move towards ONE_REG instead of the messy regs/sregs API.

ONE_REG doesn't seem to be implemented at all for book3e, I looked at
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_one_reg/kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_one_reg in booke.c file.

I can take care of it soon but in a different patch set. It's ok like this?


Do it in a different patch, but as part of this patch set.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-07-04 Thread Alexander Graf

On 25.06.2012, at 14:26, Mihai Caraman wrote:

 Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs
 for 64-bit hosts.

Please also implement a ONE_REG interface while at it. Over time, I'd like to 
move towards ONE_REG instead of the messy regs/sregs API.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-06-27 Thread Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 -Original Message-
 From: Wood Scott-B07421
 Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:35 AM
 To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
 d...@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in
 sregs
 
 On 06/25/2012 07:26 AM, Mihai Caraman wrote:
  Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs for
  64-bit hosts.
 
  Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman mihai.cara...@freescale.com
  ---
   arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c |   14 ++
   1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 
  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c index
  f9fa260..d15c4b5 100644
  --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
  +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
  @@ -1052,6 +1052,9 @@ static void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  u64 tb = get_tb();
 
  sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_BASE;
  +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
  +   sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_64;0 #endif
 
  sregs-u.e.csrr0 = vcpu-arch.csrr0;
  sregs-u.e.csrr1 = vcpu-arch.csrr1; @@ -1063,6 +1066,9 @@ static
  void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  sregs-u.e.dec = kvmppc_get_dec(vcpu, tb);
  sregs-u.e.tb = tb;
  sregs-u.e.vrsave = vcpu-arch.vrsave;
  +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
  +   sregs-u.e.epcr = vcpu-arch.epcr;
  +#endif
   }
 
   static int set_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, @@ -1071,6 +1077,11
  @@ static int set_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  if (!(sregs-u.e.features  KVM_SREGS_E_BASE))
  return 0;
 
  +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
  +   if (!(sregs-u.e.features  KVM_SREGS_E_64))
  +   return 0;
  +#endif
 
 This means that a QEMU targeting a 32-bit guest won't be able to set any
 special registers, if it sets feature bits manually rather than getting
 them from GET_SREGS.

I had some concerns about his. I only check qemu ppc code which uses get/set
approach and I followed the BASE model. Now I see that qemu x86 set them 
manually :(
Why do we care if the caller set or not BASE?

-Mike
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+jir)w*jg����ݢj/���z�ޖ��2�ޙ�)ߡ�a�����G���h��j:+v���w��٥

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-06-27 Thread Scott Wood
On 06/27/2012 06:41 AM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: Wood Scott-B07421
 Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 1:35 AM
 To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
 d...@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in
 sregs

 On 06/25/2012 07:26 AM, Mihai Caraman wrote:
 Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs for
 64-bit hosts.

 Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman mihai.cara...@freescale.com
 ---
  arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c |   14 ++
  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c index
 f9fa260..d15c4b5 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
 @@ -1052,6 +1052,9 @@ static void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 u64 tb = get_tb();

 sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_BASE;
 +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 +   sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_64;0 #endif

 sregs-u.e.csrr0 = vcpu-arch.csrr0;
 sregs-u.e.csrr1 = vcpu-arch.csrr1; @@ -1063,6 +1066,9 @@ static
 void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 sregs-u.e.dec = kvmppc_get_dec(vcpu, tb);
 sregs-u.e.tb = tb;
 sregs-u.e.vrsave = vcpu-arch.vrsave;
 +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 +   sregs-u.e.epcr = vcpu-arch.epcr;
 +#endif
  }

  static int set_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, @@ -1071,6 +1077,11
 @@ static int set_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 if (!(sregs-u.e.features  KVM_SREGS_E_BASE))
 return 0;

 +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 +   if (!(sregs-u.e.features  KVM_SREGS_E_64))
 +   return 0;
 +#endif

 This means that a QEMU targeting a 32-bit guest won't be able to set any
 special registers, if it sets feature bits manually rather than getting
 them from GET_SREGS.
 
 I had some concerns about his. I only check qemu ppc code which uses get/set
 approach and I followed the BASE model. Now I see that qemu x86 set them 
 manually :(
 Why do we care if the caller set or not BASE?

BASE contains things which should be present on all booke chips.  If
that's not set something's wrong.

None of the other feature bits are handled that way.

-Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-06-26 Thread Scott Wood
On 06/25/2012 07:26 AM, Mihai Caraman wrote:
 Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs
 for 64-bit hosts.
 
 Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman mihai.cara...@freescale.com
 ---
  arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c |   14 ++
  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
 index f9fa260..d15c4b5 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
 @@ -1052,6 +1052,9 @@ static void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
   u64 tb = get_tb();
  
   sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_BASE;
 +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 + sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_64;0
 +#endif
  
   sregs-u.e.csrr0 = vcpu-arch.csrr0;
   sregs-u.e.csrr1 = vcpu-arch.csrr1;
 @@ -1063,6 +1066,9 @@ static void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
   sregs-u.e.dec = kvmppc_get_dec(vcpu, tb);
   sregs-u.e.tb = tb;
   sregs-u.e.vrsave = vcpu-arch.vrsave;
 +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 + sregs-u.e.epcr = vcpu-arch.epcr;
 +#endif
  }
  
  static int set_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 @@ -1071,6 +1077,11 @@ static int set_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
   if (!(sregs-u.e.features  KVM_SREGS_E_BASE))
   return 0;
  
 +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 + if (!(sregs-u.e.features  KVM_SREGS_E_64))
 + return 0;
 +#endif

This means that a QEMU targeting a 32-bit guest won't be able to set any
special registers, if it sets feature bits manually rather than getting
them from GET_SREGS.

This check should only qualify whether we look at sregs.u.e.epcr, not
whether this function works at all.

BTW, shouldn't the BASE check return an error rather than silently no-op?

-Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-06-25 Thread Avi Kivity
On 06/25/2012 03:26 PM, Mihai Caraman wrote:
 Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs
 for 64-bit hosts.
 
 Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman mihai.cara...@freescale.com
 ---
  arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c |   14 ++
  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
 index f9fa260..d15c4b5 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
 @@ -1052,6 +1052,9 @@ static void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
   u64 tb = get_tb();
  
   sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_BASE;
 +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 + sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_64;
 +#endif
  

This is an ABI, but I see no trace of it in Documentation.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-06-25 Thread Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Kivity [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
 Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:00 PM
 To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
 d...@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in
 sregs
 
 On 06/25/2012 03:26 PM, Mihai Caraman wrote:
  Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs for
  64-bit hosts.
 
  Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman mihai.cara...@freescale.com
  ---
   arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c |   14 ++
   1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 
  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c index
  f9fa260..d15c4b5 100644
  --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
  +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
  @@ -1052,6 +1052,9 @@ static void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  u64 tb = get_tb();
 
  sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_BASE;
  +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
  +   sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_64; #endif
 
 
 This is an ABI, but I see no trace of it in Documentation.

The ppc sregs documentation in api.txt redirects to 
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h.
Isn't this enough?

Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in sregs

2012-06-25 Thread Avi Kivity
On 06/25/2012 04:24 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Kivity [mailto:a...@redhat.com]
 Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:00 PM
 To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
 Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
 d...@lists.ozlabs.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org
 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/17] KVM: PPC64: booke: Add EPCR support in
 sregs
 
 On 06/25/2012 03:26 PM, Mihai Caraman wrote:
  Add KVM_SREGS_E_64 feature and EPCR spr support in get/set sregs for
  64-bit hosts.
 
  Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman mihai.cara...@freescale.com
  ---
   arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c |   14 ++
   1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 
  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c index
  f9fa260..d15c4b5 100644
  --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
  +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
  @@ -1052,6 +1052,9 @@ static void get_sregs_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 u64 tb = get_tb();
 
 sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_BASE;
  +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
  +  sregs-u.e.features |= KVM_SREGS_E_64; #endif
 
 
 This is an ABI, but I see no trace of it in Documentation.
 
 The ppc sregs documentation in api.txt redirects to 
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm.h.
 Isn't this enough?

I guess it's okay.
-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html